Lymph node dissection for clinically evident lymph node metastases of malignant melanoma

Principles of Melanoma Staging

Although now commonplace in contemporary cancer care, the systematic approach to classification of disease-specific cancers into a formalized staging system is a relatively modern concept. Overall, the goals of cancer staging are to characterize the status of cancer at a specific moment in time, risk stratify, facilitate prognostication, and inform clinical decision making. The revisions to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system over time reflect changes in our understanding of the biology of the disease. Since the 1st edition, where tumor thickness was defined anatomically by its relationship to the reticular or papillary dermis (Clark level) as well as tumor thickness (Breslow thickness), there have been significant strides in our use of clinicopathological variables to stratify low- versus high-risk patients. Management of the regional nodal basin has also changed dramatically over time, impacted by techniques such as lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and changes in pathological evaluation of the regional lymph nodes. Additionally, stratification of distant metastases has evolved as survival outcomes have been shown to vary based upon anatomic site of metastases and serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. The variables in use in the current (7th edition) AJCC staging system are surrogate markers of biology with validated impact of survival outcomes. Going forward, it is likely that these and additional clinicopathological factors will be integrated with molecular and other correlates of melanoma tumor biology to further refine and personalize melanoma staging.

Low Probability of Lymphatic Drainage to Cloquet's Node Is of Limited Value as Indicator for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Lower Limb Melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

For patients with melanoma, the choice between an inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) alone and both an ILND and a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is controversial. Although Cloquet's node (CN) is considered the sentinel pelvic node, evaluation of this factor to predict pelvic node status has produced varied results. We investigated inguinal and pelvic lymphatic drainage patterns and focused on CN to clarify whether CN status could be an indicator of PLND.

METHODS

Patients with primary cutaneous lower limb melanoma who underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB. Each patient's CN was identified by SPECT/CT. A radioactive CN was detected in only 37.5% (12/32) of patients, and no lymphatic drainage to CN occurred in 62.5% (20/32). In 37.5% (12/32) of patients, the lymph drained directly from the inguinal to the pelvic nodes bypassing CN.

CONCLUSION

In melanoma patients, lymphatic drainage from the lower extremity does not always pass from the inguinal node to the pelvic nodes via CN. Tumor-negative status of CN alone is of limited value as an indicator for avoiding PLND.

Deep lymph node metastases in the groin significantly affects prognosis, particularly in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

In order to define patients eligible for only a superficial groin dissection or a combined superficial and deep groin dissection, this study aimed to determine the incidence of deep lymph node metastases (LNM) in patients with melanoma metastasized to the groin, to identify patient and melanoma factors that predict deep nodal involvement, and to analyze the impact of deep nodal involvement on survival and recurrence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a combined superficial (inguinal) and deep (iliac and obturator) complete (CLND) or therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) of the groin between 1994 and 2012 were analyzed.

RESULTS

QueryDeep LNM were found in 8 of 62 CLND patients (13 %) and in 21 of 67 TLND patients (31 %). More than three superficial LNM was the only independent predictor for deep LNM in both CLND and TLND patients. The 5-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) for CLND and TLND patients with deep LNM was 14.3 and 16.6 %, respectively, and was significantly worse (hazard ratio [HR] 3.39, 95 % CI 1.34-8.58, p = 0.010; and HR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.04-3.88, p = 0.039) compared with CLND and TLND patients without deep LNM (5-year MSS: 54.1 and 37.2 %, respectively). Distant recurrence was significantly associated with deep LNM in CLND patients (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that LNM in the deep area of the groin are fairly common in both CLND and TLND patients and significantly affect prognosis, especially in CLND patients. The number of superficial LNM is the only factor that was found to predict a finding of deep nodal metastases.

Individualized surgery: gamma-probe-guided lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically enlarged lymph node metastases from melanomas

Background

The value of a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in melanoma patients with clinically evident regional lymph node metastases has not been studied. Therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) is regarded as the clinical standard, but the appropriate extent of TLND is controversial in all lymphatic basins.

Patients and Methods

Of the 115 consecutive patients with surgery on palpable lymph node metastases, 34 received a pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphatic drainage to a second nodal basin outside the clinically involved basin was found in 15 cases. In 13 patients, the ectopic tumor-draining lymph nodes were excised as in a sentinel node biopsy. The lymph nodes from the TLND specimens were postoperatively separated and classified as either radioactive or non-radioactive.

Results

A total of 493 lymph nodes were examined pathologically. The largest macrometastasis maintained the ability to take up radiotracer in 77% of cases. Radioactively labeled lymph nodes carried a higher risk of being involved with metastasis. The proportions of tumor involvement for radioactive and non-radioactive lymph nodes were 44.5 and 16.9%, respectively (P=0.00002). Of the 13 ectopic nodal basins surgically explored, six harbored clinically occult metastases.

Conclusion

In patients undergoing TLND for palpable metastases, tumor-draining lymph nodes in a second, ectopic nodal basin should be excised, because they could be affected by occult metastasis. With respect to radioactive lymph nodes situated within the nodal basin of the macrometastasis but beyond the borders of a less-radical lymphadenectomy, further studies are needed.

Dominant lymph drainage in the upper extremity and upper trunk region: evaluation of lymph drainage in patients with skin melanomas

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to evaluate the lymph drainage from the primary focus to the regional lymph nodes in patients with melanomas of the upper extremity and upper trunk region.

METHOD

The study is a retrospective study of 20 patients with upper extremity melanomas and 14 patients with upper trunk melanomas treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or sentinel lymph node biopsy at the hospital. ALND was performed in 14 cases. In these cases, 12 were curative dissections and 2 were elective dissections. The dominant lymph drainage patterns from the primary regions were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the upper extremity and upper trunk region melanomas, lymph drainage to Level I was determined in all cases. In these two regions there were no cases of lymph drainage to Level II not passing through Level I. Furthermore, there were no cases where sentinel lymph node or metastasis of the lymph nodes was clearly determined in Level III. Among the upper extremity melanomas, lymph drainages to the cubital (10 %) and mid-arm nodes (5 %) were established. Among the scapular region melanomas, lymph drainages to the supraclavicular nodes (25 %) were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a dominant lymph drainage pattern of melanomas of the upper extremity and upper trunk region to Level I. No lymph node dissection of Level III in patients with melanomas of the upper extremity and upper trunk region is necessary unless preoperative examination determines a high possibility of metastasis-positive lymph nodes in level III.

Therapeutic surgical management of palpable melanoma groin metastases: superficial or combined superficial and deep groin lymph node dissection

Background

Management of patients with clinically detectable lymph node metastasis to the groin is by ilioinguinal or combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) according to most literature, but in practice superficial groin dissection (SGD) only is still performed in some centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the experience in CGD versus SGD patients in our center.

Methods

Between 1991 and 2009, 121 therapeutic CGD and 48 SGD were performed in 169 melanoma patients with palpable groin metastases at our institute. Median follow-up was 20 and, for survivors, 45 months.

Results

In this heterogeneous group of patients, overall (OS) and disease-free survival, local control rates, and morbidity rates were not significantly different between CGD and SGD patients. However, CGD patients had a trend towards more chronic lymphedema. Superficial lymph node ratio, the number of positive superficial lymph nodes, and the presence of deep nodes were prognostic factors for survival. CGD patients with involved deep lymph nodes (24.8%) had estimated 5-year OS of 12% compared with 40% with no involved deep lymph nodes (p = 0.001). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan had high negative predictive value of 91% for detection of pelvic nodal involvement.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that survival and local control do not differ for patients with palpable groin metastases treated by CGD or SGD. Patients without pathological iliac nodes on CT might safely undergo SGD, while CGD might be reserved for patients with multiple positive nodes on SGD and/or positive deep nodes on CT scan.

Role of radiotherapy in melanoma management

BACKGROUND

In melanoma, radiotherapy has generally been considered as a palliative treatment option indicated only for advanced cases or disseminated disease. In the 70s of the previous century, the technological advances in radiotherapy, linked to rapid development of computer sciences, resulted in restored interest for radiotherapy in melanoma management. Although a fundamental lack of well designed prospective and/or randomized clinical trials critically influenced the integration of radiotherapy into treatment strategies in melanoma, radiotherapy was recently recognized as an indispensable part in the multidisciplinary management of patients with melanoma. Altogether, approximately 23% of melanoma patients should receive at least one course of radiotherapy during the course of the disease. In this review, radiobiological properties of melanoma that govern the decisions for the fractionation patterns used in the treatment of this disease are described. Moreover, the indications for irradiation and the results of pertinent clinical studies from the literature, creating a rationale for the use of radiotherapy in the management of this disease, are reviewed and a brief description of radiotherapy techniques is given.

CONCLUSIONS

Basic treatment modality in melanoma is surgery. However, whenever surgery is not radical or there are adverse prognostic factors identified on histopathological examination of resected tissue specimen, it needs to be supplemented. Also, in patients with unresectable disease or in those not being suitable for major surgery or who refuse proposed surgical intervention, other effective mode(s) of therapy need to be implemented. From this perspective, supported by clinical experiences and literature results, radiotherapy is a valuable option: it is effective and safe, in curative and palliative setting.

Pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients: is it worthwhile?

The original procedure of intraoperative lymphatic mapping by using vital blue dye initially described by Morton and colleagues in 1992 was implemented in subsequent years by the introduction of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LS) and intraoperative gamma detection probe to allow a better identification of sentinel nodes (SNs). However, it is common, in practice, to detect more than one radioactive node with the gamma detection probe. Whether these additional lymph nodes represent true SNs is not yet clear. The aims of this study are: to investigate the role of pelvic sentinel node biopsy in recurrent pelvic disease in those patients with negative inguinal SN, having one or more deep hot spots identified by preoperative LS (follow-up group). One hundred and four stage I/II melanoma patients with primary tumor of the lower limb and lower trunk were enrolled in a restrospective study at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, between 2000 and 2007. All patients presented hot spots both in superficial (groin) and deep (iliac-obturator) areas during dynamic LS. The study population consisted of 35 men and 69 women with a median age of 57 years at the time of diagnosis. The median follow-up period was 49 months (SD 22.4; range, 10-98 months). Of the 104 patients, 83 had a negative SN (80%). All sentinel-lymph-node-positive patients underwent superficial and deep inguinal dissection. Two patients (2.4%; 95% confidence interval: 1.5-8.8%) with negative SNs had pelvic recurrence. Among patients who underwent ilioinguinal dissection, three (14%; 95% confidence interval: 4-35%) had positive pelvic lymph nodes. After a 60-month follow-up, 79% of patients were alive and 66% were disease free. In SN-negative patients, disease-free survival was 69% and in SN-positive patients 53%. No significant difference was found by SN status (log-rank P values 0.15). Even if the sample size of our study cannot bring to conclusive results, and further studies are needed, it might be possible that harvesting pelvic SN in those patients with pelvic hot spots at LS could modify the natural history of melanoma patients in terms of pelvic recurrence and disease free survival. We recommend to improve our knowledge in the role of pelvic sentinel node in the natural history of melanoma.

Multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma

This article covers the multidisciplinary treatment of primary melanoma. Excision margins and the need for sentinel lymphadenectomy are mainly dictated by the Breslow thickness although exceptions to this dictum do exist. Interferon is the only FDA approved adjuvant therapy for high risk melanoma although its overall survival benefit is minimal. Trials examining different doses or duration of interferon therapy have not demonstrated any promising survival data so far. There have been several randomized vaccine trials for melanoma but none have shown an overall survival benefit. Research into T-cell regulation continues and will hopefully bring promise for the future of melanoma treatment.

The survival benefit to patients with positive sentinel node melanoma after completion lymph node dissection may be limited to the subgroup with a primary lesion Breslow thickness greater than 1.0 and less than or equal to 4 mm (pT2-pT3)

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of sentinel node biopsy is still controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the overall survival (OS; calculated both from the date of primary tumor excision and lymph node dissection) data from two large groups of AJCC 2002 stage-III cutaneous melanoma patients-after completion lymph node dissection (CLND after positive sentinel node biopsy) and after therapeutic LND (TLND for clinically/cytologically detected regional lymph node metastases).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcomes for 544 consecutive patients, who underwent CLND (47.4%; 258 patients) or TLND (52.6%; 286 patients) at one institution between December 1994 and January 2005. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age and gender distribution and in the parameters of the primary tumor. Median follow-up time was 36 months (range 6-110 months).

RESULTS

We found no significant differences in OS (from the date of primary tumor excision) between CLND and TLND patients in the groups with primary tumor thicknesses of 1.0 mm or less or greater than 4.0 mm (pT1 and pT4); however, in patients with thicknesses greater than 1.0 mm and 4.0 mm or less (in subgroups pT2 and pT3), we found significantly better OS for CLND than for TLND patients-CLND: median OS not reached, 5-year OS was 57.2% (95%CI: 44.4-70.1%); TLND: median OS 42.1 months, 5-year OS was 37.9% (95%CI: 26.5-49.2%) (P = 0.0006). In the entire CLND and TLND groups, the median OS and 5-year OS rates were 60.5 months and 52.5% (95%CI: 45.6-61.5%) and 38.2 months and 39.5% (95%CI: 32.7-46.5%), respectively. Based on multivariate analysis, we have found that in the CLND group the important factors negatively influencing OS (from the date of lymphadenectomy) are: male gender, features of primary tumor (higher Breslow thickness and presence of ulceration) and features of nodal metastases (extracapsular invasion and number of involved nodes). In the TLND group, however, the negative prognostic factors are: male gender and features of nodal metastases (extracapsular invasion and number of involved nodes) without the impact of primary tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

The results of the study demonstrate that the survival benefit after positive sentinel node biopsy with subsequent CLND is probably limited only to the subgroup of patients with primary tumor thicknesses not larger than 4 mm and not less than 1 mm when compared with lymph node dissection of palpable nodes. The primary tumor features have no impact on survival after lymphadenectomy performed for clinically involved nodes.

Postoperative morbidity of lymph node excision for cutaneous melanoma-sentinel lymphonodectomy versus complete regional lymph node dissection

For patients with melanoma metastasis to a sentinel lymph node, subsequent complete regional lymph node dissection (CLND) is currently regarded to be the surgical standard. This approach, however, has not been confirmed by controlled studies, so that surgical morbidity is of primary importance. Using clinical examination and a questionnaire, we determined morbidity in 315 patients with axillary or inguinal lymph node excision on whom 275 sentinel lymphonodectomies (SLNEs) and 90 CLNDs were performed. The overall incidence of at least one complication following SLNE was 13.8%. The short-term complication rate was 11.3% (allergic reaction to blue dye 0%, wound breakdown 0%, haematoma 2.5%, wound infection 3.6%, seroma 6.9%). The incidence of long-term complications was 4.1% (persistent tattoo 0.4%, functional deficit 0.4%, nerve dysfunction/pain 0.7% or swelling 2.5%). All complications were mild. Significantly, the complication rate was not higher for patients aged 70 years or older. After CLND, the overall complication rate was significantly higher (65.5%, P<0.000001). The incidence of short-term complications was 50% (haematoma 0%, wound breakdown 6.7%, wound infection 24.7% or seroma 34.8%). The incidence of long-term complications was also 50% (nerve dysfunction/pain 8.9%, functional deficit 16.8%, swelling 37.1%). Overall, inguinal lymph node excision was burdened by a higher complication rate (P=0.015). Age and sex did not influence postoperative morbidity. No deaths linked to either procedure were noted. Complication rates after SLNE are low and most complications are minor and short-lasting. In contrast, CLND has been demonstrated to be a major and potentially morbid surgical procedure. This highlights the importance of testing the therapeutic value that CLND adds to the sentinel lymph node procedure.

Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Is Beneficial in Subsets of Patients with Node-positive Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The benefits of deep pelvic lymph node dissection (DLND) for patients with node-positive melanoma continue to be debated. The objective of our analysis was to identify factors associated with involvement of pelvic nodes and to determine survival outcomes following DLND.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 804 patients who had undergone any type of lymph node dissection between 1990 and 2001. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with tumor metastasis to pelvic nodes. Associations between clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of the 804 patients, 235 underwent superficial lymph node dissection (SLND) and 97 underwent combined SLND and DLND (combined LND). Age >or=50 years, number of positive superficial nodes, and positive radiological imaging findings were found to be predictors of metastasis to deep nodes. With a median follow-up of 7.5 years, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 42% for patients with positive deep nodes and 51% for those with negative deep nodes (P = 0.11). OS in patients with melanoma that metastasized to three or fewer deep pelvic lymph nodes is comparable to that in patients with no deep nodal involvement. Multivariate analysis identified number of positive deep nodes, male gender, and extra-capsular extension as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

These relatively favorable survival outcomes support current surgical practice and the classification of metastatic pelvic nodal disease as stage-III rather than stage-IV (distant) disease.

Current surgical management of melanoma

The surgical management of melanoma has changed dramatically over the last few decades. Through the development and conduction of well-designed, prospective, randomized trials, we have been able to refine the way that we surgically manage patients with melanoma. Indeed, many important issues have been addressed through such trials: the proper surgical margins for the primary melanoma, utility of the elective lymph node dissection and the role for selective lymphadenectomy, to name a few. This review will also discuss what we have learned from past clinical trials and address several issues with regards to where we are going in the future.

Morbidity and prognosis after therapeutic lymph node dissections for malignant melanoma

Melanoma patients with clinically evident regional lymph node metastases are treated with therapeutic lymph node dissections (TLNDs). The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity and mortality following TLND in our institution. Moreover, disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were evaluated and factors that influence prognosis after TLND were assessed. Between 1982 and 2005, 236 patients underwent a TLND. Patients, who received a palliative LND or a sentinel node procedure, were not included. The median Breslow thickness was 2.4mm. Ulceration was present in 23% of patients and unknown in 66%. 37 patients had unknown primary tumors. There were 129 ilio-inguinal, 50 axillary and 61 cervical dissections performed. 37% of the patients experienced at least one operation related complication. The most frequently seen complications were wound infections/necrosis and chronic lymph edema. Ilio-inguinal dissection patients experienced significantly more complications and a longer duration of hospitalization compared to axillary or cervical patients. The duration of hospitalization has been reduced in recent years from 12 to 5days. The mean follow-up was 29months. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year regional control was 79%, 5-year DFS was 19% and 5-year OS was 26%. The number of positive lymph nodes, the site of the primary tumor and extra capsular extension (ECE) were independent prognostic factors for DFS and only site and ECE for OS. In conclusion, TLND for stage III melanoma is accompanied with considerable short-term complications, and can achieve regional control and potential curation in approximately one in every four patients.

Melanoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes: Can radiotherapy replace formal dissection after local excision of nodal disease?

BACKGROUND

Completion cervical lymphadenectomy is usually performed after excisional biopsy of nodal metastases from melanoma. Radiation (XRT) might be effective for some patients in lieu of formal lymph node dissection.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with parotid or cervical node metastases from melanoma were treated with excision of nodal disease and postoperative XRT without formal lymph node dissection. Radiation was delivered to the primary site (if known), the site of nodal excision, and the undissected ipsilateral neck.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the disease recurred within the regional basin in two patients and at distant sites in 14 patients. The actuarial 5-year regional control and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 93% and 59%, respectively. Two patients had a clinically significant side effect develop.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that selected patients may receive regional XRT after local excision of nodal disease from melanoma in lieu of formal lymph node dissection.

A Critical Assessment of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Inguinal Lymph Node Metastases from Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although patients with inguinal or pelvic lymph node (LN) metastases from melanoma may develop regional recurrence after dissection, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy remains controversial.

METHODS

The medical records of 40 patients with inguinal and/or pelvic lymph node metastases from melanoma were reviewed retrospectively. Indications for adjuvant radiotherapy included the following nodal characteristics: extracapsular extension, LNs > or =3 cm in diameter, > or =4 involved LNs, and LN recurrence after prior nodal surgery. Thirty-seven of 40 patients underwent formal LN dissection. Three patients had only local excision of gross disease for recurrence after prior dissection. All patients received radiation to a median dose of 30 Gy at six Gy/fraction delivered twice weekly.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 22.5 months, the 3-year actuarial distant metastasis-free and overall survival rates were 35% and 38%, respectively. The 3-year regional control rate was 74%. Univariate analyses of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics failed to reveal any association with distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival, or regional control. Regional failures occurred in nine patients; seven of these were isolated dermal failures within the field of irradiation. Only two patients (5%) had LN basin recurrences; one of these patients also developed dermal recurrence. Fifteen of 40 patients developed lymphedema; in seven of these, lymphedema was present before initiation of radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation may prevent recurrence of nodal disease in patients at high risk for regional failure, but in-field dermal recurrences may sometimes occur (8 of 40, 20%). Treatment-related lymphedema and death from metastatic melanoma were common.

[Sentinel lymph node in melanoma]

The procedure of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has emerged as an important advance especially with respect to staging of malignant melanoma. Elective (prophylactic) lymph node dissection that had been practiced in primary melanoma with a suspected increased risk of (clinically occult) lymphatic metastasis has been replaced by SNB. Patients with proven metastatic involvement of the sentinel node (12-25%) can be specifically selected for regional lymph node dissection. Metastatic involvement of the sentinel node (SN) is a significant independent prognostic factor. The value of detecting metastasis by highly sensitive diagnostic tools such as RT-PCR is just as uncertain as is the therapeutic benefit of operative or conservative therapies in sentinel node-positive patients with respect to improving prognosis and is currently under study.

Controversies in the management of metastatic melanoma to regional lymphatic basins

The primary management of lymph nodes involved with metastatic melanoma is regional lymphadenectomy. Many controversies of regional lymph node dissection exist including extent and nature of the lymphadenectomy, treatment of lymphatic metastases in unusual locations and the role of adjuvant radiotherapy. Although radical neck dissection has been the gold standard for cervical disease, modified dissections do not seem to compromise regional control in appropriately selected patients. In the axilla, a Level I, II, and III dissection is most commonly performed. Combined superficial and deep groin dissection is justified for clinically palpable disease although management of patients with histologically positive yet clinically non-palpable disease is more controversial. Burden of disease, imaging, patient co-morbidity, and Cloquet nodal status must be considered. Many technical variations exist in an attempt to improve morbidity rates secondary to lymphadenectomy. Unfortunately, complication rates are difficult to compare secondary to variable study designs, definitions, and patient populations. Adjuvant radiation therapy appears warranted in patients with high risk of regional recurrence including bulky disease, extracapsular extension or cervical location.

Radical lymph node dissection for melanoma

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic lymph node dissection for melanoma aims to achieve regional disease control. Radical lymphadenectomy (RLND) can be a difficult procedure associated with significant postoperative morbidity. The aims of the present study were to review regional disease control and morbidity in a series of lymphadenectomies performed within a specialist unit.

METHODS

The present study involved the analysis of 73 lymphadenectomies in 64 patients, from 1995 to 2001.

RESULTS

The overall wound complication rate after inguinal lymphadenectomy (71%) was higher than after axillary lymphadenectomy (47%; P = 0.05). After inguinal lymphadenectomy, the wound infection rate was higher (25.0%vs 5.9%; P = 0.03), delayed wound healing was more frequent (25.0%vs 5.9%; P = 0.03), and the mean time that drain tubes remained in situ was longer (12.5 vs 8.2 days; P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in seroma (46%vs 32%) rates. Lymphoedema was more common after inguinal lymphadenectomy (P < 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified inguinal RLND (P = 0.002) and increasing tumour size (P = 0.045) as predictors of wound morbidity. More patients received postoperative radiotherapy after neck RLND compared to inguinal or axilla RLND (P = 0.03). Six (8%) patients developed local recurrence after lymphadenectomy. At a median follow up of 22 months, 34 (53%) patients have died, from disseminated disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical lymphadenectomy for melanoma is associated with significant morbidity. Inguinal node dissection has a higher rate of complications than axillary dissection. Low local recurrence rates can be achieved, limiting the potential morbidity of uncontrolled regional metastatic disease.