Efficacy Endpoints Conference on Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: review of the conference questionnaire

Practice Patterns in the Treatment and Monitoring of Acute T Cell-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection in Canada

Background

One of the goals of the Canadian National Transplant Research Program (CNTRP) is to develop novel therapies for acute rejection that could positively affect graft outcomes with greater efficacy or less toxicity. To develop innovative management strategies for kidney graft rejection, new modalities need to be compared with current clinical practices. However, there are no standardized practices concerning the management of acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR).

Objectives

To describe clinicians' practice patterns in the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of acute TCMR in Canada.

Design

Survey.

Setting Patients/Participants

Canadian transplant nephrologists and transplant surgeons involved in the management of acute TCMR.

Methods and Measurements

We developed an anonymous, web-based survey consisting of questions related to the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of TCMR. The survey was disseminated on 3 occasions between June and October 2016 through the Canadian Society of Transplantation (CST) kidney group electronic mailing list.

Results

Forty-seven respondents, mostly transplant nephrologists (97%), originating from at least 18 of the 25 Canadian centers offering adult or pediatric kidney transplantation, participated in the study. Surveillance biopsies were used by 28% of respondents to screen for kidney graft rejection. High-dose steroids were used by most of the respondents to treat clinical and subclinical Banff grade 1A and 1B rejections. Nine percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-17) of practitioners used lymphocyte-depleting agents as the first-line approach for the treatment of Banff grade 1B acute rejection. Eighteen percent (95% CI: 7-29) and 36% (95% CI: 8-65) of respondents reported that they would not use high-dose steroids for treating clinical and subclinical borderline rejections, respectively. Seventy percent (95% CI: 54-83) of respondents answered that there was no indication to assess histological response to treatment independent of the change in kidney function.

Limitations

The limitations of this study are its limited sample size and the low representation of pediatric specialists.

Conclusions

There is heterogeneity regarding the use of surveillance biopsies, treatment of borderline rejection, and modalities to monitor treatment response among transplant physicians. Our results illustrate the current state of practice patterns across Canada and can be used to inform the design of future trials.

Advances in pharmacotherapy to treat kidney transplant rejection

INTRODUCTION

Current immunosuppressive combination therapy provides excellent prevention of T-cell-mediated rejection following renal transplantation; however, antibody-mediated rejection remains of high concern and accounts for a large number of long-term allograft losses. The recent development of protocol biopsies resulted in the definition of subclinical rejection (SCR), showing histologic evidence for rejection but unremarkable clinical course.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the current knowledge and evidence of pharmacotherapy to treat kidney allograft rejections and covers SCR treatment options. Each substance is analyzed with regard to its classical indication and further discussed for the treatment of other forms of rejection.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a lack of randomized trials, early acute T-cell-mediated rejection can be treated effectively in most cases without graft loss. The necessity to treat SCR is currently unclear. Due to a lack of effective therapies, new treatment approaches for antibody-mediated rejection are an urgent medical need to improve long-term outcomes. Future research should aim to better define pathophysiology and histology, stratify risk, and develop rational treatment strategies from randomized controlled trials, in order to establish the value of novel therapies in the arsenal of rejection pharmacotherapy. However, the effective prevention of rejection with minimal side effects still remains the goal in immunosuppression.

Using individual DSA titers to assess for accommodation after late humoral rejection

Management of late humoral rejection remains challenging, and DSA may persist. A case report illustrates how individual DSA titers using solid-phase-based assays may help to assess for accommodation. A male cystinosis patient received a cadaveric renal transplant at the age of 12 yr with a daclizumab, tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids-based immunosuppression. After three acute rejection episodes over the first eight months, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) was diagnosed on biopsy, while the immunosuppression was left unchanged with a high target exposure for both tacrolimus and MPA. One yr later, AMR type III (C4d and DSA positive) was treated with daily plasmapheresis, IVIG 100 mg/kg and pulse steroids 5 mg/kg. DSA (DR 53, DQ4, and DQ 2) were not responding until the plasma volume was increased to 2.5 plasma volumes. A second rise of creatinine confirmed worse humoral rejection; daily plasma exchange was resumed, and two doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) were given. Subsequently, all DSA dropped, but only DR53 DSA remained unchanged, whereas the DQ antibodies rebounded to very strong titers. With a follow-up of over 120 days after recovery of the CD19 count, off all additional treatment and on identical immunosuppression with tacrolimus and MMF and prednisone, the patient's creatinine remained stable between 45 and 50 um while DQ DSA remain strong to very strong. We conclude that the patient is in a state of accommodation. DSA titers should be monitored when managing late humoral rejection.

Steroid-resistant acute allograft rejection in renal transplantation

Steroid-resistant rejection after pediatric renal transplantation forms a rare but severe complication with a guarded prognosis particularly if this occurs late after transplantation. There is a paucity of data on how to manage these challenging rejection episodes, particularly in the pediatric literature. Mohan Shenoy et al. published a case series of 15 patients who were treated with anti-thymocyte globulin for steroid-resistant acute allograft rejection over a 15-year period in a single center in this issue of Pediatric Nephrology. While the results for the early rejection group were encouraging, the results in the eight patients with late rejection episodes after transplantation were unfavorable and afflicted with a high incidence of side-effects. Important diagnostic tools such as C4d staining of the renal transplant biopsy and the measurement of donor-specific antibodies were underutilized. The editorial reviews the importance of the differentiation between humoral and cellular rejection and the challenges of treating late antibody-mediated acute rejection in these patients. A multi-center approach is required to establish a registry of these events and ideally prospective randomized interventions should be designed to provide some evidence base for the management of this challenging complication after pediatric renal transplantation.

OKT3 Therapy in Addition to Tacrolimus Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Function in Patients with Steroid Refractory Renal Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term allograft salvage rates of patients with steroid refractory allograft rejection after kidney transplantation and to identify factors indicating a successful outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with continuing rejection after high-dose steroids were included in the study. Baseline immunosuppression was switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in all patients. Twenty patients additionally received OKT3 as antirejection therapy. Patients having received a cadaveric renal transplant in 1995, excluding patients with steroid resistant rejection, were chosen as a control cohort.

RESULTS

Patient survival rates were 96% (n = 48) and 90% (n = 45) and allograft survival rates were 66% (n = 33) and 62% (n = 31) after 5 and 7 years following steroid refractory renal allograft rejection. Graft survival within the control cohort was 73% after 5 years and 69% after 7 years. Creatinine clearance increased from 20 +/- 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 at the start of tacrolimus therapy to 37 +/- 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 and to 32 +/- 26 ml/min/1.73 m2 after 5 and 7 years. OKT3 treatment predicted successful rescue therapy (p = 0.005 and p = 0.04 after 5 and 7 years).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate a reasonable graft survival in steroid refractory renal allograft rejection using tacrolimus. OKT3 treatment in addition to tacrolimus therapy may be beneficial for long-term allograft survival.

Therapy for acute rejection in pediatric organ transplant recipients

Despite the availability of potent immunosuppressive drugs, rejection after organ transplantation in children remains a serious concern, and may lead to significant morbidity, graft loss, and death of the patient. Acute graft rejection in pediatric recipients is first treated with methylprednisolone pulses, followed by progressive taper of corticosteroid doses. After control of the rejection episode, baseline immunosuppression has to be adjusted and closely monitored since rejection (especially late episodes, occurring more than 6 months after transplantation) may be due to a lack of compliance or sub-therapeutic drug concentrations. The management of corticosteroid resistant rejection is not standardized, and depends on the transplanted organ and previous immunosuppressive regimen. In patients experiencing corticosteroid resistant acute rejection while on a cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen, cyclosporine is generally changed to tacrolimus. In case of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, tacrolimus blood levels may be increased, and/or mycophenolate mofetil (which nowadays tends to replace azathioprine) or sirolimus may be added, although pharmacodynamic data and clinical studies with these agents are still scarce in pediatric recipients. The use of antithymocyte globulins or monoclonal anti-CD3 antibodies, muromonab CD3 (OKT3) is hampered by numerous adverse effects, including a significant risk of over-immunosuppression. These therapies are nowadays indicated in very selected cases. Other treatments such as plasmapheresis and high dose immunoglobulins may be useful in difficult cases. In patients with refractory rejection despite therapeutic escalation, the risks of over-immunosuppression, including opportunistic infections and malignancies (especially the Epstein-Barr virus related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease) have to be balanced with the consequences of graft loss due to rejection. Detransplantation or retransplantation may, in some instances, be preferable to severe infectious or tumoral complications.