Comparison of QT dispersion during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm in the same patients, at normal and prolonged ventricular repolarization

An Improved QT Correction Method for use in Atrial Fibrillation and a Comparison with the Assessment of QT in Sinus Rhythm

BACKGROUND

Conventional QT corrections may be inappropriate inatrial fibrillation (AF) due to RR variability and QT lag. Existing formulashave been modified by the formula RRmod to account for this lag. Wedeveloped a novel correction formula for use in AF (QTAF) based onthe slope ∆QT/∆RRmod and report its performance in AF.We also compare QTAF obtained in AF with rate-independentcorrections in NSR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 3063 RR/QT pairs from 28 patients with AFwere measured, 22 of whom also had measurements during sinus rhythm. QTc (theBazett equation), QTLC (the Framingham linear correction), and QTAFwere calculated utilizing RRmod, and the rate-independence of eachformula in AF tested. Mean QTAF values in AF were compared to QTintervals corrected with QTLC in normal sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

∆QTc/∆RRmod and∆QTLC/∆RRmod slopes were significantlynon-zero whereas ∆QTAF/∆RRmod was not. QTLCand QTc corrections were imperfect at extremes of RRmod whileQTAF was constant. QTAF corrections in AF were shorterthan QTc or QTLC corrections in NSR.

CONCLUSIONS

QTAF is a novel QT correction with adefined relationship to correction in NSR that performs better than existingstrategies.

Man versus machine: is there an optimal method for QT measurements in thorough QT studies?

Electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings from 3 placebo-controlled thorough QT healthy volunteer studies were used to compare QT intervals obtained by manual measurement with those generated by ECG machines. The effect of the positive control was compared to placebo at each time point for data obtained from both sources. Both manual and automated techniques consistently demonstrated statistically significant prolongation of QTcF with the positive controls. The proportion of outlier values was small for both methods. The pairwise comparison between manual and automated uncorrected QT intervals demonstrated clear differences, with intervals derived from one machine on average 16 to 19 milliseconds shorter and from the other 7 milliseconds longer than the manually measured QT intervals, but these differences disappeared when analyzing QT change from baseline. Both manual and automated, commercially available QT algorithms demonstrated small statistically significant effects on the QTc interval induced by positive controls.

Increase in QT/QTc dispersion after low energy cardioversion of chronic persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The effects of atrial internal cardioversion on QT interval and QT dispersion (parameters associated with increased risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias) are unknown. We investigated changes in QT interval, QTc and QT dispersion immediately after shock delivery for internal cardioversion in patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation.

METHOD

Twenty-two patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (mean duration, 17+/-23 months) underwent transvenous low-energy internal atrial cardioversion with a step-up protocol of shocks delivered between catheters in the right atrium and coronary sinus. (successful shock, 7.2+/-4.2 J). RR interval, QT interval, QTc interval, QT dispersion, and QTc dispersion were all measured on three consecutive beats (at 75 mm/s on at least 9 of 12 leads) and then averaged both before and after (1) the last unsuccessful shock, and (2) sinus rhythm restoration.

RESULTS

All parameters remained similar in the minute before and after the last unsuccessful shock. At 1 min after the successful shock, abrupt increases in QT dispersion (+43.8% vs. pre-shock; P<0.001 at least significant difference analysis) and QTc dispersion (+30.0%; P<0.05) were observed, followed by a gradual return to pre-shock values at 15 min.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings strongly suggest the likely existence of a brief period of increased electrical vulnerability immediately after restoration of sinus rhythm by internal cardioversion. Particular caution should therefore be applied whenever class III antiarrhythmic drugs are administered immediately after successful internal atrial cardioversion.