[Plaque control, a key element of successful orthodontics]

Periodontal status following orthodontic mini-screw insertion: A prospective clinical split-mouth study

BACKGROUND

Anchorage control is one of the most important determinants of orthodontic treatments. Mini-screws are used to achieve the desired anchorage. Despite all their advantages, there is a possibility that treatment will not be successful due to conditions related to their interaction with the periodontal tissue.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the status of the periodontal tissue at the sites adjacent to the orthodontic mini-implants.

METHODS

A total of 34 teeth (17 case and 17 control) in 17 orthodontic patients requiring a mini-screw in the buccal area to proceed with their treatment were included in the study. Oral health instruction was provided to the patients prior to the intervention. In addition, scaling and root planing of the root surface were done using manual instruments and ultrasonic instruments if needed. For tooth anchorage, a mini-screw with Elastic Chain or Coil Spring was used. The following periodontal indices were examined in the mini-screw receiving tooth and the contralateral tooth: plaque index, pocket probing depth, attached gingiva level (AG), and gingival index. Measurements were made before the placement of the mini-screws and 1, 2, and 3 months following that.

RESULTS

The results revealed a significant difference only in the amount of AG between the tooth with mini-screw and the control tooth (p = 0.028); for other periodontal indices, there were no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that periodontal indices in adjacent teeth of the mini-screws do not change significantly compared to other teeth and mini-screws can be used as a suitable anchorage without posing a threat to the periodontal health. Using mini-screws is a safe intervention for orthodontic treatments.

Orthodontic appliances did not increase risk of dental caries and periodontal disease under preventive protocol

OBJECTIVES

To assess periodontal parameters and microbial species levels after orthodontic appliance placement in patients who received oral hygiene instructions and who were monitored and motivated throughout the study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Periodontal Index was recorded and saliva collection was performed before (T0) and 30 (T1), 60 (T2), and 90 (T3) days after orthodontic appliance placement in 15 patients (mean age 17.53 ± 8.0 years). Analysis was carried out using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. Nonparametric statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The Periodontal Index did not change. The total amount of the purple and red complexes and Candida species showed a significant decrease from T2. The green, yellow, and orange complex showed a significant decrease at T3. The specific species analysis showed that Prevotella nigrescens, Pseudomonas putida, Fusobacterium periodonticum, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, and Tanerella forsythia showed high incidence before bonding, and their levels decreased at T2 and T3. Only Porphyromonas gingivalis showed increased levels at T2 and displayed the highest level at T3. The Streptococcus group decreased their levels from T2 onward.

CONCLUSIONS

A dynamic change in microbial levels was identified. The decrease in the levels of complexes present was only possible due to the mechanical method of oral hygiene implemented in this sample.

Microbial complexes levels in conventional and self-ligating brackets

OBJECTIVES

The aims were to evaluate the levels of bacterial species in saliva and in situ and to assess whether the design of brackets influences the risk of developing periodontal disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients (13.3 mean age) were bonded with self-ligating brackets and a conventional bracket. Saliva was collected before bonding and 30 and 60 days after bonding. One sample of each bracket was removed 30 and 60 days after bonding. The analysis was determined by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization. The data was evaluated by the non-parametric test.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the levels of bacterial species in the saliva occurred in 15 of the 22 analyzed species. The self-ligating brackets presented the highest incidence percentages for the orange and red complexes 60 days after bonding. In situ analyses showed different patterns according to the bracket design. The levels of Campylobacter rectus showed significant differences (p = 0.011) 60 days after bonding among the three brackets; the highest values were observed in the In-Ovation®R bracket.

CONCLUSIONS

The bracket design seems to influence the levels of bacterial species involved in periodontal disease. Considering the wide variety of bacterial species, additional studies are needed to aid in the establishment of effective protocols to prevent the development of periodontal disease during orthodontic treatment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A dynamic alteration in the oral microbiota may lead to inflammatory reactions in the supporting soft and hard tissues. The different types of brackets interfere with bacterial adherence. Bracket design should be considered in orthodontic treatment.

How to recognize the eight signs of periodontitis?

Orthodontics contributes to improving self-esteem and function. However, a common refrain in ortho-perio relationships states that orthodontics has no deleterious effects on the healthy or reduced and treated periodontium. Though supported for decades, this idea has now been heavily challenged by a recent systematic review of the literature. The conclusion of this article is unfortunately very clear. There is a lack of reliable evidence showing the beneficial effects of orthodontic treatment on periodontal health with, at best, mild adverse effects. How can we reduce the periodontal cost of orthodontic treatment to a minimum? How can we ensure that this "at best" does not turn into "at worst"? To minimize the adverse effects of orthodontic treatment on periodontal tissues, the orthodontist must be able to determine to which patients he/she can consider providing orthodontic treatment and those for whom prior periodontal treatment is mandatory. In addition to the items collected for an orthodontic diagnosis, the orthodontist must be able to recognize the eight signs of attachment loss.