Estimation of entrainment response using electrograms from remote sites: validation in animal and computer models of reentrant tachycardia

Simultaneous Entrainment Response Assessment at Multiple Sites

BACKGROUND

The entrainment response, defined as the difference between the postpacing interval and the tachycardia cycle length (TCL) recorded from a mapping catheter, allows to track down the components of the tachycardia loop.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate if the postpacing interval measured simultaneously from multiple sites that are remote from the pacing site (PPIR) could be clinically useful in mapping re-entrant circuits.

METHODS

Ninety-two episodes of entrainment response in 29 patients with different macro-re-entrant tachycardias were evaluated using a standardized entrainment protocol. The spatial distribution of different values of PPIR-TCL in a simulation and a computational model of an entrained re-entrant tachycardia was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The PPIR exceeded TCL by more than 20 milliseconds only if both pacing and recording sites were outside the tachycardia circuit. The PPIR-TCL at in-circuit sites was always ≤20 milliseconds. Sites with negative PPIR-TCL values were found either outside or inside the tachycardia circuit.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of entrainment response from catheters remote from the pacing site may enhance spatial mapping of the tachycardia circuit. The PPIR-TCL above 20 milliseconds has an excellent positive predictive value in identifying sites outside the tachycardia circuit.

Identification of cardiac rhythm features by mathematical analysis of vector fields

Automated techniques for locating cardiac arrhythmia features are limited, and cardiologists generally rely on isochronal maps to infer patterns in the cardiac activation sequence during an ablation procedure. Velocity vector mapping has been proposed as an alternative method to study cardiac activation in both clinical and research environments. In addition to the visual cues that vector maps can provide, vector fields can be analyzed using mathematical operators such as the divergence and curl. In the current study, conduction features were extracted from velocity vector fields computed from cardiac mapping data. The divergence was used to locate ectopic foci and wavefront collisions, and the curl to identify central obstacles in reentrant circuits. Both operators were applied to simulated rhythms created from a two-dimensional cellular automaton model, to measured data from an in situ experimental canine model, and to complex three-dimensional human cardiac mapping data sets. Analysis of simulated vector fields indicated that the divergence is useful in identifying ectopic foci, with a relatively small number of vectors and with errors of up to 30 degrees in the angle measurements. The curl was useful for identifying central obstacles in reentrant circuits, and the number of velocity vectors needed increased as the rhythm became more complex. The divergence was able to accurately identify canine in situ pacing sites, areas of breakthrough activation, and wavefront collisions. In data from human arrhythmias, the divergence reliably estimated origins of electrical activity and wavefront collisions, but the curl was less reliable at locating central obstacles in reentrant circuits, possibly due to the retrospective nature of data collection. The results indicate that the curl and divergence operators applied to velocity vector maps have the potential to add valuable information in cardiac mapping and can be used to supplement human pattern recognition.

Atypical flutter: a review

Understanding of typical flutter circuits led the way to the study of other forms of macroreentrant tachycardias of the atria, and to their treatment by catheter ablation. It has become evident that the ECG classification of atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia by a rate cutoff and the presence or absence of isoelectric baselines between atrial deflections is not a valid indicator of tachycardia mechanism. Macroreentrant circuits where activation rotates around large obstacles are the most common arrhythmias found in patients with atypical forms of flutter or atrial tachycardia, especially after surgery for congenital heart disease, however, focal mechanisms can also be found. Large areas of low voltage electrograms, suggestive of severe myocardial damage (fibrosis or infiltration) can be found in many atypical macroreentrant tachycardias at the center of the circuit. Many of these circuits can be mapped precisely, critical isthmuses can be defined, and effective catheter ablation can be performed. The need to match activation maps with anatomy precisely, makes computer assisted, anatomically precise mapping a useful tool. Entrainment techniques have to be used sparingly to avoid tachycardia interruption. In complex cases, ablation can be done in sinus rhythm, after definition of conducting channels between low voltage areas and scars or anatomic obstacles. Long-term prognosis is uncertain and depends on the underlying pathology.