Do vascular surgery patients need a cardiology work-up? A review of pre-operative cardiac clearance guidelines in vascular surgery

Frailty In Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery: A Narrative Review Of Current Evidence

Frailty is presumably associated with an elevated risk of postoperative mortality and adverse outcome in vascular surgery patients. The aim of our review was to identify possible methods for risk assessment and prehabilitation in order to improve recovery and postoperative outcome. The literature search was performed via PubMed, Embase, OvidSP, and the Cochrane Library. We collected papers published in peer-reviewed journals between 2001 and 2018. The selection criterion was the relationship between vascular surgery, frailty and postoperative outcome or mortality. A total number of 52 publications were included. Frailty increases the risk of non-home discharge independently of presence or absence of postoperative complications and it is related to a higher 30-day mortality and major morbidity. The modified Frailty Index showed significant association with elevated risk for post-interventional stroke, myocardial infarction, prolonged in-hospital stays and higher readmission rates. When adjusted for comorbidity and surgery type, frailty seems to impact medium-term survival (within 2 years). Preoperative physical exercising, avoidance of hypalbuminemia, psychological and cognitive training, maintenance of muscle strength, adequate perioperative nutrition, and management of smoking behaviours are leading to a reduced length of stay and a decreased incidence of readmission rate, thus improving the effectiveness of early rehabilitation. Pre-frailty is a dynamically changing state of the patient, capable of deteriorating or improving over time. With goal-directed preoperative interventions, the decline can be prevented.

Korean guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT

The development of cardiac CT has provided a non-invasive alternative to echocardiography, exercise electrocardiogram, and invasive angiography and cardiac CT continues to develop at an exponential speed even now. The appropriate use of cardiac CT may lead to improvements in the medical performances of physicians and can reduce medical costs which eventually contribute to better public health. However, until now, there has been no guideline regarding the appropriate use of cardiac CT in Korea. We intend to provide guidelines for the appropriate use of cardiac CT in heart diseases based on scientific data. The purpose of this guideline is to assist clinicians and other health professionals in the use of cardiac CT for diagnosis and treatment of heart diseases, especially in patients at high risk or suspected of heart disease.

Obesity and the orthopedic trauma patient: a review of the risks and challenges in medical and surgical management

The medical and surgical care of obese trauma patients presents a variety of unique and important challenges. Over the past 30 years, this population has increased dramatically in number, and the optimization of their care demands the attention of the medical community. The problems of caring for an obese trauma patient begin before the actual traumatic event occurs due to their substantially higher incidence of serious comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiopulmonary issues. In the setting of trauma, important considerations for the obese patient include careful and expeditious preoperative medical optimization; appropriate deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis; planning for and preventing operative and postoperative challenges (eg, pulmonary and wound complications); and ensuring adequate hospital equipment and staffing resources in the acute and rehabilitative phases of care. This article outlines the scope of the obesity epidemic, reviews the medical consequences of obesity, and highlights surgical considerations specific to the care of orthopedic injuries in the obese trauma patient.

Assessment and management of the obese patient

BACKGROUND

The perioperative care of the clinically severe obese patient presents numerous unique challenges. As an increasing number of people in North America fall into the category of the clinically severe obese, the care of these patients will become increasingly more challenging and prevalent. These patients have unique issues with regards to cardiovascular, pulmonary, and thromboembolic complications. In addition, hospital equipment must be able to accommodate the body habitus of this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Medline search using "perioperative care," "morbid obesity," "thromboembolic complications," "preoperative screening," and "postoperative care" as key words was performed for English-language articles. Further references were obtained through cross-referencing the bibliography cited in each work.

DISCUSSION

The management of the clinically severe obese patient requires meticulous preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care. Careful preoperative planning is essential before taking the patient to the operating room. To have excellent outcomes, a multidisciplinary approach, including the primary care physician, anesthesiologist, surgeon, nursing staff, and social work, is necessary.

Vascular evaluation and arterial reconstruction of the diabetic foot

Findings of diminished or absent pulses, pallor on elevation, redness of the foot on lowering of the leg, sluggish refilling of the toe capillaries, and thickened nails or absence of toe hair are consistent with impaired arterial perfusion to the foot. When ischemia is recognized as contributing to pedal ulceration and infection in the diabetic foot, quantitation of its severity may be difficult. Standard clinical evaluation of trophic changes is limited in an infected foot with its accompanying swelling, edema, and erythema. A palpable pedal pulse does not preclude the possibility of the presence of limb-threatening ischemia. Additional non-invasive vascular studies should be undertaken for these patients. Management of the diabetic foot is often a complex clinical problem. However, the principles of care are simple, including correction of systemic factors, such as blood glucose control, cardiovascular risk factor management, and smoking, as well as local factor correction, such as debridement, pressure relief, infection control, and revascularization when indicated. When a patient presents with evidence of infection, adequate drainage and antibiotic therapy are mandatory. The next step should be performed to differentiate the more common neuropathic ulcerations from the truly ischemic ulceration. Symptoms of rest pain or claudication are not often helpful because many of these patients are asymptomatic as a result of the presence of their neuropathy and inactivity. If an infected foot requires debridement or open partial forefoot amputation, observing the wound on a daily base is also important. Once infection is eradicated, there should be prompt signs of healing, including the development of wound granulation within several days. If wounds are not showing signs of prompt healing, arteriography is necessary. Early aggressive drainage, debridement, and local foot amputations combined with liberal use of revascularization results in cumulative limb salvage of 74% at 5 years in high-risk groups. Others report that pedal bypass to the ischemic infected foot is effective and safe as long as infection adequately controlled. These studies strongly suggest that early recognition and aggressive surgical drainage of pedal sepsis followed by surgical revascularization is critical to achieving maximal limb salvage in the high-risk population. Patients who have diabetes present a unique challenge in lower extremity revascularization because of the distal origination of many bypasses, distal distribution of the occlusive disease, and the frequently calcified arterial wall. An aggressive multidisciplinary approach to foot disease associated with diabetes involving the primary care provider, medical specialists, interventional radiology, and podiatric, plastic, and vascular surgeons will provide optimal medical and surgical care. Peripheral vascular disease is highly treatable if intervention is instituted in a timely and collegial fashion.

An appraisal of different cardiac risk reduction strategies in vascular surgery patients

OBJECTIVES

to summarize existing evidence regarding the benefits and the risks of all available interventional and medical means aimed at cardiac risk reduction in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

DESIGN

review of the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

a critical review of all studies examining the impact of various prophylactic cardiac maneuvers on perioperative outcome following vascular surgery was performed. Overall mortality, cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction rate were used as the outcome measures.

RESULTS

coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with a 60% decrease in perioperative mortality in patients undergoing vascular surgery, but in most of the cases this decrease does not outweigh the combined risk of the cardiac and the subsequent noncardiac vascular procedure. Data supporting the cardioprotective effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the perioperative setting are insufficient. beta-blockade has been shown to decrease perioperative mortality and cardiac morbidity in both high-risk (strong evidence) and low-risk (weak evidence) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

coronary revascularization is rarely indicated to simply get the patient through vascular surgery and should be reserved for patients who would need it irrespective of the scheduled vascular procedure. Among all available pharmacological agents, including beta-blockers, alpha-agonists, calcium channel blockers and nitrates, only beta-blockers have been proven to reduce the cardiac risk of vascular surgery.