Oral Nicorandil to Reduce Cardiac Death After Coronary Revascularization in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Trial

Effect of Perioperative Nicorandil on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Retrospective Study

Background

The potential myocardial protective effect of nicorandil (NICD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention has been established. However, its efficacy in the context of cardiac surgery remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the myocardial protective effect of perioperative NICD use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods

We retrospectively gathered data from patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery between 12/2018 and 04/2021 in Fuwai Hospital. Subsequently, the patients were divided into two groups, NICD group and non-nicorandil (non-NICD) group. A 1, 3 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of myocardial injury. The secondary outcomes included the mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, duration of chest drainage, the drainage volume, the total cost, the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the incidence of acute liver injury (ALI). Subsequently, we divided the entire population into two distinct subgroups based on their administration of NICD, and performed a comprehensive subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 2406 patients were ultimately included in the study. After PSM, 250 patients in NICD group and 750 patients in non-NICD group were included in the analysis. Perioperative NICD reduced the incidence of myocardial injury (47.2% versus 38.8%, P=0.025). Our subgroup analysis revealed that preoperative NICD administration not only provided myocardial protection benefits (45.7% vs 35.8%, OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.45-0.97], P=0.041), but also demonstrated statistically significant reduction in ALI, the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The perioperative NICD administration may confer myocardial protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Furthermore, the preoperative utilization of NICD has the potential to mitigate the incidence of postoperative ALI, a reduction in the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage.

Nicorandil Decreases Renal Injury in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Complicated With Type I Cardiorenal Syndrome

ABSTRACT

Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a group of disorders in which heart or kidney dysfunction worsens each other. This study aimed to explore the improvement effect of nicorandil on cardiorenal injury in patients with type I CRS. Patients with coronary heart disease complicated with type I CRS were enrolled. Based on the conventional treatment, the patients were prospectively randomized into a conventional treatment group and a nicorandil group, which was treated with 24 mg/d nicorandil intravenously for 1 week. Fasting peripheral venous blood serum and urine were collected before and at the end of treatment. An automatic biochemical analyzer and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay were used to detect B-type brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), serum creatinine (Scr) and cystatin C (Cys-C), renal injury index-kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and interleukin-18 (IL-18) levels. The left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by echocardiography. All measurements were not significantly different between the nicorandil and conventional treatment groups before treatment (all P > 0.05), and BNP, Scr, Cys-C, NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 were decreased in the 2 groups at the end of treatment (all P < 0.05). Compared with the conventional treatment group, BNP, Scr, Cys-C, NGAL, KIM-1, and IL-18 were more significantly decreased in the nicorandil group (all P < 0.05) and left ventricular ejection fraction was more significantly increased (P < 0.05). Therefore, nicorandil could significantly improve the cardiac and renal function of patients with type I CRS. This may prove to be a new therapeutic tool for improving the prognosis and rehabilitation of type I CRS.

Blood pressure targets for hemodialysis patients

The association between blood pressure (BP) and mortality is unique in hemodialysis patients compared with that in the general population. This is because of an altered benefit-risk balance associated with BP reduction in these patients. An adequately designed study comparing BP targets in hemodialysis patients remains to be conducted. The current evidence available to guide dialysis providers regarding treatment strategies for managing hypertension in this population is limited to large observational studies and small randomized controlled trials. In this opinion article, we review these data and discuss the key points regarding BP management for hemodialysis patients. Our aim is to provide a practical opinion regarding BP targets that nephrologists can incorporate into clinical practice, with a focus on moving away from dialysis unit BPs and focusing on out-of-dialysis unit BPs.

Medication adherence in randomized controlled trials evaluating cardiovascular or mortality outcomes in dialysis patients: A systematic review

Background

Medication non-adherence is common among renal dialysis patients. High degrees of non-adherence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can lead to failure to detect a true treatment effect. Cardio-protective pharmacological interventions have shown no consistent benefit in RCTs involving dialysis patients. Whether non-adherence contributes to this lack of efficacy is unknown. We aimed to investigate how medication adherence and drug discontinuation were assessed, reported and addressed in RCTs, evaluating cardiovascular or mortality outcomes in dialysis patients.

Methods

Electronic database searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE & Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs published between 2005–2015, evaluating self-administered medications, in adult dialysis patients, which reported clinical cardiovascular or mortality endpoints, as primary or secondary outcomes. Study characteristics, outcomes, methods of measuring and reporting adherence, and data on study drug discontinuation were analyzed.

Results

Of the 642 RCTs in dialysis patients, 22 trials (12 placebo controlled), which included 19,322 patients, were eligible. The trialed pharmacological interventions included anti-hypertensives, phosphate binders, lipid-lowering therapy, cardio-vascular medications, homocysteine lowering therapy, fish oil and calcimimetics. Medication adherence was reported in five trials with a mean of 81% (range: 65–92%) in the intervention arm and 84.5% (range: 82–87%) in the control arm. All the trials that reported adherence yielded negative study outcomes for the intervention. Study-drug discontinuation was reported in 21 trials (mean 33.2%; 95% CI, 22.0 to 44.5, in intervention and 28.8%; 95% CI, 16.8 to 40.8, in control). Trials with more than 20% study drug discontinuation, more often yielded negative study outcomes (p = 0.018). Non-adherence was included as a contributor to drug discontinuation in some studies, but the causes of discontinuation were not reported consistently between studies, and non-adherence was listed under different categories, thereby potentiating the misclassification of adherence.

Conclusions

Reporting of medication adherence and study-drug discontinuation in RCTs investigating cardiovascular or mortality endpoints in dialysis patients are inconsistent, making it difficult to compare studies and evaluate their impact on outcomes. Recommendations for consistent reporting of non-adherence and causes of drug discontinuation in RCTs will therefore help to assess their impact on clinical outcomes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0449-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Nicorandil, Gastrointestinal Adverse Drug Reactions and Ulcerations: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Nicorandil is a popular anti-anginal drug in Europe and Japan. Apart from some common adverse drug reactions (ADR), its safety is satisfactory. Several reports have suggested a link between nicorandil, gastrointestinal (GI) ulceration and fistulas. The review aims to critically appraise, synthesize and present the available evidence of all known GI ADR per anatomical location.

METHODS

The study complied with the PRISMA statement. Literature and pharmacovigilance databases were used to provide rate and/or calculate parameters (median age, median dose, history of symptoms, length of therapy and healing time after withdrawal of the drug). Differences in distribution of quantitative variables were analyzed via Mann-Whitney test. Correlation between quantitative variables was assessed with a Spearman's correlation coefficient. A p value <0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

Oral ulcerations occur in 0.2% of the subjects, anal ulcerations are present between 0.07% and 0.37% of patients. Oral and distal GI involvements are the most common ADR (28-29% and 27-31% of all GI ADR, respectively). The hepatobiliary system, the pancreas and salivary glands are not affected by nicorandil exposure. The time to develop oral ulcerations is 74 weeks among people on <30 mg/day compared to only 7.5 weeks in individuals on higher regimens (p = 0.47). There is a significant correlation between dose and ulcer healing time (Spearman's 0.525, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcerative disease is a very commonly reported GI ADR. A delayed ulcerative tendency supports the hypothesis of an ulcerogenic metabolite. Nicorandil seems to act as a cause of the ulcerations, but appears to also work in synergy with other promoting factors. Whether the action of the metabolites relies on a specific mechanism or a simple chemical ulceration is still to be established.

Influence of hemodialysis duration on mid-term clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients with coronary artery disease after drug-eluting stent implantation

Accelerated atherosclerosis in prolonged maintenance hemodialysis (HD) has been recognized; however, whether HD duration is associated with poor clinical outcome in HD patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is unknown. We evaluated the impact of HD duration on clinical outcomes in HD patients with CAD after DES implantation. Between April 2007 and December 2012, 168 angina pectoris patients (320 de novo lesions) on HD were treated with DES. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) were investigated at 3 years according to the HD duration (≤ 3 years, 83 patients; >3 years, 85 patients). The incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the long HD duration group (25.3 vs. 50.6 %; P = 0.001). Especially, sudden cardiac death (SCD) was significantly higher in the long HD duration group (3.6 vs. 16.5 %; P = 0.006). On the other hand, the rates of TLR were similar between the two groups (12.0 vs. 14.1 %; P = 0.69). Cox's proportional hazard analysis revealed that HD duration (HR 1.08 per year, 95 % CI 1.03-1.13, P = 0.002), β-blocker use (0.28, 0.17-0.46, P < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (2.10, 1.23-3.56, P = 0.007) were independent predictors of MACE. Longer HD duration did not affect TLR; however, SCD was significantly higher in the long HD duration group.

Cardioprotective effects of oral nicorandil use in diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the cardioprotective role of oral nicorandil (a hybrid between the nitrates and adenosine triphosphate [ATP] sensitive potassium channel activators) in diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury commonly occurs during PCI. Several agents that mimic ischemic preconditioning could help minimize this phenomenon.

METHODS

One hundred diabetic patients with stable angina were prospectively enrolled, then randomly assigned to receive oral nicorandil: 20 mg once daily (group A, 50 patients) or placebo (group B, 50 patients) 1 week before and 6 months after PCI. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels were measured before and 6, 12, and 24 hours post-PCI.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study cohort was 59.8 ± 5.8 years (males = 68%). cTnI level was significantly lower in group A (6 hours: 7.3 ± 0.3 vs. 14.5 ± 0.4 pg/mL; 12 hours: 12.7 ± 0.7 vs. 25.3 ± 0.5 pg/mL; and 24 hours: 7.7 ± 0.5 vs. 15.0 ± 0.4 pg/mL, P < 0.001). After 6 months, the same group showed significantly higher left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF%), that is, 63.5 ± 7.7% versus 56.5 ± 8.3% (P < 0.05), with a trend toward lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

CONCLUSION

In diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI, nicorandil intake was associated with decreased incidence of PCI-related myocardial injury and improvement of LVEF% after 6 months.

All-cause mortality and cardiovascular events with nicorandil in patients with IHD: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Nicorandil is able to protect the cardiomyocytes from ischemic damage, but clear benefits of nicorandil in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events were not consistently reported in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).

MATERIALS AND RESULTS

Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI and Wangfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. Data on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events were collected. Nicorandil groups were pooled to perform a comparison with control groups and to get the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, relative risks (RRs), and associated 95% CIs for cardiovascular events. STATA 11.0 software was used for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events statistics. We retrieved 17 randomized controlled studies enrolling a total of 7305 patients. The addition of nicorandil treatment significantly reduced cardiovascular events (13.83% versus 18.01%; RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.86). No differences in all-cause mortality (3.83% versus 4.70%; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.02), and repeat revascularization rate (13.06% versus 13.54%; RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.29) were observed. There was a weak linear association between cardiovascular events and nicorandil in IHD with diabetes (P=0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that nicorandil as an adjunct therapy to IHD is associated with reduced cardiovascular events in patients with IHD.

Improvement of myocardial fatty acid metabolism by oral nicorandil in hemodialysis patients without coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

We investigated the potential of oral nicorandil to improve myocardial fatty acid metabolism assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using (123)I-β-methyliodophenyl pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) in hemodialysis patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This study was based on a cohort study of 155 hemodialysis patients with angiographic absence of obstructive CAD, with analysis performed in 100 propensity-matched patients (54 men and 46 women, 64 ± 10 years); 50 with oral administration of nicorandil (15 mg/d, nicorandil group) and 50 without (control). BMIPP SPECT was performed every year after angiography. Uptake on SPECT was graded in 17 segments on a five-point scale (0 normal, 4 absent) and assessed as BMIPP summed scores (SS).

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 5.3 ± 1.9 years, we observed 25 cardiac deaths among 100 propensity-matched patients. Myocardial uptake of BMIPP in SPECT improved in the nicorandil group compared with the control group from 2 years of administration. In Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, free survival rate from cardiac death was higher in patients with a BMIPP SS improvement rate of ≥20% compared to those with ≥0% <20% or with <0% BMIPP SS improvement rate. At multiple logistic analysis, a ≥20% BMIPP SS improvement rate was positively associated with serum albumin concentration and oral nicorandil.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term oral nicorandil may inhibit cardiac death by improving myocardial fatty acid metabolism in hemodialysis patients without obstructive CAD.

Clinical potential of oral nicorandil to improve myocardial fatty acid metabolism after percutaneous coronary intervention in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The assessment of myocardial fatty acid metabolism impairment by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using (123)I-β-methyliodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) might predict the risk of cardiac death in hemodialysis patients. We investigated the potential of oral nicorandil to improve myocardial fatty acid metabolism after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this population.

METHODS

We evaluated 128 hemodialysis patients who had obtained coronary revascularization by PCI (90 men and 38 women, 66 ± 9 years). Participants for the analysis were randomly assigned to either the nicorandil (n = 63) or control group (n = 65). BMIPP SPECT was performed every year after coronary revascularization by PCI. Uptake on SPECT was graded in 17 segments on a 5-point scale (0, normal; 4, absent) and assessed as BMIPP summed scores (SS).

RESULTS

The incidence of cardiac death was lower (p = 0.004) in the nicorandil group (7/63, 11.1%) than in the control group (21/65, 32.3%) during a mean follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.4 years. BMIPP SS reduction rates improved in the nicorandil group compared with the control group from 3 years of administration. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, free survival rate of cardiac death was higher in patients with a ≥20% BMIPP SS reduction rate as compared with those with a <20% BMIPP SS reduction rate (p = 0.0001). In multiple logistic analysis, oral administration of nicorandil was associated with ≥20% reduction rates of BMIPP SS (odds ratio 2.823, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Long-term oral administration of nicorandil may improve impaired myocardial fatty acid metabolism after coronary revascularization by PCI in hemodialysis patients.

Should nicorandil infusion be adapted in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery?

In this report, we studied whether plasma concentration of nicorandil is maintained effectively and safely in dialysis-dependent patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD5D) undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Participants consisted of 10 patients undergoing CRRT after cardiac surgery. CRRT was performed with an effluent flow rate of either 600 mL/h (low-flow group; n = 5) or 1800 mL/h (high-flow group; n = 5). Nicorandil was infused intravenously at 0.1 mg/kg/h for more than 15 h starting 8 h before and 7 h after the start of CRRT. Plasma nicorandil concentrations were measured from arterial blood lines 1 h before and 7 h after CRRT initiation. Nicorandil clearance by CRRT was also calculated 1 h after CRRT initiation. Nicorandil plasma concentrations before and 7 h after CRRT initiation were 68.0 ng/mL and 74.6 ng/mL, respectively. Nicorandil clearance 1 h after CRRT initiation was 20.2 mL/min. Increasing the effluent flow rate from 600 mL/h to 1800 mL/h tended to increase nicorandil clearance. When nicorandil was infused intravenously during CRRT at 0.1 mg/kg/h in patients with CKD5D, plasma nicorandil concentrations were maintained within an effective concentration range.

Nicorandil as a novel therapy for advanced diabetic nephropathy in the eNOS-deficient mouse

Nicorandil is an orally available drug that can act as a nitric oxide donor, an antioxidant, and an ATP-dependent K channel activator. We hypothesized that it may have a beneficial role in treating diabetic nephropathy. We administered nicorandil to a model of advanced diabetic nephropathy (the streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase, eNOSKO); controls included diabetic eNOS KO mice without nicorandil and nondiabetic eNOS KO mice treated with either nicorandil or vehicle. Mice were treated for 8 wk. Histology, blood pressure, and renal function were determined. Additional studies involved examining the effects of nicorandil on cultured human podocytes. Here, we found that nicorandil did not affect blood glucose levels, blood pressure, or systemic endothelial function, but significantly reduced proteinuria and glomerular injury (mesangiolysis and glomerulosclerosis). Nicorandil protected against podocyte loss and podocyte oxidative stress. Studies in cultured podocytes showed that nicorandil likely protects against glucose-mediated oxidant stress via the ATP-dependent K channel as opposed to its NO-stimulating effects. In conclusion, nicorandil may be beneficial in diabetic nephropathy by preserving podocyte function. We recommend clinical trials to determine whether nicorandil may benefit diabetic nephropathy or other conditions associated with podocyte dysfunction.

Oral nicorandil for prevention of cardiac death in hemodialysis patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: a propensity-matched patient analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We examined the potential of oral administration of nicorandil for protecting against cardiac death in hemodialysis patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.

METHODS

This study was based on a cohort study of 155 hemodialysis patients with angiographic absence of obstructive coronary lesions, with analysis performed in 100 propensity-matched patients (54 men and 46 women, 64 ± 10 years), including 50 who received oral administration of nicorandil (15 mg/day, nicorandil group) and 50 who did not (control). The efficacy of nicorandil in preventing cardiac death was investigated.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up period of 5.3 ± 1.9 years, we observed 25 cardiac deaths among 100 propensity-matched patients, including 6 due to acute myocardial infarction, 11 due to heart failure, and 8 due to sudden cardiac death. The incidence of cardiac death was lower (p < 0.001) in the nicorandil group (4/50, 8%) than in the control (21/50, 42%). On multivariate Cox hazard analysis, cardiac death was inversely associated with oral nicorandil (hazard ratio, 0.123; p = 0.0002). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, cardiac death-free survival rates at 5 years were higher in the nicorandil group than in the control group (91.4 vs. 66.4%).

CONCLUSION

Oral nicorandil may inhibit cardiac death of hemodialysis patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.