ERCP and MRCP--when and why

Endoscopy and Pediatric Pancreatitis

Children and adolescents are increasingly impacted by pancreatic disease. Interventional endoscopic procedures, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and endoscopic ultrasonography, are integral to the diagnosis and management of many pancreatic diseases in the adult population. In the past decade, pediatric interventional endoscopic procedures have become more widely available, with invasive surgical procedures now being replaced by safer and less disruptive endoscopic interventions.

Evaluating the Quality of Optimal MRCP Image Using RT-2D-Compressed SENSE(CS)Turbo Spin Echo: Comparing Respiratory Triggering(RT)-2D-SENSE Turbo Spin Echo and Breath Hold-2D-Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo

This study aimed to select the pulse sequence providing the optimal MRCP image quality by applying various reduction and denoising level parameters—which could improve image quality and shorten examination time—to BH-2D-SSh TSE, RT- 2D-SENSE TSE, and RT-2D-Compressed SENSE(CS) TSE and then comparing and analyzing the obtained images. This study was carried out using 30 subjects (15 men and 15 women with a mean age of 53 ± 8.76 years) who underwent an MRCP test using 3.0T MRI equipment. These 30 subjects were composed of 20 patients (CHDD: 7; LC: 6; and IPMN: 7) and 10 volunteers without a disease. When the CS technique was used, five reduction values (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5) were used and four denoising levels (No, Weak, Medium, and Strong) were used. The existing SENSE method was based on a reduction value of 1, and other parameters were set the same. The image data of BH-2D-SSh TSE, RT-2D-SENSE TSE, and RT-CS-2D TSE used for the analysis were acquired in the coronal plane, and the acquired data underwent MIP post-processing for analysis. To compare these techniques, SNR and CNR were measured for six biliary duct images for the purpose of quantitative analysis, and qualitative analysis was performed on the sharpness of the duct, the overall quality of the image, and the motion artifact. The results of the quantitative and standard analyses showed that the RT-2D-CS TSE technique had the highest results for all IPMN, LC, and CHDD diseases (p < 0.05). Moreover, SNR and CNR were the highest when the reduction value was set to 1.3 and the denoising level was set to medium as the CS setting values (p < 0.05). Compared with the conventional RT-2D-SENSE TSE, the test time decreased by 20% and SNR and CNR increased by 14% on average. When conducting RT-2D-CS TSE, we found that it shortened the examination time and improved the image quality compared to the existing RT-2D-SENSE TSE. Unlike previous studies, this study using the RT technique shows that it is a useful MRI Pulse Sequence technique able to replace the BH-2D-SSh TSE and BH-3D-SENSE GRASE techniques, which require the patient to hold their breath during the test.

Prevalence of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Complications and Amylase Sensitivity for Predicting Pancreatitis in ERCP Patients

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex procedure that is widely used for diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. With respect to its growing application, the present study aims to evaluate ERCP outcomes and complications. This cross-sectional study was performed using the data from 824 patients who underwent ERCP during 2014-2017 in Qom Shahid Beheshti hospital. Data were collected by a checklist and analyzed using SPSS V22. Among 824 patients, 397 (48.18%) were male and 427 (51.82%) were female with a mean age of 47 ± 6 years. The most common indications for ERCP were choledocholithiasis (78.28%) and cholestasis (20.27%), respectively. Total prevalence of complications was 15.66% and mortality rate was 0.72%. The most common complications were pancreatitis (9.59%) and bleeding (3.28%), respectively. A serum amylase level of greater than 160 could predict pancreatitis with sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 90.3%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications are inevitable but can be controlled by early diagnosis and clinical experience. Severe complications and high-risk patients may increase the mortality of the procedure.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings in early chronic pancreatitis diagnosed according to the Japanese Diagnostic Criteria

OBJECTIVES

It is important for diagnosing early chronic pancreatitis (CP), which may be improved by therapeutic intervention. We aimed to examine the pancreatic ductal changes on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with early CP defined by the Japanese Diagnostic Criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients suspected early CP and performed both endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRCP from January 2010 to August 2018. We assessed the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) and the number of irregularly dilated duct branches using MRCP imaging in early CP.

RESULTS

We enrolled 165 patients and 25 patients (15%) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for early CP. Irregular dilatation of ≥ 3 duct branches on MRCP was more often observed in early CP compared to non-early CP (P = 0.004), although MPD diameter was comparable (2.06 mm in early CP vs. 1.96 in non-early CP, P = 0.698). The sensitivity and specificity were 45% and 74%, respectively. The prevalence of positive MRCP findings in patients with ≥ 2 positive EUS findings was higher than that in patients with 1 positive EUS finding (P = 0.08) and in patients without an EUS finding (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the average diameter of MPD.

CONCLUSION

Patients with early CP often exhibit alteration in duct branches and not in MPD in addition to parenchymal alteration. Both pancreatic parenchyma and duct branches might need to be evaluated by EUS and MRCP.

The southwestern surgical congress multi-center trial on suspected common duct stones

BACKGROUND

Choledocholithiasis is present in up to 15% of cholecystectomy patients. Treatment can be surgical, endoscopic, or via interventional radiology. We hypothesized significant heterogeneity between hospitals exists in the approach to suspected common duct stones.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients that had a preoperative MRCP, endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP), or intra-operative cholangiogram was performed. Comparisons were by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests with significance of p < 0.05 for paired variables and p < 0.017 for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Twelve participating institutions identified 1263 patients (409 men and 854 women) with a median age of 49 years (IQR: 31-94). Liver function tests (LFT's) were elevated in 939 patients (75%), median bilirubin level 1.75 mg/dl (IQ: 0.8-3.7 mg/dl) and median common duct size 7 mm (IQR 5-10 mm). The most common initial procedure was cholecystectomy with IOC at seven institutions, endoscopy at four and MRCP at one.

CONCLUSION

Significant variation exists within the surgical community regarding suspected common duct stones. These results underscore the need for a protocol for common duct stones to minimize multiple, redundant interventions.

MRCP Versus ERCP in the Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis in Children: Which Is the Better Choice?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of chronic pancreatitis (CP)-specific changes in the pediatric population.

METHODS

The study included 48 children with pancreatic disorders subjected to both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and MRCP within a 1- to 4-month interval. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRCP in the detection of CP-specific changes were determined using ERCP as a diagnostic standard.

RESULTS

Diagnostic ERCP pancreatograms were obtained in 41 (85.4%) of 48 patients and diagnostic MRCP images in all 48 children. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of MRCP were 77.1% and 90%, respectively, and its specificity and negative predictive value amounted to 50% and 27.3%, respectively. The patients with consistent results of MRCP and ERCP (ie, true-positive and true-negative cases) and individuals with incompatible results of the tests (ie, false-positive and false-negative cases) differed in terms of their median age at MRCP (14.17 vs 10.33 years) and median CP stage according to the Cambridge Scale (4 vs 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography provides diagnostic information equivalent to ERCP in a large percentage of pediatric patients with CP and should be used as the imaging method of choice, especially if the likelihood of therapeutic intervention is low.

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in diagnosing choledochal cysts: Case series and review

AIM: To determine the merits of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as the primary diagnostic test for choledochal cysts (CC’s).

METHODS: Between 2009 and 2012, patients who underwent MRCP for perioperative diagnosis were identified. Demographic information, clinical characteristics, and radiographic findings were recorded. MRCP results were compared with intraoperative findings. A PubMed search identified studies published between 1996-2012, employing MRCP as the primary preoperative imaging and comparing results with either endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or operative findings. Detection rates for CC’s and abnormal pancreaticobiliary junction (APBJ) were calculated. In addition detection rates for clinically related biliary pathology like choledocholithiasis and cholangiocarcinomas in patients diagnosed with CC’s were also evaluated.

RESULTS: Eight patients were identified with CC’s. Six patients out of them had type IV CC’s, 1 had type I and 1 had a new variant of choledochal cyst with confluent dilatation of the common bile duct (CBD) and cystic duct. Seven patients had an APBJ and 3 of those had a long common-channel. Gallstones were found in 2 patients, 1 had a CBD stone, and 1 pancreatic-duct stone was also detected. In all cases, MRCP successfully identified the type of CC’s, as well as APBJ with ductal stones. From analyzing the literature, we found that MRCP has 96%-100% detection rate for CC’s. Additionally, we found that the range for sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy was 53%-100%, 90%-100% and 56%-100% in diagnosing APBJ. MRCP’s detection rate was 100% for choledocholithiasis and 87% for cholangiocarcinomas with concurrent CC’s.

CONCLUSION: After initial ultrasound and computed tomography scan, MRCP should be the next diagnostic test in both adult and pediatric patients. ERCP should be reserved for patients where therapeutic intervention is needed.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric pancreaticobiliary system

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is an extremely useful tool for evaluating a wide variety of disorders affecting the pancreaticobiliary system in neonates/infants, children, and adolescents. This imaging technique has numerous distinct advantages over alternative diagnostic modalities, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, including its noninvasive nature and lack of ionizing radiation. Such advantages make MRCP the preferred first-line method for advanced imaging the pediatric pancreaticobiliary tree, after ultrasonography. This article presents a contemporary review of the use of MRCP in the pediatric population, including techniques, indications, and the imaging appearances of common and uncommon pediatric disorders.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for non-gastroenterologists: what you need to know

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) represents the most powerful and widely employed platform for pancreaticobiliary interventions. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography allows diagnosis and treatment of a broad spectrum of diseases of the pancreaticobiliary tree that are both benign and malignant in nature. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography continues to evolve rapidly, and non-gastroenterologists need to understand the indications, contraindications, limitations, and role of ERCP to effectively manage and coordinate the care of patients with known or suspected pancreaticobiliary disease. This article will review the role of ERCP in detail to further an understanding of the procedure as a whole and to assess when referral of a patient for an ERCP or other related test is indicated.

Primary pancreatic cystic neoplasms revisited: part II. Mucinous cystic neoplasms

Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) of the pancreas represent one of the most common primary pancreatic cystic neoplasms, accounting for approximately half of these cases. MCNs are observed almost exclusively in women, and most commonly are located in the body/tail of the pancreas. In contrast to SCNs, MCNs have malignant potential. Proliferative changes (hyperplasia with or without atypia, borderline changes, non-invasive or carcinomas in-situ, and invasive carcinomas) can often be observed within the same neoplasm. Several risk factors for the presence of underlying malignancy within an MCN have recently been recognized. Cross-sectional imaging is of key importance for the diagnostic evaluation of patients with a cystic pancreatic lesion. Cyst fluid examination (cytology, biochemical/genetic analysis) is possible by using fine needle aspiration of the MCN, usually under endoscopic guidance, and may provide useful information for the differential diagnosis. Since MCNs have malignant potential, surgical resection is the treatment of choice.

Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in pancreatic diseases

Over the last 15 years, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has evolved from a diagnostic tool to one that is primarily used to provide therapy. This development occurred first for biliary disorders and subsequently to a lesser extent for pancreatic diseases. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasonography suggest a diagnosis in the majority of patients with pancreatic diseases today and can help physicians and patients avoid unnecessary ERCP. However, a selected number of patients with pancreatic diseases may benefit from pancreatic endotherapy and avoid complex surgery and chronic use of medications. Pancreatic sphincterotomy, pancreatic stenting and pancreatic cyst drainage are some of the most effective and challenging endoscopic pancreatic interventions and should be performed with caution by expert therapeutic endoscopists. There has been a paucity of randomized studies investigating endoscopic techniques in comparison with surgery and medical therapy for the treatment of most benign and malignant pancreatic disorders due to the limited number of patients and the expertise required to attempt these procedures.

Defining criteria for selective operative management of pancreatic cystic lesions: does size really matter?

INTRODUCTION

Proposed criteria for resection of pancreatic cystic lesions have included symptoms, size (>3 cm), and suspicious features by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The objective of this study was to evaluate risk factors for malignancy in a large series of patients undergoing resection of suspected pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

METHODS

Medical records of patients selected for resection of pancreatic cystic lesions at Duke University Medical Center from 2000 to 2008 were reviewed. Lesions with solid components on cross-sectional imaging were excluded. Malignancy was defined as invasive or in situ carcinoma.

RESULTS

After review, 101 patients were confirmed to have undergone resection for suspected cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Preoperative EUS was performed in 71 patients. Sixteen patients (16%) had malignant lesions (preoperative size 1.5-5.9 cm). There was no clear association between size and malignancy. Male gender, biliary ductal dilatation (BDD), pancreatic ductal dilatation (PDD), and suspicious cytology (but not age, symptoms, or size) were associated with increased risk of malignancy. When factors available for all patients were incorporated into a multivariate model, only BDD and PDD were independent risk factors for malignancy. Only one patient with malignancy had neither BDD nor PDD but did have solid components by EUS.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients selected for resection, size was not an independent risk factor for malignancy. While size might be appropriate for stratification of asymptomatic patients with simple cysts, size should not be used as a selection criterion for patients who have cysts with solid components or with associated BDD or PDD.

Comparative diagnostic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography, ultrasonography and CT in patients with pancreatobiliary disease

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to directly compare the results of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with those of ultrasonography (US) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) in the diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 70 patients (41 men, 29 women) aged 22-89 years were studied either before (n=59) or after cholecystectomy (n=11) for biliary lithiasis. Clinical signs and symptoms were jaundice (n=15), abdominal pain (n=37) and proven biliary lithiasis (n=18). MRCP was performed in all patients, whereas abdominal US was performed in 55 (group 1) and MSCT in 37 (group 2) patients. A regional evaluation of the main structures of the pancreaticobiliary system was performed: gallbladder and cystic duct, intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts and main pancreatic duct. Histology (n=27), biopsy (n=5), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n=28) and/or clinical-imaging follow-up (n=10) were considered standards of reference. In particular, patients were classified as showing benign (n=47) or malignant (n=12) lesions or normal biliary anatomy (n=11).

RESULTS

In group 1, the results of MRCP and US were concordant in the majority (92%) of cases; however, statistically significant discordance (p<0.01) was found in the evaluation of the extrahepatic ducts, with nine cases (16%) of middle-distal common bile duct stones being detected on MRCP only. In group 2, the results of MRCP and MSCT were also concordant in most cases (87%). However, findings were significantly discordant when the intra- and extrahepatic ducts were analysed, with seven (19%) and six (16%) cases, respectively, of lithiasis being detected on MRCP only (p<0.01 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study confirm the diagnostic potential of MRCP in the study of the pancreaticobiliary duct system. In particular, the comparison between MRCP and US and MSCT indicates the superiority of MRCP in evaluating bile ducts and detecting stones in the common bile duct.

A retrospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in children

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in children and to compare MRCP with direct cholangiopancreatography (CP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an unblinded, retrospective chart review of 32 children (ages 0-18 years, 17 male) who underwent MRCP between January 2002 and June 2005. MRCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous fluoroscopic or intraoperative studies of the pancreatobiliary tree, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventeen (52%) children had MRCP alone, 15 (48%) had both MR and direct CP. MRCP results correlated with other evaluative methods in 14/15 (93%) cases. There was 1 false positive (anomalous pancreatic duct union) and 0 false negatives for anatomic abnormalities. Therapeutic intervention was performed in 7 of 28 children initially evaluated by MRCP (2 sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, 2 choledocholithiasis, 2 primary sclerosing cholangitis, 1 congenital hepatic cysts) and 1 of 4 children initially evaluated by ERCP (primary sclerosing cholangitis). All 17 children initially evaluated by MRCP had no change in clinical status to suggest a missed anatomic lesion or therapeutic opportunity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, MRCP was sensitive and specific in identifying anatomic abnormalities of the pancreatobiliary tree in children. MRCP should be considered before direct CP to evaluate anatomic abnormalities of the pancreatobiliary tree.

The use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in children

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a noninvasive method to evaluate a wide variety of pancreatobiliary disorders. These disorders include choledochal cyst, cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis, biliary atresia, Caroli's disease, primary sclerosing cholangitis, disorders of the pancreatobiliary junction, pancreas divisum, and pancreatic duct abnormalities related to chronic pancreatitis. The use of MRCP in children is increasing as experience with MRCP grows, and its technological accuracy rivals that of endoscopic evaluation. We review the current state of MRCP use in children.

Caroli's syndrome and adult polycystic kidney disease

Caroli's disease is a cystic disease of the liver, which has been rarely associated with adult onset polycystic kidney disease. Three cases have been reported in the English Medline search. The presentation of this fourth case discusses the issues surrounding the treatment of Caroli's disease in the setting of a renal transplant.

N/A

N/A

Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

AIM: To evaluate the clinical predictive value of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) in selected patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS: A total of 267 patients scheduled for elective LC from March 1999 to May 2001, with risk factors for common bile duct (CBD) stones, underwent MRC followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) or intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) to detect the stones in common bile duct and value accuracy of MRC. Suspected patient selection was based on clinical, ultrasonographic, and laboratory criteria. All those with a history of previous jaundice, previous mild gallstone pancreatitis (acute abdominal pain and at least a fourfold increase in serum amylase activity), abnormal liver function test results (especially abnormal bilirubin result) or a dilated common bile duct (more than 8 mm) on ultrasonography were considered to have high suspicion for choledocholithiasis.

RESULTS: During a 26-month period, 267 patients were studied. MRC identified all patients (78 patients) found to have CBD stones by ERC or laparoscopic cholangiography in the study group. 7 patients were incorrectly diagnosed as having CBD stones by MRC. In our study, MRC had a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 96.3%, positive predictive value of 91.8% and negative predictive value of 100.0% for the detection of common bile duct stones. There were 19 patients (7.1%) occurring the ERC procedure-related complications; 11 patients were cholangitis, 7 pancreatitis, and 1 papillary bleeding. The information obtained from MRC could be utilized to select patients who would benefit from preoperative ERC. Using the information, 68.2% (182/267) patients in our group could be away from ERC and its distress. And the complications of preoperative examination would be minimized significantly.

CONCLUSION: ERC is an invasive technique with a well-documented complication rate. MRC is an accurate and simple non-invasive imaging technique for preoperative screening for CBD stones in at-risk patients, which could minimize the need for non-therapeutic ERC.

Diagnostic imaging for pancreatic cancer: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) are sophisticated modalities typically used in the second-line diagnosis following routine clinical practice. Among them, CT is regarded as the standard imaging in diagnosing pancreatic cancer at present in Japan due to its popularity and reasonable reliability in wide-ranging diagnostic ability. However, even with multidetector row CT (MDCT), the demonstration of pancreatic cancer less than 1 cm in size remains nearly impossible. CT staging is considered accurate in one-half to two-thirds of patients, but limitations in the imaging of peripancreatic microinvasion and nodal or hepatic micrometastases still have a tendency to underestimate tumor extension. With recent advancement in imaging techniques, MRI has proven to be equal or superior to other imaging modalities in diagnosing pancreatic cancer. Most of all, it is expected that MRCP will become as effective an instrument as ultra-sonography (US) in the screening of pancreatic cancer. Functional imaging with PET using the glucose analog FDG can be used in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, but systemic or local disturbance of glucose metabolism may result in an incorrect diagnosis. The usefulness of PET is now considered in assessing tumor viability, monitoring tumor response to treatment, and detecting distant metastases.

ERCP and MRCP in the differentiation of pancreatic tumors

The introduction of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the early 1970s provided gastroenterologists with a number of diagnostic as well as therapeutic possibilities for examining biliopancreatic systems. In the meantime, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography presents a non-invasive alternative to diagnostic ECRP providing the advantage of a lower rate of possible complications. This article addresses the two methods presently available for differentiating pancreatic tumors. The objective of this article is to describe the advantages and disadvantages as well as the possibilities inherent in both methods.

Gallstone pancreatitis: when is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography truly necessary?

Acute pancreatitis is an inflammation of the pancreas that can, in a minority of patients, lead to local complications, multiorgan failure, and death. Gallstones are the most common cause of acute pancreatitis in Western countries. The majority of patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis have mild disease and recover within 3 to 5 days with bed rest and intravenous fluid replacement. In up to 20% of patients, severe pancreatitis develops and can involve pancreatic tissue necrosis and multiorgan failure. Recent advances in the care of patients with gallstone-induced pancreatitis include better severity stratification on hospital admission, more aggressive fluid resuscitation in the early disease course, early use of antibiotics in patients with pancreatic necrosis, a shift from parenteral to enteral feeding regimens, a better defined and less aggressive approach to pancreatic surgery, and the possibility to remove impacted gallstones endoscopically. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy are recommended in patients with signs of cholangitis or jaundice, ultrasound evidence of dilated common bile duct, or evidence of severe disease.