Prevalence of GB virus type C/hepatitis G virus RNA and anti-E2 among blood donors in Southeastern France

Global prevalence of human pegivirus-1 in healthy volunteer blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The local prevalence of HPgV-1 has been reported from different countries worldwide, but the global prevalence of HPgV-1 remains unknown. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather data from the literature to estimate the prevalence of HPgV-1 in healthy volunteer blood donors in the world.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases for records up to January 2019 and included studies reporting HPgV-1 virus prevalence amongst healthy volunteer blood donors based on the detection of HPgV-1 RNA.

RESULTS

In all, we included 79 studies for the systematic review and 63 for the meta-analysis. Based on the random effect meta-analysis of 35 468 volunteer blood donors, we found the global prevalence of HPgV-1 to be 3·1% (95% CI, 2·4-4·1). The pooled prevalences of HPgV-1 were 1·7% (95% CI, 1·1-2·6) in North America, 9·1% (95% CI, 6·4-12·7) in South America, 2·3% (95% CI, 2%, 2·8) in Europe and 2·4% (95% CI, 1·4-4) in Asia. Subgroup analyses based on age, gender or risk factors were not possible.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 3 in 100 blood donations worldwide are positive for HPgV-1 increasing the risk of infection from transfusion of their components to subsequent recipients. Further research on virus pathogenicity is required before recommending routine screening of HPgV-1 for healthy volunteer blood donors.

Human pegivirus isolates characterized by deep sequencing from hepatitis C virus-RNA and human immunodeficiency virus-RNA-positive blood donations, France

Human pegivirus (HPgV, formerly GBV-C) is a member of the genus Pegivirus, family Flaviviridae. Despite its identification more than 20 years ago, both natural history and distribution of this viral group in human hosts remain under exploration. Analysis of HPgV genomes characterized up to now points out the scarcity of French pegivirus sequences in databases. To bring new data regarding HPgV genomic diversity, we investigated 16 French isolates obtained from hepatitis C virus-RNA and human immunodeficiency virus-RNA-positive blood donations following deep sequencing and coupled molecular protocols. Initial phylogenetic analysis of 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR)/E2 partial sequences permitted to assign HPgV isolates to genotypes 2 (n = 15) and 1 (n = 1), with up to 16% genetic diversity observed for both regions considered. Seven nearly full-length representative genomes were characterized subsequently, with complete polyprotein coding sequences exhibiting up to 13% genetic diversity; closest nucleotide (nt) divergence with available HPgV sequences was in the range 7% to 11%. A 36 nts deletion located on the NS4B coding region (N-terminal part, 12 amino acids) of the genotype 1 HPgV genome characterized was identified, along with single nucleotide deletions in two genotype 2, 5'-UTR sequences.

Hepatitis B virus DNA-positive, hepatitis B surface antigen-negative blood donations intercepted by anti-hepatitis B core antigen testing: the Canadian Blood Services experience

BACKGROUND

The benefit of introducing anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) screening for intercepting potentially infectious donations missed by hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening in Canada was studied.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Anti-HBc testing of all donations was implemented in April 2005, along with antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA supplemental testing of anti-HBc repeat-reactive, HBsAg-negative donations. The proportion of potentially infectious donations intercepted by anti-HBc over the initial 18 months of testing was calculated based on three assumptions relating infectivity of HBV DNA-positive units to anti-HBs levels. Lookback was conducted for all DNA-positive donations.

RESULTS

Of 493,344 donors, 5,585 (1.13%) were repeat-reactive for the presence of anti-HBc, with 29 (0.52%) being HBV DNA-positive and HBsAg-negative. The proportion of potentially infectious donations intercepted by anti-HBc screening was 1 in 17,800 if all HBV DNA-positive donations were infectious, 1 in 26,900 if infectivity was limited to donations with an anti-HBs level of not more than 100 mIU per mL, and 1 in 69,300 if only donations with undetectable anti-HBs were infectious. For 279 components in the lookback study, no traced recipients were HBsAg-positive and 7 recipients were anti-HBc-reactive in association with 4 donors, 3 of whom had an anti-HBs level of more than 100 mIU per mL and 1 of whom had a level of 61 mIU per mL.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of anti-HBc screening reduced the risk of transfusing potentially infectious units by at least as much as had been expected based on the literature. The lookback did not provide proof of transfusion transmission of HBV from HBV DNA-positive, anti-HBc-reactive, HBsAg-negative donors but it did not establish lack of transmission either.

Induced hypotension with epidural/general anesthesia reduces transfusion in radical prostate surgery

PURPOSE

Radical prostatectomy is associated with substantial blood loss frequently requiring allogeneic blood transfusion. We investigated the efficacy of deliberate hypotension using combined epidural/general anesthesia in reducing allogeneic transfusion requirements in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial, 102 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were allocated to either an epidural group (n = 51) or a control group (n = 51). In the epidural group, deliberate hypotension was achieved with a target mean arterial pressure of 55-60 mmHg. The trigger for allogeneic blood transfusion in both groups was a hematocrit value < 0.25.

RESULTS

Operative blood loss in the epidural group was significantly less than that in the control group (955 +/- 517 mL vs 1477 +/- 823 mL respectively, P < 0.001). The percentage of patients who reached the threshold trigger for allogenic transfusion was significantly less in the epidural group (8% vs 26%, respectively, P = 0.019) and the number of patients who were actually transfused during hospitalization was also significantly less (P = 0.028). There were no serious adverse events in either group during the study.

CONCLUSION

Controlled hypotension using a combined epidural/ general anesthetic technique is associated with significantly less blood loss, and a reduction in the use of allogeneic blood in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy compared to general anesthesia alone.

Comparison of GB virus C, HIV, and HCV infection markers in hemophiliacs exposed to non-inactivated or inactivated factor concentrates

BACKGROUND

Until the mandatory introduction of viral inactivation techniques of blood plasma products in the early 1980s many recipients of these products were infected with various viral pathogens.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the rate of transmission of GB virus C/hepatitis G virus (GBV-C/HGV) HCV, and HIV through non-virus-inactivated clotting factor concentrates in hemophiliacs, as well as the relation between amount of administered clotting factor and risk for GBV-C/HGV infection.

STUDY DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study, we determined retrospectively the rates of infection markers for GBV-C/HGV, HCV, and HIV in a German cohort of hemophiliacs treated with documented amounts of non-virus-inactivated clotting factor concentrates (group A) and in a second group of hemophiliacs who were treated exclusively with virus-inactivated clotting factor (group B). The presence of anti-virus antibodies was determined by ELISA. Viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR. Markers for viral infections were compared to amounts of administered non-virus-inactivated clotting factor.

RESULTS

Among hemophiliacs treated with documented amounts of non-virus-inactivated clotting factor the prevalence for GBV-C/HGV, HCV, and HIV was 40.3%, 98.6%, and 56.3%, respectively. In contrast to HIV, the rate of GBV-C/HGV infections did not increase with increasing amounts of consumed non-inactivated clotting factor. Even in the subgroup of heavily treated hemophiliacs the rate of GBV-C/HGV infection markers did not exceed 45%.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of non-virus-inactivated clotting factor is not predictive for the risk of GBV-C/HGV infection in hemophiliacs. Despite repeated parenteral exposure more than 55% of hemophiliacs were not infected with GBV-C/HGV. Our findings indicate a high frequency of host factors preventing parenteral transmission of GBV-C/HGV.

[Hepatitis G virus and labile blood products: role of transfusional transmission]

The GBV-C/HGV (HGV) virus was discovered a few years ago. This virus is known to be parenterally as well as sexually transmitted. However, no study has found some pathogenic roles for HGV so far. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the transmission of HGV by blood components transfused to 284 patients hospitalized in surgery unit in 1995. We tested two parameters of infection in blood components transfused to infected recipients: viral RNA by PCR and anti-E2 antibodies by ELISA. We tried to suspect some potent hepatocyte impacts by assessing the levels of two enzymes in serums: alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alpha-glutathion S-transferase (alpha-GST). We found that HGV-RNA was detectable in 3.6% of recipients prior to transfusion and 7.5% post-transfusion. For each infected recipient, we retrospectively did a search for HGV-RNA in each transfused blood component, and we found at least one blood component as HGV-RNA-positive for each transfusional infected recipient. Anti-E2 antibody prevalence standing for a former and cured infection was 39.6% in all the recipients. In viremic recipients, ALT levels were mostly normal, while alpha-GST levels were found more commonly elevated than in non-viremic recipients although non-significantly (20% vs. 6.3%; P = 0.07). The present study underlines that HGV transmission is mostly transfusional in surgery units, and that infectiosity of blood components can be anticipated by detection of the viral RNA by PCR. Furthermore, the possible relationship between the serum activity of alpha-GST and the hepatotropism of HGV, although non-admitted as pathogenic, should be investigated.

High prevalence of GBV-C/HGV among relatives of GBV-C/HGV-positive blood donors in blood recipients and in patients with aplastic anemia

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of GB virus C (GBV-C)/HGV is high in individuals with parenteral risk factors. The frequency of GBV-C/HGV in blood donors is significantly lower, however it is still far above other parenterally transmitted viruses like HBV and HCV. Therefore, transmission routes apart from parenteral transmission must be considered.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of GBV-C/HGV in blood donors and relatives of GBV-C/HGV-positive and -negative blood donors. Prevalence was also analyzed in aplastic anemia patients. Samples were tested by RT-PCR and partially by ELISA. Positive isolates were sequenced and phylogenetically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 5733 blood donors were PCR tested and 90 were positive (1.6%). Of these, 98 relatives could be tested. Viremia was found in 14.3 percent and anti-E2 in 29.5 percent, whereas only 1.1 percent of the relatives of PCR-negative donors were viremic and 8.5 percent were anti-E2 positive. Probable virus transmission could be shown in two couples and in six mother-child pairs by sequencing of isolates indicating horizontal and vertical virus transmission, respectively. Recipients of GBV-C/HGV RNA-positive blood products were shown to be infected at a rate of 58 percent (18/31). Aplastic anemia patients were positive at a rate of 32 percent (17/53).

CONCLUSION

The high percentage of 14.3 percent of GBV-C/HGV PCR-positive relatives of GBV-C/HGV-positive blood donors suggests intrafamilial transmission. Sequence analyses revealed vertical and horizontal transmission. Although parenteral transmission is highly efficient for GBV-C/HGV (58% of recipients of GBV-C/HGV RNA-positive blood products and 32% of aplastic anemia patients), it appears that sexual and vertical transmission are the most common transmission routes.

[Is GB virus C alias "hepatitis" G virus involved in human pathology?]

GB virus-C alias "hepatitis" virus G was discovered in 1995 as a putative causative virus of non A-E hepatitis. It is a very common virus found in 1 to 5% of eligible blood donors in developed countries. Numerous studies over seven years led to the exclusion of its role as a significant etiological agent of hepatitis. Its in vivo replication site is still unknown. Its direct involvement in the induction of significant hepatic or extra-hepatic diseases could not be demonstrated. However, coinfections with other viruses may contribute to changes in the evolution of both liver disease (negatively) and HIV/AIDS (favourably). Today, no country has decided to screen GBV-C in blood donors. However, more studies are necessary before the absence of influence of GBV-C infection on human health in the context of other viral infections could be confirmed definitely. This article is a review of the literature on a possible involvement of GBV-C in pathologies whether associated or not to other infections.

GB virus C epidemiology in Denmark: different routes of transmission in children and low- and high-risk adults

With the demonstration of an effect of GBV-C infection on the outcome of HIV infection, it has become important to understand the epidemiology of GBV-C. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence in high- and low-risk populations. The following populations were tested: school children, 9 and 15 years of age (n = 901), blood donors (n = 5,203), hospital employees (n = 1,432), and prisoners and injecting drug users (n = 447). In-house RT-PCR for GBV-CRNA was used together with a commercial ELISA for anti-E2 (Boehringer, Germany). In addition, questionnaires for risk factors for transmission and serological tests for HIV and hepatitis were applied. The overall prevalence of GBV-CRNA was 1.4% among children, 2.2% among blood donors, 2.2% among hospital employees, 12.5% among non-injecting prisoners, and 34.9% among drug injectors. Correspondingly anti-E2 was found in 0.3%, 12.3%, 25.0%, and 42.7%. Among hospital employees, independent risk factors for GBV-C were professions with blood exposure and sexual risk partners. Among prisoners and drug users, injecting and a sexual risk index were associated independently with GBV-C. Based on these results, the following hypothesis is suggested: GBV-C is transmitted frequently at birth or early childhood and this leads to chronic infection in most cases. Sexual transmission is the most important route of transmission in the adult population but this infection is usually transient. Blood borne transmission plays a role among health care workers and injecting drug users and GBV-C should be further evaluated as a surrogate marker for professional blood exposure.

Nucleic acid testing for emerging viral infections

The development of new technologies leads to the discovery of new viruses. For each of these new infectious agents, relevance to transfusion, including transmissibility by transfusion, pathogenicity, prevalence in blood donors, persistence and the availability of screening assays needs to be assessed. Since 1995, one virus and a new family of viruses have been identified. GB virus-C/hepatitis G virus (GBV-C/HGV), a flavi virus with some homology with and epidemiological features of HCV, is not related to post-transfusion hepatitis but seems to positively interfere with human immunodeficiency virus replication. Human circoviruses include TT virus (TTV) and SEN-V. Both are highly variable, constituting a large family of distantly related viruses. They appear ubiquitous, infecting humans very early in life and are largely persistent. No clinical symptoms or pathogenicity is associated with TTV, but SEN-V might be associated with some non-A-E post-transfusion hepatitis. Parvovirus B19 has been known for many years, but its transmission to recipients of plasma derivatives despite viral inactivation raised the issue of screening plasma pools by nucleic acid testing. Most fractionators quantify B19 DNA in plasma pools to ensure a viral load of <10(4) IU mL-1.

The United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme (blood transfusion laboratory practice): trends in proficiency and practice between 1985 and 2000

Proficiency in blood transfusion laboratory practice has improved over the last 15 years (1985-2000). Error rates for ABO grouping have fallen from 0 x 19 to 0 x 02% (P = 0 x 003). A similar trend is evident for antibody screening, with error rates for false negative antibody screens falling from 3 x 2 to 0 x 5% (P < 0 x 001), and for antibody identification, for sera containing a single alloantibody, with error rates falling from 8 x 8% to 0 x 9% over the last 10 years (P < 0 x 001). Proficiency in serological crossmatching to detect clinically significant non-ABO incompatibilities (other than Kidd), has also improved (P < 0 x 001). However, error rates for RhD grouping have not changed and there has been a recent decline in proficiency in detecting weak ABO incompatibilities and Kidd antibodies with heterozygous cells. Procedures for pretransfusion testing have also been rationalized over this time. The indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) is used in isolation by 73% of laboratories for antibody screening, and 10% rely on the direct room temperature (DRT), immediate spin (IS) crossmatch in the absence (current and/or historical) of clinically significant antibodies. Despite the improvements in error rates that have occurred alongside the rationalizations, there is still evidence of noncompliance with current published BCSH guidelines and manufacturers' instructions.

Optimizing pretransfusion antibody detection and identification: a parallel, blinded comparison of tube PEG, solid-phase, and automated methods

BACKGROUND

The ideal pretransfusion testing strategy identifies maximal significant antibodies at minimal cost. Objectives of this study were to compare the characteristics of three testing methods and determine their optimal incorporation into the following generic testing sequence: 1) screen, for antibodies 2) if results are positive, use primary identification method, 3) if results are inconclusive, use secondary identification method.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 2000 consecutive, unselected, coded specimens were tested with three screening methods-PEG IAT, manual and automated solid phase red cell adherence assay (SPRCA). Of 202 positive results, 187 were of sufficient volume and were tested with both PEG and manual SPRCA identification panels, yielding 82 with significant antibodies, plus one that was negative by both methods found on retrospective review of nonstudy results. Calculations were made on the 1985 volume-sufficient specimens, simulating the possible testing permutations.

RESULTS

Manual SPRCA was the most sensitive antibody screen (67/83 = 81%) and the least specific (1840/1902 = 97%); automated SPRCA was the least sensitive (54/83 = 65%) and most specific (1883/1902 = 99%); and PEG was intermediate in both sensitivity (64/83 = 77%) and specificity (1860/1902 = 98%). Of the identification panels, manual SPRCA identified more antibodies than PEG (67 versus 66) but had more inconclusive results (41 versus 20). Of overall strategies, manual SPRCA screening with either sequence of identification methods identified the most antibodies (66). The combination of PEG screen, PEG identification, and manual SPRCA identification identified slightly fewer antibodies (63) but had the lowest reagent cost, total (reagent plus labor) cost, and cost per antibody identified. The sequence of automated SPRCA screening with manual SPRCA identification, and PEG identification had the lowest hands-on time.

CONCLUSIONS

The most cost-effective pretransfusion strategy is PEG screen with PEG identification, plus manual SPRCA identification when PEG identification is inconclusive.

The incidence of GB virus C / hepatitis G virus infection in Brazilian patients who received blood transfusion during cardiac surgery

The incidence of GBV-C/hepatitis G virus (GBV-C/HGV) infection after blood transfusion is unknown in Brazil. Many studies have so far addressed its relationship with blood transfusion, but its association with liver disease was not confirmed. A prospective study was carried out between 1996 and 1999 in Rio de Janeiro. Ninety three patients who received blood transfusion during cardiac surgery were followed for six months and blood samples were drawn before and after surgery to determine antibodies to GBV-C/hepatitis G virus (anti-HGenv) using a step sandwich immunoassay and GBV-C/HGV-RNA using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were serially determined as well as clinical data compiled related to hepatitis. Prior to surgery, anti-HGenv was present in 35.5% (33/93) of patients and 4.3%(4/93) were found to be viremic. Seroconversion following transfusion was observed in 9 patients and 4 additional individuals became viremic for a total incidence of 23% (13/56). Six months after blood transfusion, only 4 of those nine patients previously antibody positive still had anti-HGenv detectable in serum. No patients had clinical or laboratory evidence of acute hepatitis and no correlation was found with GBV-C/HGV infection and number of blood units transfused (p = 0.37). This study highlights the importance of using both HGV-RNA PCR and anti-HGenv to accurately estimate the magnitude of GBV-C/HGV infection. The observed high prevalence and incidence rates show that this infection is common in Brazil; however, no clinical or biochemical evidence of liver disease was demonstrated in the period of study and longer longitudinal observation is needed to define any pathogenic effect.

Which agents threaten blood safety in the future?

The safety of the blood supply is critical to many parts of modern medicine. In a time when prescriber's and the public's expectations are increasing, it is essential that transfusion services globally ensure the safety of the blood supply. There are, however, many threats to this safety, one being the appearance of new infectious agents. Such agents may be truly 'novel', or may be existing agents, known but not routinely screened for, posing a new or increased threat. However, before an agent is considered to be a true threat to blood safety it must be well characterized, and evidence must be presented that (i) transfusion transmission is a significant route of spread, and (ii) the agent causes significant clinical disease. If either of these criteria are not met, the question has to be asked as to whether the agent is truly a threat to blood safety.

GB virus C/hepatitis G virus replicates in human haematopoietic cells and vascular endothelial cells

A novel flavivirus, GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV), has been detected in chronic liver disease patients. It is known that the viral RNA can be detected in ∼5% of American blood donors. However, the implications for liver disease and the sites of virus replication remain unknown. Possible sites of virus replication were studied by using cell lines and/or primary cells derived from human lymphoid cells, myeloid cells, hepatocytes and endothelial cells. RNA was detected by virus strand-specific RT–PCR and GBV-C/HGV antigen was detected with a rabbit polyclonal anti-E2 (envelope 2) antibody by Western blot analysis. Negative-strand RNA, representative of replicating virus, was detected in lymphoid and megakaryocytoid cell lines and primary vascular endothelial cells. In addition, an increase in virus titre over time was demonstrated and viral antigen was detected, and virus could be passaged to infect fresh cells. However, viral RNA or antigen could not be detected in any of the hepatocyte lines tested. These results indicate that the replication site of GBV-C/HGV is not primarily in hepatocytes and that detection of replicating virus in hepatic tissue may reflect virus replication in haematopoietic cells and/or vascular endothelial cells present in the liver.

GB virus type C/HGV markers in HCV RNA-positive French blood donors: correlation with HCV genotypes and risk factors

BACKGROUND

Exposure to GB virus type C/HGV (GBV-C/HGV) could be determined by detection either of RNA by RT-PCR or of antibodies of the envelope protein E2.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of the GBV-C/HGV markers of infection in a blood donor population infected with HCV and to identify GBV-C/HGV routes of transmission that are associated with HCV genotypes and risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 306 HCV RNA-positive blood donors, the proportion of GBV-C/HGV RNA-positive donors and anti-E2-positive donors was 19.3 percent (95% CI = 15.0-24.2%) and 42.1 percent (95% CI = 36.6-47.9%), respectively. Exposure to GBV-C/HGV (RNA or anti-E2) was significantly associated with the risk factor of IV drug use. There was a trend toward association with HCV subtypes 1a and 3a, probably because these HCV subtypes are the most frequent in IV drug users. No correlation was observed between ALT elevation and the presence of GBV-C/HGV RNA.

CONCLUSION

In persons with HCV infection, IV drug use seems to be a major route of GBV-C/HGV transmission. Precautions taken to avoid HCV infection will probably also decrease GBV-C/HGV transmission.

High prevalence of TT virus infection in French blood donors revealed by the use of three PCR systems

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of TT virus (TTV) infection in voluntary blood donors in Southeastern France.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The sera of 289 blood donors were tested for the presence of TTV DNA by two PCR systems detecting genes located in the 5' UTR (primer set A [Set A]) and the open reading frame (ORF2) (primer set B [Set B]) of the viral genome. A randomized sample of 40 blood donors was also tested by a nested-PCR system in the ORF1 by use of primer set C (Set C). Donors were questioned for possible risk factors for virus transmission.

RESULTS

In the entire population studied, 30.8 percent of blood donors tested positive with both Sets A and B, and 70.6 percent with at least one set. In the sample tested with three sets of primers, 27.5 percent of blood donors were positive in testing with all PCR systems and 80 percent with at least one system. The specificity of TTV DNA amplification was confirmed by sequencing 10 PCR products obtained with each set of primers. Statistical analysis revealed that the prevalence of TTV reactivity increased with age.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of TTV reactivity and the absence of a pathologic condition or risk factors obviously associated with the infection in blood donors suggest that there is no need for systematic detection of TTV infection before blood donation. Further studies are required to determine if TTV isolates can be responsible for a pathologic condition in humans after blood transfusion.

GBV-C/hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA load in immunodeficient individuals and in immunocompetent individuals

The aim of this study was to establish the mean plasma GBV-C/hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA load in groups of GBV-C/HGV-infected individuals with varied immune status and to determine the most frequent patterns of evolution of the plasma GBV-C/HGV RNA load over time during the natural history of infection. The mean plasma GBV-C/HGV RNA load observed was, from the lowest to the highest: 5.21 log in immunodepressed multiply-transfused patients, 6.45 log in HIV-positive individuals, 6.66 log in immunocompetent multiply-transfused patients, and 6.71 log in blood donors. The difference was significant between the four groups (P < 0.0001). The most frequent pattern of evolution of the plasma GBV-C/HGV RNA load was as follows: after the primary GBV-C/HGV infection, the viral load was elevated from the onset; then, a high, persistent and relatively steady viral RNA level was the rule; and when it occurred, the loss of viremia was not preceded by a decrease before recovery from GBV-C/HGV infection.