Medical and endoscopic treatment in primary sclerosing cholangitis

Endoscopic treatment of biliary tract disease prior to orthotopic liver transplantation

Endoscopic therapy for biliary tract disease in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) before liver transplantation is safe and effective. Reported results in patients with choledocholithiasis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and symptomatic gallbladder diseases are encouraging. Prompt recognition and appropriate treatment of symptomatic gallbladder and bile duct disease are important in reducing morbidity and mortality in these high-risk patients while they await liver transplantation. Confirmation of tissue diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with sclerosing cholangitis is still difficult. Better screening tools and diagnostic methods are necessary for early detection. Because liver transplantation is the only definitive therapy for patients with advanced cirrhosis, maintenance of their candidacy with either endoscopic or radiologic therapeutic interventions is warranted until transplantation. Endoscopic therapy is the preferred method when feasible. If necessary, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is a viable alternative because both avoid the attendant risks of surgery in a high-risk population with advanced liver disease.

D-penicillamine for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a cholestatic disease. D-penicillamine is suggested as a treatment option due to its copper reducing and immunomodulatory potential.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of D-penicillamine for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (August 2005), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2005), EMBASE (1980 to August 2005), Science Citation Index EXPANDED (1945 to August 2005), and reference lists of relevant articles. Authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies known to produce D-penicillamine were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing D-penicillamine in any dose, duration, and route of administration versus placebo, no intervention, or other intervention(s). Trials were included irrespective of publication status, year of publication, language, or blinding.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Both authors selected the trials, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of the trials with respect to the generation of allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, and follow-up. The results were reported by intention-to-treat analysis. The outcomes were presented as relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

One randomised trial was identified and included in the review. It was of low methodological quality. The trial compared D-penicillamine versus placebo in 70 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Compared with placebo, D-penicillamine therapy had no significant effect on mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.64), liver transplantation (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.17), hepatic histologic progression (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.74), or cholangiographic deterioration (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.79). D-penicillamine led to a significant improvement in the serum aspartate aminotransferase (WMD -23.00 U/L; 95% CI -30.66 to -15.34), but not in serum bilirubin level (WMD 0.40 mg/L; 95% CI -0.19 to 0.99) and serum alkaline phosphatases activity (WMD 44.00 U/L; 95% CI -37.89 to 125.89). There were significantly more adverse events in patients receiving D-penicillamine (P = 0.013).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not sufficient evidence to support or refute the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. We do not recommend the use of D-penicillamine for patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis outside randomised trials.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. An estimated 80% of patients in North America and Europe have coexistent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The underlying pathophysiology of PSC remains poorly understood. As a result, there is currently no effective medical therapy to halt disease progression. Important complications from PSC include metabolic bone disease, colorectal neoplasia, and cholangiocarcinoma. Liver transplantation remains the only successful treatment option for patients with advanced liver disease from PSC. A diagnosis of PSC should be considered among individuals with IBD and elevated serum liver biochemical tests.

A prospective, randomized-controlled pilot study of ursodeoxycholic acid combined with mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid has been ineffective in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Because the pathogenesis of primary sclerosing cholangitis is related to immune destruction of bile duct epithelium, several immune suppressive agents have been evaluated. Mycophenolate mofetil is a potent immunosuppressant that is now widely used in organ transplantation.

AIM

In this pilot study to determine if mycophenolate mofetil when combined with ursodeoxycholic acid could prevent evidence of clinical progression and improve the biochemical, histological and/or cholangiographic features of primary sclerosing cholangitis compared with patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid alone.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with well-defined primary sclerosing cholangitis were randomized to ursodeoxycholic acid (13-15 mg/kg/day) with or without mycophenolate mofetil (1000 mg b.d.). Cholangiography and liver biopsy were performed at study entry and after 2 years of treatment. Symptoms, clinical features of liver disease and biochemical tests were monitored at 3-month intervals.

RESULTS

The mean age 44 years, 58% male, 84% Caucasian and 64% had ulcerative colitis. After 2 years, there were no differences in laboratory values, histological stage or cholangiograms between patients treated with ursodeoxycholic acid alone and those treated with mycophenolate mofetil + ursodeoxycholic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil combined with ursodeoxycholic acid does not appear to provide additional benefit compared with standard doses of ursodeoxycholic acid alone in the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis.