Surgical treatment of gastric cancer invading the oesophagus

Supra-ampullary duodenectomy in a patient with positive distal resection margin after subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a case report

Resection margin involvement after curative intent resection for gastric cancer results in a poor prognosis and deprives the patient of the chance for a cure. Reoperation to achieve an R0 status should guarantee tolerable morbidity and achievement of negative margins. We performed laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with extracorporeal Billroth II reconstruction in a 56-year-old woman with gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Scattered cancer cells were observed in the proximal and distal resection margins on immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin. Two weeks postoperatively, remnant total gastrectomy and supra-ampullary duodenectomy were performed. Before reoperation, percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and angiocatheter placement outside the ampulla of Vater (AoV) via the cystic duct were performed to avoid pancreaticoduodenectomy and to obtain the maximal distal margin. Duodenal transection was performed 1 cm above the AoV. The resected duodenum was 4 cm in length. The patient had no postoperative complications and received adjuvant chemotherapy 1 month after the reoperation.

[R1 resection of esophageal carcinoma]

The microscopic identification of residual tumor tissue in the oral or aboral resection margins (R1 resection) of esophageal specimens following oncologic esophageal resection, increases the risk of tumor recurrence and disease-related morbidity. Esophageal resection with its associated risks is only meaningful, if an R0 situation can be safely achieved. The relevance of microscopic involvement of the circumferential resection margin (CRM) in esophageal carcinoma in its different definitions by the British and the American Societies of Pathology has up to now never been investigated in a prospective study. According to the German S3 guideline, radiochemotherapy should be performed in a postoperatively proven R1 situation, which cannot be converted by a curative extended re-resection into an R0 situation or in unfavorable conditions for an extended re-resection, independent of neoadjuvant therapy. In the case of an R1 situation in the region of the CRM, an extended re-resection is not simply possible on account of the anatomical conditions with corresponding limitations by the aorta and the spinal column, in contrast to extensions of the re-resection orally or aborally.

The length of proximal margin does not influence the prognosis of Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction after transhiatal curative gastrectomy

Background

The optimal length of proximal margin for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEJ) is still need to be clarified. The aim of the present study was to investigate the appropriate length of proximal margin for Siewert type II/III AEJ through transhiatal approach.

Methods

From September 2009 to December 2014, a total of 693 consecutive patients with Siewert type II/III AEJ were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received transhiatal R0 resection. The proximal margin length was measured immediately after resection. The prognostic value of proximal margin length on Siewert type II/III AEJ with transhiatal approach was analyzed.

Results

There were 404 cases of Siewert type II AEJ (58.3 %) and 289 cases of Siewert type III AEJ (41.7 %). Total gastrectomy was performed in 526 patients (75.9 %), and proximal gastrectomy was performed in 167 patients (24.1 %). The median length of the gross proximal margin was 2.4 (range 0.1–5.0) cm. Lymph node metastasis was the only independent prognostic predictor for Siewert type II AEJ. Tumor size and lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic predictors for Siewert type III AEJ.

Conclusions

For Siewert type II/III AEJ with esophageal invasion of 3 cm or less, proximal margin length does not influence the prognosis of patients after transhiatal curative gastrectomy.

Incidence of microscopically positive proximal margins in adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction

Aim

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of microscopically positive proximal margins in Chinese patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.

Methods

The medical records of 483 patients, who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in a single high-volume tertiary medical center, were reviewed. Demographic, radiographic, endoscopic, pathologic, and treatment-related variables were evaluated. All proximal margins were re-evaluated by two experienced pathologists, and a positive proximal margin was defined as the microscopic presence of invasive tumor cells seen at the esophageal transaction margin submitted en face on final paraffin sections.

Results

The incidence of positive proximal margins was 23.81% in this series. Siewert type, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node involvement, presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion, and presence of perineural invasion were significantly associated with positive proximal margins. On multivariate analysis, the presence of vascular or lymphatic invasion and advanced-stage disease were independent risk factors for positive proximal margins in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.

Conclusion

Residual cancer at proximal resection margins remains a major issue for the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction in China.

Benefit of mediastinal and para-aortic lymph-node dissection for advanced gastric cancer with esophageal invasion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Lymph-node dissection in gastric cancers with esophageal invasion (AGCE) is of current interest. This study examined the significance of inferior mediastinal lymph-node (IM) and para-aortic lymph-node (PA) dissection for this type of cancer.

METHOD

Two hundred and seventy cases of AGCE were clinicopathologically reviewed. An index of estimated benefit from lymph-node dissection (IEBLD) was calculated from the frequency of lymph node metastasis in IM and PA, and from 5-year survival rates for metastatic cases.

RESULTS

Among the cases of AGCE, IM and PA metastasis rates were 18.1% and 22.2%, respectively. The IEBLD for IM and PA was similar to that for dissection of the second-tier lymph nodes around the celiac axis. The IM metastasis rate was 0.0% for esophageal invasion of 0-9 mm, 2.2% for 10-19 mm, 17.8% for 20-29 mm, and 21.7% for 30-39 mm of esophageal invasion.

CONCLUSION

AGCE is associated with a high rate of PA metastasis, and with a high rate of IM metastasis when esophageal invasion exceeds 2 cm. Since dissection of IM and PA achieved the same benefit as dissection of second-tier lymph nodes, we recommend thorough dissection of these lymph nodes.

Ecoendoscopia na avaliação pré-operatória do estádio em doentes com câncer gástrico: correlação com os achados cirúrgicos e/ou histopatológicos

RACIONAL: O câncer gástrico é a maior causa de morte por câncer no Brasil. Na avaliação do prognóstico e no planejamento da terapêutica, é importante determinar o estádio e classificá-lo em TNM. OBJETIVO: Estudar os resultados da ecoendoscopia na determinação pré-operatória das categorias T e N. MÉTODOS: Foram examinados prospectivamente e de forma consecutiva 30 pacientes com adenocarcinoma gástrico no período de 1 ano. Utilizou-se o aparelho Olympus GIF-UM-20. Após seu posicionamento na terceira porção duodenal, estudaram-se as estações linfonodais 16, 13, 12, 6, 5, 4, 3, 8, 7, 9, 10, 11, 1 e 2, usando a freqüência de 7,5 MHz. Os resultados T e N foram comparados com os achados cirúrgicos e/ou histopatológicos. Nos casos irressecáveis, a correlação foi feita com os achados macroscópicos. Para a análise estatística utilizou-se o teste de correlação coeficiente kappa. RESULTADOS: Foram realizadas 16 gastrectomias totais, 7 subtotais, 5 laparotomias exploradoras e 2 videolaparoscopias. Para a categoria T a ecoendoscopia acertou em 25/30 casos (83,3%). Todos os restantes 16,7% foram superestimados. A precisão variou de 90% a 96,7%, de acordo com as subdivisões T1 a T4. Para a categoria N, a ecoendoscopia foi correta em 23/30 casos (76,7%), sendo 16,6% subestimados e 6,7% superestimados. A precisão variou de 76,7% a 90%, de acordo com as subdivisões N0 a N2. CONCLUSÃO: Houve nítida correlação entre a ecoendoscopia pré-operatória e os achados cirúrgicos e/ou histopatológicos em pacientes com adenocarcinoma gástrico.

Health-related quality of life among patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction treated by gastrectomy or oesophagectomy

Background

Tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction may be resected by total gastrectomy (TG) or transthoracic oesophagectomy (TTO). This study compared health-related quality of life (HRQL) following these procedures.

Methods

Prospective clinical and HRQL data (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30) were collected from 63 consecutive patients (20 TG and 43 TTO) before and 6 months after surgery for Siewert type I–III gastro-oesophageal tumours.

Results

Questionnaire response rates exceeded 90 per cent. Patients were similar with respect to disease stage, treatment-related mortality and survival, but those selected for TTO were younger with less co-morbidity than those undergoing TG. These differences were reflected in baseline HRQL scores, which were better in patients selected for TTO. Six months after surgery, however, HRQL showed a greater deterioration after TTO than after TG in terms of role and social function, global quality of life and fatigue. Symptom scores for pain and diarrhoea increased in both groups.

Conclusion

TTO had a greater negative impact on HRQL than TG for tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction.

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the length of esophageal resection or the operative approach influences outcome for patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

While R0 resection remains the mainstay of curative treatment of patients with GEJ cancer, the optimal length of esophageal resection remains controversial.

METHODS

Patients with Siewert I, II, or III adenocarcinoma who underwent complete gross resection without neoadjuvant therapy were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Proximal margin lengths were recorded ex vivo as the distance from the gross tumor edge to the esophageal transection line. Operative approaches were grouped into gastrectomy (limited esophagectomy) or esophagectomy (extended esophagectomy).

RESULTS

From 1985 through 2003, 505 patients underwent R0/R1 gastrectomy (n = 153) or esophagectomy (n = 352) without neoadjuvant treatment. There were no differences in R1 resection rate, number of nodes examined or operative mortality between gastrectomy and esophagectomy. Univariate analysis found >3.8 cm to be the ex vivo proximal margin length (approximately 5 cm in situ) most predictive of improved survival. Multivariable analysis in patients who underwent R0 resection with >or=15 lymph nodes examined (n = 275) found the number of positive lymph nodes, T stage, tumor grade, and ex vivo proximal margin length >3.8 cm to be independent prognostic factors. Subset analysis found that the benefit associated with >3.8 cm margin was limited to patients with T2 or greater tumors and <or=6 positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy, the goal for patients with adenocarcinoma of the GEJ should be R0 resection including at least 15 lymph nodes, preferably with 5 cm of grossly normal in situ proximal esophagus for those with <or=6 positive lymph nodes. The operative approach may be individualized to achieve these goals.

Influence of a microscopic positive proximal margin in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia

AIM: To investigate the influence of a positive proximal margin in total gastrectomy patients with gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

METHODS: Medical records of 191 patients with total gastrectomies for adenocarcinoma of the cardia between 1995 and 2000 were reviewed. The clinicopathologic features associated with a positive margin were determined, and the predictors for survival were analyzed.

RESULTS: The incidence of positive proximal margin was 8.4% (16/191). The positive margins were associated with advanced diseases. The tumor size and the depth of tumor invasion were independent risk factors for a positive margin. The mean survival in the positive margin group was 33.9 mo as compared with 62.4 mo in the negative group (P < 0.001). However, the difference in survival lost significance in subgroup analysis according to stage. Multivariate analysis identified that a positive margin was not an independent prognostic factor for survival.

CONCLUSION: A positive margin is more of an indication of advanced disease in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia rather than an independent prognostic factor for survival.

Adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia: what is the optimal surgical approach?

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia is rising in Western countries. This study evaluates prognostic factors associated with surgical management of this cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Medical records of consecutive patients with gastric cardial cancer treated by surgical resection from 1991 through 2001 were reviewed. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using log-rank test and Cox regression. Mean followup period was 34 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients met study inclusion criteria. Median patient age was 65 years (range 86 to 22). Fifty-nine (72%) patients had type II tumors and 23 (28%) patients had type III tumors, according to the Siewert classification for gastroesophageal junction tumors. Twenty-seven (33%) patients underwent total esophagectomy, 24 (29%) patients underwent extended gastrectomy with thoracotomy, and 31 (38%) patients underwent extended gastrectomy without thoracotomy. Overall postoperative 5-year survival rate was 30%. On multivariate analysis, patient age 65 years and older, absence of lymph node metastasis, and R0 resection emerged as factors independently associated with improved postoperative survival. Frequency with which proximal resection margin was infiltrated with cancer was a function of gross margin length and T stage. Proximal gross margin length of at least 6 cm was required to achieve a microscopically negative proximal margin for T3 and T4 cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving R0 resection should be the goal of surgical therapy for the gastric cardial cancer. The surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients to achieve this goal.

Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction

AIMS

The optimal extent of oesophageal resection and surgical approach in patients treated for adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) are still uncertain. We report the correlations between resection margin involvement and outcome.

METHODS

Patients with positive proximal resection margin (PPRM) and those with negative proximal resection margin (NPRM) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 94 patients with macroscopically complete resection, eight were PPRM. There was no difference between the two groups in postoperative mortality or morbidity rates, in anastomotic leakage or in recurrence rates. The median survival in the PPRM group was 11.1 months compared with 36.3 months in the NPRM group (P=0.02). No infiltration was observed in patients whose proximal margin exceeded 7 cm. The extended transthoracic approach was the only prognostic factor for tumours type II (P=0.03, RR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8).

CONCLUSION

Histologic infiltration of oesophageal resection margin influences 5-year survival rate. In adenocarcinomas of the OGJ that can be treated curatively, a transection with a 8 cm oesophagectomy above the tumour in fresh specimen should be performed, and by thoracoabdominal approach for tumours type I and II.