Mapping the current flow in sacral nerve stimulation using computational modelling

The Influence of Electrode Configuration Changes on the Sensory and Motor Response During (Re)Programming in Sacral Neuromodulation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the neurophysiological basis behind troubleshooting in sacral neuromodulation (SNM). Close follow-up of SNM patients with program parameter optimization has proven to be paramount by restoring clinical efficacy and avoiding surgical revision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 34 successful SNM patients (28 overactive bladder wet, six nonobstructive urinary retention) with an implantable pulse generator were included. All possible bipolar and monopolar electrode settings were tested at sensory threshold (ST) to evaluate sensory (mapped on a perineal grid with 1 cm² coordinates) and motor (peak-to-peak amplitude and latency of muscle action potential) responses of the pelvic floor. Pelvic floor muscle electromyography was recorded using a multiple array probe, placed intravaginally. Parametric tests were used for paired data: repeated-measures ANOVA or t-test. A nonparametric test was used for paired data: Friedman ANOVA or Wilcoxon signed rank (WSR) test; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. If significant, ANOVA was followed by Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Monopolar configurations showed significantly lower STs-1.38 ± 0.73 V vs 1.76 ± 0.89 V (paired t-test: p < 0.0001)-and presented with significantly higher peak-to-peak amplitudes-115.67 ± 79.03 μV vs 90.77 ± 80.55 μV (WSR: p = 0.005)-than bipolar configurations. When polarity was swapped, configurations with the cathode distal to the anode showed significantly lower STs, 1.73 ± 0.91 V vs 1.85 ± 0.87 V (paired t-test: p = 0.003), and mean peak-to-peak amplitudes, 81.32 ± 72.82 μV vs 100.21 ± 90.22 μV (WSR: p = 0.0001). Cathodal changes resulted in more changes in sensory responses than anodal changes (χ² test: p = 0.044). In cathodal changes only, peak-to-peak amplitudes were significantly higher when the distance between electrodes was maximally spread (WSR: p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

From a neurophysiological point of view, monopolar configurations stimulated more motor nerve fibers at lower STs, therefore providing more therapeutic efficiency. Swapping polarity or changing the position of the cathode led to different sensory and motor responses, serving as potential reprogramming options.

The science behind programming algorithms for sacral neuromodulation

AIM

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a widely adopted treatment for overactive bladder, non-obstructive urinary retention and faecal incontinence. In the majority, it provides sustained clinical benefit. However, it is recognized that, even for these patients, stimulation parameters (such as amplitude, electrode configuration, frequency and pulse width) may vary at both initial device programming and at reprogramming, the latter often being required to optimize effectiveness. Although some recommendations exist for SNM programming, the scientific data to support them are understood by few clinicians.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of the literature covering some of the science behind stimulating a mixed peripheral nerve and available preclinical data in the field of SNM. It covers electrode configuration, amplitude, frequency, pulse width and cycling considerations. The review is targeted at clinicians with an interest in the field and does not seek to provide exhaustive detail on basic neuroscience.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the science of neuromodulation provides some guiding principles for programming but these are broad. These principles are not refuted by preclinical data but specific parameters in clinical use are not strongly supported by animal data, even after the limitations of small and large animal models are considered. The review presents a shortlist of programming principles on a theoretical basis but acknowledges that current practice is as much derived from evolved experience as science.

Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice

Background

In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure.

Objective

Standardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed.

Methods

Systematic literature review and collective clinical experience report.

Results

The basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step‐by‐step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented.

Conclusions

Programming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow‐up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients.