Outcome analysis of chest pain patients discharged from the ED--a pilot study

Predictors of Adverse Outcomes of Patients with Chest Pain and Primary Diagnosis of Non-Cardiac Pain at the Time of Discharge from Emergency Department: A 30-Days Prospective Study

Background

Chest pain is a common symptom for referring patients to emergency departments (ED). Among those referred, some are admitted to hospitals with a definite or tentative diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome and some are discharged with primary diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain. This study aimed at investigating 30 days' adverse outcomes of patients discharged from ED of a major heart center in Iran.

Methods

Out of 1638 chest pain admissions to the centre during 2010–2011, 962 patients (mean age= 50.9±15.9 years) who were admitted to Afshar Heart Center's ED with chest pain as their chief complaint, and discharged with primary diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain, were followed for any adverse cardiac events 30 days post discharge. The adverse events were: unstable angina, non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), coronary revascularization (percutaneous angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting) and death.

Results

Adverse cardiac events, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS), revascularization and death were observed in 30 patients (3.1%) including: acute MI n=5 (0.5%, sudden cardiac death inn=1 (0.1%, coronary revascularization in n=8 (0.8%) and hospitalization due to unstable angina/NSTEMI in n=16 (1–7%). Adverse events were seen more frequently in patients with history of hypertension, dyslipidemia and previous coronary artery disease. In univariate analysis, the chance of postdischarge adverse cardiac events was higher in patients with hypertension (OR=9.36, CI=3.24–27.03), previous coronary artery disease (OR= 3.8, CI=1.78–8.0), dyslipidemia (OR=3.5, CI=1.7–7.38) and discharge against medical advice (OR=2.85, CI= 1.37–5.91).

Conclusion

The extent of adverse cardiac events in patients with a primary diagnosis of non-cardiac chest pain within 30 days of discharge was significant, mandating nation-wide registries to provide better care for these patients.

Short-term risk after initial observation for chest pain

Few studies have evaluated the necessity of immediate stress testing after observation for chest pain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of outpatient stress testing after discharge from a chest pain unit. We hypothesized that discharge from a chest pain unit before stress testing is associated with a low rate of short-term adverse outcomes. This was a retrospective chart review of managed care patients discharged from the chest pain unit before the performance of stress testing. Records were reviewed for the occurrence of adverse cardiac outcomes before an outpatient stress test up to 60 days post-discharge. Primary outcomes were defined as death or myocardial infarction, and secondary outcomes as readmission for chest pain evaluation, unstable angina, or congestive heart failure. Three hundred forty-four patients were identified. One hundred sixty-six patients had either a recent prior stress test (17) or an outpatient test (149) performed within 60 days of discharge. During that time, 2 patients (0.6%) had a fatal out-of-hospital cardiac event, and there were 27 subsequent chest pain visits to the Emergency Department by 24 patients (7.0%). Nine patients (2.6%) were admitted to the hospital and 10 (2.9%) were readmitted to the observation unit for chest pain. We conclude that patients who have negative serial electrocardiograms and enzyme testing in a chest pain unit are at low risk for short-term cardiac events. Appropriately selected patients may be discharged for subsequent outpatient testing.

A comparison trial for stratifying intermediate-risk chest pain: benefits of emergency department observation centers

Chest pain of uncertain etiology (intermediate-risk chest pain [IR-CP]) constitutes a majority of acute chest pain presentations to emergency departments (EDs). A before- and-after trial of 2197 IR-CP patients transferred from the hospital's ED to one of three units-ED-based observation center (ED-OC), inpatient observation center (IN-OC), and inpatient units-compared mean cost, length of stay, and safety over a 2-year period. The mean per patient cost for management of IR-CP was lower in the ED-OC ($1642) than the IN-OC ($1910) or the inpatient units ($2785). The mean length of stay was shorter in the ED-OC (0.75 days) than in the IN-OC (1.18 days) or the inpatient units (2.16 days). Return rates were lower in the ED-OC at 7 days (0%) and at 6 months (0.45%) than the IN-OC (0% and 1.22%) or the inpatient units (0.77% and 3.67%). Overall hospital costs for managing IR-CP dropped significantly (12.5%) after the ED-OC was opened. ED-OCs provide a safe and cost-effective alternative to admission of IR-CP patients.