Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a tendon graft: a biomechanical study comparing a novel "sutured throughout" tendon graft to a standard tendon graft

Surgical treatments for acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations

INTRODUCTION

Surgical treatment is usually recommended for acute, high-grade acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries. A wide variety of surgical techniques exist, and the literature does not strongly support one over the other. In this literature review, we describe and compare the results of different surgical treatments for the management of acute unstable ACJ dislocation and aim to guide surgeons on optimal treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed by searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Only studies with comparative data were included. The clinical and radiological outcomes of these studies were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in this literature review. We found no difference in outcomes between open and arthroscopic procedures. Coracoclavicular ligament (CCL) reconstruction techniques provide better results than the more rigid hook plate fixation. There is no evidence that biologic repair with tendon graft is superior to synthetic grafts. Furthermore, an autograft is not shown to be better than an allograft. Rigid fixation between the clavicle and coracoid and the non-anatomic Weaver-Dunn technique appears less popular in recent literature. The hook plate is associated with subacromial osteolysis, acromial erosion, and the morbidity of a secondary procedure.

DISCUSSION

There is a recent increase in publications on the reconstruction of the ACJ after injury, with new techniques focusing on the anatomic reconstruction of the CCLs aiming to restore both vertical and horizontal plane stability of the ACJ using synthetic/biological grafts. Despite the plethora of new techniques introduced, meaningful comparisons are difficult to draw due to the heterogeneity of the treatments used and the outcome measure used to assess the results.

Soft tissue reconstruction on the very late presenting neglected acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood type IV. A case report

Introduction and importance

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation Rockwood type IV is a rare condition characterized by the posterior displacement of the distal clavicle and soft tissue damage. The rate of soft tissue healing markedly decreases as time from injury increases. In this case report, we had a very late presenting neglected AC joint dislocation Rockwood type IV successfully treated by AC and coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction.

Case presentation

A 24-year-old female presented with pain around her right shoulder since a motorcycle accident four years prior to current presentation. She was diagnosed with a posterior AC joint dislocation and suggested undergoing surgery, but she refused and chose to seek an alternative treatment. The patient felt pain chronically and could not elevate her shoulder, and she decided to come to our hospital. We performed a physical and radiograph examination that showed an AC joint dislocation Rockwood type IV. The management, suggested to the patient, was AC and CC soft tissue reconstruction.

Clinical discussion

The advantages of using this procedure were to restore effective anatomy and avoid bone-to-bone contact between the clavicle and acromion. The disadvantages were increased cost and needed to be evaluated for long-term results. We considered the idea of maintaining AC joint reduction by biologic soft tissue healing of the graft and augmentation fixation to replace the CC ligaments. We could not rely on biological soft tissues healing themselves due to the chronicity.

Conclusion

AC and CC reconstruction can be an option of treatment in neglected AC joint dislocation Rockwood type IV with excellent clinical and radiographic results.

•

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation Rockwood type IV is a rare condition.

•

Soft tissue reconstruction on the neglected acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood type IV gives excellent clinical and radiographic results.

•

The advantages of using these procedures were restoring effective alignment between the clavicle and acromion and reconstructing the acromioclavicular (AC) ligament and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament.

Arthroscopic Anatomical Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction using a Button Device and a Semitendinosus Graft

Objective

To report a new technique for anatomical acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction.

Methods

In order to minimize such complications, the authors describe a new anatomical and biological AC joint repair. This technique aims to provide greater stability by using two anatomically placed clavicular tunnels and a combined construct with a double endobutton cortical fixation for primary stabilization, and to be biologically advantageous by using an autologous semitendinosus (ST) tendon graft. Additionally, the coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction is complemented with an AC joint cerclage and capsular reinforcement, which will protect the biological construction in its initial stage of healing.

Results

This technique provides adequate primary and secondary biomechanical stability by passing both a semitendinosus autogenous graft and a double endobutton device, through anatomically placed and small diameter clavicle holes, without the need for coracoid drilling. Our technique showed encouraging results regarding pain resolution, range of motion, and function. At final follow‐up we experienced excellent results with average pain score of 1.6, and average ROM of 159° of forward flexion, 160° of abduction, 68° of external rotation, and internal rotation level at T11. Postoperative function also showed great improvements with average ASES of 85 points, an average Constant Score of 87 and a Subjective Shoulder Value of 89 points. This technique also achieved perfectly acceptable radiographic results, with an average coracoclavicular distance increase of 0.8 mm. Regarding complications, our sample showed one case of AC join subluxation, two cases of internal saphenous nerve injury, and two partial graft tears at the suture‐button interface, with none of these requiring surgical revision.

Conclusion

This technique is advantageous in treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation and can be performed in both the subacute and chronic setting.

Anchorless Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Repair Using a Graft-Passing Instrument to Pass Suture Under the Coracoid

Acromioclavicular joint separation is a common shoulder injury. Grade I and II separation may be treated nonoperatively, whereas higher grades tend to require surgical intervention. Various repair techniques have been described in the literature, with no consensus on the gold standard. This Technical Note describes our use of a graft-passing instrument to pass suture under the coracoid during an anatomic reconstruction of both the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments. Although this approach is technically challenging, it avoids coracoid drilling and requires smaller-diameter clavicle and acromion drilling. Furthermore, using suture instead of graft material increases the cost-effectiveness of the procedure.

Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To compare the stability and cost of the used implants in nonanatomic and anatomic acromioclavicular joint repair/reconstruction (ACCR) techniques tested in cadaveric shoulder biomechanical studies during the last decade.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library databases. Studies evaluating 3-direction stability under 70-N loads and load-to-failure protocols with servohydraulic testing systems were included. A meta-analysis of the mean differences of anterior, posterior, and superior direction; relative stability value in 3 directions; superior direction load-to-failure; stability/cost index; and load-to-failure/cost index was performed using a continuous random-effects model and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Eighteen articles were included. Both non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and load-to-failure. ACCR techniques were biomechanically better in terms of anterior stability (P = .04) and relative stability value (mean difference 64.08%, P = .015). However, supraphysiological stability and failure loads were achieved with non-ACCR techniques at a lower cost of implants. Techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes had the greatest stability/cost index and load-to-failure/cost index among the included techniques (confidence interval 99%).

Conclusions

Non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and failure loads in controlled biomechanical testing. However, non-ACCR and techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes provide supraphysiologic stability and failure loads at a lower cost of implants.

Clinical Relevance

Non-ACCR and suture-based techniques may provide more cost-effective and greater value treatment for acromioclavicular joint injury and could be considered in the surgical management of normal activity individuals and cost-sensitive populations.

Acromio-Clavicular Joint Dislocation Types IV to VI: Does the Outcome with the modified Weaver-Dunn Procedure Justify the Treatment?

Introduction: The optimal surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries remains controversial. The modified Weaver-Dunn (WD) procedure is one of the frequently used techniques. Recently when it was compared with anatomical autogenous tendon graft reconstruction procedures, the results were inferior. However, these anatomical procedures are technically more demanding with small margin of error and they have tendency for postoperative pain because of extra donor site incision.

Materials and Methods: Forty patients with type IV to VI ACJ dislocations were treated by modified WD procedure using non-absorbable synthetic suture passed through the base of coracoid process for augmentation of transferred coraco-acromial (CA) ligament. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score, Nottingham Clavicular Score and Visual Analog Score (VAS) at the final follow-up after surgery.

Results: The mean pre-operative Oxford Shoulder Score improved from 25.22±2.64 (range 20 to 30) to 44.75±1.99 (range 40 to 48) and mean pre-operative Nottingham Shoulder Score improved from 49.25±4.91 (range 39 to 58) to 87.27±4.39 (range 79 to 96) at last follow-up after surgery with p-value <0.001. Thirty-five (87.5%) patients had excellent outcomes, four (10%) patients had good outcomes and one (2.5%) patient had fair outcome. Thirty-eight (95%) patients had no pain while two (5%) had moderate pain based on VAS score.

Conclusion: Modified Weaver-Dunn is a simple well established technique for grade IV to VI ACJ dislocation. We cannot consider this procedure as old and outdated on the argument that the long term functional outcomes are not suboptimal.