Anticoagulant properties, clinical efficacy and safety of efegatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor, in patients with unstable angina

An Overview of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) 3CL Protease Inhibitors: Peptidomimetics and Small Molecule Chemotherapy

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly emerged coronavirus that infected more than 8000 individuals and resulted in more than 800 (10-15%) fatalities in 2003. The causative agent of SARS has been identified as a novel human coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and its viral protease, SARS-CoV 3CL(pro), has been shown to be essential for replication and has hence been recognized as a potent drug target for SARS infection. Currently, there is no effective treatment for this epidemic despite the intensive research that has been undertaken since 2003 (over 3500 publications). This perspective focuses on the status of various efficacious anti-SARS-CoV 3CL(pro) chemotherapies discovered during the last 12 years (2003-2015) from all sources, including laboratory synthetic methods, natural products, and virtual screening. We describe here mainly peptidomimetic and small molecule inhibitors of SARS-CoV 3CL(pro). Attempts have been made to provide a complete description of the structural features and binding modes of these inhibitors under many conditions.

The Future of Anticoagulation

Anticoagulant agents, such as unfractionated heparin and warfarin, have been in use for roughly 50 years. Over the past decade, injectable agents such as low-molecular-weight heparins, pentasaccharide, and direct thrombin inhibitors have been major advances in preventing and treating thrombosis. Despite these somewhat recent additions, there is still enormous potential to improve on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these agents, as well as improve patient outcomes. There are currently a large number of anticoagulant agents (injectable and oral) that could be available for use in the next several years. Many of these new agents have unique mechanisms that may provide practitioners with anticoagulant alternatives. This review gives a detailed analysis of the anticoagulant agents that may add to our armamentarium in the management of thrombosis.

From SARS to MERS: crystallographic studies on coronaviral proteases enable antiviral drug design

This review focuses on the important contributions that macromolecular crystallography has made over the past 12 years to elucidating structures and mechanisms of the essential proteases of coronaviruses, the main protease (M(pro) ) and the papain-like protease (PL(pro) ). The role of X-ray crystallography in structure-assisted drug discovery against these targets is discussed. Aspects dealt with in this review include the emergence of the SARS coronavirus in 2002-2003 and of the MERS coronavirus 10 years later and the origins of these viruses. The crystal structure of the free SARS coronavirus M(pro) and its dependence on pH is discussed, as are efforts to design inhibitors on the basis of these structures. The mechanism of maturation of the enzyme from the viral polyprotein is still a matter of debate. The crystal structure of the SARS coronavirus PL(pro) and its complex with ubiquitin is also discussed, as is its orthologue from MERS coronavirus. Efforts at predictive structure-based inhibitor development for bat coronavirus M(pro) s to increase the preparedness against zoonotic transmission to man are described as well. The paper closes with a brief discussion of structure-based discovery of antivirals in an academic setting.

Advantages and limitations of the new anticoagulants

During recent years, three new anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban) have been introduced to the market, probably with one more anticoagulant (edoxaban) in the next 2 years. This review is not intended to compare the efficacy and risks of these new agents, but rather to detail the advantages and limitations. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of these drugs have few drug and food interactions, predictable dose responses, and rapid onset and offset, thus resulting in simplified management of the patient requiring anticoagulant therapy. No routine laboratory monitoring is required. A somewhat unexpected, but exciting observation involving the new anticoagulants, is the uniform reduction in intracranial bleeding by one-half compared with warfarin. The potential limitations of the new anticoagulants include uncertainty regarding assessment of drug levels, safe drug levels for major surgery, management of major bleeding, renal dependence, multiple dose regimens, adherence in the absence of frequent monitoring and unknown, rare side effects that were not captured in the trials. This review should clarify some of these concerns.

Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology

BACKGROUND

Age is an important determinant of outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS); however, community practice reveals a disproportionately lower use of cardiovascular medications and invasive treatment even among elderly patients with ACS who would stand to benefit. Reasons include limited trial data to guide the care of older adults and uncertainty about benefits and risks, particularly with newer medications or invasive treatments and in the setting of advanced age or complex health status.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This 2-part American Heart Association scientific statement summarizes evidence on patient heterogeneity, clinical presentation, and treatment of non-ST-elevation ACS in relation to age (< 65, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and > or = 85 years). In addition, we review methodological issues that influence the acquisition and application of evidence to the elderly patients treated in community practice. A writing group combining international cardiovascular and geriatric perspectives convened to summarize available data from trials (5 combined Virtual Coordinating Center for Global Collaborative Cardiovascular Research [VIGOUR] trials) and 3 registries (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, and the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines national quality improvement initiative [CRUSADE]) to provide a conceptual framework for future work in the care of the elderly with acute cardiac disease. Treatment for non-ST-segment-elevation ACS (Part I) and ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (Part II) are reviewed. In addition, ethical considerations pertaining to acute care and secondary prevention are considered (Part II). The primary goal is to identify the areas in which sufficient evidence is available to guide practice, as well as to determine areas that warrant further study. Although treatment-related benefits should rise in an elderly population with high disease risk, data to assess these benefits are limited, outcomes of importance vary, and heterogeneity among the elderly increases treatment-related risks. Although a uniform approach to care in the oldest of the old is unlikely, understanding the major contributors to benefits and risks from treatment will advance the ability to apply guideline-based care in this subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a few recent trials have described treatment effects in older patients, others continue to exclude patients on the basis of age. Going forward, prospective trials should enroll elderly subjects proportionate to their prevalence among the treated population to define risk and benefit. Findings from age subgroup analyses should be reported in a consistent manner across trials, including absolute and relative risks for efficacy and safety. Outcomes of particular relevance to the elderly, such as quality of life, physical function, and independence, should also be considered. Creatinine clearance should be calculated for every elderly patient to enable appropriate dosing. In addition, physicians need an understanding of conditions unique to older patients (eg, frailty, cognitive impairment) that influence treatment goals and outcomes. With these efforts, treatment risks can be minimized, and benefits can be placed in the health context of the elderly patient with ACS.

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: effect in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention

AIMS

We evaluated the effect of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in patients undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), using the DTI Trialists' Collaboration database of 35,970 patients from 11 randomized trials of DTIs vs. heparin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis with PCI as a time-dependent covariate to assess the independent impact of DTIs according to the performance of early PCI. PCI was performed in 7049 patients in the first 72 h after randomization. In trials in which PCI was not planned, DTIs were associated with a 10% relative risk reduction in death or myocardial infarction at 30 days (HR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.84-0.97). This benefit was found to be greater in patients undergoing early PCI (HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.91) than those undergoing non-early PCI (HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.86-1.03). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and propensity to undergo PCI, the risk of death or myocardial infarction remained lower with DTI (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.89).

CONCLUSION

After adjustment for baseline differences and propensity to undergo early PCI, DTIs appeared to be more effective than heparin in reducing death or re-infarction among patients undergoing early PCI.

Different antithrombotic properties of factor Xa inhibitor and thrombin inhibitor in rat thrombosis models

We compared the antithrombotic properties of a factor Xa inhibitor (DX-9065a) with those of a thrombin inhibitor (melagatran) in a rat disseminated intravascular coagulation model and a rat venous thrombosis model. Rat disseminated intravascular coagulation and venous thrombosis models were produced by injection of tissue factor and platinum wire placement, respectively. DX-9065a exerted antithrombotic effects dose dependently in both models. Melagatran was also effective in the venous thrombosis model, whereas it showed an aggravation in the disseminated intravascular coagulation model at low but not high doses. In the in vitro study, DX-9065a decreased the C(max) of the thrombin generation curve in plasma irrespective of whether protein C was present or not. However, melagatran increased the C(max) at low concentrations when protein C was present. This increase was not detected in protein C-deficient plasma. These results suggest that, unlike DX-9065a, melagatran in low doses aggravates disseminated intravascular coagulation by increasing thrombin generation, which may be partly due to suppression of negative feedback by activated protein C.

Clinician update: direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes

Antithrombotic therapy has become the cornerstone of the treatment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the thrombin inhibitor of choice for decades. UFH, however, has its deficiencies. To overcome these problems several direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been developed. These agents are capable of inactivating clot-bound thrombin more efficiently, and provide more predictable and safer anticoagulation in patients with of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The initial studies of hirudin and bivalirudin in the clinical settings of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), unstable angina (UA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) conducted in the early 1990s proved to be disappointing. As the knowledge of more appropriate use of these drugs progressed, there is a renewed interest in DTIs. Herein we will review the clinical studies assessing hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban in the settings of AMI, UA and PCI.

Vectorcardiography risk stratifies emergency department chest pain patients with left ventricular hypertrophy on the initial 12-lead ECG

BACKGROUND

Vectorcardiographic (VCG) measurements of ST-vector magnitude (VM) and QRS-vector difference (VD) have been demonstrated to be independent predictors of adverse outcome (AO) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in emergency department (ED) chest pain patients with absence of bundle branch block or left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on the initial 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The prognostic value of ST-VM and QRS-VD in ED chest pain patients with LVH on the initial 12-lead ECG has not been previously investigated.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed in 196 consecutive ED chest pain patients with suspected AMI and presence of voltage criteria for LVH on initial ECG who underwent continuous VCG monitoring during the initial evaluation. The optimal baseline ST-VM value and 2-hour QRS-VD value were defined as the most accurate value on the receiver operator characteristic curve (value with lowest false-negative and false-positive rate). Thirty-day AO was defined as AMI, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), or cardiac death occurring within 30 days of initial ED visit.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (7.1%) were diagnosed as 24-hour AMI and 28 patients (14.3%) experienced 30-day AO. The optimal cut-off value for predicting 30-day AO was > 124 microV for ST-VM and > 21.7 microV for QRS-VD. Patients with either a positive ST-VM or a positive QRS-VD had 8.8 times increased odds of AMI (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.9-40.3; P = 0.003); 4.3 times increased odds of 30-day PTCA/CABG (95% CI 1.3-13.8; P = 0.019); and 3.8 times increased odds of 30-day AO (95% CI 1.6-9.3; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline ST-VM and 2-hour QRS-VD risk stratifies ED chest pain patients with LVH voltage criteria on the initial 12-lead ECG.

Direct thrombin inhibitors for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: what, when, and where?

BACKGROUND

Unfractionated heparin has been the cornerstone of antithrombin therapy in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes for more than a decade. Several new anticoagulants have emerged in recent years and have been studied extensively in patients with unstable coronary syndromes and in the percutaneous coronary intervention setting.

METHODS

Direct thrombin inhibitors comprise a family of agents with promising properties that offer several potential advantages over unfractionated heparin. Hirudin has been studied in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation coronary syndromes, and coronary angioplasty. Bivalirudin has been studied in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, with very promising efficacy and safety profile compared with unfractionated heparin.

RESULTS

The clinical trials of direct thrombin inhibitors in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and coronary angioplasty are reviewed.

The influence of direct and antithrombin-dependent thrombin inhibitors on the procoagulant and anticoagulant effects of thrombin

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials evaluating direct thrombin inhibitors in unstable coronary artery disease (CAD) have been disappointing. The hypothesis tested in the present study was that these agents may inhibit the anticoagulant effect of thrombin to a further extent than the procoagulant effect of thrombin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied both reversible and irreversible thrombin inhibitors and compared the effects of each inhibitor on activated protein C (APC) generation vs. the effect on fibrinopeptide A (FPA) generation. A mixture of protein C, thrombin inhibitor, fibrinogen, fibrin polymerisation blocker and thrombin was incubated with thrombomodulin (TM)-expressing human saphenous vein endothelial cells (HSVECs). The inhibitors investigated were melagatran, inogatran, hirudin, hirugen, D-Phe-D-Pro-D-arginyl chloromethyl ketone (PPACK), and antithrombin (AT) alone or in combination with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).

RESULTS

All agents, except hirugen, inhibited APC and FPA generation in a dose-dependent manner. FPA inhibition/APC inhibition ratios, based on IC50 for inogatran, melagatran, hirudin, PPACK, AT, AT-UFH and AT-LMWH were 1.73, 0.85, 0.55, 2.1, 0.5, 0.65 and 3.1 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All agents, except hirugen, inhibited APC and FPA generation approximately to a similar extent. Thus, it can be inferred that the poor efficacy of thrombin inhibitors in recent clinical trials in patients with unstable CAD is unlikely to be a consequence of their effects on the protein C system.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

This review deals with a newly-developed category of antithrombotic drugs - the direct thrombin inhibitors. These agents interact with thrombin and block its catalytic activity on fibrinogen, platelets and other substrates. Heparin and its derivatives (low molecular weight heparins and the active pentasaccharide) inhibit thrombin and/or other coagulation serine proteases indirectly via antithrombin, and the warfarin-type drugs interfere with the synthesis of the precursors of the coagulation serine proteases. The direct thrombin inhibitors approved for clinical use at present (lepirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) and another in the advanced clinical testing stage (melagatran/ximelagatran), are the subject of this review. The chemical structure; kinetics of thrombin inhibition; pharmacokinetics and clinical use of each of these is discussed.

The evolving role of direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes

The central role of thrombin in the initiation and propagation of intravascular thrombus provides a strong rationale for direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Direct thrombin inhibitors are theoretically likely to be more effective than indirect thrombin inhibitors, such as unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, because the heparins block only circulating thrombin, whereas direct thrombin inhibitors block both circulating and clot-bound thrombin. Several initial phase 3 trials did not demonstrate a convincing benefit of direct thrombin inhibitors over unfractionated heparin. However, the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis confirms the superiority of direct thrombin inhibitors, particularly hirudin and bivalirudin, over unfractionated heparin for the prevention of death or myocardial infarction (MI) during treatment in patients with ACS, primarily due to a reduction in MI (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.91) with little impact on death. The absolute risk reduction in the composite of death or MI at the end of treatment (0.8%) was similar at 30 days (0.7%), indicating no loss of benefit after cessation of therapy. Supportive evidence for the superiority of direct thrombin inhibitors over heparin derives from the recently reported Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 randomized trial with ST-segment elevation ACS, which demonstrated a similar benefit of bivalirudin over heparin for the prevention of death or MI at 30 days (absolute risk reduction 1.0%), again primarily due to a reduction in MI during treatment (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.87), with little impact on death. Further evaluation of hirudin and bivalirudin in the antithrombotic management of patients with ACS is warranted.

The activated clotting time can be used to monitor the low molecular weight heparin dalteparin after intravenous administration

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare the dose response of dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) on the activated clotting time (ACT), and to determine whether the ACT can be used to monitor intravenous (IV) dalteparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during PCI has been limited by the presumed inability to monitor its anticoagulant effect using bedside assays.

METHODS

This study was performed in three phases. In vitro, ACTs were measured on volunteer (n = 10) blood samples spiked with increasing concentrations of dalteparin or UFH. To extend these observations in vivo, ACTs were then measured in patients (n = 15) who were sequentially treated with IV dalteparin and then UFH. Finally, a larger monitoring study was undertaken involving patients (n = 110) who received dalteparin 60 or 80 international U (IU)/kg alone or followed by abciximab. We measured ACT (Hemochron), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), plasma anti-Xa and anti-IIa levels, tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) concentration, and plasma dalteparin concentration.

RESULTS

Dalteparin induced a significant rise in the ACT with a smaller degree of variance as compared to UFH. Five min after administration of IV dalteparin 80 IU/kg the ACT increased from 125 s (122 s, 129 s) to 184 s (176 s, 191 s) (p < 0.001). The aPTT, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities, and TFPI concentration also demonstrated significant increases following IV dalteparin.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACT and aPTT are sensitive to IV dalteparin at clinically relevant doses. These data suggest that the ACT may be useful in monitoring the anticoagulant effect of intravenously administered dalteparin during PCI.

Inhibition of endothelial cell-mediated generation of activated protein C by direct and antithrombin-dependent thrombin inhibitors

The present study investigated the effect of the thrombin inhibitors antithrombin (AT) (with and without unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin), hirudin, inogatran and melagatran on thrombin-thrombomodulin-mediated generation of activated protein C (APC), in solution and on endothelial cells. Sequential incubation with thrombin, thrombin inhibitors and protein C was followed by measurement of APC by an amidolytic assay. The approximate concentrations resulting in 50% inhibition of endothelial cell-mediated APC generation for AT, AT-unfractionated heparin, AT-low molecular weight heparin, hirudin, melagatran and inogatran were 200, 4, 9, 1, 8 and 60 nmol/l, respectively. The normal plasma level of AT is 2800 nmol/l and relevant therapeutic concentrations from clinical trials are 200 nmol/l for hirudin, 500 nmol/l for melagatran and 1000 nmol/l for inogatran. The present study indicates that clinically relevant concentrations of the tested thrombin inhibitors interfere with endothelial-mediated APC generation, which may offer an explanation for the lack of a dose-response effect in clinical trials with thrombin inhibitors.

Management of patients with acute coronary syndromes: what is the clinical role of direct thrombin inhibitors?

Despite important pharmacokinetic and biological advantages of direct thrombin inhibitors over heparin, early randomised trials failed to demonstrate a clear net clinical benefit of these agents compared with heparin because of a higher bleeding risk, particularly with hirudin, and only modest efficacy gains. More recently, however, a systematic review of the direct thrombin inhibitor trials based on individual patient data as well as the results of the 17 000-patient Hirulog Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial have confirmed the superiority of both hirudin and bivalirudin over unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Ongoing trials should further clarify the role of bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the context of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use, while additional studies are required to define the role of direct thrombin inhibitors used in conjunction with other newer antithrombotic and/or thrombolytic strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Use of baseline ST-vector magnitude to identify electrocardiographic injury in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction

No information is currently available regarding optimal cut-off values of the ST-vector magnitude (ST-VM) for predicting acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in emergency department (ED) chest pain patients undergoing vectorcardiographic (VCG) monitoring. A prospective observational study was performed in 1,722 chest pain patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and absence of bundle branch block (BBB) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) on initial ECG who underwent continuous VCG ST-segment monitoring during the initial ED evaluation. Three cut-off values for baseline ST-VM are reported and represent the smallest values in which the positive likelihood ratio (+LR) for AMI is greater than 5, 10, and 20, respectively. AMI occurred in 158 of 1,722 patients (9.2%) without BBB or LVH on initial ECG. Optimal cut-off values at the predetermined +LR values of 5, 10, and 20, were 121 microV (sensitivity, 41.8%; specificity, 92.0%), 151 microV (sensitivity, 29.1%; specificity, 97.1%), and 175 microV (sensitivity, 25.9%; specificity, 98.7%), respectively. Combining the earlier-mentioned cut-off values with physician judgment of initial pretest probability (high, intermediate, or low, respectively) resulted in a relative increase in identification of injury of 37.5% as compared with the ED physician's interpretation of initial ECG (41.8% v 30.4%; P <.0001), and 65.2% as compared with the official ECG interpretation (41.8% v 25.3%; P <.0001). Increasing ST-VM results in increasing likelihood of AMI. Clinical studies need to be performed to determine if ST-VM cut-off values of 121, 151, and 175 microV in conjunction with physician pretest probability of AMI can be used as criterion for emergent reperfusion therapy in patients without LVH or BBB on the initial ECG.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Thrombin plays a central role in thrombosis. Consequently, most current antithrombotic treatment strategies are aimed at blocking the activity of thrombin, or preventing its generation. Although heparin has been a cornerstone of treatment, it has limitations. Thus, the anticoagulant response to heparin is unpredictable, the heparin/antithrombin complex is unable to inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin, an important trigger of thrombus growth, and heparin is neutralized by platelet factor 4. Direct thrombin inhibitors were developed to overcome these limitations. Unlike heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors produce a predictable anticoagulant response that is unaffected by platelet factor 4, and they inhibit fibrin-bound thrombin. Three parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors--hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban--are currently licensed for use in North America, and orally available direct thrombin inhibitors are under investigation. This review summarizes the clinical trial data with direct thrombin inhibitors and provides perspective on the role of direct thrombin inhibitors in the face of other new anticoagulants currently under development.

Direct thrombin inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: principal results of a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data

BACKGROUND

To obtain more reliable and precise estimates of the effect of direct thrombin inhibitors in the management of acute coronary syndromes, including patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, we undertook a meta-analysis based on individual patients' data from randomised trials comparing a direct thrombin inhibitor (hirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban, efegatran, or inogatran) with heparin.

METHODS

We included trials that involved at least 200 patients. The primary efficacy outcome was death or myocardial infarction, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. Data from individual trials were combined by use of a modified Mantel-Haenszel method.

FINDINGS

In 11 randomised trials, 35,970 patients were assigned up to 7 days' treatment with a direct thrombin inhibitor or heparin and followed up for at least 30 days. Compared with heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of death or myocardial infarction at the end of treatment (4.3% vs 5.1%; odds ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.94]; p=0.001) and at 30 days (7.4% vs 8.2%; 0.91 [0.84-0.99]; p=0.02). This was due primarily to a reduction in myocardial infarctions (2.8% vs 3.5%; 0.80 [0.71-0.90]; p<0.001) with no apparent effect on deaths (1.9% vs 2.0%; 0.97 [0.83-1.13]; p=0.69). Subgroup analyses suggested a benefit of direct thrombin inhibitors on death or myocardial infarction in trials of both acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary interventions. A reduction in death or myocardial infarction was seen with hirudin and bivalirudin but not with univalent agents. Compared with heparin, there was an increased risk of major bleeding with hirudin, but a reduction with bivalirudin. There was no excess in intracranial haemorrhage with direct thrombin inhibitors.

INTERPRETATION

Direct thrombin inhibitors are superior to heparin for the prevention of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. This information should prompt further clinical development of direct thrombin inhibitors for the management of arterial thrombosis.

Advances in the development of thrombin inhibitors

Thromboembolic diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the Western world, which has stimulated enormous research efforts by the pharmaceutical industry to introduce new antithrombotic therapies. One strategy is the development of direct inhibitors of the serine protease thrombin, which holds a central position in the final steps of the blood coagulation cascade and in platelet activation. At present there is only limited clinical use of some parenteral preparations of thrombin inhibitors in acute situations, especially when the common antithrombotic drugs heparin, warfarin and aspirin are ineffective or associated with side effects. However, for use in prophylaxis of thrombotic diseases such inhibitors should be orally available, must be safe to avoid bleeding complications and should have an appropriate half-life, allowing once or twice daily dosing to maintain adequate antithrombotically effective blood levels. Details of several new and potent thrombin inhibitors have been published during the last years. For some of them oral bioavailability is claimed and they are effective in in vitro coagulation assays. However, most of them showed only limited efficacy in animal studies with respect to the doses administered. For that reason, effort is concentrated on the evaluation and optimisation of the overall physicochemical characteristics of the inhibitors in order to improve the pharmacokinetics and, thus, the development of promising drug candidates. Nevertheless, only careful clinical studies can give clear answers about the true therapeutical benefit of new developments in this field. This review summarises the current status of direct thrombin inhibitors which are already in clinical use and clinical development and gives an overview on recently published and promising new compounds.