Role of the Coronary Sinus in Maintenance of Atrial Fibrillation

Coronary Sinus Isolation for High-Burden Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The coronary sinus is an arrhythmogenic structure that can initiate and maintain atrial fibrillation (AF). Coronary sinus ablation has been shown to be effective in prolonging the AF cycle length and terminating AF in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF who have persistent AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to undertake a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of coronary sinus isolation (CSI) as an adjunctive ablation strategy for the treatment of high-burden AF.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic long episodes of paroxysmal AF (≥48 h but ≤7 days) or persistent AF (>7 days and ≤12 months) referred for first-time ablation were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either PVI, roofline ablation, and CSI (CSI group) or PVI and roofline ablation only (non-CSI group). Participants were assessed postprocedurally via clinical follow-up and 7-day Holter monitoring at regular intervals. The primary outcome was single-procedure drug-free atrial arrhythmia-free survival at 2 years.

RESULTS

One hundred participants were recruited to the study; 48 were randomized to the CSI group and 52 to the non-CSI group. Acutely successful CSI was achieved in 45 of the 48 patients in the CSI group. At 2 years follow up, 30 of 48 patients (62.5%) in the CSI group and 33 of 52 (63.4%) in the non-CSI group were free from arrhythmia recurrence. Single-procedure drug-free survival at 2 years was no different between groups (P = 0.91). Similarly, multiple procedure drug assisted survival at 5 years was not different between groups (P = 0.80). Complication rates were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive CSI as part of a de novo ablation strategy does not confer any additional benefit greater than PVI and roofline for the treatment of high-burden AF.

Atrial Fibrillation and Underlying Structural and Electrophysiological Heterogeneity

As atrial fibrillation (AF) progresses from initial paroxysmal episodes to the persistent phase, maintaining sinus rhythm for an extended period through pharmacotherapy and catheter ablation becomes difficult. A major cause of the deteriorated treatment outcome is the atrial structural and electrophysiological heterogeneity, which AF itself can exacerbate. This heterogeneity exists or manifests in various dimensions, including anatomically segmental structural features, the distribution of histological fibrosis and the autonomic nervous system, sarcolemmal ion channels, and electrophysiological properties. All these types of heterogeneity are closely related to the development of AF. Recognizing the heterogeneity provides a valuable approach to comprehending the underlying mechanisms in the complex excitatory patterns of AF and the determining factors that govern the seemingly chaotic propagation. Furthermore, substrate modification based on heterogeneity is a potential therapeutic strategy. This review aims to consolidate the current knowledge on structural and electrophysiological atrial heterogeneity and its relation to the pathogenesis of AF, drawing insights from clinical studies, animal and cell experiments, molecular basis, and computer-based approaches, to advance our understanding of the pathophysiology and management of AF.

Assessing the impact of blocking distal coronary sinus-left atrial muscular connection on inducible rate of atrial fibrillation and follow-up recurrence in persistent atrial fibrillation patients with different fibrotic degrees of left atrial: A retrospective study

Background

The musculature of the coronary sinus (CS), especially its distal connection with the post wall of the left atrial (LA), has been associated with the genesis and maintenance of atrial flutter (AFL) and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the relative contributions of the distal coronary sinus (CSD)-LA connection to PersAF with various degrees of atrial fibrosis remain unknown.

Objective

This study aimed to explore the different roles of blocking the CSD-LA connection in the induction of acute AF and middle-term follow-up of recurrence among PersAF patients with various degrees of LA fibrosis.

Methods and results

A retrospective cohort of 71 patients with drug-refractory and symptomatic PersAF underwent ablation for the first time were studied. The population was divided into two groups according to disconnection of the CSD-LA or not. All patients enrolled accepted the unified ablation procedure (circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation and ablation of the CSD-LA connection). Group A (n = 47) successfully blocked the CSD-LA electrical connection and Group B (n = 24) failed. Twenty-five patients could be induced into sustained AF in the Group A compared to 20 in the Group B (53.2 vs. 83.3%, p = 0.013). After a mean follow-up of 185 ± 8 days, 24 (33.8%) patients experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrences. The Group A had significantly fewer recurrences (25.5%) compared to Group B (50%). Meanwhile, in Group A, the ROC curve analysis suggested that in the case of blocking CSD-LA, low voltage area (LVA) of LA can act as a predictive factor for acute AF induction (AUC = 0.943, Cut-off = 0.190, P < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 92.3 and 90.5%, and middle-term recurrence (AUC = 0.889, Cut-off = 0.196, P < 0.001) with sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 65.7%.

Conclusion

Disconnection of CSD-LA could reduce the inducible rate of acute AF and the recurrences of atrial arrhythmia during middle-term follow-up. The PersAF patients with CSD-LA muscular connection blocked, experienced a higher acute AF inducible rate with larger proportion of LVA of LA (≥19%) and a higher recurrent rate of atrial arrhythmias with a larger proportion of LA fibrosis (≥19.6%).

The Relevance of Heart Rate Fluctuation When Evaluating Atrial Substrate Electrical Features in Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Coronary sinus (CS) catheterization is critical during catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the association of CS electrical activity with atrial substrate modification has been barely investigated and mostly limited to analyses during AF. In sinus rhythm (SR), atrial substrate modification is principally assessed at a global level through P-wave analysis. Cross-correlating CS electrograms (EGMs) and P-waves’ features could potentiate the understanding of AF mechanisms. Five-minute surface lead II and bipolar CS recordings before, during, and after CA were acquired from 40 paroxysmal AF patients. Features related to duration, amplitude, and heart-rate variability of atrial activations were evaluated. Heart-rate adjustment (HRA) was applied. Correlations between each P-wave and CS local activation wave (LAW) feature were computed with cross-quadratic sample entropy (CQSE), Pearson correlation (PC), and linear regression (LR) with 10-fold cross-validation. The effect of CA between different ablation steps was compared with PC. Linear correlations: poor to mediocre before HRA for analysis at each P-wave/LAW (PC: max. +18.36%, p = 0.0017, LR: max. +5.33%, p = 0.0002) and comparison between two ablation steps (max. +54.07%, p = 0.0205). HRA significantly enhanced these relationships, especially in duration (P-wave/LAW: +43.82% to +69.91%, p < 0.0001 for PC and +18.97% to +47.25%, p < 0.0001 for LR, CA effect: +53.90% to +85.72%, p < 0.0210). CQSE reported negligent correlations (0.6−1.2). Direct analysis of CS features is unreliable to evaluate atrial substrate modification due to CA. HRA substantially solves this problem, potentiating correlation with P-wave features. Hence, its application is highly recommended.

The Dissimilar Impact in Atrial Substrate Modificationof Left and Right Pulmonary Veins Isolation after Catheter Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Since the discovery of pulmonary veins (PVs) as foci of atrial fibrillation (AF), the commonest cardiac arrhythmia, investigation revolves around PVs catheter ablation (CA) results. Notwithstanding, CA process itself is rather neglected. We aim to decompose crucial CA steps: coronary sinus (CS) catheterization and the impact of left and right PVs isolation (LPVI, RPVI), separately. We recruited 40 paroxysmal AF patients undergoing first-time CA and obtained five-minute lead II and bipolar CS recordings during sinus rhythm (SR) before CA (B), after LPVI (L) and after RPVI (R). Among others, duration, amplitude and atrial-rate variability (ARV) were calculated for P-waves and CS local activation waves (LAWs). LAWs features were compared among CS channels for reliability analysis. P-waves and LAWs features were compared after each ablation step (B, L, R). CS channels: amplitude and area were different between distal/medial (p≤0.0014) and distal/mid-proximal channels (p≤0.0025). Medial and distal showed the most and least coherent values, respectively. Correlation was higher in proximal (≥93%) than distal (≤91%) areas. P-waves: duration was significantly shortened after LPVI (after L: p=0.0012, −13.30%). LAWs: insignificant variations. ARV modification was more prominent in LAWs (L: >+73.12%, p≤0.0480, R: <−33.94%, p≤0.0642). Medial/mid-proximal channels are recommended during SR. CS LAWs are not significantly affected by CA but they describe more precisely CA-induced ARV modifications. LPVI provokes the highest impact in paroxysmal AF CA, significantly modifying P-wave duration.

Single-catheter simplified stepwise approach to persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The strategy for atrial fibrillation ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation remains controversial. A single-catheter approach was recently validated for pulmonary vein isolation.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility of this approach to performing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial lines, if needed.

METHODS

We prospectively included 159 consecutive patients referred to our centre for a first persistent atrial fibrillation ablation between January 2018 and December 2018. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation. If the patient was still in atrial fibrillation (spontaneously or inducible), we subsequently performed a stepwise approach, including roof line, anterior mitral line, posterior box lesion and cavotricuspid isthmus line. Finally, if patient remained in atrial fibrillation at the end of the procedure, a synchronized direct-current cardioversion was applied to restore sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

At baseline, 54 patients were in sinus rhythm and underwent pulmonary vein isolation. For patients in atrial fibrillation, after pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of additional lines, if needed, 18 patients were converted to atrial tachycardia and one directly to sinus rhythm; 96 were still in atrial fibrillation and underwent direct-current cardioversion. After a mean follow-up of 17±6 months, 57 patients (36%) experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrence. No deaths, tamponades or phrenic nerve injuries were observed following the procedure. The main mode of arrhythmia recurrence was atrial fibrillation in 75% of cases and atrial tachycardia in 25% of cases.

CONCLUSION

A single-catheter approach, including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial lines, is feasible and safe in patients undergoing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, with an acceptable success rate of 64% at mid-term follow-up.

PRECAF Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that the presence of dual muscular coronary sinus (CS) to left atrial (LA) connections, coupled with rate-dependent unidirectional block in one limb, is associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) induction. This study sought to examine whether ablation of distal CS to LA connections at a first AF ablation reduces arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up.

METHODS

In this single-center, randomized, controlled trial, 35 consecutive patients with drug-refractory AF undergoing first-time ablation between August 2018 and August 2019, were randomly assigned to (1) standard ablation (pulmonary vein isolation and nonpulmonary vein trigger ablation) versus (2) standard ablation plus elimination of distal CS to LA connections targeting the earliest LA activation during distal CS pacing with a deca-polar catheter placed with its proximal electrode at the ostium. Change of the local CS atrial electrogram and LA activation sequence to early activation of the LA septum or roof during distal CS pacing were the end point for CS-LA connection elimination.

RESULTS

Thirty patients completed 6 months study follow-up (15 patients in each group). Demographic characteristics including age and AF persistence were similar in both groups. After a mean follow-up of 170±22 days, there were 7 atrial arrhythmia recurrences in the standard group and 1 recurrence in the CS-LA connection elimination group (46.7% versus 6.7%, hazard ratio, 0.12, P=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Elimination of distal CS to LA connections reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrences compared with standard pulmonary vein isolation and nonpulmonary vein trigger ablation in patients undergoing a first AF ablation procedure in a small randomized study. This strategy warrants further evaluation in a multicenter randomized trial. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03646643.

Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Posterior Wall, Vein of Marshall, Coronary Sinus, Superior Vena Cava, and Left Atrial Appendage

The optimal ablation strategy for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation remains controversial. Non-PV triggers have been shown to have a major arrhythmogenic role in these patients. Common sources of non-PV triggers are: posterior wall, left atrial appendage, superior vena cava, coronary sinus, vein of Marshall, interatrial septum, crista terminalis/Eustachian ridge, and mitral and tricuspid valve annuli. These sites are targeted empirically in selected cases or if significant ectopy is noted (with or without a drug challenge), to improve outcomes in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This article focuses on summarizing the current evidence and the approach to mapping and ablation of these frequent non-PV trigger sites.

Severe and uniform bi-atrial remodeling measured by dominant frequency analysis in persistent atrial fibrillation unresponsive to ablation

BACKGROUND

High values of ECG and intracardiac dominant frequency (DF) are indicative of significant atrial remodeling in persistent atrial fibrillation (peAF). We hypothesized that patients with peAF unresponsive to ablation display higher ECG and intracardiac DFs than those remaining in sinus rhythm (SR) on the long term.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients underwent stepwise ablation for peAF (sustained duration 19 ± 11 months). Electrograms were recorded before ablation at 13 left atrium (LA) sites and at the right atrial appendage (RAA) and coronary sinus (CS) synchronously to the ECG. DF was defined as the highest peak within the power spectrum.

RESULTS

peAF was terminated within the LA in 28 patients (left-terminated [LT]), whereas 12 patients remaining in AF after ablation (not left-terminated [NLT]) were cardioverted. Over a mean follow-up of 34 ± 14 months, all 12 NLT patients had a recurrence. Of the LT patients, 71% had a recurrence (20/28, LT_Rec), while 29% remained in SR throughout the follow-up (8/28, LT_SR). DF values and correlations between pairs of LA appendage (LAA), RAA, and CS DFs showed distinctive patterns among the subgroups. The NLT subgroup displayed the highest ECG and intracardiac DFs, with strong intragroup homogeneity between pairs of CS and LAA DFs, and to a lesser extent between pairs of CS and RAA DFs. Conversely, the LT_SR subgroup showed the lowest DFs, with significant intragroup heterogeneity between pairs of CS and both LAA and RAA DFs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with peAF unresponsive to ablation show high surface and intracardiac DFs indicative of severe and uniform bi-atrial remodeling.

Sustained and self-terminating atrial fibrillation induced immediately after pulmonary vein isolation exhibit differences in coronary sinus electrical activity from onset

INTRODUCTION

Little data exists on the electrophysiological differences between sustained atrial fibrillation (sAF; >5 minutes) vs self-terminating nonsustained AF (nsAF; <5 minutes). We sought to investigate the electrophysiological characteristics of coronary sinus (CS) activity during postpulmonary vein isolation (PVI) sAF vs nsAF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 142 patients post-PVI for paroxysmal AF (PAF). In a 50-patient subset, CS electrograms in the first 30 seconds of induced AF were analyzed manually. A custom-made algorithm for automated electrogram annotation was derived for validation on the whole patient set. In patients with sAF post-PVI, CS fractionated potentials were ablated. Manual analysis showed that patients with sAF exhibited higher activation pattern variability (2.1 vs 0.5 changes/sec; P < .001); fewer proximal-to-distal wavefronts (25 vs 61%; P < .001); fewer unidirectional wavefronts (60 vs 86%; P < .001); more pivot locations (4.3 vs 2.1; P < .001); shorter cycle lengths (190 vs 220 ms; P < .001); and shorter cumulative isoelectric segments (35 vs 44%; P = .045) compared to nsAF. These observations were confirmed on the whole study population by automated electrogram annotation and sample entropy computation (SampEn: 0.29 ± 0.15 in sAF vs 0.15 ± 0.05 in nsAF; P < .0001). The derived model predicted sAF with 78% sensitivity, 88% specificity; agreement with manual model: 88% (Cohen's kappa= 0.76). CS defragmentation resulted in AF termination or noninducibility in 49% of sAF.

CONCLUSION

In PAF patients post-PVI, induced sAF shows greater activation sequence variability, shorter cycle length, and higher SampEn in the CS compared to nsAF. Automated electrogram annotation confirmed these results and accurately distinguished self-terminating nsAF episodes from sAF based on 30-second recordings at AF onset.

Coronary Sinus Ablation Is a Key Player Substrate in Recurrence of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent atrial arrhythmia. During the last few decades, owing to numerous advancements in the field of electrophysiology, we reached satisfactory outcomes for paroxysmal AF with the help of ablation procedures. But the most challenging type is still persistent AF. The recurrence rate of AF in patients with persistent AF is very high, which shows the inadequacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Over the last few decades, we have been trying to gain insight into AF mechanisms, and have come to the conclusion that there must be some triggers and substrates other than pulmonary veins. According to many studies, PVI alone is not enough to deal with persistent AF. The purpose of our review is to summarize updates and to clarify the role of coronary sinus (CS) in AF induction and propagation. This review will provide updated knowledge on developmental, histological, and macroscopic anatomical aspects of CS with its role as arrhythmogenic substrate. This review will also inform readers about application of CS in other electrophysiological procedures.

Novel concepts and approaches in ablation of atrial fibrillation: the role of non-pulmonary vein triggers

Ablation of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers is an important step to improve outcomes in atrial fibrillation ablation. Non-pulmonary vein triggers typically originates from predictable sites (such as the left atrial posterior wall, superior vena cava, coronary sinus, interatrial septum, and crest terminalis), and these areas can be ablated either empirically or after observing significant ectopy (with or without drug challenge). In this review, we will focus on ablation of non-PV triggers, summarizing the existing evidence and our current approach for their mapping and ablation.

Double atrial potentials in left-sided accessory pathways are associated with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Muscular connections between the coronary sinus (CS) and left atrium probably impact distribution of electrical activity. Double atrial potentials (DP) may be their presentation. The aim was to investigate the presence of DP in CS recordings during atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and its contribution to the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

A group of 247 patients with accessory pathways (AP) were screened for DP. The patients with DP during AVRT were compared to those without DP.

RESULTS

DP during AVRT were found only among the left-sided AP (AP-L). Patients with AP-L were divided into Group 1 (n  =  17) with DP during AVRT and Group 2 (n  =  108) without DP. Patients in Group 1 had higher incidence of AF in history (47.1% vs. 23.1%; P  =  0.0376), AF induced during electrophysiological (EP) study (70.6% vs. 25%; P  =  0.0002). Group 1 had higher heart rate (HR) during AVRT in the EP study (197.2 ± 27 vs. 175.1 ± 26.3 bpm; P  =  0.0019), but HR of clinical AVRT (208.5 ± 30.8 vs. 191.6 ± 27.8 bpm) was not significant different (P  =  ns). Additionally, electrical alternans of QRS amplitude during AVRT in the EP study was more frequent in Group 1 (52.9 vs. 20.4 %; P  =  0.0048).

CONCLUSION

Patients with DP and AP-L were more prone to develop AF. The presence of DP was associated with faster AVRT rate. The direction of atrium depolarization during AVRT may be different in the presence of DP and probably plays a role in development of AF in this group of patients.

What Is the Appropriate Lesion Set for Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation?

OPINION STATEMENT

Special attention must be paid to detect, diagnose, and optimize management of reversible or treatable causes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) such as obesity, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), hypertension, hypo or hyperthyroidism, inflammatory and infectious diseases, and stress. Though, we strongly believe that the role of the pulmonary veins (PVs) is more pronounced in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) than in persistent AF, performing an adequate pulmonary vein isolation is still key in LSPAF. Patients with LSPAF will frequently require a more aggressive mapping and ablative approach. We do not encourage the use of empiric lines or complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Ablation of sites associated with non-PV triggers such as the entire posterior wall, the roof, the anterior part of the left atrium septum, left atrial appendage (LAA), the CS and SVC has been shown to improve the freedom from AF at follow-up when combined with PVs isolation. During the isoproterenol challenge, non-PV triggers are detected in most patients with AF. Mapping non-PV triggers is guided by multiple catheters positioned along both the right and left atriums: a 10-pole circular mapping catheter in the left superior PV recording the far-field LAA activity, the ablation catheter in the right superior PV that records the far-field interatrial septum and a 20-pole catheter with electrodes spanning from the SVC to the CS. With this simple catheter setup, when focal ectopic atrial activity is observed (a single ectopic beat is enough) their activation sequence is compared to that of sinus rhythm, allowing to quickly identify their area of origin. For significant non-PV triggers (repetitive isolated beats, focal atrial tachycardias or beats triggering AF/atrial flutter, a more detailed activation mapping is performed in the area of origin. They are subsequently targeted with focal ablation, exception being the triggers originating from the SVC, LAA or CS, in which cases complete isolation of these structures is the ablation strategy of choice. We truly believe the LAA deserves special consideration when managing patients with persistent AF and LSPAF.

Frequency Gradient Within Coronary Sinus Predicts the Long-Term Outcome of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation

Background

The coronary sinus (CS), as a junction of the atria, contributes to atrial fibrillation (AF) by developing unstable reentry, and isolating the atria by ablation at the CS could terminate AF. The present study evaluated whether AF activities at the CS in a subset of patients contributed to AF maintenance and predicted clinical outcome of ablation.

Methods and Results

We studied 122 consecutive patients who had a first‐time radiofrequency ablation for persistent AF. Bipolar electrograms were obtained from multiple regions of the left atrium by a Lasso mapping catheter before ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation terminated AF in 12 patients (9.8%). Sequential stepwise ablation was conducted in pulmonary vein isolation nontermination patients and succeeded in 22 patients (18%). In the stepwise termination group, AF frequency in the proximal CS (CSp) was significantly higher (10.2±2.1 Hz versus 8.3±1.8 Hz, P<0.001), and the ratio of distal CS (CSd) to proximal CS (CSd/CSp ratio, 56.6%±10.11% versus 70.7%±9.8%, P<0.001) was significantly lower than that in the nontermination group. The stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that the CSd/CSp ratio was an independent predictor with an odds ratio of 1.131 (95%CI 1.053‐1.214; P=0.001). With a cutoff of 67%, the patients with lower CSd/CSp ratios had significantly better index and long‐term outcomes than those with higher ratios during a follow‐up of 46±18 months.

Conclusions

Rapid repetitive activities in the musculature of the proximal CS may contribute to maintenance of AF after pulmonary vein isolation alone in persistent AF. A cutoff at 67%, of the CSd/CSp frequency ratio might be an indicator to stratify the subset of patients who might benefit from CS ablation.

Techniques for the provocation, localization, and ablation of non-pulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation

The end point of current catheter-based ablation approaches for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the elimination of all the possible triggers with the least amount of ablation necessary. Once all the triggers have been eliminated, the incremental value of any additional lesion sets remains to be proven. Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation approaches for eliminating AF triggers. However, up to 11% of patients demonstrate reproducible sustained AF initiation from non-PV foci. In these patients, triggers can typically be elicited using standardized induction protocols, which include cardioversion of spontaneous and/or induced AF and infusion of high-dose isoproterenol. Non-PV triggers typically arise from discrete anatomical structures that include the mitral and tricuspid periannular regions, the crista terminalis and Eustachian ridge, the interatrial septum, the left atrial (LA) posterior wall, the left atrial appendage (LAA), and other thoracic veins such as the superior vena cava, the coronary sinus, and the ligament of Marshall. Localization of non-PV foci involves a detailed analysis of specific intra-atrial activation sequences using multipolar catheters in standard atrial locations coupled with information from the surface electrocardiogram P wave when possible. Multipolar catheters positioned along the coronary sinus and crista terminalis/superior vena cava region together with direct recordings from the right and left PVs allow a quick localization of non-PV foci. Elimination of non-PV triggers by means of focal ablation at the site of origin or isolation of arrhythmogenic structures (eg, LA posterior wall or superior vena cava) has been associated with improved arrhythmia-free survival.

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Strategies and technology related to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) continue to advance since its inception nearly 20 years ago. Broader selections of patients are now offered ablation with a similar level of procedural outcome and safety standards. It is hoped that improved understanding of the pathophysiologic processes of the initiation and maintenance of AF will refine target selection during ablation and improve long-term procedural efficacy, particularly in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF.

Electrophysiological Perspectives on Hybrid Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

To overcome limitations of minimally invasive surgical ablation as a standalone procedure in eliminating atrial fibrillation (AF), hybrid approaches incorporating adjunctive endovascular catheter ablation have been proposed in recent years. The endovascular component targets residual conduction gaps and identifies additional electrophysiological targets with the goal of minimizing recurrent atrial arrhythmia. We performed a systematic review of published studies of hybrid AF ablation, analyzing 432 pooled patients (19% paroxysmal, 29% persistent, 52% long-standing persistent) treated using three different approaches: A. bilateral thoracoscopy with bipolar radiofrequency (RF) clamp-based approach; B. right thoracoscopic suction monopolar RF catheter-based approach; and C. subxiphoid posterior pericardioscopic ("convergent") approach. Freedom from recurrence off antiarrhythmic medications at 12 months was seen in 88.1% [133/151] for A, 73.4% [47/64] for B, and 59.3% [80/135] for C, with no significant difference between paroxysmal (76.9%) and persistent/long-standing persistent AF (73.4%). Death and major surgical complications were reported in 8.5% with A, 0% with B and 8.6% with C. A critical appraisal of hybrid ablation is presented, drawing from experiences and insights published over the years on catheter ablation of AF, with a discussion of the rationale underlying hybrid ablation, its strengths and limitations, where it may have a unique role in clinical management of patients with AF, which questions remain unanswered and areas for further investigation.

Transcatheter mapping and ablation of arrhythmias in the coronary sinus

The coronary sinus (CS) is a complex structure of particular interest to cardiac electrophysiologists. It is exploited as an anatomical reference, a site to record left-sided atrial and ventricular signals and for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Perhaps less appreciated, it may itself serve as a substrate for arrhythmias. It is now increasingly recognized that arrhythmias may be targeted by transcatheter ablation within the CS. This review summarizes pertinent anatomic considerations, explores the relationship between the CS and various arrhythmia substrates, elaborates on current indications for intra CS ablation and addresses efficacy and safety concerns associated with transcatheter ablation.

Triggers and anatomical substrates in the genesis and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation

The definition of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a functional electrical disorder does not reflect the significant underlying structural abnormalities. Atrial and Pulmonary Vein (PV) muscle sleeve microstructural remodeling is present, and establishes a vulnerable substrate for AF maintenance. In spite of an incomplete understanding of the anatomo-functional basis for AF, current evidence demonstrates that this arrhythmia usually requires a trigger for initiation and a vulnerable electrophysiological and/or anatomical substrate for maintenance. It is still unclear whether the trigger mechanisms include focal enhanced automaticity, triggered activity and/or micro re-entry from myocardial tissue. Initiation of AF can be favored by both parasympathetic and sympathetic stimulation, which also seem to play a role in maintaining AF. Finally, evolving clinical evidence demonstrates that inflammation is associated with new-onset and recurrent AF through a mechanism that possibly involves cellular degeneration, apoptosis, and subsequent atrial fibrosis.

Coronary sinus isolation: no myth but reality

Coronary sinus (CS) has muscular connections with atria and is often targeted to complete left atrial ablation for curing atrial fibrillation; however, complete CS isolation is difficult to achieve with hard end points. We present a distinctive case of complete isolation of CS that had an unusual muscular connection.

The role of coronary sinus musculature in the induction of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Coronary sinus (CS) musculature connects the right atria (RA) and the left atria (LA). However, the functional significance of the electrical junctions between the atria and the CS musculature is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated electrophysiological properties of the CS-atrial connections and their role in atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

By using an optical mapping system, we mapped action potentials at 256 sites on the epicardial surface of 16 isolated and arterial-perfused canine atrial tissues containing the entire musculature of the CS, lower RA, posterior LA, left inferior pulmonary vein, and vein of Marshal. We paced from each of the above regions to measure electrophysiological properties and inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmias.

RESULTS

The CS musculature connected to the RA at the ostium of the CS and to the LA at proximal and distal CS sites. Electrical conduction across each of these CS-atrial junctions was slow (P < .01), but not decremental. Rapid pacing often induced entrance block at the CS-atrial junctions and resulted in sequential changes of activation sequence in the CS. Macroreentrant circuit involving the CS musculature and the CS-atrial junctions occurred in association with conduction block at these junctions. The reentrant circuit was usually unstable and resulted in atrial fibrillation-like electrocardiographic activity.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical and electrical connections between the CS musculature and the RA and the LA caused conduction slowing and block in the CS musculature and its atrial junctions, which frequently initiated unstable macroreentry and atrial fibrillation.

Non-invasive detection of conduction pathways to left atrium using magnetocardiography: validation by intra-cardiac electroanatomic mapping

AIMS

Alteration in conduction from right to left atrium (LA) is linked to susceptibility to atrial fibrillation (AF). We examined whether different inter-atrial conduction pathways can be identified non-invasively by magnetocardiographic mapping (MCG).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 27 patients undergoing catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, LA activation sequence was determined during sinus rhythm using invasive electroanatomic mapping. Before this, 99-channel magnetocardiography was recorded over anterior chest. The orientation of the magnetic fields during the early (40-70 ms from P onset) and later part (last 50%) of LA depolarization was determined using pseudocurrent conversion. Breakthrough of electrical activation to LA occurred through Bachmann bundle (BB) in 14, margin of fossa ovalis (FO) in 3, coronary sinus ostial region (CS) in 2, and their combinations in 10 cases by invasive reference in total of 29 different P-waves. Based on the combination of pseudocurrent angles over early and late parts of LA activation, the MCG maps were divided to three types. These types correctly identified the LA breakthrough sites to BB, CS, FO, or their combinations in 27 of 29 (93%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Magnetocardiographic mapping seems capable of distinguishing inter-atrial conduction pathways. Recognizing the inter-atrial conduction pattern may assist in understanding the pathogenesis of AF and identifying the subgroups for patient-tailored therapy.

The Coronary Sinus as a Focal Source of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: More Evidence for the ?Fifth Pulmonary Vein??

The coronary sinus (CS) has been described as a substrate being involved in the atrial fibrillation (AF) process. However, there are no data describing the CS as a single source of AF. We report a patient with paroxysmal AF who demonstrated an arrhythmogenic focus within the proximal CS as single source initiating and driving AF. This discrete spot was characterized by a sharp "pulmonary vein-like" spike potential preceding every beat during AF and following the atrial potential during sinus rhythm. Radiofrequency ablation at that site led to elimination of the spike potential, disappearance and noninducibility of AF.

Impact of Catheter Ablation of the Coronary Sinus on Paroxysmal or Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the impact of catheter ablation of the coronary sinus (CS) region during paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

BACKGROUND

The CS musculature and connections have been implicated in the genesis of atrial arrhythmias.

METHODS

Forty-five patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF were studied. The CS was targeted if AF persisted after ablation of pulmonary veins and selected left atrial tissue. CS ablation was commenced endocardially by dragging along the inferior paramitral left atrium. Ablation was continued from within the vessel (epicardial) if CS electrograms had cycle lengths shorter than that of the left atrial appendage. RF energy was limited to 35 W endocardially and 25 W epicardially. The impact of ablation was evaluated on CS electrogram cycle length (CSCL) and activation sequence, atrial fibrillatory cycle length measured in the left atrial appendage (AFCL) and on perpetuation of AF.

RESULTS

Endocardial ablation significantly prolonged CSCL by 17 +/- 5 msec and organized the CS activation sequence (from 13% of patients before to 51% after ablation); subsequent epicardial ablation further increased local CSCL by 32 +/- 27 msec (P < 0.001). AFCL prolonged significantly both during endocardial and epicardial ablation (median: 152 to 167 msec P = 0.03) and was associated with AF termination in 16 (35%) patients (46% of paroxysmal and 30% of persistent AF). AFCL prolongation > or =5 msec and/or AF termination was associated with more rapid activity in the CS region originally: P < or = 0.04.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation targeting both the endocardial and epicardial aspects of the CS region significantly prolongs fibrillatory cycle length and terminates AF persisting after PV isolation in 35% of patients.

Indications for Coronary and Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death and disability in the developed world. Over the last several years, many noninvasive imaging techniques have been used to enhance the diagnosis of cardiac disease. One of these advances, multidetector computed tomographic angiography (CTA), has transformed computed tomography from a single-slice transaxial imaging modality to a true 3-dimensional imaging technique with the ability to acquire submillimeter volumetric data. These benefits enable novel applications of CTA for the assessment of cardiac and coronary anatomy that were not previously possible. In this report, we discuss evolving indications for coronary CTA, noncoronary cardiac CTA, and several potential future indications for cardiac CTA.

Coronary Sinus and Fossa Ovalis Ablation: Effect on Interatrial Conduction and Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Interatrial conduction occurs via discrete pathways along the coronary sinus musculature, fossa ovalis region, and Bachman's bundle. We assessed the feasibility of altering interatrial conduction by selectively ablating two of these conduction pathways using a novel mesh electrode ablation catheter.

METHODS

Circular radiofrequency energy catheter ablation lesions were created in the proximal coronary sinus in four dogs and in both the fossa ovalis and the proximal coronary sinus regions in seven pigs. Interatrial conduction was assessed by analyzing intracardiac electrogram and noncontact isopotential mapping data. Inducibility of atrial fibrillation was assessed before and after ablation (in six pigs).

RESULTS

Ablation lesions in the proximal coronary sinus eliminated interatrial conduction along the coronary sinus musculature in four dogs and five of seven pigs. Ablation lesions in the fossa ovalis region eliminated interatrial conduction via midseptal pathways in six of seven pigs. Atrial fibrillation, inducible in five of seven pigs at baseline, was rendered noninducible in all five. There was no adverse effect on AV nodal conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Using a novel mesh electrode ablation catheter, we were able to ablate interatrial conduction pathways along the proximal coronary sinus and fossa ovalis regions. (2) This altered interatrial conduction and altered atrial fibrillation inducibility and maintenance. (3) Catheter ablation of interatrial conduction pathways may be useful in the therapy of atrial fibrillation.

Thoracic Vein Arrhythmias

The thoracic veins are important foci for the genesis of ectopic atrial tachycardia and play a critical role in the pathophysiology of paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation. The pulmonary veins have the highest arrhythmogenic activity and other venous structures (eg, superior vena cava, coronary sinus and ligament of Marshall) have also been shown arrhythmogenic potential. Thoracic veins contain cardiomyocytes with distinct electrical activities and complex anatomical structures. This review summaries the current understanding of the basic and clinical electrophysiology of thoracic vein arrhythmias.