Early outcome after the use of the triceps fascia flap in interposition elbow arthroplasty: a novel method in the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness

Elbow stiffness due to malunited capitellum fracture: A case report and the role of 3D printing in surgical management

INTRODUCTION

Elbow stiffness is an uncommon condition that significantly impacting a patient's daily activities. Trauma is the most frequent cause of elbow stiffness. However, capitellum fractures are rare, accounting for approximately 1 % of elbow fractures. They are often misdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptoms and the complex anatomy of the elbow joint.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 54-year-old female who presented with left elbow stiffness eight months after a traumatic incident. On physical examination, her left elbow extension was +10°, and flexion was restricted to 65°, with no limitation in pronation or supination. Imaging studies revealed a malunited capitellum with osteophytes at the posterolateral site of the olecranon. A 3D-printed model of her elbow was created based on a CT scan to aid surgical planning. She underwent capsulectomy and osteotomy and was stabilized with two bioabsorbable P(L/DL)LA pins. Six months postoperatively, the patient's elbow range of motion was fully restored, and no complications were observed.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Elbow stiffness resulting from the malunion of a capitellum fracture typically necessitates surgical intervention to restore functional movement in the elbow.

CONCLUSION

Capitellum fractures are uncommon and frequently underdiagnosed, leading to complications such as elbow stiffness and reduced functionality. Early detection is crucial, as delayed diagnosis can result in complex management due to malunion. 3D printing from CT scans helps surgeons accurately evaluate malunions and plan precise surgical interventions.

Interposition Arthroplasty in an Acute Setting to Treat Unexpected Denuded Distal Humerus Articular Cartilage After AO 13C2.2 Distal Humerus Fracture, Surgical Technique, and a Case Report

Restoring elbow joint motion is paramount for upper extremity optimum function. In end-stage elbow disease and stiffness, total elbow arthroplasty is the recommended option for older patients; however, for younger, highly demanding patients, interposition arthroplasty (IPA) is the management option of choice. We report a case of an 16-year-old female patient who presented after she had an open-grade IIIA, type AO 13C2.2 distal humerus fracture, which was managed initially by debridement and a cross-elbow external fixation. The decision was made to manage the fracture by open reduction and internal fixation through a posterior approach, and after performing an olecranon osteotomy, the surgeon found that the distal humerus segment was denuded of articular cartilage, so a decision was made after consulting the patient's parents to perform an IPA using fascia lata. At the final follow-up after 16 months, the fracture united completely, and the elbow ROM was from 15° to 120°. Interposition arthroplasty is a valid option to manage unexpected denuded distal humerus articular cartilage while managing distal humerus fractures.

Functional Outcomes Following Interposition Elbow Arthroplasty Using Fascia Lata Graft for Post-Traumatic Elbow Osteoarthritis Without Ligament Reconstruction: A Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up Study

Purpose

Elbow osteoarthritis is a debilitating disease for patients. Surgical options are to be considered when conservative management becomes unsatisfactory. Total elbow arthroplasty is an effective surgical option for patients older than 65 years and those with a sedentary lifestyle. Meanwhile, interposition elbow arthroplasty is suitable for young, high-demand patients. The retrospective study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of interposition elbow arthroplasty for elbow osteoarthritis.

Methods

Eight patients who underwent interposition elbow arthroplasty from 2018 to 2020 in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Interposition elbow arthroplasty was performed using fascia lata autografts. Mayo elbow performance score; disability of arm, shoulder, and hand scores; and range of motion were evaluated and compared with that of the preoperative state.

Results

The mean Mayo elbow performance score significantly improved from 53.7 ± 14.6 (before surgery) to 85.6 ± 12.1 (after surgery). The mean disability of arm, shoulder, and hand score also significantly improved from 93.1 ± 11.8 (before surgery) to 57.5 ± 15.9 (after surgery). The mean arc of motion increased by 85.8°, from a mean before surgery value of 6.2° ± 5.8° to 92.0° ± 34.0° after surgery. Satisfaction rate was 92.5%.

Conclusions

Interposition elbow arthroplasty is a nonprosthetic reconstruction that respects the joint and does not burn any bridge for further total elbow arthroplasty if needed. It provides favorable surgical outcomes with high satisfaction rates among young patients with elbow osteoarthritis.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Long-term outcomes of open arthrolysis combined with radial head arthroplasty for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: results are durable over 8 years

BACKGROUND

Post-trauma elbow stiffness (PTES) is a common complication after elbow trauma that causes severe upper limb disability. Open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) with radial head arthroplasty (RHA) is an effective method to treat PTES with rotation limitation, or persistent pain/instability after radial head resection. However, no long-term results have been reported for this technique. This study aimed to show the clinical and radiographic outcomes of OEA with RHA over 8 years and compare its efficacy at 3 years (short-term).

METHODS

Patients with PTES treated by OEA with RHA between September 2010 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen patients were followed up over 8 years (range, 100-106 months). A bipolar prosthesis of RHA was performed during OEA. Preoperative, 3-year, and 8-year elbow and forearm motion, upper limb function, radiographic outcomes, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Clinically important improvements in elbow motion and forearm rotation were obtained, from 34° and 58° preoperatively, to 109° and 135° at 3 years, which were maintained over 8 years, to 113° (P = .262) and 134° (P = .489). The Mayo Elbow Performance Index had clinically important increases from the preoperative level of 58 to 94 points at 3 years, and was maintained over 8 years (95 points, P = .422), with 100% reporting excellent to good outcomes. Pain and nerve symptoms were also improved. Complications consisted of new-onset ulnar nerve symptoms in 1 patient, nonclinically significant heterotopic ossification recurrence in 3, humeroulnar arthritis exacerbation in 4, and periprosthetic lucency in 8.

CONCLUSIONS

OEA with RHA yielded satisfactory short-term outcomes for PTES at 3 years, with substantial improvements in elbow mobility and function, and the results were durable over the long term (8 years).

Interposition arthroplasty: Current indications, technique and expectations

The ultimate means of functional restoration of joints with end stage arthritis is prosthetic replacement. Even though there is reluctance to replace the joint of a younger individual, the mean age of joint replacement continues to decrease. This is due to three factors: 1) social expectations, 2) uncertainty with many joint preservation procedures and 3) the ever-increasing reliability and longevity of prosthetic replacement. Unfortunately, the elbow does not share in these advantageous trends to the extent as is the case for the hip, knee and shoulder. Social pressure for restoration of normal or near normal function is certainly present, but the desired improvement of longevity and fewer restrictions of activity have not been documented. Hence, possibly somewhat disproportionately to other joints, there is great need for a reliable and functional non replacement joint reconstruction option. For most other joints, fusion is the ultimate non replacement option. Further, for most joints an optimum position has been defined to allow the greatest chance of normal function of the individual. Unfortunately, there is no truly 'optimum' functional position of elbow fusion, and the recommended 90° of flexion is considered the 'least worse' position. Further, unfortunately, elbow fusion dysfunction cannot be mitigated by compensated shoulder motion. Hence, while there is little experience in general with interposition arthroplasty of the elbow, in the authors' opinion it remains the treatment of choice in some individuals and in certain circumstances for the reasons explained above. In our judgment, the reason for avoiding this procedure is that it is technically difficult, the absolute frequency of need is not great, and outcomes do appear to be a function of experience and technique. Based on these considerations, in this chapter we review the current indications and assessment and selection considerations. Emphasis is placed on our current technique with technical tips to enhance the likelihood of success and longevity. We conclude with a review of expectations based on current literature.

Interpositional elbow arthroplasty using fascia lata autograft in stiff elbow: Case series of 8 patients

INTRODUCTION

Constrain of a total elbow replacement and elbow arthrodesis are too much for the working population to bear. As such interpositional elbow arthroplasty using fascia lata autologous graft to reconstruct the elbow joint is a viable option in this age group.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

8 patients were operated for arthritic stiff elbow, and joint reconstruction was done using fascia lata autologous graft, with out the use of any hinged external fixator. Pre-operative and post-operative functional assessment was done using Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and statistically measured using a paired t-test. Result There was significant improvement in range of motion in coronal (flexion-extension) and axial (supination-protonation) with p-value of <0.001. The mean pre-operative MEPI increased from 40.6 points to 91.9 points (p < 0.0001). All parameters of MEPI had statistically significant improvement with exception of stability (p-value = 0.0824).

Open elbow arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: an update

Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging for upper limb surgeons. Open elbow arthrolysis is commonly used for the treatment of stiff elbow when conservative therapy has failed. Multiple questions commonly arise from surgeons who deal with this disease. These include whether the patient has post-traumatic stiff elbow, how to evaluate the problem, when surgery is appropriate, how to perform an excellent arthrolysis, what the optimal postoperative rehabilitation is, and how to prevent or reduce the incidence of complications. Following these questions, this review provides an update and overview of post-traumatic elbow stiffness with respect to the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, arthrolysis strategies, postoperative rehabilitation, and prevention of complications, aiming to provide a complete diagnosis and treatment path. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:576-584.