Genetic polymorphisms and transplantation

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay for donor-reactive interferon-gamma-producing cells identifies T-cell presensitization and correlates with graft function at 6 and 12 months in renal-transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

A major goal in clinical transplantation is the individualization of immunosuppression. This requires a definition of markers that identify patients at heightened risk of acute rejection and immune-mediated chronic allograft nephropathy.

METHODS

Frequencies of interferon-gamma-producing donor-reactive cells were serially determined in unselected renal-transplant patients in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay (ELISPOT) before transplantation (n = 42) and up to 10 (mean 5.0) times during the first 6 months posttransplantation (n = 48) to determine detailed kinetics and analyze for correlation with acute rejection and graft function at 6 and 12 months posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Pretransplant ELISPOT frequencies were significantly higher in patients with acute rejection (16/42) versus nonrejecters (26/42). Highly elevated pretransplant frequencies (>200 spots/300,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs], n = 5/42) were associated with a risk of severe acute rejection episodes but were independent of risk factors such as high panel reactive antibodies. Early graft failure exclusively occurred in this group. Importantly, mean ELISPOT frequencies at weeks 2 and 3 but not at month 6 posttransplant correlated inversely with 6 and 12 months glomerular filtration rate. The correlation between ELISPOT frequencies and renal function showed the highest significance in patients without acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The pretransplant ELISPOT assay might be useful to identify T-cell presensitized patients, who are at heightened risk for severe early acute rejection. An analysis of ELISPOT donor-reactive cells during the early posttransplant period might allow an identification of patients at risk for immune-mediated graft deterioration.

Assessment by flow cytometry of intracellular cytokine production in the peripheral blood cells of renal transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

There is accumulating evidence that non-invasive immune monitoring may be useful in the early period after renal transplant, particularly with regard to predicting the presence of acute rejection. It is less clear whether chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is also associated with consistent changes in peripheral blood or urine cells. We hypothesized that patients with CAN would manifest different patterns of cytokine production (compared with non-CAN controls), detectable in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).

METHODS

Flow cytometry was used to quantify production within PBMCs of multiple cytokines.

RESULTS

A pilot study showed significant differences in cytokine production between healthy controls and transplanted subjects. However, differences between transplanted patients with and without CAN were small and non-significant.

DISCUSSION

Flow cytometry is a potentially useful method for quantifying cytokine production by PBMCs of renal transplant recipients. The technique is sensitive enough to detect differences between distinct test groups but could not find differences between recipients with and without CAN. This probably reflects the lack of a true difference because pathological changes within the long-term allograft may simply not be reflected or detected in the total population of PBMCs. Further studies should explore the usefulness of this technique in assaying more defined populations of PBMCs (such as those activated by donor allopeptides) and in serial monitoring of individual patients.

Hypercoagulability in renal transplant recipients. Identifying patients at risk of renal allograft thrombosis and evaluating strategies for prevention

Renal transplantation improves survival and quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Improvements in immunosuppressive therapy have reduced early allograft loss due to acute rejection to very low levels. Early allograft loss, due to acute thrombotic complications, remains a constant and proportionally increasing complication of renal transplantation. Identifying risk factor(s) for thrombosis amenable to preventive strategies has been elusive. Epidemiological studies have attempted to define risk in terms of modifiable (drugs, dialysis modality, surgical procedure) and non-modifiable (age, diabetes mellitus, vascular anomalies) factors, or identify changes in coagulation or fibrinolysis promoting a more thrombotic state. Most recently the evolution of thrombophilia research has established the potential for inherited hypercoagulability to predispose to acute allograft thrombosis. Inheritance of the factor V Leiden (FVL), prothrombin G20210A mutation, or the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) may increase the risk of renal allograft thrombosis approximately 3-fold in selected patients. Patients with ESRD due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) appear at particularly high risk of thrombosis, especially if they have either APA or detectable beta(2)-glycoprotein-1. Data for other hypercoagulable states such as hyperhomocystinemia or the C677T polymorphism of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are deficient. Patients with APA, FVL, or prothrombin G20210A mutation also appear to have greater graft loss due to vascular rejection, possibly reflecting immunological injury upon the vascular wall exacerbated or induced by the prothrombotic state. While substantial in vitro data suggest cyclosporine is prothrombotic, an independent clinical association with allograft thrombosis is unproven. Interventions to reduce thrombotic risk including heparin, warfarin, and aspirin have been evaluated in both selected high-risk groups (heparin and warfarin) and unselected populations (heparin and aspirin). In unselected patients at low clinical risk, aspirin (75-150 mg/day) with or without a short period of unfractionated heparin (5000U twice a day for 5 days) appears to reduce the risk of renal allograft thrombosis significantly with a low risk of bleeding, especially when compared with low molecular weight heparins which risk accumulation in renal failure. In high-risk groups (identified thrombophilic risk factor, previous thrombosis, or SLE) longer period of heparin, with or without aspirin and maintenance with warfarin, should be considered. Re-transplantation following graft loss due to vascular thrombosis can be undertaken with a low risk of recurrence. Further prospective studies evaluating both putative risk factors and intervention strategies are required to determine whether routine clinical screening for thrombophilic factors is justified.

Enzyme linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay for interferon-gamma independently predicts renal function in kidney transplant recipients

Post-transplant monitoring of cellular immunity might be useful in predicting long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients. We used an enzyme linked immunoabsorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay to serially measure the frequency of peripheral blood lymphocytes producing interferon-gamma in response to stimulator cells from donors or third parties in 55 primary kidney transplant recipients. Mean frequencies measured during the first 6 months after transplantation correlated significantly with the serum creatinine concentration at both 6 and 12 months following transplantation. The mean frequencies were higher in patients with acute rejection than in those without acute rejection. Multiple regression analyses indicated that the correlations between the early ELISPOT measurements of interferon-gamma and serum creatinine were independent of acute rejection, delayed graft function, or the presence of panel reactive antibodies before transplantation. Patients with low mean frequencies of interferon-producing cells in the early post-transplant period were generally free from acute rejection and exhibited excellent renal function at 6 and 12 months post-transplant. In conclusion, using the ELISPOT assay, we show an independent correlation between early cellular alloreactivity and long-term renal function. Increased levels of early alloreactivity measured with this assay may serve as a surrogate for chronic allograft dysfunction.