Epidemiology, surveillance, and prevention of bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients

Taurolidine Irrigation Reduces Relapse and Recurrence of Hemodialysis Access Infection

BACKGROUND

Infection of hemodialysis access is a clinically important concern and can lead to increased morbidity and mortality among patients on hemodialysis. In this study, we aimed to determine whether using taurolidine as an irrigating antiseptic after drainage of pus or removal of infected tissue and graft during surgery decreases the relapse and recurrence of infection.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2023, 48 episodes in 38 patients hospitalized and treated for hemodialysis access infections were examined. Relapse, recurrence, and mortality of infection were analyzed in patients who received additional taurolidine irrigation versus those who did not. After drainage alone or after total or partial graft removal, all patients received massive irrigation with normal saline. The episodes of infection were examined consecutively during follow-up.

RESULTS

The majority (97.9%) of hemodialysis access infections was arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) or interposed grafts from native veins. In AVGs, infections occurred primarily after a median of 523 days from the first needling. All prosthetic materials that were the infection foci were removed in 58.3% of the cases, with partial resection and bypass or drainage performed in the remaining cases. The most common pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (45.8%). After surgical intervention, relapse was observed in 12.5% of the cases and recurrence in 20.8% of the cases. The relapse occurrence was significantly reduced by taurolidine irrigation (odds ratio [OR]: 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.98, P = 0.05) and the total resection of prosthetic material (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.70, P = 0.02). Recurrence was significantly decreased by taurolidine irrigation (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.56, P = 0.01) and increased dramatically in cases with relapse history (OR: 8.50, 95% CI: 1.69-42.76, P < 0.01). Finally, male sex (hazard ratio: 7.01, 95% CI: 1.19-41.40, P = 0.03) and AVG (hazard ratio: 4.49, 95% CI: 1.01-20.01, P = 0.05) were significantly associated with increased overall mortality in infected hemodialysis access.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional taurolidine irrigation after surgical resection significantly reduced the relapse and recurrence of infection in hemodialysis access. Taurolidine appears to be a safe and useful antiseptic for the control of hemodialysis access infection.

Validation of a Clinical Scale for Early Detection of Infections at the Exit Site of Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis

Introduction

Exit-site infections (ESI) of central venous catheters for hemodialysis (CVC-HD) has been associated with early catheter removal and an increased risk of CVC-HD related bacteremia. No specific clinical scales to predict ESI have previously been validated.

Methods

A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed to validate the proposed scale, which is based on the following 5 signs and symptoms: (i) pain at exit site during interdialytic period; (ii) hyperemia or erythema ≥2 cm from exit site; (iii) inflammation, induration, or swelling at exit site; (iv) fever ≥38 °C not attributable to other causes, and (v) obvious abscess or purulent exudate at the exit site. Adult patients with a tunneled CVC-HD for at least 1 month after insertion has been included. During each hemodialysis session, the exit site was assessed with the proposed scale by nurses. If any item was present, a pericatheter skin swab culture was collected: positive results were gold standard. The scale was validated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression analysis. For this purpose, the logit function was applied, and the ESI probability calculated, as elogit ESI/1 + elogit ESI.

Results

Three hundred thirty-seven CVC-HDs from 310 patients were analyzed, producing 515 cultures (117 infected and 398 healthy). The final version of the scale includes the following 3 signs and symptoms, which present the greatest predictive capacity: (i) pain at exit site during interdialytic period, (ii) hyperemia or erythema ≥2 cm from exit site, and (iii) abscess or purulent exudate at the exit site. The final version generated an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 88.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.2%-91%; P < 0.001), Youden index 0.7557 ≈ 1, sensitivity 80.34% (95% CI: 71.36%-87.71%) and specificity 95.23% (95% CI: 92.73%-97%).

Conclusions

The validation shows that the scale has good predictive properties, detecting approximately 90% of ESI with very acceptable validity parameters.

A Six-Year Follow-Up of Bloodstream Infections in Hemodialysis Facilities in the United States, National Healthcare Safety Network, 2020

Key Points

In 2020, 7183 hemodialysis facilities in the United States reported bloodstream infection data for over five million patient-months to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network. Pooled mean bloodstream infection rates per 100 patient-months ranged from 0.12 among patients with arteriovenous fistulas to 0.80 among patients with central venous catheters. Rates of bloodstream infection were lower than predicted overall and in almost all states and territories.

Background

Approximately 500,000 people in the United States undergoing hemodialysis are at risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network conducts surveillance for BSIs among outpatient hemodialysis facilities in the United States. Quality improvement initiatives encourage these facilities to adopt evidence-based interventions to decrease the incidence of BSI in patients. We describe the incidence of BSI among patients at outpatient hemodialysis facilities in the United States during 2020, stratified by state or territory.

Methods

Outpatient hemodialysis facilities report BSI events to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Pooled mean rates with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated overall and for each type of vascular access (arteriovenous [AV] fistula, AV graft, or a central venous catheter). Standardized infection ratios (SIRs) were calculated as observed BSI events divided by the predicted number of events on the basis of national aggregate data. Median facility-level SIRs and 95% CIs were stratified by state and US territory.

Results

During 2020, 7183 outpatient hemodialysis facilities reported data for 5,235,234 patient-months with 15,181 BSI events. Pooled mean rates per 100 person-months were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.30) overall, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.82) for central venous catheter, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.12) for AV fistula, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.22) for AV graft, and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19–0.40) for other access types. The national SIR was 0.40 (95% CI, 0.39 to 0.41). South Dakota had a SIR significantly higher than one (1.34; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.62). Fifty-one of 54 states and territories had BSI SIR significantly lower than one.

Conclusions

In 2020, the median SIR for BSI in US outpatient hemodialysis facilities was lower than predicted overall and in almost all states and territories. An elevated SIR was identified in South Dakota.

Guidelines on vascular access for hemodialysis from the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery

Chronic kidney disease is a worldwide public health problem, and end-stage renal disease requires dialysis. Most patients requiring renal replacement therapy have to undergo hemodialysis. Therefore, vascular access is extremely important for the dialysis population, directly affecting the quality of life and the morbidity and mortality of this patient population. Since making, managing and salvaging of vascular accesses falls within the purview of the vascular surgeon, developing guideline to help specialists better manage vascular accesses for hemodialysis if of great importance. Thus, the objective of this guideline is to present a set of recommendations to guide decisions involved in the referral, evaluation, choice, surveillance and management of complications of vascular accesses for hemodialysis.

Prevalence, Microbial Etiology and Risk Factors Associated With Healthcare Associated Infections Among End Stage Renal Disease Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy

End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality due to healthcare associated infections (HCAIs). The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, microbial etiology, and risk factors associated with HCAIs among ESRD patients on RRT. A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted from June to December 2019. ESRD patients with minimum of 6 months on RRT were included, while pregnant patients and patients <18 years were excluded. To reduce the risk of selection bias, all patients were randomly selected using a simple random sampling technique. The prevalence showing the proportion of patients that acquired HCAI since the initiation of dialysis until 2019 was calculated using the European patients' academy (EUPATI) formula. Risk factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate regression analysis. The prevalence of HCAI among ESRD patients was 174/400 (43.5%). Catheter related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) was the most common infection [64(36.8%)], followed by peritonitis [45(25.8%)] and pneumonia [37(21.2%)]. Out of 382 total pathogens identified, 204 (53.4%) were Gram positive and 162 (42.4%) were Gram negative. Both methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) showed statistically significant associations (p<0.05) with CRBSI. Use of multiple accesses, increased blood sugar levels, low serum sodium levels and higher CRP concentration increased the occurrence of HCAIs. The burden of HCAIs among the patients undergoing RRT is high. Preventive strategies and optimum empirical therapy of antibiotics should be used to reduce the risk of these infections among ESRD patients.

The use of mini-invasive surgical techniques to treat refractory exit-site and tunnel infections in peritoneal dialysis patients: a clinical approach

Peritoneal dialysis-(PD) related infections continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients on PD. Although great advances have been made in the prevention and treatment of infectious complications over the past two decades, catheter-related infections represent a significant cause of technical failure in PD. Recent studies support the role of exit-site/tunnel infections in causing peritonitis. Peritonitis secondary to tunnel infection led to catheter loss in most cases. Thus, removing the catheter when exit-site/tunnel infection is refractory to medical therapy has been recommended. This approach requires interrupting PD and, after the placement of a central venous catheter, and transferring the patient to haemodialysis. In order to continue PD, simultaneous catheter removal and replacement of the PD catheter has been suggested. Although simultaneous catheter removal and replacement avoids temporary haemodialysis, it implies the removal/reinsertion of the catheter and the immediate initiation of PD with the risk of mechanical complications, such as leakage and malfunction. Hence, several mini-invasive surgical techniques, such as curettage, cuff-shaving, removal of the superficial cuff, and partial reimplantation of the catheter, have been proposed as rescue treatments. These procedures may allow the rescue of the catheter with a success rate of 70-100%. Therefore, in case of refractory exit-site/tunnel infection, a mini-invasive surgical revision should be considered before removing the catheter.

Early identification of bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients by machine learning

Background

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a prevalent cause of admission in hemodialysis (HD) patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to establish a diagnostic, predictive model for the early identification of BSI in HD patients.

Methods

HD patients who underwent blood culture testing between August 2018 and March 2022 were enrolled in this study. Machine learning algorithms, including stepwise logistic regression (SLR), Lasso logistic regression (LLR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, random forest (RF), and gradient boosting machine (XGboost), were used to predict the risk of developing BSI from the patient's clinical data. The accuracy (ACC) and area under the subject working curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of such models. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were used to explain each feature's predictive value on the models' output. Finally, a simplified nomogram for predicting BSI was devised.

Results

A total of 391 HD patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 74 (18.9%) were diagnosed with BSI. The XGboost model achieved the highest AUC (0.914, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.861-0.964) and ACC (86.3%) for BSI prediction. The four most significant co-variables in both the significance matrix plot of the XGboost model variables and the SHAP summary plot were body temperature, dialysis access via a non-arteriovenous fistula (non-AVF), the procalcitonin levels (PCT), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Conclusions

This study created an effective machine-learning model for predicting BSI in HD patients. The model could be used to detect BSI at an early stage and hence guide antibiotic treatment in HD patients.

The predictors of catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Here we aimed to investigate the predictors of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients with acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease who required renal replacement therapy through a non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients who received non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups; those who developed CRBSI and those who did not. Patient's demographic data, laboratory results at admission, information regarding catheter infections, and culture results were obtained from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 64 ± 16 years, and 51 of them were male. CRBSI occurred in 14 patients (12.6%). Admission serum albumin level (OR: 0.119, 95% CI: 0.019-0.756, p = 0.024), admission mean platelet volume (OR: 2.207, 95% CI: 1.188-4.100, p = 0.012) and catheter duration (OR: 1.580, 95% CI: 1.210-2.064, p = 0.001) were independent predictors for the CRBSI development. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that a catheter duration of 22 days was predictive for presence of CRBSI (78% sensitivity, 76% specificity, AUC: 0.825, 95% CI: 0.724-0.925, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged catheter duration, low serum albumin, and high mean platelet volume independently predict the development of CRBSI in patients undergoing hemodialysis for acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease.

Application Value of Nursing Intervention under the Guidance of Risk Prevention Management Concept in Preventing Vascular Access Infection in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Objective

To explore the application value of nursing intervention under the guidance of risk prevention management concept in preventing vascular access infection in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).

Methods

A total of 100 MHD patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of our hospital from May 2019 to May 2020 were enrolled. Based on the principle of double-blind grouping, patients were randomly divided into the risk management group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, while the risk management group was given nursing intervention under the guidance of risk prevention management concept on the basis of the control group. The nursing intervention effect and incidence of vascular access infection were compared between the two groups. The psychological status and quality of life in both the groups were evaluated by the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), and Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36).

Results

After intervention, biochemical indexes (serum albumin, creatinine, and hemoglobin) and body mass in the risk management group were significantly higher than those in the control group, while malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS) was significantly lower than the control group (P < 0.05). After intervention, SAS and SDS scores in both the groups were significantly decreased, which were significantly lower in the risk management group than in the control group (P < 0.05). At 8 w and 12 w after intervention, incidence rates of vascular access infection in risk management group were significantly lower than those in the control group (10.00% vs. 26.00% and 12.00% vs. 34.00%, P < 0.05). After intervention, SF-36 scores in each dimension of both the groups were significantly increased, which were significantly higher in the risk management group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The implementation of nursing intervention under the guidance of risk prevention management concept for MHD patients can effectively improve biochemical indexes, nutritional status, and body mass and reduce the incidence of vascular access infection, which is of great significance for improving psychological status and quality of life.

Reduction in hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infections after implementation of a novel care program

BACKGROUND

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) due to dialysis is the major factor causing morbidity and mortality factor for patients undergoing hemodialysis and is associated with additional costs for these patients. This study investigated the effect of a novel care program in terms of reducing CRBSIs for hemodialysis patients with nontunneled (temporary) catheters inserted in their femoral veins.

METHODS

This study included dialysis patients (inpatients and outpatients) from July 2018 to September 2019, covering two periods, pre-intervention (baseline period) and intervention with a novel care program (novel care period). The novel care program was initiated on December 1, 2018. The CRBSI rates (/1000 catheter-days) for the baseline and novel care periods were compared, and the characteristics of the pathogens were determined.

FINDINGS

Of a total of 72 patients, 33 were from the baseline period and 39 were from the novel care period. Patients in the baseline and novel care periods had the catheter inserted in their femoral veins for a median of 20 and 29 days, respectively. The CRBSI rate decreased by 82.63%, from 8.52/1000 catheter-days in the baseline period to 1.48/1000 catheter-days in the novel care period (p = 0.036). The most common organisms involved in CRBSIs were coagulase-negative staphylococcus and Burkholderia cepacia (26% for both).

DISCUSSION

The novel care program reduced the incidence of CRBSIs in patients with temporary catheters inserted in their femoral veins.

Using nasal povidone-iodine to prevent bloodstream infections and transmission of Staphylococcus aureus among haemodialysis patients: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised control trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 38% of haemodialysis patients carry Staphylococcus aureus in their noses, and carriers have a nearly four-fold increased risk of S. aureus access-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) compared with non-carriers. Our objective is to determine the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of a novel intervention using nasal povidone-iodine (PVI) to prevent BSIs among patients in haemodialysis units. We will survey patients and conduct qualitative interviews with healthcare workers to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will perform an open-label, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of nasal PVI compared with standard care. Sixteen outpatient haemodialysis units will participate in the study. The 3-year trial period will be divided into a 4-month baseline period and eight additional 4-month time blocks. The primary outcome of the study will be S. aureus BSI, defined as a S. aureus positive blood culture collected in the outpatient setting or within one calendar day after a hospital admission. The study team will evaluate characteristics of individual patients and the clusters by exposure status (control or intervention) to assess the balance between groups, and calculate descriptive statistics such as average responses separately for control and intervention survey questions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has received IRB approval from all study sites. A Data Safety and Monitoring Board will monitor this multicentre clinical trial. We will present our results at international meetings. The study team will publish findings in peer-reviewed journals and make each accepted peer-reviewed manuscript publicly available.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04210505.

Transportation protocols for accurate assessment of microbial burden classification using molecular methods

Point-of-care testing is cost-effective, rapid, and could assist in avoiding hospital visits during a pandemic. However, they present some significant risks that current technologies cannot fully address. Skin flora contamination and insufficient specimen volume are two major limitations preventing self-collection microbiological testing outside of hospital settings. We are developing a hybrid testing procedure to bridge the laboratory test with patient-side specimen collection and transportation for molecular microbial classification of causative bacterial infection and early identification of microbial susceptibility profiles directly from whole blood or urine specimens collected patient-side by health care workers such as phlebotomists in nursing homes or family clinics. This feasibility study presents our initial development efforts, in which we tested various transportation conditions (tubes, temperature, duration) for direct-from-specimen viable pathogen detection to determine the ideal conditions that allowed for differentiation between contaminant and causative bacteria in urine specimens and optimal growth for low-concentration blood specimens after transportation. For direct-from-urine assays, the viable pathogen at the clinical cutoff of 10⁵ CFU/mL was detected after transportation with molecular assays while contaminants (≤ 10⁴ CFU/mL) were not. For direct-from-blood assays, contrived blood samples as low as 0.8 CFU/mL were reported positive after transportation without the need for blood culture.

Epidemiology of bloodstream infections in a Scottish haemodialysis population with focus on vascular access method

BACKGROUND

Infection is the second highest cause of mortality in end-stage renal disease, with a significant proportion relating to haemodialysis (HD) vascular access-related infection (VARI).

AIM

To report the rate and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of all-source bloodstream infections (BSIs) by vascular access type in a Scottish HD cohort.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was undertaken of data on adult patients attending seven HD units during 2017. Total HD days for each vascular access type were calculated. BSIs were analysed with rates expressed per 1000 HD days. AMR was verified using health board microbiology databases.

FINDINGS

Excluding contaminant organisms, there was an overall BSI rate of 0.57 per 1000 HD days. The highest all-source and vascular access-related infection (VARI) BSI rates per 1000 HD days were in the non-tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC) group (3.11 and 2.07 respectively), followed by tunnelled CVC (1.10 and 0.67), arteriovenous graft (0.51 and 0.31), and finally arteriovenous fistula (0.29 and 0.02). The non-VARI BSI rates were lowest in the arteriovenous graft group. Staphylococci comprised the majority of events, with Staphylococcus aureus implicated in 29%. Gram-negative BSIs were prevalent, particularly in CVC groups, and associated with higher mortality. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus and carbapenem resistance were relatively low. MDR Gram-negatives were high compared with the Scottish population.

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous fistula access is confirmed as having lowest all-source and VARI BSI rates, and arteriovenous graft access the lowest non-VARI BSI rates. Staphylococci remain the prevailing genus; however, the contributions of Gram-negative BSIs, the higher mortality, and proportion of MDR organisms in this group are notable.

Heparin locks with low and high concentration in haemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

There is no evidence-based consensus on the optimal concentration for heparin locks; several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the concentration of heparin locks, yet the results remain inconsistent. We aimed to assess heparin locks with low and high concentration in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs focusing on the concentration in heparin locks. Studies were identified by searching PUBMED, EMBASE, Science Direct, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang databases (from inception to 15 March 2020). Summary risk ratios or mean differences with 95% confidence interval were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 370 patients with four RCTs were included. Heparin locks with 1000 U/ml could significantly reduce the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) compared with 5000 U/ml. No significant differences were seen in the occurrence of catheter-related thrombosis, the length of catheter stay, the rates of bleeding and catheter occlusions between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower concentrations in heparin lock are optimal for shortening APTT in haemodialysis patients; further studies are needed to elucidate the role of heparin concentration in the lock practice.

Opportunities to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing in Outpatient Hemodialysis Facilities: A Report From the American Society of Nephrology and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antibiotic Stewardship White Paper Writing Group

Antibiotic use is necessary in the outpatient hemodialysis setting because patients receiving hemodialysis are at increased risk for infections and sepsis. However, inappropriate antibiotic use can lead to adverse drug events, including adverse drug reactions and infections with Clostridioides difficile and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Optimizing antibiotic use can decrease adverse events and improve infection cure rates and patient outcomes. The American Society of Nephrology and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention created the Antibiotic Stewardship in Hemodialysis White Paper Writing Group, comprising experts in antibiotic stewardship, infectious diseases, nephrology, and public health, to highlight strategies that can improve antibiotic prescribing for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Based on existing evidence and the unique patient and clinical setting characteristics, the following strategies for improving antibiotic use are reviewed: expanding infection and sepsis prevention activities, standardizing blood culture collection processes, treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infections with β-lactams, optimizing communication between nurses and prescribing providers, and improving data sharing across transitions of care. Collaboration among the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; American Society of Nephrology; other professional societies such as infectious diseases, hospital medicine, and vascular surgery societies; and dialysis provider organizations can improve antibiotic use and the quality of care for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Eradication of Staphylococcus aureus colonization by chronic use of mupirocin in patients on home parenteral nutrition

OBJECTIVES

Although in other groups Staphylococcus aureus eradication has proven to be an effective infection prevention measure, to our knowledge, no such studies have been performed in patients on home parenteral nutrition (HPN). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of chronic nasal mupirocin use on S. aureus eradication and prevention of catheter related infections in patients on HPN.

METHODS

This was a cohort study with data collected from adult patients on HPN who were screened for S. aureus carriage. In case of carriage, the patient was instructed to apply mupirocin nasal ointment monthly. Outcomes were the percentage of successful S. aureus eradication and the effect on the incidence of catheter-related infections and development of mupirocin resistance.

RESULTS

S. aureus nasal carriage was found in 54% of the patients. Eradication was successful in 66% (70 of 106) of patients treated with mupirocin. Overall S. aureus catheter-related infection rates decreased by 50% (P = 0.02). The decrease was mostly due to a drop in central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates (0.26versus 0.1 per 1000 central venous catheter days; P = 0.04). The overall CLABSI rates decreased as well (incidence ratio rate, 0.43; 95% confidence interval. 0.24-0.76; P < 0.01). Low-level mupirocin resistance was observed in four patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from the present study highlighted the potential usefulness of mupirocin ointment prophylaxis to establish S. aureus eradication in patients on HPN. However, awareness for the development of mupirocin resistance is prudent. Further research needs to be carried out to validate these findings.

Association between initial dialytic modalities and the risks of mortality, infection death, and cardiovascular events: A nationwide population-based cohort study

To date, few studies have been conducted to pairwise compare the prognosis of peritoneal dialysis (PD), unplanned PD, and unplanned hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed longitudinal data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. We included 45,165 patients whose initial dialytic modality was PD or unplanned HD between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2013. We divided the patients into three groups according to their initial dialytic modalities. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and death from infection during 1-year follow up. The risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were higher in the unplanned PD group than in the planned PD group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–1.60; HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32–1.80). Likewise, the risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were higher in the unplanned HD group (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.82; HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.61–2.13). Furthermore, the risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were also higher in the unplanned HD group than in the unplanned PD group (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07–1.23; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09–1.32). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that patients whose initial modality was planned PD or unplanned PD may have better clinical outcomes than those whose initial modality was unplanned HD.

Clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of septic arthritis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes of septic arthritis in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). We systematically reviewed medical records of 16 HD patients with septic arthritis admitted to our hospital from April 2008 to April 2018. A total of 16 HD in patients with bloodstream infection but without septic arthritis were randomly selected as controls. The incidence of septic arthritis in our patient group was 0.2% per year. Organisms isolated were Staphylococcus aureus in 11 (68.7%), Gram-negative bacilli in 3, streptococci in 1, and fungi in 1. Patients with septic arthritis were significantly older (72.7 ± 9.4 vs 63.5 ± 8.7 years, p = 0.035) and had more joint diseases (62.5% vs 12.5%, p = 0.003) and a longer duration of hospitalization (35.2 ± 5.7 vs 22.1 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.021) than the control group. In a logistic regression analysis, patients with older age and more joint diseases were more likely to have septic arthritis compared with controls (OR = 1.39, p = 0.024 and OR = 3.24, p = 0.003, respectively). These findings indicate that old age and joint diseases (osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis) were independent risk factors for septic arthritis in patients on HD when bloodstream infection occurred. Key Points • Patients with septic arthritis were significantly older and had more joint diseases than the control group. • Old age and joint diseases are independent risk factors for septic arthritis in patients on HD when bloodstream infection occurs.

Bloodstream infections and patient survival with tunneled-cuffed catheters for hemodialysis: A single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

In hemodialysis patients, a tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter is mandatory when the arteriovenous fistula is not feasible. The major risks of the use of tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter are bloodstream infections. The aim of this study is to analyze bloodstream infections from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

An observational prospective study was carried out and 79 hemodialysis patients with tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter were enrolled. Patients were divided into those with bloodstream infections from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter and those without. Their clinical and laboratory characteristics were compared. An original tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter lock therapy sequence was carried out combined with systemic antibiotic therapy. In case of antibiotic resistance, the tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter was removed.

RESULTS

The patients affected by bloodstream infections from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter were 16/79 (20.3%). The bloodstream infection from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter's incidence rate was 0.52 per 1000 catheter days. Twenty-three bloodstream infections from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter were found in 16/79 patients who used tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter. Staphylococcus aureus was the cause of bloodstream infection from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter in 35% of the cases and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 30% of the cases. Risk factors were infection located in other organs and the presence of peripheral obstructive arterial disease.

CONCLUSION

The enrolled cohort showed a reduced bloodstream infection from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter incidence rate in comparison with the reference value (1 per 1000 catheter days). To reduce the number of bloodstream infections from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter, hand hygiene and asepsis management of the tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter during the connection to the extracorporeal circuit and an original tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter lock therapy sequence seem to be the most efficient measures. Infections of other organs and the presence of peripheral obstructive arterial disease are the most important risk factors for bloodstream infections from tunneled-cuffed permanent catheter.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

Complications and outcomes of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in China: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the complications and survival of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) or urgent-start haemodialysis (USHD), and to explore the value of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the emergent dialysis method for elderly patients with ESRD.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary care hospitals in Shanghai, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Chinese patients (n=542) >65 years of age with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤15 mL/min/m2 who received urgent-start dialysis between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, and with at least 3 months of treatment. Patients who converted to other dialysis methods, regardless of the initial dialysis method, were excluded, as well as those with comorbidities that could significantly affect their dialysis outcomes.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Dialysis-related complications and survival were compared. Patients were followed until death, stopped PD, transfer to other dialysis centres, loss to follow-up or 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

There were 309 patients in the USPD group and 233 in the USHD group. The rate of dialysis-related complications within 30 days after catheter implantation was significantly lower in the USPD group compared with the USHD group (4.5% vs 10.7%, p=0.031). The 6-month and 1, 2 and 3-year survival rates were 95.3%, 91.4%, 86.6% and 64.8% in the USPD group, and 92.2%, 85.7%, 70.2% and 57.8% in the USHD group, respectively (p=0.023). The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that USHD (HR=2.220, 95% CI 1.298 to 3.790; p=0.004), age (HR=1.025, 95% CI 1.013 to 1.043, p<0.001) and hypokalaemia (HR=0.678, 95% CI 0.487 to 0.970; p=0.032) were independently associated with death.

CONCLUSIONS

USPD was associated with slightly better survival compared with USHD. USPD was associated with fewer complications and better survival than USHD in elderly patients with ESRD.

The relationship between oral diseases and infectious complications in patients under dialysis

OBJECTIVES

Association was investigated between oral health before dialysis and the incidence of systemic infections during dialysis. We hypothesized that low-grade systemic inflammation caused by poor oral health associates with infectious episodes in patients on dialysis, despite earlier eradication of oral infection foci.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 117 patients (46 with peritoneal and 71 with hemodialysis) were examined and treated at predialysis stage and followed up during dialysis. Number of infection episodes and microorganisms cultured from blood and peritoneal fluid were analyzed. Number of teeth, periodontal inflammatory burden, and total dental index scores were assessed, and salivary matrix metalloproteinase 8, triggering receptor on myeloid cells 1, peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 (PGLYRP1), and interleukin-1β were measured.

RESULTS

In hemodialysis, 134 infection episodes were recorded, while peritoneal dialysis group had 77 peritonitis episodes. Culture-negative samples were 69% in hemodialysis and 23% in peritoneal dialysis group. Staphylococci were the most frequently associated microorganisms. Infections during dialysis did neither associate with oral health parameters nor associate with salivary inflammatory biomarkers, except for PGLYRP1, which associated with number of infection episodes during hemodialysis (p = .046).

CONCLUSIONS

A number of infection episodes during hemodialysis were associated with salivary PGLYRP1 but not the other salivary markers or oral infection markers.

Early and Late Patient Outcomes in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

Significant interest in the practice of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (PD) is mounting internationally, with several observational studies supporting the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of this approach. However, little is known about the early complication rates and long-term technique and peritonitis-free survival for patients who start PD urgently (i.e. within 2 weeks of catheter insertion), compared to those with a conventional start.

Methods

This single-center, matched case-control study evaluated patients commencing PD between 2010 and 2015. Urgent-start PD patients were matched 1:3 with conventional-start PD controls based on diabetic status and age. The primary outcomes were early complications, both following catheter insertion and PD commencement (within 4 weeks). Secondary outcomes included technique and peritonitis-free survival.

Results

A total of 104 patients (26 urgent-start, 78 conventional-start) were included. Urgent-start patients were more likely to be referred late, initiate PD in hospital, and be prescribed lower initial exchange volumes ( p < 0.01). They experienced more frequent leaks post-catheter insertion (12% vs 1%, p = 0.047) and more frequent catheter migration following commencement of PD (12% vs 1%, p = 0.047). There were no significant differences in the rates of overall or infectious complications. Kaplan-Meier estimates of technique survival and time to first episode of peritonitis were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Compared with conventional-start PD, urgent-start PD has acceptably low early complication rates and similar long-term technique survival. Urgent-start PD appears to be a safe way to initiate urgent renal replacement therapy in patients without established dialysis access.

Double purse-string around the inner cuff of the peritoneal catheter: A novel technique for an immediate initiation of continuous peritoneal dialysis

International guidelines recommended a delayed start of peritoneal dialysis at least 2 weeks between catheter insertion and continuous peritoneal dialysis therapy initiation (break-in period). Up to now, the optimal duration of the break-in period is still unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate in patients, with immediate initiation of continuous peritoneal dialysis, the efficacy of a double purse-string around the inner cuff in preventing mechanical and infectious complications either in semi-surgical or surgical catheter implantation. From January 2011 to December 2018, 135 peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions in 125 patients (90 men and 35 women, mean age 62.02 ± 16.7) were performed. Seventy-seven straight double-cuffed Tenckhoff catheters were implanted semi-surgically on midline under the umbilicus by a trocar, and 58 were surgically implanted through the rectus muscle. In all patients, continuous peritoneal dialysis was started immediately after catheter placement. Mechanical and infectious catheter-related complications during the first 3 months after initiation of continuous peritoneal dialysis were recorded. The overall incidence of leakages, catheter dislocations, peritonitis, and exit-site infections was 4/135 (2.96%), 2/135 (1.48%), 14/135 (10.3%), and 4/135 (2.96%), respectively. Regarding the incidence of catheter-related complications, no bleeding events, bowel perforations, or hernia formations were observed with either the semi-surgical or surgical technique. Double purse-string technique around the inner cuff allows an immediate start of continuous peritoneal dialysis both with semi-surgical and surgical catheter implantation. This technique is a safe and feasible approach in patients needing an urgent peritoneal dialysis.

Three years' experience of dialysis event surveillance

BACKGROUND

The main study aim was to track infections, evaluate performance, and identify opportunities for improved practice since infections, especially those associated with multidrug-resistant organisms, are the second most common cause of death among end-stage renal disease patients.

METHODS

This study describes the establishment of baseline dialysis event surveillance at a large dialysis center. Every month, the dialysis center staff reported the total number of maintenance hemodialysis patients to the department of infection control and hospital epidemiology. The surveillance system for dialysis events included monthly monitoring of hemodialysis patients in outpatient settings for positive blood cultures, intravenous antimicrobial initiation, and local vascular access infections.

RESULTS

We calculated the pooled mean rates of positive blood cultures, intravenous antimicrobial initiation, and local vascular access infections during the period from June 1, 2014 to September 30, 2017. Results indicated more dialysis events were attributed to the CVC than any other dialysis vascular access. Regardless of vascular access type, intravenous antimicrobial initiation was the most commonly reported dialysis-associated event.

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis events surveillance can be used to produce a decrease in both morbidity and mortality rates in hemodialysis patients.

Prevention and Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in End-Stage Renal Disease

Chronic kidney disease patients are at high risk for infections because of multidrug-resistant organisms. Infections are the second most common cause of death in patients with ESRD. Patients with ESRD are prone to infections given alterations in immunity, increased rates of colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms, increased hospitalizations, and interactions with health care systems. Infections range from urinary tract infections, pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections, central line-associated bloodstream infections to sepsis. A coordinated collaborative effort using a multipronged approach must be stressed to reduce the burden of infections. Preventive measures such as hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship, immunizations, and minimizing central venous catheters are critical to curtail infections with multidrug-resistant organisms. Empirical and targeted treatment for multidrug-resistant organisms may require collaboration with infectious disease providers to improve outcomes in these serious infections. It is imperative to address multidrug-resistant organisms in ESRD patients at this juncture to improve medical outcomes now and for the future.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Emergent Start Peritoneal Dialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease: Outcomes and Advantages

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Initiating renal replacement therapy in late referred patients with central venous catheter (CVC) hemodialysis (HD) causes serious complications. In urgent start peritoneal dialysis, initiating peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 14 days of catheter insertion still needs HD with CVC. We initiated Emergent start PD (ESPD) with Automated PD (APD) at our center within 48 h from the time of presentation.

METHODS

A prospective, case-controlled, intention-to-treat study with 56 patients was conducted between March 2016 and August 2017. Group A (24 patients) underwent conventional PD 14 days after catheter insertion. Group B (32 patients), underwent ESPD with APD. Exit site leak (ESL), catheter blockage, and peritonitis at 90 days were primary outcomes. Technique survival was secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar with 3 episodes of ESLs (9.4%) in the study group and none in the control group (p = 0.123). Catheter blockage (16.7%-Group A, 25%-Group B) and peritonitis (none vs. 9.4% in study group) were similar in terms of statistical details just as technique survival (95%-Group A, 88.2%-Group B at 90 days).

CONCLUSION

ESPD with APD in the unplanned patient is an appropriate approach.

National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Dialysis Event Surveillance Report for 2014

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Persons receiving outpatient hemodialysis are at risk for bloodstream and vascular access infections. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducts surveillance for these infections through the National Healthcare Safety Network. We summarize 2014 data submitted to National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event Surveillance.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Dialysis facilities report three types of dialysis events (bloodstream infections; intravenous antimicrobial starts; and pus, redness, or increased swelling at the hemodialysis vascular access site). Denominator data consist of the number of hemodialysis outpatients treated at the facility during the first 2 working days of each month. We calculated dialysis event rates stratified by vascular access type (e.g., arteriovenous fistula, arteriovenous graft, or central venous catheter) and standardized infection ratios (comparing individual facility observed with predicted numbers of infections) for bloodstream infections. We described pathogens identified among bloodstream infections.

RESULTS

A total of 6005 outpatient hemodialysis facilities reported dialysis event data for 2014 to the National Healthcare Safety Network. These facilities reported 160,971 dialysis events, including 29,516 bloodstream infections, 149,722 intravenous antimicrobial starts, and 38,310 pus, redness, or increased swelling at the hemodialysis vascular access site events; 22,576 (76.5%) bloodstream infections were considered vascular access related. Most bloodstream infections (63.0%) and access-related bloodstream infections (69.8%) occurred in patients with a central venous catheter. The rate of bloodstream infections per 100 patient-months was 0.64 (0.26 for arteriovenous fistula, 0.39 for arteriovenous graft, and 2.16 for central venous catheter). Other dialysis event rates were also highest among patients with a central venous catheter. Facility bloodstream infection standardized infection ratio distribution was positively skewed with a median of 0.84. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated bloodstream infection pathogen (30.6%), and 39.5% of S. aureus isolates tested were resistant to methicillin.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2014 National Healthcare Safety Network Dialysis Event data represent nearly all United States outpatient dialysis facilities. Rates of infection and other dialysis events were highest among patients with a central venous catheter compared with other vascular access types. Surveillance data can help define the epidemiology of important infections in this patient population.

Association Between Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Hospital Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients With Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Cohort From Japanese Tertiary Care Centers

Multiple studies have shown that Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) has been a major cause of death in hemodialysis patients. We examined whether SAB is a risk for mortality among chronic hemodialysis patients in Japan where the standard vascular access is arteriovenous fistula (AVF). This was a multicenter, retrospective study of maintenance hemodialysis patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) from 2011 to 2013 at tertiary care centers in Japan. The endpoint was hospital mortality. Our cohort contained 32 SAB cases (14 MRSA and 18 MSSA) and 42 non-SAB cases. Hospital mortality was higher among SAB cases than non-SAB cases (46.9% vs. 23.8%, P = 0.038). In patients with BSI, SAB was significantly associated with hospital mortality after adjustment for potential confounders, including type of vascular access (OR 3.26). S. aureus was the leading cause of BSI and hospital mortality among this cohort. Therefore, initial empiric treatment should cover for S. aureus.

Practical Aspects of Nontunneled and Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters

Nontunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) are typically used when vascular access is required for urgent renal replacement therapy. The preferred site for NTHC insertion in acute kidney injury is the right internal jugular vein followed by the femoral vein. When aided by real-time ultrasound, mechanical complications related to NTHC insertion are significantly reduced. The preferred site for tunneled hemodialysis catheters placement is the right internal jugular vein followed by the left internal jugular vein. Ideally, the catheter should be inserted on the opposite side of a maturing or planned fistula/graft. Several dual-lumen, large-diameter catheters are available with multiple catheter tip designs, but no one catheter has shown significant superior performance.

Early cannulation of the Flixene™ arteriovenous graft

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to search for evidence of the efficiency of early cannulation of the Flixene™ (Maquet-Atrium Medical, Hudson, NH, USA) arteriovenous graft (AVG) in the current literature and to assess its patency and complication rates.

METHODS

Searches in Pubmed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were performed using the following specific search terms: early cannulation AVG and/or Flixene™ graft. The primary outcomes were mean time to first cannulation and patency rates at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were complications.

RESULTS

Six studies reporting outcomes in a total of 260 procedures were included in this review. The median delay from intervention to first cannulation was documented in four studies and was less than 3 days. Primary assisted patency at 12 months ranged from 45% to 53% in the four documented series. In five studies, documented secondary patency at 12 months ranged from 63% to 92%. Two studies compared outcomes between traditional and Flixene™ grafts: one study reported significantly (p&lt;0.01) improved one-year patency using the Flixene™ graft, the two studies did not report significant differences in complication rates between both groups. The rate of infection and pseudo-aneurysm formation ranged from 0 to 11% and 0 to 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that early cannulation of the Flixene™ graft within 3 days following its implantation is feasible with one-year patency and complication rates equivalent to those of conventional grafts which can be cannulated only after 2 weeks.

High Risk of Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis and Death After Valve Replacement Operations in Dialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Despite a high burden of dialysis access-related bloodstream infections and an increasing incidence of endocarditis, few data are available addressing the risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) in the dialysis population. We sought to assess the risk of PVE and death after valve replacement operations in patients receiving long-term dialysis.

METHODS

A matched retrospective cohort study was conducted comprising patients admitted for valve replacement operations at two university hospitals. Patients without dialysis were matched 1:1 with dialysis patients by valve(s) replaced, year of operation, and presence of active endocarditis as the indication for valve replacement. Patient characteristics were compared using χ(2) and t tests. The development of PVE was defined by use of the modified Duke criteria and analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-eight patients were included, with 139 in either cohort. The PVE risk per year of follow-up was 0.14 in the dialysis cohort and 0.03 in the nondialysis cohort. Dialysis remained a risk factor (adjusted hazard ratio 5.61 [95% confidence interval, 2.17 to 14.5], p = 0.0004) after age and race were controlled for. The 5-year survival rate was lower after valve replacement operation in the dialysis group (25.4%) than in the nondialysis group (75.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of PVE and death after valve replacement operations in dialysis patients is substantial and significantly higher than in patients without dialysis. These findings highlight the importance of a careful preoperative risk-benefit assessment and underscore the need to prevent hemodialysis-related bloodstream infections.

Low dose heparin lock (1000 U/mL) maintains tunnelled hemodialysis catheter patency when compared with high dose heparin (5000 U/mL): A randomised controlled trial

Introduction Heparin is commonly used after hemodialysis treatments as a locking solution to prevent catheter thrombosis. The comparative efficacy and safety of different heparin concentrations to maintain catheter patency has been previously reported in retrospective studies. We conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled study of 1000 U/mL heparin (low dose) versus 5000 U/mL heparin (high dose) locking solution to maintain patency of tunnelled catheters. Methods One hundred patients receiving chronic, unit-based hemodialysis with newly placed tunnelled hemodialysis catheters (less than 1 week) were randomly assigned to either a low dose (n = 48) or high dose heparin (n=52). The primary intention-to-treat analysis examined time to malfunction in both groups over a 90 day period. A secondary analysis compared baseline patient characteristics in relation to catheter malfunction. Findings Overall rate of catheter patency loss was 32% of catheters by 90 days. There was no significant difference in time to malfunction of catheters locked with low dose or high dose heparin (P = 0.5770). Time to catheter malfunction was not associated with diabetic, hypertensive or smoking status. There was no difference in mean delivered blood flow rate, venous and arterial pressure, and dialysis adequacy between low dose and high dose groups. No patient suffered a hemorrhagic complication requiring hospitalisation during the study period. Discussion Low dose heparin is adequate to maintain tunnelled hemodialysis catheter patency when compared with high dose heparin. The study also suggests that there is no relationship between catheter malfunction and diabetic, hypertensive or smoking status.

Evaluation of Manual and Automated Bloodstream Infection Surveillance in Outpatient Dialysis Centers

Outpatient hemodialysis bloodstream infection rates, now used for performance measurement and were significantly higher for manual compared with automated surveillance (P<.001), largely owing to the absence of blood culture data in the dialysis electronic health record. Improvement in data sharing between hospitals and outpatient dialysis centers is necessary.

Pediatric Fistula Initiative: Reducing Bloodstream Infections in an Outpatient Pediatric Hemodialysis Center

Bloodstream infection is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in children on hemodialysis (HD). From January 2009 through April 2011, the incidence of access-related bloodstream infections (ARBs) in pediatric patients on HD at our hospital was 3.45/1000 patient days. Almost all of these children were receiving HD via central line catheters, and none were receiving HD via arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs). In an effort to reduce the rate of infection in children receiving HD at our institution, we introduced the Pediatric Fistula Initiative, a program to increase creation and use of AVFs in children. Thirty-three children on HD were observed, 9 of whom received AVFs during the study period. The incidence of ARBs decreased to 1.30/1000 patient days (P < .001) during the 24-month intervention period from May 2011 through May 2013.

Post-hemodialysis dosing of 1 vs. 2 g of ceftazidime in anuric end-stage renal disease patients on low-flux dialysis and its pharmacodynamic implications on clinical use

Ceftazidime is a cost-effective antimicrobial against Gram-negative pathogens associated with sepsis in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hemodialysis patients with potential for wider use with the advent of ceftazidime-avibactam. Dosing ceftazidime post-hemodialysis appears attractive and convenient, but limited in vivo data on pharmacodynamic efficacy (PE) attainment, defined as >70% of the interdialytic period drug concentrations exceed susceptible pathogens minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) (%TMIC), warrants further assessment. We therefore evaluated PE and tolerability of 1 against 2 g regime in anuric ESRD patients on low-flux hemodialysis. Two doses of 1 or 2 g ceftazidime were administered post-hemodialysis prior to 48- and 72-hour interdialytic intervals in ESRD inpatients without active infections. Peak and trough concentrations (mg/L) were assayed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Proportion of patients achieving PE for known pathogens with MICs ≤ 8 mg/L and adverse effects were assessed. Six (43%) and eight (57%) adult patients received 1 and 2 g dose, respectively. Median (25th-75th percentile), peak, 48- and 72-hour trough ceftazidime concentrations were 78 (60-98) vs. 158 (128-196), 37 (23-37) vs. 49 (39-71), and 13 (12-20) vs. 26 (21-41) mg/L, respectively, resulting in 100% TMIC for both doses. One patient on the 1-g dose experienced mild pruritus. Reliable and safe PE attainment over both 48- and 72-hour interdialytic interval was achievable with 1 g of ceftazidime dosed post-hemodialysis. The 2 g dose was equally effective and well tolerated but may not be necessary. These findings need validation in non-anuric patients, high-flux hemodialysis, and during avibactam co-administration.

Success of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in a Large Canadian Renal Program

♦

BACKGROUND

Many patients start renal replacement therapy urgently on in-center hemodialysis via a central venous catheter, which is considered suboptimal. An alternative approach to manage these patients is to start them on peritoneal dialysis (PD). In this report, we describe the first reported Canadian experience with an urgent-start PD program. Additionally we reviewed the literature in this area. ♦

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we report on our experience in a single academic center. This program started in July 2010. We included patients who initiated PD urgently, that is within 2 weeks of catheter insertion. We followed all incident PD patients until October 2013 for mechanical and infectious complications. Peritoneal dialysis catheters were inserted either percutaneously or laparoscopically and dialysis was initiated in either an inpatient or outpatient setting. ♦

RESULTS

Thirty patients were started on urgent PD during our study period. Follow-up ranged from 28 to 1,050 days. Twenty insertions (66.7%) were done percutaneously and 10 (33.3%) were laparoscopic. Dialysis was initiated within 2 weeks (range: 0-13 days, median = 6 days). Twenty-four patients (80%) started PD in an outpatient setting and 6 patients (20%) required immediate inpatient PD start. Three patients (10%) developed a minor peri-catheter leak during the first week of training that was managed conservatively. There were no episodes of peritonitis or exit-site/tunnel infection during the first 4 weeks post-insertion. Four patients (13.3%) from the percutaneous insertion group and 2 patients (6.7%) from laparoscopic insertions developed catheter dysfunction due to migration, which was managed by repositioning, without need for catheter replacement or modality switch. ♦

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are consistent with other studies in this area and demonstrate that urgent-start PD is an acceptable and safe alternative to hemodialysis in patients who need to start dialysis urgently without established dialysis access.

The Economic and Humanistic Burden of Severe Sepsis

Sepsis and severe sepsis in particular remain a major health problem worldwide. Their cost to society extends well beyond lives lost, as the impact of survivorship is increasingly felt. A review of the medical literature was completed in MEDLINE using the search phrases "severe sepsis" and "septic shock" and the MeSH terms "epidemiology", "statistics", "mortality", "economics", and "quality of life". Results were limited to human trials that were published in English from 2002 to 2014. Articles were classified by dominant themes to address epidemiology and outcomes, including quality of life of both patient and family caregivers, as well as societal costs. The severity of sepsis is determined by the number of organ failures and the presence of shock. In most developed countries, severe sepsis and septic shock account for disproportionate mortality and resource utilization. Although mortality rates have decreased, overall mortality continues to increase and is projected to accelerate as people live longer with more chronic illness. Among those who do survive, impaired quality of life, increased dependence, and rehospitalization increase healthcare consumption and, along with increased mortality, all contribute to the humanistic burden of severe sepsis. A large part of the economic burden of severe sepsis occurs after discharge. Initial inpatient costs represent only 30 % of the total cost and are related to severity and length of stay, whereas lost productivity and other indirect medical costs following hospitalization account for the majority of the economic burden of sepsis. Timeliness of treatment as well as avoidance of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired illness/morbidity lead to important differences in both cost and outcome of treatment for severe sepsis and represent areas where improvement in care is possible. The degree of sophistication of a health system from a national perspective results in significant differences in resource use and outcomes for patients with serious infections. Comprehensive understanding of the cost and humanistic burden of severe sepsis provides an initial practical framework for health policy development and resource use.

Hemodialysis Catheter-related Infection: Prophylaxis, Diagnosis and Treatment

Purpose

Infectious complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs) are a major source of morbidity and mortality among hemodialysis (HD) patients. This review aims to discuss prevention, diagnosis criteria and management of CVC-related infections in HD patients.

Methods

We searched Medline for articles published in the last 10 years, with the keywords “catheter,” “hemodialysis,” “infection,” “treatment,” “diagnosis,” “prophylaxis” and “adults.” Only English language articles were reviewed. We reviewed prophylaxis and surveillance protocols, diagnosis criteria, including new molecular tools, and the management of catheter-related infections, including antibiotic regimen, empiric and according to causal agents, lock therapy, catheter salvage or removal choice and treatment of complications.

Results

To prevent infectious complications, first of all we need to avoid using catheters. If we need CVC, adoption of prophylaxis and surveillance protocols, and antibiotic ointment at the exit site reduce infectious complications. The diagnosis of CVC-related infections should be made with drainage and/or blood cultures. Empiric systemic antibiotics should cover Gram-positive and -negative microorganisms, and final regimen should be based on culture results. In selected cases, salvage of site, by CVC exchange over wire, or salvage of catheter, using antibiotic lock, under the cover of systemic antibiotics, could be attempted.

Conclusions

The best approach to prevent CVC-related infection would be to avoid the use of CVC. However, in patients for whom it is impossible, the adoption of adequate prophylaxis protocols, early diagnosis and effective treatment of infectious complications are essential to improve outcomes.

Risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients at a Brazilian hemodialysis center: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Infection is the leading cause of morbidity and the second leading cause of mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy. The rates of bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients vary according to the type of venous access used. Gram-positive bacteria are most frequently isolated in blood cultures of hemodialysis patients. This study evaluated risk factors for the development of bloodstream infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

Risk factors associated with bloodstream infections in patients on hemodialysis were investigated using a case-control study conducted between January 2010 and June 2013. Chronic renal disease patients on hemodialysis who presented with positive blood cultures during the study were considered as cases. Controls were hemodialysis patients from the same institution who did not present with positive blood cultures during the study period. Data were collected from medical records. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 162 patients included in the study (81 cases and 81 controls). Gram-positive bacteria were isolated with the highest frequency (72%). In initial logistic regression analysis, variables were hypertension, peritoneal dialysis with previous treatment, type and time of current venous access, type of previous venous access, previous use of antimicrobials, and previous hospitalization related to bloodstream infections. Multiple regression analysis showed that the patients who had a central venous catheter had an 11.2-fold (CI 95%: 5.17-24.29) increased chance of developing bloodstream infections compared with patients who had an arteriovenous fistula for vascular access. Previous hospitalization increased the chance of developing bloodstream infections 6.6-fold (CI 95%: 1.9-23.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection prevention measures for bloodstream infections related to central venous catheter use should be intensified, as well as judicious use of this route for vascular access for hemodialysis. Reducing exposure to the hospital environment through admission could contribute to a reduction in bloodstream infections in this population.

Risk factors for bloodstream infection in patients at a Brazilian hemodialysis center: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Infection is the leading cause of morbidity and the second leading cause of mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy. The rates of bloodstream infection in hemodialysis patients vary according to the type of venous access used. Gram-positive bacteria are most frequently isolated in blood cultures of hemodialysis patients. This study evaluated risk factors for the development of bloodstream infections in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

METHODS

Risk factors associated with bloodstream infections in patients on hemodialysis were investigated using a case-control study conducted between January 2010 and June 2013. Chronic renal disease patients on hemodialysis who presented with positive blood cultures during the study were considered as cases. Controls were hemodialysis patients from the same institution who did not present with positive blood cultures during the study period. Data were collected from medical records. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 162 patients included in the study (81 cases and 81 controls). Gram-positive bacteria were isolated with the highest frequency (72%). In initial logistic regression analysis, variables were hypertension, peritoneal dialysis with previous treatment, type and time of current venous access, type of previous venous access, previous use of antimicrobials, and previous hospitalization related to bloodstream infections. Multiple regression analysis showed that the patients who had a central venous catheter had an 11.2-fold (CI 95%: 5.17-24.29) increased chance of developing bloodstream infections compared with patients who had an arteriovenous fistula for vascular access. Previous hospitalization increased the chance of developing bloodstream infections 6.6-fold (CI 95%: 1.9-23.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Infection prevention measures for bloodstream infections related to central venous catheter use should be intensified, as well as judicious use of this route for vascular access for hemodialysis. Reducing exposure to the hospital environment through admission could contribute to a reduction in bloodstream infections in this population.

Variation in infection prevention practices in dialysis facilities: results from the national opportunity to improve infection control in ESRD (End-Stage Renal Disease) project

OBJECTIVE To observe patient care across hemodialysis facilities enrolled in the National Opportunity to Improve Infection Control in ESRD (end-stage renal disease) (NOTICE) project in order to evaluate adherence to evidence-based practices aimed at prevention of infection. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Thirty-four hemodialysis facilities were randomly selected from among 772 facilities in 4 end-stage renal disease participating networks. Facility selection was stratified on dialysis organization affiliation, size, socioeconomic status, and urban/rural status. MEASUREMENTS Trained infection control evaluators used an infection control worksheet to observe 73 distinct infection control practices at the hemodialysis facilities, from October 1, 2011, through January 31, 2012. RESULTS There was considerable variation in infection control practices across enrolled facilities. Overall adherence to recommended practices was 68% (range, 45%-92%) across all facilities. Overall adherence to expected hand hygiene practice was 72% (range, 10%-100%). Compliance to hand hygiene before and after procedures was high; however, during procedures hand hygiene compliance averaged 58%. Use of chlorhexidine as the specific agent for exit site care was 19% overall but varied from 0% to 35% by facility type. The 8 checklists varied in the frequency of perfect performance from 0% for meeting every item on the checklist for disinfection practices to 22% on the arteriovenous access practices at initiation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that there are many areas for improvement in hand hygiene and other infection prevention practices in end-stage renal disease. These NOTICE project findings will help inform the development of a larger quality improvement initiative at dialysis facilities.

Faldaprevir for the treatment of genotype-1 hepatitis C virus

Historically, pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin was the standard of care in hepatitis C virus; however, this combination is often poorly tolerated, has a significant side-effect profile and is of limited efficacy in hepatitis C virus genotype-1. More recently, pegylated interferon/ribavirin has been combined with direct acting antiviral agents such as the first generation NS3/4A protease inhibitors. Faldaprevir, a first generation, second-wave protease inhibitor, when used with a pegylated interferon/ribavirin regimen, has also been shown to increase treatmentsuccess while shortening treatment duration; however, second generation direct acting antiviral agents offer even betterefficacy and tolerability. Various direct acting antiviral agent combinations in interferon-free regimens have been effective in over 95% of patients and are now in licensed use. While faldaprevir was a pioneering drug, by the time it reached late phase development it was superseded by newer agents.