Tourniquets in arterial bypass surgery

Tourniquet Use in Extremity-Based Microsurgery

BACKGROUND

 The use of tourniquets and their role in extremity-based microsurgery has not been thoroughly investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate tourniquet use and its associated outcomes and complications. The authors hypothesize that tourniquets enhance visualization, bloodless approaches to vessel harvest, flap elevation, and anastomosis without added complications.

METHODS

 A retrospective chart review was completed for patients who had undergone extremity-based microsurgery with the use of a tourniquet between January 2018 and February 2022 at two large academic institutions. Demographic characteristics, initial reasons for surgery, complications, and outcomes were recorded. Patients were separated into groups based on tourniquet use during three operative segments: (1) flap elevation, (2) vessel harvest, and (3) microvascular anastomosis. An internal comparison of complication rate was performed between cases for which a tourniquet was used for one operative segment to all cases in which it was not used for the same operative segment. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify statistically significant results.

RESULTS

 A total of 99 patients (106 surgeries) were included in this study across sites. The mean age was 41.2 years and 67.7% of the patients were male. The most common reason for microsurgical reconstruction was trauma (50.5%). The need for an additional unplanned surgery was the most common surgical complication (16%). A total of 70, 61, and 32% of procedures used a tourniquet for flap elevation, vessel harvest, and for anastomosis, respectively. Statistical analyses identified no difference in complication rates for procedures for which a tourniquet was or was not used for interventions.

CONCLUSION

 Based on these results, the authors state that tourniquets can be utilized for extremity-based microsurgery to enable bloodless dissection without the concern of increased complication rates.

Distal bypasses in patients with diabetes and infrapopliteal disease: technical considerations to achieve success

The combination of diabetes and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is challenging in many ways. The characteristic and complex distal distribution of PAD often encountered in patients with diabetes means that bypass surgery in this context is technically challenging. In addition, many of these patients have a burden of serious comorbidities that must be optimized and managed concurrently. While the authors acknowledge that "achieving success" in distal bypass relies on much more than technical expertise, there are some technical aspects that should be considered when planning surgery on these patients. This article outlines some important issues in the treatment pathway of a patient with diabetes and PAD requiring distal bypass surgery--from selection and optimization of the patient (in the context of a multidisciplinary team) and preoperative workup, to the operative strategy planning, technical tips, and nonoperative adjuncts. These considerations, as well as sound knowledge of the underlying disease process, confounding medical factors and awareness of the difficulty in predicting treatment outcomes, should help maximize the chances of success.

Surgery for varicose veins: use of tourniquet

BACKGROUND

Varicose vein surgery is a common surgical procedure but there is no consensus regarding the best surgical technique. The use of tourniquets during varicose vein surgery has been advocated as a means of reducing the potential for blood loss during the operation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether the use of a tourniquet should be recommended when undertaking surgery for the management of primary varicose veins.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched April 2013) and the CENTRAL (2013, Issue 3).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies described as randomised controlled trials that examined the use of tourniquets during surgery for patients with primary varicose veins were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data from eligible studies were extracted and summarised independently by two authors. All studies were cross-checked independently by the authors.

MAIN RESULTS

No additional studies were included or excluded in the updated review. Twenty papers detailing 18 trials were considered. Only three trials were randomised controlled trials and were included in the review. The remaining fifteen studies were excluded for various reasons. All three included trials had a small sample size and reported the trial design, outcome measures and analysis poorly. There were also variations in the outcome measures used between the trials. In addition, there was no consistency on the reporting of mean and medians for blood loss during the operation. It was therefore not possible to pool the data to perform meta-analysis. However, the reported blood loss when using a tourniquet was between 0 and 16 ml compared to between 107 to 133 ml when not using a tourniquet (P < 0.01).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there were significant quality issues with the available evidence, the use of a tourniquet would appear to reduce blood loss during surgery. There were no reported differences between the use or non-use of a tourniquet in terms of complications and morbidity. However, the available trials were not of sufficient size to detect rarer complications such as nerve damage.

Surgery for varicose veins: use of tourniquet

BACKGROUND

Varicose vein surgery is a common surgical procedure but there is no consensus regarding the best surgical technique. The use of tourniquets during varicose vein surgery has been advocated as a means of reducing the potential for blood loss during the operation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether the use of a tourniquet should be recommended when undertaking surgery for the management of primary varicose veins.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The reviewers searched the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group trials register (last searched November 2001), thirteen electronic bibliographic databases, including the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR) (last searched Issue 3, 2001), covering biomedical science, social science, health economic and grey literature (including current research). In addition, the reference lists of relevant articles were checked and various health services research related resources were consulted via the Internet. These included health economics and HTA organisations, guideline producing agencies, generic research and trials registers, and specialist sites.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies described as randomised controlled trials that examined the use of tourniquets during surgery for patients with primary varicose veins were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data from eligible studies were extracted and summarised independently by two reviewers. All studies were cross-checked independently by the reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of twenty published papers and nineteen studies were identified. Only three of these were randomised controlled trials and were included in the review. Sixteen studies were excluded as they were non-randomised and one was a duplicate study. All three trials had a small sample size and reported the trial design, outcome measures and analysis poorly. There were also variations in the outcome measures used between the trials. In addition, there was no consistency on the reporting of mean and medians for blood loss during the operation. It was therefore not possible to pool the data to perform meta-analysis. However, the reported blood loss when using a tourniquet was between 0 and 16mls compared to between 107 to 133mls when not using a tourniquet (p<0.01).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although there were significant quality issues with the available evidence, the use of a tourniquet would appear to reduce blood loss during surgery. There were no reported differences between the use or non-use of a tourniquet in terms of complications and morbidity. However, the available trials were not of sufficient size to detect rarer complications such as nerve damage.