Protocol biopsies should be part of the routine management of kidney transplant recipients. Con

A Randomized 2x2 Factorial Clinical Trial of Renal Transplantation: Steroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression with Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal after Six Months Associates with Improved Renal Function and Reduced Chronic Histopathology

INTRODUCTION

The two most significant impediments to renal allograft survival are rejection and the direct nephrotoxicity of the immunosuppressant drugs required to prevent it. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), a mainstay of most immunosuppression regimens, are particularly nephrotoxic. Until less toxic antirejection agents become available, the only option is to optimize our use of those at hand.

AIM

To determine whether intensive rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction followed by CNI withdrawal would individually or combined improve graft function and reduce graft chronic histopathology-surrogates for graft and, therefore, patient survival. As previously reported, a single large rATG dose over 24 hours was well-tolerated and associated with better renal function, fewer infections, and improved patient survival. Here we report testing whether complete CNI discontinuation would improve renal function and decrease graft pathology.

METHODS

Between April 20, 2004 and 4-14-2009 we conducted a prospective, randomized, non-blinded renal transplantation trial of two rATG dosing protocols (single dose, 6 mg/kg vs. divided doses, 1.5 mg/kg every other day x 4; target enrollment = 180). Subsequent maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, a CNI, and sirolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor. We report here the outcome of converting patients after six months either to minimized tacrolimus/sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil/sirolimus. Primary endpoints were graft function and chronic histopathology from protocol kidney biopsies at 12 and 24 months.

RESULTS

CNI withdrawal (on-treatment analysis) associated with better graft function (p <0.001) and lower chronic histopathology composite scores in protocol biopsies at 12 (p = 0.003) and 24 (p = 0.013) months, without affecting patient (p = 0.81) or graft (p = 0.93) survival, or rejection rate (p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

CNI (tacrolimus) withdrawal at six months may provide a strategy for decreased nephrotoxicity and improved long-term function in steroid-free low immunological risk renal transplant patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00556933.

Surveillance biopsies in children post-kidney transplant

Surveillance biopsies are increasingly used in the post-transplant monitoring of pediatric renal allograft recipients. The main justification for this procedure is to diagnose early and presumably modifiable acute and chronic renal allograft injury. Pediatric recipients are theoretically at increased risk for subclinical renal allograft injury due to their relatively large adult-sized kidneys and their higher degree of immunological responsiveness. The safety profile of this procedure has been well investigated. Patient morbidity is low, with macroscopic hematuria being the most common adverse event. No patient deaths have been attributed to this procedure. Longitudinal surveillance biopsy studies have revealed a substantial burden of subclinical immunological and non-immunological injury, including acute cellular rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, microvascular lesions and transplant glomerulopathy. The main impediment to the implementation of surveillance biopsies as the standard of care is the lack of demonstrable benefit of early histological detection on long-term outcome. The considerable debate surrounding this issue highlights the need for multicenter, prospective, and randomized studies.

SWOT analysis of Banff: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the international Banff consensus process and classification system for renal allograft pathology

The Banff process defined the diagnostic histologic lesions for renal allograft rejection and created a standardized classification system where none had existed. By correcting this deficit the process had universal impact on clinical practice and clinical and basic research. All trials of new drugs since the early 1990s benefited, because the Banff classification of lesions permitted the end point of biopsy-proven rejection. The Banff process has strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT). The strength is its self-organizing group structure to create consensus. Consensus does not mean correctness: defining consensus is essential if a widely held view is to be proved wrong. The weaknesses of the Banff process are the absence of an independent external standard to test the classification; and its almost exclusive reliance on histopathology, which has inherent limitations in intra- and interobserver reproducibility, particularly at the interface between borderline and rejection, is exactly where clinicians demand precision. The opportunity lies in the new technology such as transcriptomics, which can form an external standard and can be incorporated into a new classification combining the elegance of histopathology and the objectivity of transcriptomics. The threat is the degree to which the renal transplant community will participate in and support this process.

Low incidence of adverse events in outpatient pediatric renal allograft biopsies

In 1999, our center implemented a policy of outpatient protocol biopsies as standard practice for the clinical management of pediatric renal allograft recipients. In order to determine the safety of this procedure, we conducted a retrospective chart audit of all outpatient renal allograft biopsies performed at our center. Biopsies were performed under conscious (midazolam) or procedural (propofol/fentanyl) sedation. Localization of the lower pole of the renal allograft was achieved with renal ultrasound. Using a Biopty gun with a 16-gauge needle, two cores were obtained. Patients were discharged four h post-biopsy. Patient demographics, hospital length of stay (LOS), specimen adequacy (per Banff criteria) and major and minor adverse events were recorded in a central database. Data were expressed as mean +/- SD. From June 1999 to July 2004, we performed 162 biopsies in 43 pediatric renal allograft recipients. Most patients underwent extraperitoneal transplantation (42/43, 97.7%) and were greater than five yr of age at biopsy (129/131 biopsies, 98.5%). The majority of these procedures (131/162, 80.9%) were conducted in the outpatient department, with 113 of 131 (86.3%) being obtained for protocol (n = 89) and one-month follow-up acute rejection therapy (n = 24) indications. Patients underwent 3.7 +/- 2.7 biopsies (range = 1-11). Specimen adequacy was achieved in 119 of 124 (96.0%) of documented cases. The overall incidence of adverse events was 12 of 131 (9.2%) biopsies, all of which were minor in severity. Macroscopic hematuria was the most common minor adverse event, occurring after 11 of 131 (8.4%) biopsies. While macroscopic hematuria prolonged LOS (adverse events vs. no adverse events: 23.0 +/- 26.0 vs. 8.6 +/- 4.1 h, p = 0), none of these episodes required major surgical or radiographic interventions. We conclude that in patients greater than five yr of age with extraperitoneal renal allografts, outpatient protocol biopsies using a 16-gauge needle are sufficiently safe to justify their inclusion in the routine clinical management of pediatric renal allograft recipients and in pediatric clinical trials.

Protocol Transplant Biopsies: Are They Really Needed?

Studies suggest that surveillance or protocol biopsies that are performed during the first year after kidney transplantation may be clinically useful in identifying early acute rejection or chronic allograft nephropathy at a point when they may be amenable to treatment. Although the benefit of this approach has yet to be evaluated in large, multicenter, prospective trials, numerous studies suggest that implementation of protocol biopsies may improve long-term graft function. In particular, a number of reports suggest that detection of chronic allograft nephropathy in early protocol biopsies is predictive of subsequent graft function and loss and that early treatment may have a dramatic effect on the outcome of the graft. Protocol biopsies also have the potential to be of great value in high-risk patients, such as those with delayed graft function, by allowing for early intervention for acute rejection. Furthermore, the procedure seems to be relatively straightforward and safe. Nevertheless, paucity of data has meant that clear proof of a benefit of early treatment of subclinical rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy detected by protocol biopsy is lacking. Moreover, the optimal timing of protocol biopsies and reliable methods to quantify the histologic changes observed in biopsy specimens have yet to be determined. This review discusses the pros and cons of protocol biopsies and considers the place of this procedure in the routine treatment of kidney transplant patients.

Predicting subsequent decline in kidney allograft function from early surveillance biopsies

Identifying factors that are predictive of allograft loss might be an important step toward prolonging kidney allograft survival. In this study we sought to determine the association between histologic changes on 1-year surveillance biopsies, changes in graft function and survival. This analysis included 292 adults, recipients of kidneys from living donors (69%) or deceased donors (31%), transplanted between 1998 and 2001 and followed up for 46 +/- 14 months. The primary end point was death-censored graft loss or a >50% reduction in GFR beyond 1 year. One-year biopsies were classified as: (i) Normal (N = 87, 30%), (ii) inflammation (N = 6, 2%), (iii) fibrosis (N = 131, 45%), (iv) fibrosis and inflammation (N = 53, 18%) and (v) transplant glomerulopathy (N = 15, 5%). By multivariate Cox analysis, survival related to biopsy classification (HR = 4.2, p = 0.001), graft function (HR = 0.97, p = 0.001) and HLA mismatches (HR = 1.003, p = 0.004). Using normal histology as a reference, fibrosis and inflammation (HR = 8.5, p < 0.0001) and glomerulopathy (HR = 10, p < 0.0001) related to poorer survival but mild fibrosis alone did not. Importantly, the degree of inflammation associated with fibrosis generally did not qualify for the diagnosis of borderline rejection. In conclusion, inflammation and glomerulopathy 1 year post-transplant predict loss of graft function and graft failure independently of function and other variables.