1
|
Loo M, Clavier JB, Attal Khalifa J, Moyal E, Khalifa J. Dose-Response Effect and Dose-Toxicity in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236086. [PMID: 34885193 PMCID: PMC8657210 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Brain metastases are one of the most frequent complications for cancer patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery is considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases and the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remain unknown. The aim of this literature review is to discuss the dose-effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery, accounting for fractionation and technical considerations. Abstract For more than two decades, stereotactic radiosurgery has been considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases. Historically, radiosurgery in a single fraction has been the standard of care but recent technical advances have also enabled the delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for dedicated situations. Only few studies have investigated the efficacy and toxicity profile of different hypofractionated schedules but, to date, the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remains unknown. Moreover, the linear-quadratic model is being debated regarding high dose per fraction. Recent studies shown the radiation schedule is a critical factor in the immunomodulatory responses. The aim of this literature review was to discuss the dose–effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery accounting for fractionation and technical considerations. Efficacy and toxicity data were analyzed in the light of recent published data. Only retrospective and heterogeneous data were available. We attempted to present the relevant data with caution. A BED10 of 40 to 50 Gy seems associated with a 12-month local control rate >70%. A BED10 of 50 to 60 Gy seems to achieve a 12-month local control rate at least of 80% at 12 months. In the brain metastases radiosurgery series, for single-fraction schedule, a V12 Gy < 5 to 10 cc was associated to 7.1–22.5% radionecrosis rate. For three-fractions schedule, V18 Gy < 26–30 cc, V21 Gy < 21 cc and V23 Gy < 5–7 cc were associated with about 0–14% radionecrosis rate. For five-fractions schedule, V30 Gy < 10–30 cc, V 28.8 Gy < 3–7 cc and V25 Gy < 16 cc were associated with about 2–14% symptomatic radionecrosis rate. There are still no prospective trials comparing radiosurgery to fractionated stereotactic irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Loo
- Radiotherapy Department, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse—Oncopôle, 31100 Toulouse, France; (J.A.K.); (E.M.); (J.K.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Jean-Baptiste Clavier
- Radiotherapy Department, Strasbourg Europe Cancer Institute (ICANS), 67033 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Justine Attal Khalifa
- Radiotherapy Department, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse—Oncopôle, 31100 Toulouse, France; (J.A.K.); (E.M.); (J.K.)
| | - Elisabeth Moyal
- Radiotherapy Department, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse—Oncopôle, 31100 Toulouse, France; (J.A.K.); (E.M.); (J.K.)
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Radiotherapy Department, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse—Oncopôle, 31100 Toulouse, France; (J.A.K.); (E.M.); (J.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong Y, Zhang Y, Zhang T, Fan M, Zhu J, Li B, Huang W. Feasibility and Efficacy of Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy based on MRI-CT fusion in Patients with Brain Metastases of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. J Cancer 2018; 9:4477-4483. [PMID: 30519353 PMCID: PMC6277651 DOI: 10.7150/jca.26547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the feasibility and therapeutic effects of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) based on the fusion imaging of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) as a dose-intensive technique in patients with brain metastases (BM) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods and materials: Forty-six NSCLC patients with 1 to 7 brain metastases were enrolled in this retrospective study between November, 2011 and February, 2017. Thirty-one patients (67.4%) had 1-3 metastases (oligometastases), otherwise, more than 3 metastases were seen in only 15 patients (32.6%). GTV (Gross tumor volume) contouring was based on the fusion imaging of MRI-CT, WBRT was prescribed in 37.5 Gy/15 fractions with a simultaneous boost in the metastatic lesions of 52.5 Gy/15 fractions. Results: The median overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression free survival (PFS) for all the patients were 20.0 months and 11.0 months, respectively. The 6-month and 1-year OS were 87.0% and 69.6% respectively, while the 6-month and 1-year PFS were 78.3% and 43.5% respectively. Until the end of the follow-up, 16 patients (34.8%) were alive. No evidence of intracranial progress or recurrence was found in 6 patients (13.0%) during the follow-up. Conclusion: SIB-IMRT with the dose/fractionation based on the fusion imaging of MRI-CT is feasible and safe. It is beneficial to the NSCLC patients with BM and can reduce the overall costs of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinping Dong
- School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yanke Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the General Hospital of Yan-zhou Mining Group, Jining, China
| | - Tianyi Zhang
- School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Min Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Baosheng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Wei Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Habets EJJ, Dirven L, Wiggenraad RG, Verbeek-de Kanter A, Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ, Zwinkels H, Klein M, Taphoorn MJB. Neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: a prospective study. Neuro Oncol 2015; 18:435-44. [PMID: 26385615 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is expected to have a less detrimental effect on neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than whole-brain radiotherapy. To evaluate the impact of brain metastases and SRT on neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL, we performed a prospective study. METHODS Neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL of 97 patients with brain metastases were measured before SRT and 1, 3, and 6 months after SRT. Seven cognitive domains were assessed. HRQoL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and BN20 questionnaires. Neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL over time were analyzed with linear mixed models and stratified for baseline Karnofsky performance status (KPS), total metastatic volume, and systemic disease. RESULTS Median overall survival of patients was 7.7 months. Before SRT, neurocognitive domain and HRQoL scores were lower in patients than in healthy controls. At group level, patients worsened in physical functioning and fatigue at 6 months, while other outcome parameters of HRQoL and cognition remained stable. KPS < 90 and tumor volume >12.6 cm(3) were both associated with worse information processing speed and lower HRQoL scores over 6 months time. Intracranial tumor progression was associated with worsening of executive functioning and motor function. CONCLUSIONS Prior to SRT, neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL are moderately impaired in patients with brain metastases. Lower baseline KPS and larger tumor volume are associated with worse functioning. Over time, SRT does not have an additional detrimental effect on neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL, suggesting that SRT may be preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther J J Habets
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Ruud G Wiggenraad
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Antoinette Verbeek-de Kanter
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Hanneke Zwinkels
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Martin Klein
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (E.J.J.H., H.Z., M.J.B.T.); Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.D., M.J.B.T.); Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, the Netherlands (R.G.W., A.V.-d.K.); Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, the Netherlands (G.J.L.àN.); Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (M.K.)
| |
Collapse
|