The acute abdomen and the obstetrician

Management of small bowel obstruction in the third trimester

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) in pregnancy is exceedingly rare. Management of SBO in the third trimester may pose particular challenges, as clinicians must determine whether or not the delivery of the fetus is indicated. In this report, we review the case of a patient in her mid-20's with no prior surgical history who presented with nausea and vomiting at 34 weeks of gestation and was ultimately diagnosed with an SBO. Following expectant management during the initial 4 days of inpatient admission, the patient subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy at 35 weeks without concurrent delivery. She was monitored for the remainder of her pregnancy with non-stress tests to evaluate fetal status and eventually underwent induction of labour at 39 weeks, resulting in a successful vaginal delivery. Herein, we review the challenges related to the diagnosis and management of SBO in pregnancy, as well as the maternal-fetal outcomes in the setting of SBO in the third trimester.

A Rare Case of Small Bowel Obstruction in Pregnancy Due to Adenocarcinoma

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) rarely occurs in pregnancy, primarily due to the adhesions resulting from previous abdominal surgery. However, malignancy causing SBO during pregnancy is exceedingly rare. We present a case of a 34-year-old pregnant woman who was recently diagnosed with small bowel disease at 19 weeks and two days of gestation and initially managed conservatively. Diagnostic procedures, such as endoscopy or colonoscopy and enterography magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were postponed due to her pregnancy. With recurrent episodes of worsening symptoms, the patient underwent multiple admissions, during which an abdominal X-ray was performed, revealing dilated loops of the small and large bowel, highly suggestive of SBO. Subsequently, a plain abdominal MRI revealed a stricture in the left lower quadrant, resulting in SBO. Given the absence of a fetal pulse, the patient underwent an emergency laparotomy. Surgical resection involving part of the mass in the terminal ileum was performed, followed by a primary side-to-side anastomosis. Histopathological examination of the resected tissue confirmed the presence of small bowel adenocarcinoma. The successful surgical resection and subsequent histopathological confirmation emphasized the importance of prompt diagnosis and appropriate management. This case underscores the challenges faced in diagnosing and managing small bowel obstruction during pregnancy, particularly when malignancy is the underlying cause. It highlights the need to balance diagnostic investigations with fetal safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between obstetricians, surgeons, and radiologists is crucial in navigating the complexities of managing such cases and ensuring optimal outcomes for both the mother and the fetus.

Intestinal obstruction in pregnancy-a rare presentation of uterine perforation

BACKGROUND

Intestinal obstruction is an uncommon non-obstetric condition during pregnancy which may cause maternal and fetal mortality. Clinicians are confronted with challenges in diagnosis and treatment of intestinal obstruction due to the overlapping symptoms, concerns over radiological evaluation, and surgical risks.

CASE PRESENTATION

We reported a 39-year old, gravida 7, para 2, woman who suffered from acute intestinal obstruction at 34 weeks of gestation. Ultrasonography and abdominal computed tomography were applied for intestinal obstruction diagnose. Conservative treatment was initially attempted. But following ultrasound found the absence of fluid in the amniotic sac and the patient showed no improvement in clinical symptoms. An emergency caesarean section was then performed. Intra-operative assessment showed dense adhesion between the left wall of uterus and omentum, descending colon, and sigmoid colon. After adhesion dialysis, uterine rupture with complete opening of the uterine wall at the site of left uterine cornua was found without active bleeding. The uterine rupture was then repaired.

CONCLUSIONS

Although uncommon during pregnancy, clinical suspicion of bowel obstruction is necessary especially in women with a history of abdominal surgery. Surgical intervention is indicated when conservative therapy fails and when there are signs of abnormal fetal conditions and worsened symptoms.

Midgut Volvulus in a Pregnant Patient Presenting With Abdominal Pain

Abdominal pain is a common symptom during pregnancy, but bowel obstruction as the cause is a rare phenomenon. Moreover, intestinal volvulus is an even more unusual cause of obstruction during pregnancy and normally involves the sigmoid colon. We report a unique case of midgut volvulus in a pregnant patient entering her third trimester who presented to the hospital with abdominal pain. Our case demonstrates the safety of computed topography in pregnancy while restricting radiation dose and highlights the need to have a high index of suspicion for bowel obstruction when approaching a pregnant patient with abdominal pain.

A Case of a Patient with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction in Pregnancy after Extensive Myomectomy for Diffuse Uterine Leiomyomatosis

Background. Diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis is a rare disease in which countless, poorly defined, and small nodules are present in most parts of the uterine myometrium. It frequently occurs in fertile women and causes infertility. A deep, median, longitudinal incision of the uterine corpus with the opening of the endometrial cavity, “extensive myomectomy,” is required to restore fertility. However, myomectomy may also be a risk factor for perinatal complications. We present a rare case of adhesive small bowel obstruction after extensive myomectomy for diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis. Case. A 37-year-old primigravida presented with sharp epigastric pain and vomiting at 21-week gestation. The patient had a history of extensive myomectomy for diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis. Abdominal radiography revealed moderate air fluid levels in the small intestine, and the patient was diagnosed with adhesive small bowel obstruction. The patient was also diagnosed with placenta previa. Bowel rest with intestinal tube was continued until delivery. Cesarean section was performed at 32-week gestation due to (i) prolonged fasting and total parenteral nutrition for conservative treatment and (ii) fear of sudden massive bleeding from placenta previa. Because the ileum was strongly adherent to the uterine scar from the previous myomectomy, adhesiolysis and enterectomy were performed. The placenta was uncomplicatedly delivered and the hemorrhage was well-controlled. Conclusions. Pregnancy with a history with extensive myomectomy for diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis should be carefully monitored because of the occasional occurrence of adhesive small intestine obstruction during pregnancy.

Parturient with Acute Abdomen

Management of a parturient with an acute abdomen presents unique challenges. We aim to review the common obstetric and nonobstetric causes for acute abdomen in pregnancy, approach to diagnosis, the role of imaging, and management including the scope and timing of operative intervention.

Strangulated internal hernia following severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a case report

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of ovarian stimulation. Herein, we report a rare case of strangulated internal hernia in a woman with severe OHSS following ovulation induction. A delay in the diagnosis and management of acute abdominal pain can lead to serious problems. The aim of this case report was to highlight the diagnostic difficulties of abdominal pain in women with OHSS, and emphasize the positive effects of imaging and a timely differential diagnosis in clinical practice.

Intussusception in a pregnant woman

Abdominal pain in a pregnant woman with a history of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) in the emergency department is challenging. Intussusception is a rare cause of small bowel obstruction after LRYGB and can lead to intestinal necrosis, perforation, sepsis and death. The authors report a case of a 34-week pregnant patient, previously submitted to LRYGB, presenting to the emergency department with abdominal pain and vomiting. A computed tomography scan suggested the presence of ileoileal intussusception. So, an emergent laparotomy was performed with invagination reduction. The postoperative period was uneventful, as well as pregnancy and caesarian performed 4 weeks after surgery. At the 45-month follow-up, there was no recurrence of intussusception.

Sepsis in Pregnancy: Recognition and Resuscitation

The normal physiologic changes of pregnancy complicate evaluation for sepsis and subsequent management. Previous sepsis studies have specifically excluded pregnant patients. This narrative review evaluates the presentation, scoring systems for risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of sepsis in pregnancy. Sepsis is potentially fatal, but literature for the evaluation and treatment of this condition in pregnancy is scarce. While the definition and considerations of sepsis have changed with large, randomized controlled trials, pregnancy has consistently been among the exclusion criteria. The two pregnancy-specific sepsis scoring systems, the modified obstetric early warning scoring system (MOEWS) and Sepsis in Obstetrics Score (SOS), present a number of limitations for application in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods of generation and subsequently limited validation leave significant gaps in identification of septic pregnant patients. Management requires consideration of a variety of sources in the septic pregnant patient. The underlying physiologic nature of pregnancy also highlights the need to individualize resuscitation and critical care efforts in this unique patient population. Pregnant septic patients require specific considerations and treatment goals to provide optimal care for this particular population. Guidelines and scoring systems currently exist, but further studies are required.

Accuracy of MRI in Diagnosing Appendicitis during Pregnancy

Appendectomy for presumed appendicitis is the most common surgical emergency during pregnancy. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis carries risk for the fetus and mother. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis. All pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis between January 2014 and April 2016 were included. MRI reports were categorized into positive, negative, and inconclusive groups. Diagnosis of appendicitis was based on pathology report. Fifty-two patients were included in the study. The MRI was positive in two, negative in 29, and inconclusive in 21 patients. Twelve patients had surgery, 11 of which had positive appendicitis on pathology. Both positive MRI patients had appendicitis. In the negative MRI group, 3 of 29 (10%) had appendicitis. In the inconclusive MRI group, 6 of 21 (29%) had appendicitis. A positive MRI result was very specific with a 100 per cent positive predictive value; however, the sensitivity was as low as 18 per cent (diagnosed only 2 of 11 cases). Although a positive MRI finding was reliable in making a decision to operate, a negative or inconclusive MRI was not. In patients with a high clinical suspicion of appendicitis, surgery should still be considered even without definitive positive MRI findings.

Acute appendicitis in pregnancy: literature review

INTRODUCTION

suspected appendicitis is the most common indication for surgery in non-obstetric conditions during pregnancy and occurs in about one in 500 to one in 635 pregnancies per year. This occurs more often in the second trimester of pregnancy. Acute appendicitis is the most common general surgical problem encountered during pregnancy.

METHODS

a literature review on research of scientific articles, under the terms "acute appendicitis" and "pregnancy", in PubMed, Lilacs/SciELO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Uptodate databases.

RESULTS

the clinical manifestations of appendicitis are similar to non-pregnant women, however, without a classic presentation, which often occurs, diagnosis is difficult and must be supported by imaging.

DISCUSSION

clinical diagnosis should be strongly suspected in pregnant women with classic findings such as abdominal pain that migrates to the right lower quadrant. The main purpose of imaging is to reduce delays in surgical intervention due to diagnostic uncertainty. A secondary objective is to reduce, but not eliminate, the negative appendectomy rate. Differential diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis usually includes pathologies considered in non-pregnant people.

CONCLUSION

the imaging study of choice is ultrasound, MRI may be used when the former is not conclusive and, as a last resort, a CT scan can be performed. The treatment remains appendectomy by laparotomy, since the feasibility of video- assisted surgery in these cases remains controversial.

Small bowel obstruction in pregnancy is a complex surgical problem with a high risk of fetal loss

INTRODUCTION

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) in pregnancy is rare and is most commonly caused by adhesions from previous abdominal surgery. Previous literature reviews have emphasised the need for prompt laparotomy in all cases of SBO because of the significant risks of fetal loss and maternal mortality. We undertook a review of the contemporary literature to determine the optimum management strategy for SBO in pregnancy.

METHODS

The MEDLINE® and PubMed databases were searched for cases of SBO in pregnancy between 1992 and 2014. Two cases from our own institution were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-six cases of SBO in pregnancy were identified, with adhesions being the most common aetiology (50%). The overall risk of fetal loss was 17% and the maternal mortality rate was 2%. In cases of adhesional SBO, 91% of cases were managed surgically, with 14% fetal loss. Two cases (9%) were managed conservatively with no complications. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to diagnose SBO in 11% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience and the contemporary literature, we recommend that urgent MRI of the abdomen should be undertaken to diagnose the aetiology of SBO in pregnancy. In cases of adhesional SBO, conservative treatment may be safely commenced, with a low threshold for laparotomy. In other causes, such as volvulus or internal hernia, laparotomy remains the treatment of choice.

Intestinal obstruction in pregnancy: a case report

Background. Intestinal obstruction in pregnancy is uncommon. The condition is associated with significant maternal and fetal mortality. The delay in diagnosis is due to nonspecific symptoms and a disinclination to carry out radiologic investigations in pregnancy. Case. A 39-year-old lady at 32 weeks of gestation presented with abdominal pain and nausea. Her symptoms worsened during admission. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed dilated small bowel loops suggestive of intestinal obstruction. She eventually underwent a laparotomy as conservative measures failed. Conclusion. A high index of clinical suspicion is required to diagnose intestinal obstruction in pregnancy. Prompt diagnosis should be made and the appropriate treatment instituted. Surgical intervention should be performed if necessary as further delay only results in increased morbidity and mortality.

[Acute abdomen]

Acute abdomen is not a disease entity on its own but describes a critical state of the patient which can be caused by numerous diseases. The surgeon and internist have to apply an interdisciplinary approach to enable a rapid decision on whether immediate laparotomy is mandatory. Few appropriate diagnostic procedures support decision making. In many cases there is an indication for immediate surgery, such as perforated gastric or duodenal ulcer, acute appendicitis, diverticulitis, ruptured aortic aneurysm, mechanic ileus, infarction of the mesenteric artery. This review is mainly focused on diseases which may present as acute abdomen but for which surgery is usually not indicated, such as acute pancreatitis. Furthermore, one also has to consider rare diseases in which laparotomy would clearly be a mistake, such as acute intermittent porphyria or intestinal pseudo-obstruction.

Acute Abdomen in Gynaecological Practice

Acute abdomen in pregnancy is due to consequence of pregnancy itself or is totally unrelated to pregnancy. During pregnancy, a woman is at an increased risk of acute abdomen due to various physiological changes. The article discusses the various conditions which can present as acute abdomen in women during pregnancy and in non-pregnant state. The clinician often has a difficult task in diagnosing and managing acute abdomen in pregnancy. Clinical evaluation is further confounded by various anatomical and physiological changes occurring in pregnancy. The growing gravid uterus too causes difficulty in detailed examination. The general reluctance to use conventional X-rays because of pregnancy should be set aside when faced with a seriously ill mother. A reluctance to operate during pregnancy adds unnecessary delay, which increases morbidity for both the mother and the fetus. Adnexal accidents should always be kept in mind in a woman with acute abdomen even if she is not pregnant. Such mistakes should be avoided as prompt diagnosis and appropriate therapy are crucial. A general approach to acute abdominal conditions in pregnancy is to manage these problems considering the risk to mother regardless of the pregnancy.

Abdominal pain during pregnancy

Numerous medical, surgical, psychiatric, gynecologic, and obstetric disorders can cause abdominal pain during pregnancy. The patient history, physical examination, laboratory data, and radiologic findings usually provide the diagnosis. The pregnant woman has physiologic alterations that affect the clinical presentation, including atypical normative laboratory values. Abdominal ultrasound is generally the recommended radiologic imaging modality; roentgenograms are generally contraindicated during pregnancy because of radiation teratogenicity. Concerns about the fetus limit the pharmacotherapy. Maternal and fetal survival have recently increased in many life-threatening conditions, such as ectopic pregnancy, appendicitis, and eclampsia, because of improved diagnostic technology, better maternal and fetal monitoring, improved laparoscopic technology, and earlier therapy.