Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery

Limb-Shaking Transient Ischemic Attacks in Patients with Carotid Occlusion or Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attack (LSTIA) is a rare neurological condition which presents with involuntary jerky movements of the arm or leg, often because of carotid stenosis or occlusion. Due to the rarity of the condition, the epidemiology of LSTIA is poorly understood and the disease is frequently misdiagnosed. There is no standard treatment to date. The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the epidemiology of LSTIA and its current treatment options.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials, and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to December 30, 2023 for articles containing information on the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA. An individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) was performed using data extracted from the included articles. Inclusion criteria were description of both the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA in patients over the age of 18 with carotid stenosis/occlusion, confirmed by radiographic imaging. Exclusion criteria were studies focusing on pediatrics, no epidemiological data, internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis/occlusion not radiologically confirmed, full text unavailable, full text not in English or Dutch, and non-original articles.

RESULTS

Of the 8,855 articles screened, 55 articles containing 251 patients were included. Fifty articles harboring 81 patients were included in the IPD-MA, and 7 articles harboring 187 patients were included in the cohort analysis. The results of the IPD-MA showed that LSTIA was caused by unilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 29 patients (36%) and most often from bilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 52 patients (64%). Limb-shaking was unilateral in 66 patients (83%) and was accompanied by weakness in 27 patients (33%). The intervention with the highest success rate was endovascular intervention (carotid stenting or balloon angioplasty), as all 10 patients remained asymptomatic after treatment. The cohort analysis showed that LSTIA can be caused by both unilateral and bilateral carotid stenosis or occlusion. The prevalence within cohorts of TIA patients of LSTIA varied considerably from 3.5 to 29%.

CONCLUSION

A large international clinical registry is warranted to gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of LSTIA. There is insufficient evidence available to suggest a standard treatment.

Imaging modality-dependent carotid stenosis severity variations against intravascular ultrasound as a reference: Carotid Artery intravasculaR Ultrasound Study (CARUS)

PURPOSE

Different non-invasive and invasive imaging modalities are used to determine carotid artery stenosis severity that remains a principal parameter in clinical decision-making. We compared stenosis degree obtained with different modalities against vascular imaging gold standard, intravascular ultrasound, IVUS.

METHODS

300 consecutive patients (age 47-83 years, 192 men, 64% asymptomatic) with carotid artery stenosis of " ≥ 50%" referred for potential revascularization received as per study protocol (i) duplex ultrasound (DUS), (ii) computed tomography angiography (CTA), (iii) intraarterial quantitative angiography (iQA) and (iv) and (iv) IVUS. Correlation of measurements with IVUS (r), proportion of those concordant (within 10%) and proportion of under/overestimated were calculated along with recipient-operating-characteristics (ROC).

RESULTS

For IVUS area stenosis (AS) and IVUS minimal lumen area (MLA), there was only a moderate correlation with DUS velocities (peak-systolic, PSV; end-diastolic, EDV; r values of 0.42-0.51, p < 0.001 for all). CTA systematically underestimated both reference area and MLA (80.4% and 92.3% cases) but CTA error was lesser for AS (proportion concordant-57.4%; CTA under/overestimation-12.5%/30.1%). iQA diameter stenosis (DS) was found concordant with IVUS in 41.1% measurements (iQA under/overestimation 7.9%/51.0%). By univariate model, PSV (ROC area-under-the-curve, AUC, 0.77, cutoff 2.6 m/s), EDV (AUC 0.72, cutoff 0.71 m/s) and CTA-DS (AUC 0.83, cutoff 59.6%) were predictors of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS (p < 0.001 for all). Best predictor, however, of ≥ 50% DS by IVUS was stenosis severity evaluation by automated contrast column density measurement on iQA (AUC 0.87, cutoff 68%, p < 0.001). Regarding non-invasive techniques, CTA was the only independent diagnostic modality against IVUS on multivariate model (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

IVUS validation shows significant imaging modality-dependent variations in carotid stenosis severity determination.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Vertebral artery stenosis (narrowing of the vertebral artery) is an important cause of posterior circulation ischaemic stroke. Medical treatment (MT) e.g. controlling risk-factors and drug treatment, surgery, and endovascular treatment (ET) are the prevailing treatment strategies for symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. ET consist s of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (balloon catheter through the skin), with or without stenting. However, optimal management of people with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis has not yet been established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, with or without stenting, combined with MT, compared to MT alone, in people with episodes of cerebral ischaemia due to vertebral artery stenosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and two other indexes in Web of Science, China Biological Medicine Database, Chinese Science and Technique Journals Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang Data, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov trials register and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to 23 July 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ET plus MT with MT alone in treating people aged 18 years or over with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis. We included all types of ET modalities (e.g. angioplasty alone, balloon-mounted stenting, and angioplasty followed by placement of a self-expanding stent). MT included risk factor control, antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and individualised management for people with hypertension or diabetes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened potentially eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed trial quality and risk of bias.  We applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. The primary outcomes were 30-day post-randomisation death/stroke (short-term outcome) and fatal/non-fatal stroke after 30 days post-randomisation to completion of follow-up (long-term outcome).  MAIN RESULTS: We included three RCTs with 349 participants with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis with a mean age of 64.4 years. The included RCTs were at low risk of bias overall. However, all included studies had a high risk of performance bias because blinding of the ET was not feasible. There was no significant difference in 30-day post-randomisation deaths/strokes between ET plus MT and MT alone (risk ratio (RR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 7.07; 3 studies, 349 participants; low-certainty evidence). There were no significant differences between ET plus MT and MT alone in fatal/non-fatal strokes in the territory of the treated vertebral artery stenosis after 30 days post-randomisation to completion of follow-up (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.01; 3 studies, 349 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke during the entire follow-up period (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.32; 3 studies, 349 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), death during the entire follow-up period (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.62; 3 studies, 349 participants; low-certainty evidence), and stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) during the entire follow-up period (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.06; 2 studies, 234 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This Cochrane Review provides low- to moderate-certainty evidence indicating that there are no significant differences in either short- or long-term risks of stroke, death, or TIA between people with symptomatic vertebral artery stenosis treated with ET plus MT and those treated with MT alone.

Neurovascular disease, diagnosis, and therapy: Cervical and intracranial atherosclerosis, vasculitis, and vasculopathy

Stroke is a leading cause of death, disability, and financial burden in the United States. Perhaps more than any other disease process, the rapidity with which the diagnosis and treatment of stroke are successfully achieved is paramount to the reduction of its associated morbidity and mortality. Steno-occlusive intracranial vascular disease, the most notorious culprit of cerebral ischemia and/or hemorrhage, traces its etiology to native and embolic atherosclerosis as well as various forms of vascular inflammation, insult, and dysfunction. Distinguishing between these causes is a critical first step in the diagnosis and treatment of a patient presenting with cerebrovascular compromise. In this chapter, we delineate the clinical and imaging features of cervical and intracranial atherosclerosis, vasculitis, and vasculopathy, along with the evidence behind the treatments which comprise their current-day standard of care. The modern imaging armamentarium is diverse and complex, with contrast-enhanced and non-contrast MR angiography, CT angiography, digital subtraction angiography, and ultrasound; each playing an important role in providing rapid insight into the patient's disease process. Understanding these imaging techniques and their application in the acute setting is critical for the provider caring for stroke patients.

Multiple reader comparison of 2D TOF, 3D TOF, and CEMRA in screening of the carotid bifurcations: Time to reconsider routine contrast use?

Background and purpose

MR contrast-enhanced techniques are undergoing increased scrutiny since the FDA applied a warning for gadolinium-based MR contrast agents due to gadolinium deposition within multiple organ systems. While CE-MRA provides excellent image quality, is it required in a screening carotid study? This study compares 2D TOF and 3D TOF MRA vs. CE-MRA in defining carotid stenosis in a large clinical patient population, and with multiple readers with varying experience.

Materials and methods

200 consecutive patients had their carotid bifurcations evaluated with 2D TOF, 3D TOF and CE-MRA sequences by 6 board-certified neuroradiologists. Stenosis and quality of examinations were defined for each study. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using two-way random effects intraclass correlation coefficients. Intra-reader reliability was computed via weighted Cohen’s κ. Weighted Cohen’s κ were also computed to assess agreement in stenosis ratings between enhanced images and unenhanced images.

Results

Agreement between unenhanced and enhanced ratings was substantial with a pooled weighted κ of 0.733 (0.628–0.811). For 5 of the 6 readers, the combination of unenhanced 2D TOF and 3D TOF showed better agreement with contrast-enhanced than either 2D TOF or 3D TOF alone. Intra-reader reliability was substantial.

Conclusions

The combination of 2D TOF and 3D TOF MRA showed substantial agreement with CE-MRA regarding degree of carotid stenosis in this large outpatient population across multiple readers of varying experience. Given the scrutiny that GBCA are undergoing due to concerns regarding CNS and soft tissue deposition, it seems prudent to reserve CE-MRA for cases which are not satisfactorily answered by the nonenhanced study or other noninvasive examinations.

Bimodal Automated Carotid Ultrasound Segmentation Using Geometrically Constrained Deep Neural Networks

For asymptomatic patients suffering from carotid stenosis, the assessment of plaque morphology is an important clinical task which allows monitoring of the risk of plaque rupture and future incidents of stroke. Ultrasound Imaging provides a safe and non-invasive modality for this, and the segmentation of media-adventitia boundaries and lumen-intima boundaries of the Carotid artery form an essential part in this monitoring process. In this paper, we propose a novel Deep Neural Network as a fully automated segmentation tool, and its application in delineating both the media-adventitia boundary and the lumen-intima boundary. We develop a new geometrically constrained objective function as part of the Network's Stochastic Gradient Descent optimisation, thus tuning it to the problem at hand. Furthermore, we also apply a bimodal fusion of amplitude and phase congruency data proposed by us in previous work, as an input to the network, as the latter provides an intensity-invariant data source to the network. We finally report the segmentation performance of the network on transverse sections of the carotid. Tests are carried out on an augmented dataset of 81,000 images, and the results are compared to other studies by reporting the DICE coefficient of similarity, modified Hausdorff Distance, sensitivity and specificity. Our proposed modification is shown to yield improved results on the standard network over this larger dataset, with the advantage of it being fully automated. We conclude that Deep Neural Networks provide a reliable trained manner in which carotid ultrasound images may be automatically segmented, using amplitude data and intensity invariant phase congruency maps as a data source.

The role of imaging in acute ischemic stroke

Neuroimaging has expanded beyond its traditional diagnostic role and become a critical tool in the evaluation and management of stroke. The objectives of imaging include prompt accurate diagnosis, treatment triage, prognosis prediction, and secondary preventative precautions. While capitalizing on the latest treatment options and expanding upon the "time is brain" doctrine, the ultimate goal of imaging is to maximize the number of treated patients and improve the outcome of one the most costly and morbid disease. A broad overview of comprehensive multimodal stroke imaging is presented here to affirm its utilization.

Percutaneous Treatment of Vertebral Artery Stenosis

Endovascular treatment of the ostial and proximal portions of the vertebral artery is a safe and effective technique for alleviating symptoms and improving cerebral blood flow to the posterior circulation. Vertebral artery angioplasty can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates, low complication rates, and durable long-term results. Although restenosis rates range from 0% to 48%, the durability of vertebral artery angioplasty is evidenced by low restenosis rates in multiple large series reported in the literature using multiple treatment options, including balloon angioplasty alone, bare metal stents, and drug-coated stents.

Imaging recommendations for acute stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: A joint statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery

SUMMARY

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Imaging plays a critical role in evaluating patients suspected of acute stroke and transient ischemic attack, especially before initiating treatment. Over the past few decades, major advances have occurred in stroke imaging and treatment, including Food and Drug Administration approval of recanalization therapies for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. A wide variety of imaging techniques has become available to assess vascular lesions and brain tissue status in acute stroke patients. However, the practical challenge for physicians is to understand the multiple facets of these imaging techniques, including which imaging techniques to implement and how to optimally use them, given available resources at their local institution. Important considerations include constraints of time, cost, access to imaging modalities, preferences of treating physicians, availability of expertise, and availability of endovascular therapy. The choice of which imaging techniques to employ is impacted by both the time urgency for evaluation of patients and the complexity of the literature on acute stroke imaging. Ideally, imaging algorithms should incorporate techniques that provide optimal benefit for improved patient outcomes without delaying treatment.

Advanced neuroimaging to guide acute stroke therapy

Traditionally non-contrast CT has been considered the first choice imaging modality for acute stroke. Acute ischemic stroke patients presenting to the hospital within 3-hours from symptom onset and without any visible hemorrhages or large lesions on CT images are considered optimum reperfusion therapy candidates. However, non-contrast CT alone has been unable to identify best reperfusion therapy candidates outside this window. New advanced imaging techniques are now being used successfully for this purpose. Non-invasive CT or MR angiography images can be obtained during initial imaging evaluation for identification and characterization of vascular lesions, including occlusions, aneurysms, and malformations. Either CT-based perfusion imaging or MRI-based diffusion and perfusion imaging performed immediately upon arrival of a patient to the hospital helps estimate the extent of fixed core and penumbra in ischemic lesions. Patients having occlusive lesions with small fixed cores and large penumbra are preferred reperfusion therapy candidates.

Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The authors present an overview of the current evidence and management recommendations for evaluation and treatment of adults with acute ischemic stroke. The intended audiences are prehospital care providers, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators responsible for the care of acute ischemic stroke patients within the first 48 hours from stroke onset. These guidelines supersede the prior 2007 guidelines and 2009 updates.

METHODS

Members of the writing committee were appointed by the American Stroke Association Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee, representing various areas of medical expertise. Strict adherence to the American Heart Association conflict of interest policy was maintained throughout the consensus process. Panel members were assigned topics relevant to their areas of expertise, reviewed the stroke literature with emphasis on publications since the prior guidelines, and drafted recommendations in accordance with the American Heart Association Stroke Council's Level of Evidence grading algorithm.

RESULTS

The goal of these guidelines is to limit the morbidity and mortality associated with stroke. The guidelines support the overarching concept of stroke systems of care and detail aspects of stroke care from patient recognition; emergency medical services activation, transport, and triage; through the initial hours in the emergency department and stroke unit. The guideline discusses early stroke evaluation and general medical care, as well as ischemic stroke, specific interventions such as reperfusion strategies, and general physiological optimization for cerebral resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Because many of the recommendations are based on limited data, additional research on treatment of acute ischemic stroke remains urgently needed.

Non-invasive carotid imaging using optoacoustic tomography

The high prevalence of atherosclerosis and the corresponding derived morbidity drives the investigation of novel imaging tools for disease diagnosis and assessment. Multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) can resolve structural, hemodynamic and molecular parameters that relate to cardiovascular disease. Similarly to ultrasound imaging, optoacoustic (photoacoustic) imaging can be implemented as a handheld arrangement which further brings dissemination potential to point of care applications. Correspondingly, we experimentally investigate herein the performance of non-invasive optoacoustic scanning developed for carotid imaging, in phantoms and humans. The results demonstrate that traditional transducers employed in ultrasound imaging do not offer optimal MSOT imaging. Instead, feasibility to detect human carotids and carotid-sized vessels in clinically-relevant depths is better demonstrated with curved arrays and tomographic approaches.

Endovascular treatment of extracranial vertebral artery stenosis

Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of extracranial vertebral artery (VA) stenosis seems a safe, effective and useful technique for resolving symptoms and improving blood flow to the posterior circulation, with a low complication rate and good long-term results. In patients with severe tortuosity of the vessel, stent placement is a real challenge. The new coronary balloon-expandable stents may be preferred. A large variability of restenosis rates has been reported. Drug-eluting stents may be the solution. After a comprehensive review of the literature, it can be concluded that percutaneous angioplasty and stenting of extracranial VA stenosis is technically feasible, but there is insufficient evidence from randomized trials to demonstrate that endovascular management is superior to best medical management.

[Internal carotid artery occlusion or subocclusion--contemporary diagnostic challenges: case report]

INTRODUCTION

Measurement of vessel stenosis using ultrasonography or magnetic resonance is still the principal method for determining the severity of carotid atherosclerosis and need for endarterectomy.

CASE OUTLINE

A 56-year-old male was admitted to the Cardiovascular Institute "Dedinje" due to a clinically asymptomatic restenosis of the operated left internal carotid artery (ICA). Angiography and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in previous hospitalization had revealed occluded right ICA. However, routine duplex ultrasonography revealed a high-grade restenosis (85%) of the left ICA and subocclusion of the right ICA by an ulcerated plaque (confirmed on repeated MRA).

CONCLUSION

Selective arteriography examination could misrepresent the degree of stenosis especially in patents with the ICA that seems to be occluded. MRA is considered the method of choice for identifying pseudo-occlusions of ICA.

Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive tests--individual patient data meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To find clinically relevant estimates of the accuracy of noninvasive imaging-Doppler ultrasonography (US), computed tomographic (CT) angiography, magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and contrast material-enhanced MR angiography-in diagnosing both severe and moderate symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to ascertain the effect of prespecified clinical factors and clinical setting on diagnostic accuracy; and to estimate the probability of agreement between two noninvasive tests.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Original principal investigators obtained ethics approval for each data set. All data were anonymized. Individual patient data sets (IPDs) for noninvasive imaging tests were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the tests for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to compare ipsilateral with contralateral arteries; to compare IPDs with literature estimates; to compare routine audit and research data; and to determine the effect of age and sex on sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was the most accurate (sensitivity, 0.85 [30 of 35]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69, 0.93; and specificity, 0.85 [67 of 78]; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.92) for 70%-99% symptomatic stenosis. Sensitivity for a 50%-69% stenosis was poor, although data were limited. Sensitivity and specificity were generally lower in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral artery. IPD estimates were lower than literature values. Results of comparison of research with audit-derived data were inconclusive. Neither age nor sex affected accuracy. Agreement was better between two Doppler US tests and between two contrast-enhanced MR angiographic tests than it was between Doppler US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography, except for a 70%-99% symptomatic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Primary studies should distinguish ipsilateral from contralateral arteries and carefully describe the patients' characteristics and study environment. The literature overestimates noninvasive imaging accuracy. More data are needed to inform physicians in routine clinical practice.

Evaluation of metabolic syndrome frequency and carotid artery intima-media thickness as risk factors for atherosclerosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate metabolic syndrome (MetS) frequency and carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) as risk factors for atherosclerosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted on 40 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients and 40 age-matched healthy control subjects. Common carotid artery IMT and MetS criteria [according to the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Expert Panel on Detection, evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (NCEP-ATPIII), the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), the American Heart Association in conjunction with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI)] were evaluated for all study subjects.

RESULTS

MetS according to NCEP-ATPIII, IDF and AHA/NHLBI criteria was present in 55, 67.5 and 62.5% of NAFLD patients, respectively. The mean IMT was significantly higher in NAFLD patients (0.646 +/- 0.091 mm) than control subjects (0.544 +/- 0.067 mm), (P < 0.001). Among the vascular risk factors evaluated, the diagnosis of NAFLD and increased body mass index were significant independent predictors of increased IMT.

CONCLUSIONS

As cardiovascular risk factors, both MetS and increased IMT occur frequently among NAFLD patients. Screening for both conditions might be beneficial for assessment of future atherosclerotic complications.

Carotid Imaging for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Routine Practice

Carotid imaging is key to effective secondary stroke prevention. It is commonly performed, but is a rather specialist procedure requiring regular practice to maintain acceptable accuracy. Previously the domain of the neuroradiologist, noninvasive carotid imaging is now widely practiced in general departments where specialist knowledge of anatomy and intracranial disorders may be less available. Noninvasive imaging is largely replacing intraarterial angiography in the assessment of carotid stenosis in most centres because the accuracy is perceived to be sufficient. However, effective stroke prevention needs to be delivered rapidly, guided by imaging tests that are used with an understanding of their limitations and accuracy. This review will discuss currently available imaging methods, their advantages and disadvantages, difficulties in determining their accuracy, current estimates of accuracy and gaps in knowledge.

Introduction: Stroke is common, has a poor outcome, and treatment must be delivered quickly. Many pharmacological acute stroke treatments have failed, reinforcing the need for effective prevention. There has been extensive testing of many pharmacological secondary prevention treatments and most of the ‘positive’ stroke trials have been in secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke. The surgical procedures for stroke prevention, carotid endarterectomy and angioplasty, have also been subjected to far closer scrutiny in large randomised-controlled trials than almost any other surgical or interventional radiological procedures. However, it is unfortunate that much of the focus of secondary stroke prevention has been on drug mechanisms, or surgery vs. endovascular methods, rather than on how to identify accurately and quickly the right patients for each intervention. Thus, until fairly recently ( 1 , 2 ), the need for very rapid initiation of medical and surgical interventions in patients whose carotid stenosis has been accurately diagnosed by imaging ( 3 ), and the service modifications required to deliver this ( 4 ), have largely been overlooked.

Should Conventional Angiography Be the Gold Standard for Carotid Stenosis?

PURPOSE

To compare conventional angiography (CA) and rotational angiography (RA) to assess the degree of angiographically-measured stenosis versus cross-sectional area (CSA) stenosis in an in vitro carotid model.

METHODS

Various grades of stenosis were created by adhering different amounts of silicone rubber sealant onto the inner wall of clear, radiolucent tubes. Following 2- and 3-projection CA and 20-projection RA, the tubes were transected at the actual maximum stenosis. The cross-sectional areas were digitally photographed, and CSA stenosis was calculated using ImageJ planimeter software. The differences among CA, RA, and CSA stenosis measurements were compared statistically.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between RA and CSA stenosis measurements (p=0.46). Conventional angiography with 2 or 3 projections between 0 degrees and 90 degrees underestimated the severity of disease in 19 (63%) of 30 samples. The maximum stenosis percentage was significantly lower in CA versus RA (p<0.0001 in 2-projection, p<0.0003 in 3-projection) and in CA versus CSA stenosis (p<0.0004 in 2-projection, p<0.001 in 3-projection). The maximum stenosis percentages measured by RA were less than CSA stenosis in 5 (71.4%) of 7 tubes (p=NS) containing 50% to 69% stenoses. Eight tubes had mountain-shaped lesions, which was significantly overestimated by RA (11.5%+/-9.7%, p<0.012).

CONCLUSION

CA with 2 or 3 projections significantly underestimates the maximum stenosis in an in vitro model. RA may overestimate disease in patients with mountain-shaped plaques and may underestimate disease if the stenosis is <70%. Our data suggest that CA should not be the gold standard for the qualification of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients, nor for vascular laboratory quality assurance analysis.

Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography

The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic potential of color-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS), power-Doppler (PD) and B-flow ultrasound in assessing the degree of extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in comparison to CT-angiography (MD-CTA). Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for CTA with 41 ICA-stenoses were included in this prospective study. MD-CTA was performed using a 64 row scanner with a CTDIvol of 13.1 mGy/cm. In CTA, CCDS, PD and B-flow, the degree of stenosis was evaluated by the minimal intrastenotic diameter in comparison to the poststenotic diameter. Two radiologists performed a quantitative evaluation of the stenoses in consensus blinded to the results of ultrasound. These were correlated to CTA, CCDS, PD and B-flow, intraoperative findings and clinical follow-up. Grading of the stenoses in B-flow ultrasound outperformed the other techniques in terms of accuracy with a correlation coefficient to CTA of 0.88, while PD and CCDS measurements yield coefficients of 0.74 and 0.70. Bland-Altman analysis additionally shows a very little bias of the three US methods between 0.5 and 3.2 %. There is excellent correlation (coefficient 0.88, CI 0.77-0.93) with 64-MD-CTA and B-flow ultrasound in terms of accuracy for intrastenotic and poststenotic diameter. Duplex sonography is useful for screening purposes.

Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Past, Present and Future

BACKGROUND

The role of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (aCAS) remains a matter of debate. It seems that not only the degree of stenosis, but also other factors have to be taken in account to improve patient selection and increase the benefit of CEA for aCAS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The literature pertaining aCAS was reviewed in order to describe the natural history, risk of stroke and benefit of CEA for patients with aCAS in regard to several factors.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of CEA for aCAS is low. Current factors influencing the indication for CEA are severity of stenosis, age, contralateral disease, stenosis progression to >80%, gender, concomitant operations and life expectancy. To improve patient selection investigations will concentrate on plaque characteristics and instability and cerebral hemodynamics and metabolism.

Diagnostics and characterisation of preocclusive stenoses and occlusions of the internal carotid artery with B-flow

The purpose was to evaluate whether B-flow can improve the ultrasonographic diagnosis of preocclusive stenosis and occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) compared with colour-coded Doppler and power Doppler. Ninety patients with occlusions or preocclusive stenoses of the ICA suspected by Doppler sonography were examined with B-flow in comparison with colour-coded Doppler sonography (CCDS), power Doppler (PD) and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Intrastenotic flow detection and lengths of stenoses were the main criteria. Ulcerated plaques found by surgery in 42/90 patients were compared by ultrasonography (US). Diagnosis of ICA occlusion with CCDS, PD and B-flow was correct in all 42 cases. A preocclusive ICA stenosis in DSA was detected correctly in all 48/48 cases (100%) for B-flow, in 44/48 (92%) for PD and in 39/48 (81%) for CCDS. Surgical findings showed in 17/42 cases ulcerated plaques; 15/17 (89%) of these cases were detected with B-flow, 12/17 (71%) with PD, 10/17 (59%) with CCDS, and 8/17 (47%) with DSA. With B-flow the extent of stenosis was appraised more precisely than with PD and CCDS (P<0.0001). In conclusion, B-flow is a reliable method for preocclusive stenosis of the ICA with less intrastenotic flow artefacts. B-flow facilitates the characterization of plaque morphologies.

Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate carotid imaging is important for effective secondary stroke prevention. Non-invasive imaging, now widely available, is replacing intra-arterial angiography for carotid stenosis, but the accuracy remains uncertain despite an extensive literature. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography for diagnosing carotid stenosis in patients with carotid territory ischaemic symptoms.

METHODS

We searched for articles published between 1980 and April 2004; included studies comparing non-invasive imaging with intra-arterial angiography that met Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria; extracted data to calculate sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive imaging, to test for heterogeneity and to perform sensitivity analyses; and categorised percent stenosis by the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) method.

RESULTS

In 41 included studies (2541 patients, 4876 arteries), contrast-enhanced MR angiography was more sensitive (0.94, 95% CI 0.88-0.97) and specific (0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.96) for 70-99% stenosis than Doppler ultrasound, MR angiography, and CT angiography (sensitivities 0.89, 0.88, 0.76; specificities 0.84, 0.84, 0.94, respectively). Data for 50-69% stenoses and combinations of non-invasive tests were sparse and unreliable. There was heterogeneity between studies and evidence of publication bias.

INTERPRETATION

Non-invasive tests, used cautiously, could replace intra-arterial carotid angiography for 70-99% stenosis. However, more data are required to determine their accuracy, especially at 50-69% stenoses where the balance of risk and benefit for carotid endarterectomy is particularly narrow, and to explore and overcome heterogeneity. Methodology for evaluating imaging tests should be improved; blinded, prospective studies in clinically relevant patients are essential basic characteristics.

Is carotid duplex scanning sufficient as the sole investigation prior to carotid endarterectomy?

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the accepted treatment for certain patients who have had, or who are at risk of having, a stroke if they have a significant narrowing of the internal carotid artery. Rapid and accurate classification of the degree of stenosis is important as the benefit of surgery is highly dependent on this. The aim of this study was to assess whether the addition of angiography to duplex scanning resulted in a change in patient management in a unit where duplex scanning was used as the sole imaging investigation prior to CEA. The study population consisted of 64 patients with significant internal carotid artery stenosis on duplex scanning who were suitable for, and wished to be considered for, CEA. All patients underwent an angiogram. In this study 9 (14%) patients did not proceed to surgery on the basis of angiography and in a further 11 (17%) patients insufficient views of the distal vessel were obtained on duplex scanning. Three of these patients had extensive disease which excluded surgery. One patient experienced a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) at the time of angiography. In conclusion, this audit has highlighted the limitations in performing duplex scanning alone, and the costs that this can incur on the patient who may undergo an unnecessary operation. We cannot recommend duplex scanning as the sole investigation prior to CEA. There is need to evaluate the role of additional non-invasive carotid imaging such as magnetic resonance angiography or CT angiography in the assessment of these patients.

Quantitative Vascular Measurements in Arterial Occlusive Disease

Accuracy in quantifying arterial occlusive disease requires an understanding of the relevant technical considerations and familiarity with the strengths and weaknesses of various imaging modalities in this setting. The degree of stenosis is evaluated in terms of diameter stenosis, which can be measured on either projection images or cross-sectional images, or area stenosis, which can be measured only on cross-sectional images. With projection images, the minimum luminal diameter should be sought on multiple images obtained at different angles. The reference site used for measurement should be noted and may be located at the level of the lesion or in a normal-looking portion of the stenotic vessel near the lesion. Multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography are starting to replace digital subtraction angiography in quantifying arterial occlusive disease. CT angiography allows accurate evaluation without reducing in-plane resolution, although beam-hardening artifacts from high-attenuation structures can degrade image quality. MR angiography is useful even in cases of severe calcification but has a lower spatial resolution. Ultrasonography (US) may also be helpful in quantifying arterial occlusive disease; US analysis is almost always based on blood flow velocity measurement. Precise measurements of stenotic occlusion will help determine optimal therapy for affected patients.

Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers

Background and Purpose— To develop recommendations for the establishment of comprehensive stroke centers capable of delivering the full spectrum of care to seriously ill patients with stroke and cerebrovascular disease. Recommendations were developed by members of the Brain Attack Coalition (BAC), which is a multidisciplinary group of members from major professional organizations involved with the care of patients with stroke and cerebrovascular disease.

Summary of Review— A comprehensive literature search was conducted from 1966 through December 2004 using Medline and Pub Med. Articles with information about clinical trials, meta-analyses, care guidelines, scientific guidelines, and other relevant clinical and research reports were examined and graded using established evidence-based medicine approaches for therapeutic and diagnostic modalities. Evidence was also obtained from a questionnaire survey sent to leaders in cerebrovascular disease. Members of BAC reviewed literature related to their field and graded the scientific evidence on the various diagnostic and treatment modalities for stroke. Input was obtained from the organizations represented by BAC. BAC met on several occasions to review each specific recommendation and reach a consensus about its importance in light of other medical, logistical, and financial factors.

Conclusions— There are a number of key areas supported by evidence-based medicine that are important for a comprehensive stroke center and its ability to deliver the wide variety of specialized care needed by patients with serious cerebrovascular disease. These areas include: (1) health care personnel with specific expertise in a number of disciplines, including neurosurgery and vascular neurology; (2) advanced neuroimaging capabilities such as MRI and various types of cerebral angiography; (3) surgical and endovascular techniques, including clipping and coiling of intracranial aneurysms, carotid endarterectomy, and intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy; and (4) other specific infrastructure and programmatic elements such as an intensive care unit and a stroke registry. Integration of these elements into a coordinated hospital-based program or system is likely to improve outcomes of patients with strokes and complex cerebrovascular disease who require the services of a comprehensive stroke center.

Hepatic steatosis is associated with an increased risk of carotid atherosclerosis

AIM: Although an association between hepatic steatosis and vascular risk factors has been described, direct relationships between fatty liver and atherosclerosis have not yet been investigated. The aim of the present study has been to investigate those relationships.

METHODS: The Study of Health in Pomerania examined a random population sample aged between 20 and 79 years. A study population of 4222 subjects without hepatitis B and C infections and without liver cirrhosis was available for the present analysis. Hepatic steatosis was defined sonographically and intima-media thickness (IMT) as well as plaque prevalence were estimated by carotid ultrasound.

RESULTS: The prevalence rate of hepatic steatosis was 29.9%. Among subjects aged ≥45 years, an association between hepatic steatosis and IMT of the carotid arteries was found in bivariate analysis, but not after adjustment for atherosclerotic risk factors. Individuals with fatty liver had more often carotid plaques than persons without fatty liver (plaque prevalence rate 76.8% vs 66.6%; P<0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for confounding factors and was predominantly present in subjects with no to mild alcohol consumption.

CONCLUSION: There is an independent association between hepatic steatosis and carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Metabolic changes due to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease may explain this relationship.

[Diagnostic evaluation of carotid artery stenoses with multislice CT angiography. Review of the literature and results of a pilot study]

BACKGROUND

The accurate evaluation of carotid artery stenoses is important for therapeutic decision making. Catheter digital subtraction angiography (DSA) still represents the gold standard, while the advent of multislice CT (MSCT) has led to improved temporal and spatial resolutions of CTA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a pilot study, we investigated 14 diseased vessels in 9 symptomatic patients (7m, 2f; mean age 60.7+/-10,9 years) comparing biplanar DSA with standardized 16-slice MS-CTA. The degree of stenosis was evaluated in a consensus reading following modified NASCET criteria.

RESULTS

DSA demonstrated 4 occlusions, 5 high-grade stenoses (>70%) and 5 lower-grade stenoses (<70%). One dissecting, infrapetrous stenosis was not adequately quantified by CTA due to a close topographic relation to the skull base. In the carotid bifurcation (n=13), an excellent correlation was demonstrated between DSA and CTA with a correlation coefficient of 0.99.

CONCLUSION

MS-CTA has a good diagnostic potential in the evaluation of carotid artery stenoses. Larger studies will need to demonstrate the relative diagnostic value for different subtypes of stenosis and for different reader experience levels.

Imaging of acute stroke: state of the art

The high incidence of stroke, plus its fatal or debilitating outcome, has prompted tremendous advances over the last two decades on both diagnostic and therapeutic fronts. Multiple randomized trials have proven the utility of thrombolytic agents with rejuvenation of the role of diagnostic imaging. State of the art imaging (mainly computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) is crucial for patient selection (eg, excluding intracranial hemorrhage), diagnosis of stroke and prediction of prognosis. Here, we discuss the anatomic and physiologic changes due to an ischemic insult as manifested by modern imaging techniques, including diffusion and perfusion imaging, as well as demonstration of vascular disease by cross sectional angiography supplemented by three dimensional postprocessing. The main target of management is "Penumbra", or salvageable tissue, which is primarily dependent upon the expediency of the whole process, better expressed by the phrase "Time is Brain".

Advances in Multidetector Computed Tomography

The improvement in multidetector computed tomography has had a tremendous impact on neuroimaging. Some of these strides include imaging in the setting of acute stroke with the advent of perfusion computed tomography, and studying intracranial aneurysms and, to some extent, carotid artery disease. The purpose of this article is to review these applications as they were outlined at the "Advances in Multidetector CT" meeting held in Washington, DC, September 13-14, 2003.

Quand, comment et pourquoi réaliser une imagerie des carotides extracrâniennes ?

The indications for treating carotid artery stenosis are related to the symptomatic nature of the lesion and the degree of stenosis. Duplex sonography is adequate for screening. While some groups believe that Duplex US alone or in combination with transcranial Doppler imaging may be sufficient for presurgical evaluation, it often is recommended to complete the evaluation with either MRA or CTA. Both techniques are advantageous since they allow evaluation of the cervical and intracranial arteries as well as cerebral parenchyma hence providing valuable information prior to definitive management. Catheter angiography remains indicated in patients with multi-vessel disease and ischemic cardiomyopathy, when results at non-invasive evaluation are discordant or in an emergency setting. Duplex US is used for routine follow-up of non-surgical lesions and after endarterectomy. Transcranial Doppler as well as advances in MRA and CTA techniques will be reviewed. Even though the treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenoses remains primarily surgical, specific considerations related to angioplasty will be reviewed. Finally, diseases of the intracranial carotid artery and non-atherosclerotic diseases (dissection...) will also be discussed.