Minimally invasive adrenal surgery

Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the gold standard treatment for adrenal lesions. Robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RAA) is a safe approach, associated with higher costs in absence of clear-cut benefits. Several series reported some advantages of RAA over LA in challenging cases, but definitive conclusions are lacking. We evaluated the cost effectiveness and outcomes of robotic (R-LTA) and laparoscopic (L-LTA) approach for lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy in a high-volume center.

METHODS

Among 356 minimally invasive adrenalectomies (January 2012-August 2021), 286 were performed with a lateral transabdominal approach: 191 L-LTA and 95 R-LTA. The R-LTA and L-LTA patients were matched for lesion side and size, hormone secretion, and BMI with propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Postoperative complications, operative time (OT), postoperative stay (POS), and costs were compared.

RESULTS

PSM analysis identified 184 patients, 92 in R-LTA and 92 in L-LTA group. The two groups were well matched. The median lesion size was 4 cm in both groups (p = 0.533). Hormonal hypersecretion was detected in 55 and 54 patients of R-LTA and L-LTA group, respectively (p = 1). Median OT was significantly longer in R-LTA group (90.0 vs 65.0 min) (p < 0.001). No conversion was registered. Median POS was similar (4.0 vs 3.0 days in the R-LTA and L-LTA) (p = 0.467). No difference in postoperative complications was found (p = 1). The cost margin analysis showed a positive income for both procedures (3137 vs 3968 € for R-LTA and L-LTA). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, independent risk factors for postoperative complications were hypercortisolism (OR = 3.926, p = 0.049) and OT > 75 min (OR = 8.177, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative outcomes of R-LTA and L-TLA were similar in our experience. Despite the higher cost, RAA appears to be cost effective and economically sustainable in a high-volume center (60 adrenalectomies/year), especially if performed in challenging cases, including patients with large (> 6 cm) and/or functioning tumors.

Recommendation for laparoscopic ultrasound guided laparoscopic left lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy

Background

Left sided adrenalectomy may be associated with intraoperative bleeding and conversion or injury of the pancreatic tail leading to postoperative fistula. Another problem may be the identification of adrenal mass in the case of previous upper abdominal surgery. Intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) enables the safe plane of dissection, identification of key structures and reduction of conversion and complication rate to the minimum.

Methods

Laparoscopic left lateral transabdominal adrenalectomy (LTA) was performed in 94 patients. LUS was performed in 50 patients with identification of adrenal mass, its vascularization and surrounding anatomical planes.

Results

Laparoscopic left LTA with LUS was associated with significant shorter operating time, smaller rate of conversions and intraoperative bleeding in comparison to the group without intraoperative ultrasound.

Conclusions

Intraoperative ultrasound during laparoscopic left LTA is a very effective method of navigation and its use should be taken into consideration especially in cases when the visualization and possibility of safe dissection are reduced.

Robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy from inception to ingenuity: the perspective on two high volume endocrine surgery centers

Background

With increased utilization of robotic technology, robotic adrenalectomy (RA) became popular in certain high-volume centers as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes of RA in two high-volume centers in Turkey.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2019, consecutive patients who underwent robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in two referral centers for surgical endocrine diseases in Turkey were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 111 patients were analyzed. Mean diameter of the tumor in preoperative imaging was 38.6±2.0 mm. Total operation time was 135.4±47.9 min. The analysis of the learning curve period and the post-learning curve period in both centers demonstrated that the total surgery time decreased from 152.68±48.6 to 118.8±37.1 min, and the console time decreased from 113.2±38.9 to 81.6±35.1 min (P<0.0001). In 8 patients, complications arose during the surgery and postoperative complications were observed in 10 patients. Intraoperative complication rate was 28% in patients with a tumor diameter of greater than 50 mm (P<0.0001). There was no mortality.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that RA is a safe and effective procedure with low-morbidity and without mortality in high number of cases.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy

In the last three decades, endoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard for the surgical treatment of most adrenal diseases. Gagner et al., first reported in 1992, the lateral trans-abdominal laparoscopic approach to adrenalectomy. Afterwards, several retrospective and comparative studies addressed the advantages of minimally invasive adrenalectomy specifically consistent in less postoperative pain, improved patients' satisfaction, shorter hospital stay and recovery time when compared to open adrenalectomy. The lateral transabdominal approach to the adrenals is currently one of the most widely used, since it allows an optimal comprehensive view of the adrenal region and surrounding structures, and provides and adequate working space. On the other hand, from a technical point of view, essential requirements for a successful laparoscopic adrenalectomy are an appropriate knowledge of retroperitoneal anatomy, a gentle tissue manipulation and a precise haemostasis technique in order to identify appropriately the structures of interest and avoid the troublesome 'oozing' that could complicate the surgical procedure.

Lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy for complicated adrenal tumor larger than 5 centimeters

BACKGROUND

The role of lateral retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (LRA) for complicated tumor with large diameter remains controversial, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this procedure on the management of tumor larger than 5cm in diameter.

METHODS

A retrospective comparison was conducted of 67 patients with large complicated adrenal tumor (>5cm). 41 patients received LRA, and 26 received open adrenalectomy (OA) in our hospital between January 2011 and June 2015. Basic characteristics regarding mean age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, tumor side, previous abdominal surgery, resection method, pathology were preferentially analyzed. Operative indicators regarding operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversion to ICU, complications, post-operative hospitalization, duration of drain, time to first oral intake and ambulation were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in the basic characteristics. The mean operation time for LRA was shorter than OA (98.7±32.3 min vs 152.7±72.3 min, P = 0.001). EBL was 31.9±20.0 ml for LRA and 590.0±1181.1 ml for OA (P = 0.03). There was no complication in LRA group and one patient in OA group had complications, but this difference was not significant (P = NS). The post-operative hospitalization in LRA was 7.4±2.8 days, and shorter than 9.8±2.7 days in OA group (P = 0.00). The time to first oral intake and ambulation for LRA was shorter than OA (first oral intake, 1.9±0.8 days vs 3.1±1.3 days, P = 0.00; time to ambulation, 2.6±1.4 days vs 4.2±1.6 days, P = 0.00). While the difference between groups were not significant in terms of ICU conversion (3/41 vs 4/26, P = NS) and duration of drain (3.9±2.2 days vs 4.7±1.9 days, P = NS).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that LRA can be performed safely and effectively for complicated adrenal tumors larger than 5 cm in diameter, but it remains technically demanding.

What is the appropriate role of minimally invasive vs. open surgery for small adrenocortical cancers?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of endoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenocortical carcinoma is the most controversial and debated points in adrenal surgery. We reviewed the most recent literature on this topic.

RECENT FINDINGS

From the amount of available data (even if not conclusive), the following could be extrapolated: first, for patients with apparently localized disease the adrenal gland should be removed en bloc with the entire retroperitoneal fat pad, which also includes some periadrenal lymph nodes, but no extended resection is necessary in absence of involvement of adjacent structures; second, in experienced centers, oncologic outcome for endoscopic adrenalectomy is not inferior to open adrenalectomy when strict selection criteria and the principles of oncologic surgery are respected. When performed by nonexperienced surgeons, endoscopic adrenalectomy may be associated with a higher rate of positive margin and local recurrence; third, patients observed at specialized referral centers receive a more accurate preoperative workup that allows a better operative planning and a more comprehensive postoperative treatment.

SUMMARY

Although waiting for further more exhaustive studies, we think that for suspected adrenocortical carcinoma, smaller than 8-10 cm and without pre or intraoperative evidence of local invasion, endoscopic adrenalectomy in a referral center seems to be an acceptable option.

Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey

BACKGROUND

We compared the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy and endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-six patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (stage I/II) who underwent R0 resection were included in an Italian multiinstitutional surgical survey. They were divided into 2 groups based on the operative approach (either conventional or endoscopic).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients underwent open adrenalectomy and 30 patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy. The 2 groups were well matched for age, sex, lesion size, and stage (P = NS). The mean follow-up time was similar for the 2 groups (P = NS). The local recurrence rate was 19% for open adrenalectomy and 21% for endoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas distant metastases were recorded in 31% of patients in the conventional adrenalectomy group and 17% in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). The mean time to recurrence was 27 ± 27 months in the conventional open adrenalectomy group and 29 ± 33 months in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (38.3% vs 58.2%) and 5-year overall survival rates (48% vs 67%; P = NS).

CONCLUSION

The operative approach does not affect the oncologic outcome of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma, if the principles of surgical oncology are respected.

Surgical treatment options for aldosteronomas

Introduction

Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA) is the most feasible approach for removing aldosteronomas.

Aim

To analyse the advantages and disadvantages of surgical approaches to treating small adrenal tumours.

Material and methods

In the period 2002-2011, 31 patients were operated on at Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics for aldosteronomas. Adrenalectomies were performed in the lateral laparoscopic (group A, n = 6), the endoscopic retroperitoneal (group B, n = 20), and the single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and SARA (group C, n = 5) approaches. Seventy five percent of patients were operated on by the same surgeon. The duration of adrenalectomies, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were compared. The possibility of minimally invasive adrenalectomies was evaluated.

Results

According to the patients’ age, body mass index and tumour size, the groups were equal. The average duration of surgery in group A was shorter than in groups B and C (91 ±23 min vs. 118 ±57 min vs. 144 ±88 min). Right laparoscopic adrenalectomy was longer than the left (105 ±26 min vs. 77 ±6 min), whereas right endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy was shorter than the left (109 ±50 min vs. 126 ±57 min). The best cosmetic view was in group C. The SARA method was converted into the endoscopic retroperitoneal approach and then into the laparoscopic for one patient. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Conclusions

Evaluating the minimal invasion of the method, its abilities and simplicity of conversion into another type of endoscopic surgical way, the SARA approach should be the first option for removing aldosteronomas.

Endoscopic adrenalectomy: Is there an optimal operative approach? Results of a single-center case-control study

BACKGROUND

The choice in between the laparoscopic lateral transabdominal (LTA) or the posterior retroperitoneoscopic (PRA) approach for adrenalectomy is usually based on surgeon's preference, rather than on objective arguments. We compared the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of LTA and PRA to determine whether there is a preferable approach.

METHODS

Thirty-eight consecutive patients successfully underwent PRA for benign adrenal tumors </=6 cm. A case-control study including 38 patients who successfully underwent LTA was performed. Operative time, intraoperative ventilatory parameters (CO(2) production [Vco(2)], whole body oxygen consumption, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [Paco(2)], and arterial partial pressure of oxygen [Pao(2)]), final histology, complications, postoperative stay, analgesic requirement, time to regain normal bowel function, and time to return to work were recorded and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The 2 groups did not differ in terms of operative time, analgesic requirement, time to first flatus, complication rate, duration of postoperative stay, or final histology. Patients in the LTA group showed significantly lower Paco(2), Pao(2), and Vco(2) at the end of the operation. Patients in the PRA group experienced a significantly faster return to work.

CONCLUSION

No procedure can be considered preferable overall. In cases of bilateral adrenalectomy and previous abdominal surgery, PRA may offer some advantages. Surgeon's preference and experience will continue to guide this choice.

Isolated adrenal metastasis: the role of laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Solitary adrenal metastases (AM) are rare and their management unclear. Surgery, especially laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), is debatable in the management of AM. This retrospective study analysed the feasibility and the results of LA for AM.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2003, 16 patients underwent LA for isolated AM. Completeness of resection, postoperative morbidity and follow-up (FU) were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 10 synchronous AM and 6 metachronous AM. Primary tumours included lung cancer (n = 9), melanoma (n = 3), mesothelioma (n = 1), rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1), colonic adenocarcinoma (n = 1) and renal cell carcinoma (n = 1). Five patients required conversion to an open procedure. Minor complications occurred in three patients. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of AM. Mean tumour size was 60 (range: 15-110) mm. Nine patients (56%) had complete resections, 3 had positive margins and 4 had incomplete macroscopic resections. Mean observed FU was 25 (range: 1-68) months. Median overall calculated survival was 23 months. Overall 5-year survival was 33% (Kaplan-Meyer). At the end of study, 8 patients were alive with a mean FU of 35 months (3 without evidence of disease). No patient presented with local relapse or port-site metastasis. We did not identify any predictive factors. All patients with incomplete macroscopic resection died within 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

LA can achieve an acceptable 5-year survival, comparable to open surgery but with better postoperative comfort. It should be considered for AM with the intention of complete resection. It offers the patient the possibility of tumour resection with the benefit of a laparoscopic approach.

Évolution de la prise en charge de la pathologie surrénalienne depuis l'avènement de la laparoscopie. Une étude rétrospective de 220 patients

OBJECTIVE

Soon after its introduction in 1992, laparoscopic adrenalectomy became the gold standard in the surgical management of most adrenal tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of laparoscopy on surgical indications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 2003, 220 adrenalectomies were performed, 179 among them by a laparoscopic approach. There were 137 females and 83 males. The mean age was 53 years (range 15-83 years).

RESULTS

The indications of adrenalectomy were: Cushing syndrome 18%, pheochromocytoma 31%, Conn syndrome 16%, incidentaloma 21%, and malignant tumours 13%. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 81% of the cases and the conversion rate was 11%. There were 3 postoperative deaths (2 after laparoscopy). The mean hospital stay was 7.6 days in the laparoscopic group, and 13.6 days in the open surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is consistent with the findings of the literature supporting that there are no indications for the open procedure in case of small benign lesions. The video-asisted adrenalectomy had not changed the management of the adrenal incidentaloma. Today, the laparoscopic approach seems to be adapted also for malignant disease.

[Lessons learned from 274 laparoscopic adrenalectomies]

AIMS

To define the role of minimally invasive video-assisted surgery in the surgical management of adrenal disease and discuss the respective indications of the trans and retroperitoneal video assisted approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the last 8 years (1994-2001), 330 adrenalectomies were performed in 305 patients: 274 (83%) laparoscopic approaches and 56 (17%) open approach. Open surgery was reserved for patients presenting with large or malignant tumours (29 cases), multiple and/or extraadrenal phaeochromocytomas (13 cases), previous intraabdominal intestinal surgery (10 cases), and in those requiring concomitant intraabdominal surgery (4 cases). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed using the lateral transperitoneal approach for 89 Conn's syndrome, 67 Cushing's syndrome, 2 virilizing tumours, 51 phaeochromocytomas and 65 non secretory tumours greater than 4 cm in diameter. Nineteen patients underwent bilateral adrenalectomy.

RESULTS

There were no deaths. Twenty patients (7.3%) had a complication. Eleven cases required open conversion (4%) because of difficulties with dissection (8 cases), preoperative suspicion of malignancy (2 cases), and one pneumothorax. The average size of tumours was 34 mm (7-110 mm). There were 18 malignant tumours (6.5%): 8 adrenocortical carcinomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, and 9 metastases. All patients with hormonally secreting tumours were cured of their endocrinopathy. There was 1 death secondary to hepatic metastases in a patient with an adrenocortical carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Most adrenal tumours are suitable for video assisted excision. The only absolute contraindication is an invasive carcinoma requiring an extended excision. The lateral, transperitoneal approach is the most suitable for tumours greater than 5-6 cm in diameter. Both the transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approaches are suitable for smaller tumours depending on operator choice and experience. However in the presence of a large right lobe of liver or previous intraabdominal surgery the retroperitoneal approach may be preferable.