Automatic detection of calcium phosphate deposit plugs at the terminal ends of kidney tubules

Clinical Applications of Machine Learning for Urolithiasis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Previous systematic reviews related to machine learning (ML) in urology often overlooked the literature related to endourology. Therefore, we aim to conduct a more focused systematic review examining the use of ML algorithms for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or urolithiasis. In addition, we are the first group to evaluate these articles using the STREAM-URO framework.

METHODS

Searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were conducted from inception through July 12, 2021. Keywords included those related to ML, endourology, urolithiasis, and BPH. Two reviewers screened the citations that were eligible for title, abstract and full-text screening, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Two reviewers extracted information from the studies, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. The data collected was then qualitatively synthesized by consensus. Two reviewers evaluated each article according to the STREAM-URO checklist with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

After identifying 459 unique citations, 63 articles were retained for data extraction. Most articles consisted of tabular (n=32) and computer vision (n=23) tasks. The two most common problem types were classification (n=40) and regression (n=12). In general, most studies utilized neural networks as their ML algorithm (n=36). Among the 63 studies retrieved, 58 were related to urolithiasis and five focused on BPH. The urolithiasis studies were designed for outcome prediction (n=20), stone classification (n=18), diagnostics (n=17), and therapeutics (n=3). The BPH studies were designed for outcome prediction (n=2), diagnostics (n=2), and therapeutics (n=1). On average, the urolithiasis and BPH articles met 13.8 (SD 2.6), and 13.4 (4.1) of the 26 STREAM-URO framework criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the retrieved studies successfully helped with outcome prediction, diagnostics, and therapeutics for both urolithiasis and BPH. While ML shows great promise in improving patient care, it is important to adhere to the recently developed STREAM-URO framework to ensure the development of high-quality ML studies.

Endoscopic Papillary Abnormalities and Stone Recognition (EPSR) during Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comprehensive Review

Introduction: The increasing efficiency of the different lasers and the improved performance of endoscopic devices have led to smaller stone fragments that impact the accuracy of microscopic evaluation (morphological and infrared). Before the stone destruction, the urologist has the opportunity to analyze the stone and the papillary abnormalities endoscopically (endoscopic papillary recognition (EPR) and endoscopic stone recognition (ESR)). Our objective was to evaluate the value for those endoscopic descriptions. Methods: The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched in February 2021 for studies on endoscopic papillary recognition and endoscopic stone recognition. Results: If the ESR provided information concerning the main crystallization process, EPR provided information concerning the origin of the lithogenesis and its severity. Despite many actual limitations, those complementary descriptions could support the preventive care of the stone formers in improving the diagnosis of the lithogenesis mechanism and in identifying high-risk stone formers. Conclusion: Until the development of an Artificial Intelligence recognition, the endourologist has to learn EPSR to minimize the distortion effect of the new lasers on the stone analysis and to improve care efficiency of the stone formers patients.