Radical radiotherapy incorporating a brachytherapy boost for the treatment of carcinoma of the thoracic oesophagus: results from a cohort of patients and review of the literature

Radical treatment for oesophageal cancer patients unfit for surgery and chemotherapy. A 10-year experience from the Norwegian Radium Hospital

BACKGROUND

Over a 10-year period from 1990, 445 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus were admitted to the Norwegian Radium Hospital and 184 of these patients received treatment with curative intent. Even though surgery is the treatment of choice for these patients, many of them suffer from medical conditions that increase the risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity. In a retrospective study, the effect of the curative treatment offered to patients was explored with a particular focus on patients unfit for surgery.

METHODS

Medical data of the 184 patients treated with curative intent were reviewed and additional clinical information was retrieved from local hospitals and general practitioners. Preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery was the standard curative treatment for operable patients. Medically inoperable patients were offered radical split-course hyperfractionated radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost.

RESULTS

More than 50% (103/184) received non-surgical treatment only. Patients who received radical surgery (n = 81) were younger, had better performance status, less weight loss and dysphagia compared to patients treated with radical radiotherapy (n = 102). One patient received only photodynamic therapy. The 3-year survival was 29% for patients treated with radical surgery, and 8% for patients who received radical radiotherapy. The overall median crude survival for the two groups of patients were 20 months and seven months respectively.

CONCLUSION

The hyperfractionated radiotherapy provided symptom relief without extensive toxicity and with a possibility for cure for patients with oesophageal cancer who are unfit for surgery and chemoradiotherapy. The literature supports the curative potential of high dose accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy even though the optimal radiotherapy regimen still needs to be explored.

Self-expandable esophageal stent loaded with 125I seeds: initial experience in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the response to treatment with a self-expandable esophageal stent loaded with iodine 125 ((125)I) seeds for intraluminal brachytherapy versus the response to treatment with a conventional self-expandable covered stent in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients from one institution who had dysphagia caused by inoperable esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to receive treatment with a stent loaded with (125)I seeds (irradiation stent group) or a conventional covered stent (control group). After stent implantation, the outcomes were measured in terms of relief of dysphagia, survival time, and complications related to the procedure. Dysphagia was assigned a grade. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

RESULTS

The stent was successfully placed in the diseased esophagus in all 53 patients (27 patients in the irradiation stent group and 26 patients in the control group). The dysphagia grades significantly improved in both groups within the 1st month after stent placement but were better in the irradiation stent group than in the control group after 2 months (P < .05). The median and mean survival times were better in the irradiation stent group than in the control group, and the differences were significant (P < .001). Hemorrhage occurred in 16 (30%) patients in both groups combined during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced esophageal cancer, treatment with an esophageal stent loaded with (125)I seeds, compared with that with a conventional covered stent, has potential benefit in that it allows a slightly longer relief of dysphagia and extended survival.

Equivalent uniform dose concept evaluated by theoretical dose volume histograms for thoracic irradiation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The goal of our study was to quantify the limits of the EUD models for use in score functions in inverse planning software, and for clinical application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We focused on oesophagus cancer irradiation. Our evaluation was based on theoretical dose volume histograms (DVH), and we analyzed them using volumetric and linear quadratic EUD models, average and maximum dose concepts, the linear quadratic model and the differential area between each DVH.

RESULTS

We evaluated our models using theoretical and more complex DVHs for the above regions of interest. We studied three types of DVH for the target volume: the first followed the ICRU dose homogeneity recommendations; the second was built out of the first requirements and the same average dose was built in for all cases; the third was truncated by a small dose hole. We also built theoretical DVHs for the organs at risk, in order to evaluate the limits of, and the ways to use both EUD(1) and EUD/LQ models, comparing them to the traditional ways of scoring a treatment plan. For each volume of interest we built theoretical treatment plans with differences in the fractionation.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that both volumetric and linear quadratic EUDs should be used. Volumetric EUD(1) takes into account neither hot-cold spot compensation nor the differences in fractionation, but it is more sensitive to the increase of the irradiated volume. With linear quadratic EUD/LQ, a volumetric analysis of fractionation variation effort can be performed.

Self-expandable stent loaded with 125I seeds: feasibility and safety in a rabbit model

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate technical feasibility and acute and subacute radiotolerance of a self-expandable stent loaded with (125)I seeds in the rabbit esophagus.

METHODS

A self-expandable stent designed for esophageal application was made of 0.16mm nitinol wire and loaded with (125)I seeds (CIAE-6711). Twenty-seven stents with three different radioactive dosages (n=9 in each dosage group) were implanted in the esophagus of healthy rabbits, while nine stents alone were used as controls. The stents were perorally deployed into the esophagus under fluoroscopic guidance. Radiological follow-up included plain chest film, CT scan, and barium esophagography which were undertaken in all rabbits of each group at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively, which were correlated to histopathological findings. The stented esophageal segments along with their adjacent tissues were harvested for histopathological examinations.

RESULTS

The stent was successfully deployed into the targeted esophageal segment in all rabbits. Neither (125)I seeds dislodged from the stent during the deployment, nor they did during the follow-up period. The greatest (16.2Gy) absorbed dose was found in the tissue 10mm from (125)I seeds at 8 weeks. Slight epithelial hyperplasia on the stent surface and submucosal inflammatory process developed at 2 weeks, which reached the peak at 8 weeks after the procedure. Significant thickness of the esophageal muscular layer was found at 8 weeks only in the groups with (125)I seeds. On radiologic follow-up, moderate strictures on both ends of the stents developed at 4 weeks and became severe at 8 weeks after the procedure in all groups.

CONCLUSION

Deployment of a self-expandable stent loaded with (125)I seeds is technically feasible and safe within the first 8 weeks. Acute and subacute radiotolerance of the treated esophagus and its adjacent tissues by (125)I seeds is well preserved in a healthy rabbit model.

New approach to malignant strictures of the esophagus

Primary esophageal cancer is the most common cause of malignant esophageal stricture. Prognosis and treatment outcomes vary with the stage of the disease. Endoscopic ultrasound has a high accuracy rate for local and regional staging. Surgery is curative for early cancer. Endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy, or brachytherapy can be used with curative intent for early cancer, especially in patients with comorbid conditions precluding surgery. Unfortunately, the majority of patients with esophageal cancer present with advanced disease. The primary aim in these patients is to alleviate symptoms with a minimum of side effects and reinterventions. Palliative surgery or chemoradiotherapy can be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Several endoscopic techniques for palliation are available, and all have the potential of significantly improving swallowing. The choice of a particular endoscopic approach is usually determined by local expertise and characteristics of the stricture.