Systemische Therapie des kutanen Lupus erythematodes. Systemic treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Kutaner Lupus erythematodes

The diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) requires a specific diagnostic approach to identify subtypes, to address differential diagnostic considerations, and to rule out systemic organ involvement. In addition to a detailed patient's history and clinical evaluation of the skin, histopathologic and immunofluorescent examination of a skin biopsy as well as laboratory screening are recommended. Photoprovocation tests can be performed to confirm the diagnosis of CLE and to assess photosensitivity in these patients. Recently, a scoring system for the activity of the cutaneous manifestations in CLE has been developed and validated which involves anatomical areas and morphologic signs of the skin lesions. In all subtypes of CLE, antimalarials are still the treatment of choice. Advances in biotechnology have led to the development of several novel agents for the treatment of autoimmune diseases; however, controlled trials have not been performed in patients with CLE. Furthermore, there is need for specific immunointervention, especially for patients who fail to respond to standard therapies. The second part of this review will enable the reader to differentiate CLE from other diseases and to suggest specific diagnostic procedures and treatment approaches.

Lupus erythematosus: considerations about clinical, cutaneous and therapeutic aspects

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a chronic inflammatory disease with multifactorial etiology. Although clinical manifestations are varied, the skin is an important target-organ, which contributes to the inclusion of skin lesions in 4 out of the 17 new criteria for the diagnosis of the disease, according to the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics. The cutaneous manifestations of lupus are pleomorphic. Depending on their clinical characteristics, they can be classified into Acute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus, Chronic Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus and Intermittent Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus. Treatment is based on preventive measures, reversal of inflammation, prevention of damage to target organs and relief of adverse events due to pharmacological therapy. The most commonly used treatment options are topical, systemic and surgical treatment, as well as phototherapy. The correct handling of the cases depends on a careful evaluation of the morphology of the lesions and the patient's general status, always taking into consideration not only the benefits but also the side effects of each therapeutic proposal.

Activation of type I interferon pathway in systemic lupus erythematosus: association with distinct clinical phenotypes

Growing evidence over the last few years suggests a central role of type I IFN pathway in the pathogenesis of systemic autoimmune disorders. Data from clinical and genetic studies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus-prone mouse models, indicates that the type I interferon system may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of several lupus and associated clinical features, such as nephritis, neuropsychiatric and cutaneous lupus, premature atherosclerosis as well as lupus-specific autoantibodies particularly against ribonucleoproteins. In the current paper, our aim is to summarize the latest findings supporting the association of type I IFN pathway with specific clinical manifestations in the setting of SLE providing insights on the potential use of type I IFN as a therapeutic target.

Cyclosporin combined with methotrexate in two patients with recalcitrant subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

The treatment of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus is a therapeutic challenge. Frequently, patients are resistant to or intolerant towards single selected immunosuppressants. In combination, lower doses of methotrexate and cyclosporin A might be used to minimize toxicity. This is the first report of a successful combination of these drugs in two patients suffering from subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus refractory to standard treatment.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: update of therapeutic options part I

In patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), it is important to provide instructions concerning methods of protection from sunlight and artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation. Topical corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment for patients with CLE; however, they are of limited value because of their well-known side effects. Recently, calcineurin inhibitors have been shown to be efficient as topical therapy in various CLE subtypes. The first-line treatment for severe and widespread skin manifestations is antimalarials; hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine can each be combined with quinacrine in refractory CLE. Systemic steroids can be used additionally in exacerbations of the disease. In the first part of this review, recent information on topical and first-line systemic treatment is described in detail while providing the reader with up-to-date information on efficacy, side effects, and dosage for the various agents. In the second part, additional systemic agents for the treatment of CLE will be discussed.

[Successful therapy of discoid lupus erythematosus with efalizumab]

The therapy of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is occasionally a therapeutic challenge. Topical treatment is often not sufficient and therapy with antimalarials [(hydroxy-) chloroquine] not always successful. We report on a 50-year-old male patient with recalcitrant chronic DLE who experienced within 12 weeks at first improvement and then almost complete remission for 11 months after off-label application of the anti-CD11a antibody efalizumab.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: issues in diagnosis and treatment

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) may present in a variety of clinical forms. Three recognized subtypes of cutaneous LE are acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE), and chronic cutaneous LE (CCLE). ACLE may be localized (most often as a malar or 'butterfly' rash) or generalized. Multisystem involvement as a component of systemic LE (SLE) is common, with prominent musculoskeletal symptoms. SCLE is highly photosensitive, with predominant distribution on the upper back, shoulders, neck, and anterior chest. SCLE is frequently associated with positive anti-Ro antibodies and may be induced by a variety of medications. Classic discoid LE is the most common form of CCLE, with indurated scaly plaques on the scalp, face, and ears, with characteristic scarring and pigmentary change. Less common forms of CCLE include hyperkeratotic LE, lupus tumidus, lupus profundus, and chilblain lupus. Common cutaneous disease associated with, but not specific for, LE includes vasculitis, livedo reticularis, alopecia, digital manifestations such as periungual telangiectasia and Raynaud phenomenon, photosensitivity, and bullous lesions. The clinical presentation of each of these forms, their diagnosis, and the inter-relationships between cutaneous LE and SLE are discussed. Common systemic findings in SLE are reviewed, as are diagnostic strategies, including histopathology, immunopathology, serology, and other laboratory findings. Treatments for cutaneous LE initially include preventive (e.g. photoprotective) strategies and topical therapies (corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors). For skin disease not controlled with these interventions, oral antimalarial agents (most commonly hydroxychloroquine) are often beneficial. Additional systemic therapies may be subdivided into conventional treatments (including corticosteroids, methotrexate, thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone, and azathioprine) and newer immunomodulatory therapies (including efalizumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, and rituximab). We review evidence for the use of these medications in the treatment of cutaneous LE.

Identification of type I interferon-associated inflammation in the pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus opens up options for novel therapeutic approaches

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is one of the most common dermatological autoimmune disorders worldwide. Recently, several studies provided evidence for a pathogenic role of type I interferons (IFNs) in this disease. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are major type I IFN producers in CLE skin lesions. Type I IFNs are able to induce the expression of several proinflammatory chemokines, including CXCL9 and 10, and enhance the cytotoxic capacity of infiltrating cells. Additionally, adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1, cutaneous lymphocyte antigen, E-selectin, CCR4 and CXCR3, are involved in the recruitment of potentially autoreactive lymphocytes into the skin. Here, we review the role of type I IFNs, adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors in CLE and discuss options for novel therapeutic approaches.

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in recalcitrant cutaneous lupus erythematosus: results of a retrospective study in 43 patients

BACKGROUND

The therapy of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is often challenging, especially in patients resistant to topical treatment and established first-line systemic drugs such as antimalarials. Systemic corticosteroids are effective, but their use is limited due to well-known side-effects, especially in long-term treatment. In recent years several other immunosuppressive agents have been successfully applied in CLE. However, there are no large studies or explicit guidelines on the use of these drugs in CLE.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a retrospective investigation of the efficacy of low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of CLE.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-nine patients with CLE were seen at our department between 2001 and 2003, of whom 43 patients required low-dose MTX. All had histologically confirmed CLE lesions. Clinical data including disease activity, additional treatment, laboratory parameters and side-effects were recorded carefully at the time of presentation. Statistical analyses were performed by paired nonparametric Wilcoxon test and Student's t-test using SPSS 11 software.

RESULTS

MTX led to a highly significant (P < 0.01) decline in disease activity. An improvement of the cutaneous lesions was recorded in nearly all patients treated with MTX (42 of 43; 98%). Severe side-effects necessitating discontinuation of MTX treatment were recorded in seven patients (16%), which quickly resolved when MTX was discontinued. Life-threatening complications were not observed. Intravenous application was tolerated better than oral administration. Interestingly, we observed a significant increase in circulating lymphocyte numbers in patients with lymphopenia (< 1.0 x 10(9) cells L(-1)) prior to MTX treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports earlier findings reporting the efficacy of low-dose MTX in CLE lesions, particularly in recalcitrant clinical courses. MTX treatment appears to be safe if patients are carefully selected and monitored, with particular attention to side-effects and contraindications.