Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty compared to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction

Shenxiang Suhe pill improves cardiac function through modulating gut microbiota and serum metabolites in rats after acute myocardial infarction

CONTEXT

Shenxiang Suhe pill (SXSH), a traditional Chinese medicine, is clinically effective against coronary heart disease, but the mechanism of cardiac-protective function is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the cardiac-protective mechanism of SXSH via modulating gut microbiota and metabolite profiles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 8): Sham, Model, SXSH (Low, 0.063 g/kg; Medium, 0.126 g/kg; High, 0.252 g/kg), and Ato (atorvastatin, 20 mg/kg). Besides the Sham group, rats were modelled with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by ligating the anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery (LAD). After 3, 7, 14 days' administration, ultrasound, H&E staining, serum enzymic assay, 16S rRNA sequencing were conducted to investigate the SXSH efficacy. Afterwards, five groups of rats: Sham, Model, Model-ABX (AMI with antibiotics-feeding), SXSH (0.126 g/kg), SXSH-ABX were administrated for 14 days to evaluate the gut microbiota-dependent SXSH efficacy, and serum untargeted metabolomics test was performed.

RESULTS

0.126 g/kg of SXSH intervention for 14 days increased ejection fraction (EF, 78.22%), fractional shortening (FS, 109.07%), and aortic valve flow velocities (AV, 21.62%), reduced lesion area, and decreased serum LDH (8.49%) and CK-MB (10.79%). Meanwhile, SXSH upregulated the abundance of Muribaculaceae (199.71%), Allobaculum (1744.09%), and downregulated Lactobacillus (65.51%). The cardiac-protective effect of SXSH was disrupted by antibiotics administration. SXSH altered serum metabolites levels, such as downregulation of 2-n-tetrahydrothiophenecarboxylic acid (THTC, 1.73%), and lysophosphatidylcholine (lysoPC, 4.61%).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The cardiac-protective effect and suggested mechanism of SXSH could provide a theoretical basis for expanding its application in clinic.

Assessment of Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon Only Angioplasty in STEMI

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) has emerged as the standard of care, but stent-related events have persisted. Drug-coated balloon (DCB)-only angioplasty is an emerging technology, although it is not fully evaluated compared with DES in the context of pPCI.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of DCB-only angioplasty compared with second-generation DES in pPCI.

METHODS

All-cause mortality and net adverse cardiac events (cardiovascular mortality, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, and unplanned target lesion revascularization [TLR]) were compared among all patients treated with DCBs only or with second-generation DES only for first presentation of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) due to de novo disease between January 1, 2016, and November 15, 2019. Patients treated with both DCBs and DES were excluded. Data were analyzed using Cox regression models, Kaplan-Meier estimator plots and propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Among 1,139 patients with STEMI due to de novo disease, 452 were treated with DCBs and 687 with DES. After a median follow-up period of >3 years, all-cause mortality was 49 of 452 and 62 of 687 in the DCB and DES groups, respectively (P = 0.18). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, there was no difference in mortality between DCBs and DES in the full and propensity score-matched cohorts. Age, frailty risk, history of heart failure, and family history of ischemic heart disease remained significant independent predictors of mortality. There was no difference in any of the secondary endpoints, including unplanned TLR.

CONCLUSIONS

DCB-only angioplasty appears safe compared with DES for STEMI in terms of all-cause mortality and all net adverse cardiac events, including unplanned TLR. DCB may be an efficacious and safe alternative to DES in selected patient groups. (Drug Coated Balloon Only vs Drug Eluting Stent Angioplasty; NCT04482972).

Comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies

BACKGROUND

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more effective on average than fibrinolytic therapy in the treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Yet, most US hospitals are not equipped for PCI, and fibrinolytic therapy is still widely used. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction regionalization strategies to increase the use of PCI against standard emergency transport and care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We estimated incremental treatment costs and quality-adjusted life expectancies of 2000 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who received PCI or fibrinolytic therapy in simulations of emergency care in a regional hospital system. To increase access to PCI across the system, we compared a base case strategy with 12 hospital-based strategies of building new PCI laboratories or extending the hours of existing laboratories and 1 emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting all patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction to existing PCI-capable hospitals. The base case resulted in 609 (95% CI, 569-647) patients getting PCI. Hospital-based strategies increased the number of patients receiving PCI, the costs of care, and quality-adjusted life years saved and were cost-effective under a variety of conditions. An emergency medical services-based strategy of transporting every patient to an existing PCI facility was less costly and more effective than all hospital expansion options.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that new construction and staffing of PCI laboratories may not be warranted if an emergency medical services strategy is both available and feasible.

Mechanical intervention after thrombolysis

Revascularisation strategies for acute myocardial infarction have evolved from early admission to coronary care units, bed rest and cardiac rhythm monitoring, to thrombolytic therapy and primary angioplasty. Although mechanical intervention for a failed prior revascularisation attempt is common widespread clinical practice, the outcome of this two-step modality may yet be an issue of debate. The available evidence is selected and reviewed within a clinical reference framework. This enables the presentation of a practical model for all stakeholders participating in cardiovascular care.

Reperfusion treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction

Reperfusion treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is one of the medical interventions with the largest potential for saving human lives, independently of age and gender. An attempt to reopen an acutely occluded coronary artery can be done within a wide array of possibilities, from the simple administration of aspirin to the combination of drugs and complex coronary artery interventions. Fibrinolytic drugs and aspirin represent the easiest way to attempt reperfusion and together offer an acceptable compromise between opportunity for treatment and efficacy. Other drugs and the use of invasive revascularization alternatives yield further advantages, and in some high-risk subgroups may be the most rational treatment approach. Beyond investigator's bias and dedication to either form of reperfusion treatment, interventions and/or drugs should be used as needed (and as possible) to increase the overall impact of reperfusion treatment in the community, taking advantage of the best potential of each approach. Most resources have been directed toward the improvement of reperfusion rates with the combination of fibrinolytic and antiplatelet drugs or with angioplasty. These efforts have certainly raised costs, but have not decisively improved clinical outcome nor have they broadened the impact of reperfusion treatment in the community. Indeed, the main shortcoming of reperfusion therapy is that the cohort of untreated patients is still larger than the cohort of treated patients. At a time when mortality of patients with STEMI reaching the hospital and receiving treatment has decreased significantly, the prehospital diagnosis and treatment of STEMI with the objective of enlarging the treated population and shortening the pretreatment delays is likely the best strategy to further reduce mortality. The need for a population approach to treatment of STEMI is even more obvious when considering the expanding patient load that continuously worsens its clinical risk profile, together with the increasing incidence of diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and smoking habits. The target for improving reperfusion treatment of STEMI in the future, and thereby saving more lives, seems now to involve a cultural change and fulfillment of an organizational mission more than an incremental improvement in the current pharmacologic or interventional approach. These epidemiologic and social aspects of contemporary medicine deserve full attention at a time when researchers, clinicians, and health care providers tend to focus primarily on technological advances.

Influence of prehospital administration of aspirin and heparin on initial patency of the infarct-related artery in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of prehospital administration of aspirin and heparin on the initial patency of the infarct-related artery (IRA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Prehospital diagnosis of acute MI facilitates early pharmacologic intervention on the way to the catheterization laboratory for primary angioplasty.

METHODS

We studied the angiographic data and 30-day clinical outcome of 1,702 patients treated with primary angioplasty; 860 received aspirin and heparin before transportation to our hospital and 842 received aspirin and heparin in our hospital.

RESULTS

The Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 2 or 3 flow in the IRA was higher in the prehospital treated group (31% vs. 20%, relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.78, p < 0.001). Patients with TIMI 2 or 3 flow on the initial angiogram had a higher angioplasty success rate (94% vs. 89%, p < 0.001), a smaller enzymatic infarct size, a higher left ventricular ejection fraction and a lower 30-day mortality (1.6% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Prehospital administration of aspirin and heparin results in a higher initial patency of the IRA in patients with acute MI.

Practice variation and missed opportunities for reperfusion in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)

BACKGROUND

The benefits of reperfusion therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes have been established, but there is much variation in the type of reperfusion given and decisions about which patients are eligible. This study assessed current practices in relation to reperfusion therapy of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction from data collected in the multinational, prospective Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.

METHODS

94 hospitals in 14 countries are recruiting patients for the registry. Hospitals are organised into population-based clusters that reflect the population characteristics of the region. Information about patients' demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, medical history, time between symptom onset and presentation, and clinical and electrocardiographic features is recorded in a standard case record.

FINDINGS

Of the 9251 patients enrolled, 1763 presented within 12 h of symptom onset with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Of these, 30% did not receive reperfusion therapy. Elderly patients (75 years and older), those presenting without chest pain, and those with a history of diabetes, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or coronary bypass surgery were less likely to receive reperfusion therapy. The rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention was highest in the USA and lowest in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. The rate at sites with a catheterisation laboratory was 19% compared with zero at sites without this facility.

INTERPRETATION

A substantial proportion of patients who are eligible for reperfusion therapy still do not receive this treatment. These typically high-risk patients can be identified in advance, and reasons for the underuse of these beneficial treatments need to be clarified.