Adjuvant interferon-alpha in malignant melanoma: current status

Therapeutic Efficacy of Delta-Like Ligand 4 Gene Vaccine Overexpression on Liver Cancer in Mice

Delta-like ligand 4 is a notch ligand that is predominantly expressed in the endothelial tip cells and plays essential roles in the regulation of angiogenesis. In this study, we explored the therapeutic effects of delta-like ligand 4 gene vaccine overexpression on the syngeneic model mouse model of liver cancer and the underlying mechanisms. Mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cell line H22-H8D8 was used to generate subcutaneous syngeneic model liver cancer in Kunming mice, and the effects of recombinant plasmid pVAX1 containing delta-like ligand 4 vaccine on tumor growth was examined. Compared to controls, delta-like ligand 4 vaccination reduced syngeneic model tumor size by 70.31% (from 17.11 ± 9.30 cm³ to 5.08 ± 2.75 cm³, P = .035) and tumor weight by 34.19% (from 6.26 ± 3.01 g to 4.12 ± 2.52 g, P = .102), while the mouse survival was significantly increased (from 27.7 ± 6.0 days to 33.1 ± 6.1 days, P = .047). High level of delta-like ligand 4 antibody, together with a significantly increased number of CD4⁺ and decreased CD8⁺ cells were identified in the mouse peripheral blood serum samples after delta-like ligand 4 immunization. In addition, elevated serum levels of interleukin 2, interleukin 4, and interferon γ were detected in the delta-like ligand 4-vaccinated mice when compared to the controls. Further studies have revealed increased CD31 and decreased Ki67 expression in the syngeneic model tumor tissues of vaccinated mice. Taken together, our studies suggest that delta-like ligand 4 gene vaccine can inhibit the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice through inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and boosting antitumor immune responses. Hence, delta-like ligand 4 gene vaccination may be a promising strategy for the treatment of transplanted liver cancer.

Adjuvant therapy of melanoma with interferon: lessons of the past decade

The effect of interferon alpha (IFNalpha2) given alone or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials over the past 30 years. Despite the number of adjuvant studies that have been conducted, controversy remains in the oncology community regarding the role of this treatment. Recently an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis at longer follow-up was reported, showing a statistically significant benefit for IFN in relation to relapse-free survival, without any difference according to dosage (p = 0.2) or duration of IFN therapy (p = 0.5). Most interestingly, there was a statistically significant benefit of IFN upon overall survival (OS) that translates into an absolute benefit of at least 3% (CI 1-5%) at 5 years. Thus, both the individual trials and this meta-analysis provide evidence that adjuvant IFNalpha2 significantly reduces the risk of relapse and mortality of high-risk melanoma, albeit with a relatively small absolute improvement in survival in the overall population. We have surveyed the international literature from the meta-analysis (2006) to summarize and assimilate current biological evidence that indicates a potent impact of this molecule upon the tumor microenvironment and STAT signaling, as well as the immunological polarization of the tumor tissue in vivo. In conclusion, we argue that there is a compelling rationale for new research upon IFN, especially in the adjuvant setting where the most pronounced effects of this agent have been discovered. These efforts have already shed light upon the immunological and proinflammatory predictors of therapeutic benefit from this agent--that may allow practitioners to determine which patients may benefit from IFN therapy, and approaches that may enable us to overcome resistance or enhance the efficacy of IFN. Future efforts may well build toward patient-oriented therapy based upon the knowledge of the unique molecular features of this disease and the immune system of each melanoma patient.

Pretreatment levels of sTNF-R1 and sIL-6R are associated with a higher vulnerability for IFN-alpha-induced depressive symptoms in patients with malignant melanoma

Immunomodulatory therapy with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) often leads to neuropsychiatric side effects, especially depression. An activation of the immune system is discussed to trigger neurotransmitter changes and depressive illness. So far, few data are available about biologic markers, who may predict the individual risk for developing depressive symptoms during IFN-alpha therapy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive role of certain immunologic markers for the development of IFN-alpha-induced depression. We hypothesized that patients characterized by a proinflammatory and TH1-accentuated immune response before treatment might have an increased risk for developing depressive mood changes. Thirty-three melanoma patients were prospectively investigated during adjuvant treatment with IFN-alpha-2a/2b (3 x 3 Mio units/wk). Depressive mood changes were assessed with the self-rating depression scale (SDS, Zung-scale) before and during IFN-alpha treatment. Serum concentrations of soluble tumor necrosis factor-R1 (sTNF-R1), soluble interleukin-6R (sIL-6R), sIL-4R, and neopterin were measured before and after 3 months of treatment. sIL-6R, which was negatively associated with SDS scores, significantly predicted higher depression scores in the first 3 months of IFN-alpha treatment. sTNF-R1, which was positively associated with SDS scores, significantly predicted the development of late depressive symptoms after 6 months of therapy. In contrast to the initial hypothesis, patients characterized by high sTNF-R1 and low sIL-6R baseline levels, indicating an anti-inflammatory condition before therapy, had a higher vulnerability for depression during IFN-alpha therapy.

Autologous renal cell cancer vaccines using heat shock protein-peptide complexes

Investigations into the role of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in immune response have progressed well into a third decade, and indications of their use for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the adjuvant setting will be revealed in the near future when a randomized phase III clinical trial is completed. Additional ongoing and planned randomized clinical trials will test the efficacy of HSP-based vaccines in more advanced stages of RCC. This review describes the compelling scientific rationale behind testing HSPs in RCC against the backdrop of other immunotherapeutic approaches in this indication.

Technical hurdles in a pilot clinical trial of combined B7-2 and GM-CSF immunogene therapy for glioblastomas and melanomas

OBJECTIVE

Malignant glioblastomas and melanomas continue to have a dismal prognosis despite advances in conventional therapy. This has led to investigations of novel treatment strategies including immunogene therapy. We report a pilot clinical trial of combined B7-2 and GM-CSF immunogene therapy for gliomas and melanomas and discuss technical hurdles encountered.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent malignant gliomas or medically refractory melanomas were vaccinated with irradiated autologous tumor cells transduced with B7-2 and GM-CSF genes using a retroviral vector. Patients were monitored for toxicity, inflammatory/immune reactions, and clinical status.

RESULTS

Vaccine preparation was attempted from 116 malignant glioma and 32 melanoma specimens. Adequate vaccines could only be prepared for five glioblastoma and three melanoma patients. Six patients (three recurrent glioblastomas and three melanomas) were actually vaccinated. Minor toxicities included flu-like symptoms (3/6), injection site erythema (4/6), and asymptomatic elevations in liver enzymes (3/6). Most patients showed evidence of an inflammatory response but specific anti-tumor immunity was not demonstrated. All six patients have died, although three patients with minimal residual disease at treatment had prolonged recurrence-free intervals after vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined B7-2 and GM-CSF immunogene therapy for glioblastomas and melanomas using autologous tumor cells has many technical pitfalls hindering large scale application and evaluation. As a result, this pilot study was too limited to draw meaningful conclusions regarding safety or anti-tumor immunity. While immunotherapy has been promising in pre-clinical studies, alternate strategies will be required to bring these benefits to patients.

Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of interferon-alpha in malignant melanoma: results from randomised trial

A definitive conclusion regarding the value of low-dose extended duration adjuvant interferon-alpha therapy in the treatment of malignant melanoma is only possible once data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs have been considered. This trial randomised 674 patients to interferon alpha-2a (3 megaunits three times per week for 2 years or until recurrence) or placebo. Health-related quality of life (QoL) was to be assessed up to 60 months using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30. Data for the economic analysis, including cost information and the EQ-5D were also collected. Patients in the observation (OBS) group had significantly better mean follow-up quality of on five dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scales: role functioning (P = 0.033), emotional functioning (P = 0.003), cognitive functioning (P = 0.001), social functioning (P = 0.003) and global health status (P = 0.001). Patients in the OBS group had significantly better mean follow-up symptom scores on seven dimensions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 V1 symptom scales. Economic data showed that costs were 3066 pounds higher in the interferon group and produces an incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year of 41,432 pounds at 5 years. The results show that interferon has significant effects on QoL and symptomatology and is unlikely to be cost-effective in this patient group in the UK.

Adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma: where are we?

To date, no standard adjuvant therapy have increased overall survival in patients with malignant melanoma (MM). The effect of interferon alpha as a single agent or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials. Critical reading of the major international randomised trials showed that response to interferon (IFN) in terms of improvement of overall survival (OS) may not be strictly correlated with the used dosage and that duration of therapy may impact disease-free survival (DFS) but not OS. Patients' heterogeneity could be an explanation for the discordant data of the international literature. Indeed, majority of these studies started in late 1980s or early 1990s, when accurate staging procedure were not available yet. The adequate surgical treatment should be considered as an independent variable in the analysis of MM adjuvant protocols. Considering the treatment cost, which is the main goal: DFS, OS or quality of life? Answering these questions is difficult, but some considerations must be taken to put order in this field. Putting together data from all different studies, IFN therapy seems to protect MM patients from recurrences during the entire treatment period and a prolonged IFN therapy seems to improve DFS. The only positive result on OS was demonstrated for high-dose IFN (HD-IFN) in a single study (presenting a relatively short follow-up median) and not confirmed in a subsequent study from the same authors. Considering that low-dose interferon (LD-IFN) is tolerated much better than HD-IFN (about 10% versus more than 70% of cases with grade 3-4 toxicity, respectively), a prolonged LD-IFN (more than 2 years) may represent a reasonable opportunity for MM patients, also considering its advantageous cost-effectiveness. Conversely, considering the improvement of OS as the main target of MM adjuvant therapy, the "wait and watch" attitude remains the only approach to be pursued at present. It is a physician's choice.

Systemic chemo-immunotherapy for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of systemic chemo-immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced HCC were treated by using systemic chemo-immunotherapy (PIAF regimen), which consisted of cisplatin (20 mg/m²) intravenously daily for 4 consecutive day, doxorubicin (40 mg/m²) intravenously on day 1, 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m²) intravenously daily for 4 consecutive day, and human recombinant α-interferon-2a (5 Mu/m²) subcutaneous injection daily for 4 consecutive day. The treatment was repeated every 3 wk, with a maximum of six cycles.

RESULTS: A total of 90 cycles of PIAF treatment were administered, with a mean number of 3.9 cycles per patient. Eight patients received six cycles of treatment (group A), and the remaining 18 were subjected to two to five cycles (group B). There were 0 complete response, 4 partial responses, 9 static diseases and 13 progressive diseases, with a disease control rate of 50% (13/26). The 1-year survival rate was 24.3%, with a median survival time of 6.0 mo. Group A had a remarkably better survival as compared with group B, the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 62.5% vs 6.1% and 32.3% vs 0%, and a median survival time was 12.5 mo vs 5.0 mo (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Systemic chemo-immunotherapy using PIAF regimen represented an effective treatment and could improve the survival rate and prolong the survival time in selected patients with advanced HCC.

Correlation between sICAM-1 and depressive symptoms during adjuvant treatment of melanoma with interferon-alpha

Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) treatment is frequently complicated by symptoms of depression. The mechanism by which peripherally administered IFN-alpha enters and modulates the central nervous system remains unclear. The cell adhesion molecule ICAM-1 is involved in the regulation of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. ICAM-1 expression was shown to increase during IFN-alpha treatment and recently the expression of ICAM-1 on vascular endothelial cells in the brain was found to be correlated with the development of depression. We therefore hypothesized that soluble ICAM-1 may be involved in the development of IFN-alpha associated depression. In a prospective study, serum levels of soluble ICAM-1 (double sandwich ELISA test) and symptoms of depression (SDS) were measured in 48 patients with malignant melanoma before and during adjuvant IFN-alpha treatment. Both, depression scores and the serum levels of sICAM-1 significantly increased after three months of IFN-alpha treatment compared to baseline levels (p < .001). Patients who developed depression (SDS-index scores > or = 50) after three months of treatment had higher sICAM-1 levels compared to non-depressed patients. Furthermore, sICAM-1 levels were positively correlated with SDS values (r = .367, p = .018). Our data provides evidence for an association between the induction of sICAM-1 and the development of symptoms of depression during IFN-alpha treatment, possibly by enhancing BBB-permeability.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for renalcellcancer

Metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) is resistant to chemotherapy, and patients with this disease have a poor outlook. Immunotherapy by use of cytokines and vaccines against tumour antigens has shown encouraging results in a small group of patients. Advances in the understanding of the graft-versus-tumour effect in haematological malignant disorders have led to the use of stem-cell transplantation for treatment of solid-organ malignant diseases such as RCC. Techniques of bone-marrow ablation have been superseded by safer conditioning regimens, with occasional complete remission and partial remission in some patients. Graft-versus-host disease, engraftment failure, and disease progression remain important obstacles to the widespread use of new techniques for metastatic RCC. Here, we summarise important issues surrounding immunotherapy for RCC, the problems encountered with use of immunotherapy, and the present use of non-myeloablative techniques for treatment of this disease.

Adjuvant interferon in high-risk melanoma: the AIM HIGH Study--United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research randomized study of adjuvant low-dose extended-duration interferon Alfa-2a in high-risk resected malignant melanoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate low-dose extended duration interferon alfa-2a as adjuvant therapy in patients with thick (> or = 4 mm) primary cutaneous melanoma and/or locoregional metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial involving 674 patients, the effect of interferon alfa-2a (3 megaunits three times per week for 2 years or until recurrence) on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared with that of no further treatment in radically resected stage IIB and stage III cutaneous malignant melanoma.

RESULTS

The OS and RFS rates at 5 years were 44% (SE, 2.6) and 32% (SE, 2.1), respectively. There was no significant difference in OS or RFS between the interferon-treated and control arms (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.18; P =.6; and OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.10; P =.3; respectively). Male sex (P =.003) and regional lymph node involvement (P =.0009), but not age (P =.7), were statistically significant adverse features for OS. Subgroup analysis by disease stage, age, and sex did not show any clear differences between interferon-treated and control groups in either OS or RFS. Interferon-related toxicities were modest: grade 3 (and in only one case, grade 4) fatigue or mood disturbance was seen in 7% and 4% respectively, of patients. However, there were 50 withdrawals (15%) from interferon treatment due to toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study, taken in isolation, do not indicate that extended-duration low-dose interferon is significantly better than observation alone in the initial treatment of completely resected high-risk malignant melanoma.

Immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most prevalent malignancy within the kidney and the incidence is rising. Due to improved radiological evaluation over 50% of the renal cancers are found incidentally. Despite the fact that these incidentalomas are often confined to the kidney, around 50% of all patients diagnosed with kidney cancer will develop systemic disease. Metastatic RCC has a poor prognosis. Traditional treatment modalities like chemo- and radiotherapy show overall response percentages of 2-6%. In view of the observed spontaneous remissions of advanced renal cancer, immune mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in the natural disease course of RCC. At present, several non-specific cytokine regimens are used in the treatment of mRCC, e.g. interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha, in combination or as monotherapy or in combination with substances like 13-cis-retinoic acid and/or 5-fluorouracil. Collective data of trials evaluating cytokine-based therapies for mRCC show an overall response rate of approximately 15%, with 5% of the patients showing complete responses. More importantly, cytokine treatment clearly translates into a significant survival benefit in a subset of patients. Nevertheless, the toxicity profile of these cytokine regimens is significant. With the enhanced knowledge of tumor-immunology, the identification of immunogenic tumor proteins, and antibodies recognizing tumor-associated antigens, new treatment strategies with increased specificity and fewer side effects are of interest. Here we review the different immunotherapeutical modalities currently used as well as new approaches for the treatment of advanced RCC.

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 1

Interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) is a pleiotropic cytokine with direct and indirect antitumour effects. These include prolongation of the cell cycle time of malignant cells, inhibition of biosynthetic enzymes and apoptosis, interaction with other cytokines, and immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects. The first clinical trials in solid tumours used crude preparations of natural IFNalpha and demonstrated that tumour regressions in solid tumours and haematological malignancies were possible. Since the advent of genetic engineering technology, recombinant (r) IFNalpha has been widely evaluated in solid tumours. This review discusses the use and potential of rIFNalpha in solid tumours; the first part focuses on malignant melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma, rIFNalpha has been tested in randomised trials in more than 6000 patients. High-dosage IFNalpha (> or =10MU) prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival (OS). Low-dosage IFNalpha (< or =3MU) has not been shown to prolong DFS or OS, and current data do not support its use outside clinical trials. The latest United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research meta-analysis of ten randomised trials that used adjuvant rIFNalpha has shown that there is a benefit in DFS but not OS. No conclusions can be reached for intermediate-dosage IFNalpha (5 to 10MU) until the mature results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 18952 are available. In RCC, current evidence does not support the use of adjuvant IFNalpha. In metastatic malignant melanoma and RCC, reported response rates to rIFNalpha are approximately 15%. In a minority of responding patients, however, these responses can be long-standing. In metastatic malignant melanoma, IFNalpha combined with other cytotoxic agents with or without interleukin-2 has achieved high response rates but has not improved survival. In metastatic RCC, intermediate dosages of rIFNalpha should be used and therapy should probably be prolonged (>12 months); response depends on prognostic factors such as good performance status, whereas survival is affected by factors such as low tumour burden. Nephrectomy should therefore be considered in patients with good performance status prior to IFNalpha immunotherapy in advanced RCC, even in patients with metastatic disease. The toxicity of high-dosage IFNalpha and the lack of definite benefit on OS with high- or low-dosage IFNalpha do not support its use outside clinical trials. Data from the ongoing US Intergroup studies, the ongoing EORTC 18991 study (long-term therapy with pegylated IFNalpha) and mature data from EORTC 18952 (intermediate-dosage IFNalpha) will help establish the role of IFNalpha as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma.

Adjuvant therapy of malignant melanoma

High risk surgically resected melanoma is associated with a less than 50% 5-year survival. Adjuvant therapy is an appropriate treatment modality in this setting, and is more likely to be effective as the tumour burden here is small. Clinical observations of spontaneous tumour regressions and a highly variable rate of disease progression suggest a role of the immune system in the natural history of melanoma. Biological agents have therefore been the subjects of numerous adjuvant studies. Early, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), levamisole, Corynebacterium parvum, chemotherapy, isolated limb perfusion (ILP), radiotherapy, transfer factor (TF), megestrol acetate and vitamin A yielded largely negative results. Current trials focus on vaccines and the interferons. To date the latter is the only therapy to have shown a significant benefit in the prospective randomised controlled phase III setting. This report represents a systematic review of studies in adjuvant therapy in melanoma. Data from ongoing studies is awaited before a role for adjuvant agents in high risk melanoma is confirmed.

Interferon alfa therapy for malignant melanoma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

No standard systemic adjuvant therapy has been proven to increase overall survival in melanoma patients. The effect of interferon alfa (IFNalpha) as a single agent or in combination has been widely explored in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of IFNalpha therapy in malignant melanoma.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing regimens with or without IFNalpha adjuvant therapy in melanoma patients. We assessed the effect of IFNalpha therapy on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), melanoma recurrences, and toxicity. The quality of each trial was systematically evaluated.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IFNalpha therapy in melanoma patients were identified. Eight were published and one was unpublished. Eight trials comprising 3,178 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Quality assessment scores ranged from 22 to 71, with a mean score of 55.4 (95% confidence interval, 53.8 to 57.0). For OS, only one trial reported a statistically significant benefit for IFNalpha, but our analysis did not confirm it. Two trials reported statistically significant benefit in DFS for the patients treated with IFNalpha, but our analysis confirmed it in only one trial. There was a wide clinical heterogeneity between included trials, making meta-analysis inappropriate.

CONCLUSION

In our review, results from included RCTs demonstrated no clear benefit of IFNalpha therapy on OS in melanoma patients. A large RCT is required to answer whether a full regimen of IFNalpha therapy is effective and to identify the subgroups of patients who might benefit from IFNalpha treatment.