A Proposal for Improving Evidence Generation in Nephrology

Performance-based risk-sharing agreements in renal care: current experience and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

Performance-based risk-sharing agreements (PBRSAs), between payers, health care providers, and technology manufacturers can be useful when there is uncertainty about the (cost-) effectiveness of a new technology or service. However, they can be challenging to design and implement.

AREAS COVERED

A total of 18 performance-based agreements were identified through a literature review. All but two of the agreements identified were pay-for-performance schemes, agreed between providers and payers at the national level. No examples were found of agreements between health care providers and manufacturers at the local level. The potential for these local agreements was illustrated by hypothetical case studies of water quality management and an integrated chronic kidney disease program.

EXPERT OPINION

Performance-based risk-sharing agreements can work to the advantage of patients, health care providers, payers, and technology manufacturers, particularly if they facilitate the introduction of technologies or systems of care that might not have been introduced otherwise. However, the design, conduct, and implementation of PBRSAs in renal care pose a number of challenges. Efforts should be made to overcome these challenges so that more renal care patients can benefit from technological advances and new models of care.

Optimizing dialysate potassium

Potassium shifts in thrice weekly HD patients are likely a reversible cause of arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. In general, a dialysate potassium <2.0 mmol/L should be avoided, and many patients with dialysate potassium of 2 mmol/L could safely be adjusted upwards. The ideal predialysis serum potassium should be around 5.0 mmol/L. Trends in serum potassium and not single values, should inform chronic changes of dialysate potassium prescription. Atypical values should be dealt with as a one off, but should not lead to chronic bath changes. Referral to a renal dietician for counseling to limit dietary potassium intake is vital to prevent recurrence of these atypical episodes. Finally, facilities should develop and implement a formal and reliable way to alert the physician about possible potassium bath mismatching. This facility level approach works best if a policy is developed and endorsed by all involved stakeholders.

Debate: Should dialysis at home be mandatory for all suitable ESRD patients?: patients should not be forced onto home dialysis

Outcomes are similar between hospital-based hemodialysis and less expensive home-based therapies, especially home peritoneal dialysis. Because of this, some have argued that all suitable patients should be forced to these less expensive modalities. However, such an approach would violate the ethical principles of autonomy and maleficence, and would run counter to the movement toward patient-centered care. Therefore, from a North American perspective, home dialysis should be actively promoted for suitable patients, but should not be mandatory. Extending these arguments into newer paradigms of home- and community-based dialysis, with paid assistance, will be a challenge as traditional cost effectiveness arguments may not be definitive and effective. Nephrology will need to embrace new methods for evaluation of therapies and to develop and endorse sophisticated principles of advocacy to influence health care policy and funding decision makers to maximize nonhospital-based, patient-centered care and improve outcomes in the future.

Screening for depression: only one piece of the puzzle

In this issue of NDT, van den Beukel et al. from the Netherlands suggest that a 5-item survey questionnaire might be used to replace the Beck Depression Index to screen patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for depression. The nephrology community is at a tipping point in terms of the assessment of outcomes, especially among patients on dialysis. Indeed, the entire healthcare community has begun to shift its focus to patient-reported outcomes (PROs), including quality of life, patient satisfaction and the psychosocial determinants of health. Beyond depression, there are a myriad of aspects of psychological distress that include anxiety, worrying, fear of progression of kidney disease and the fear of the future in general, death and dying, hopelessness, questions around the meaning of life and the experience of recurrent psychological and physical trauma through the CKD trajectory. We encourage the community and its researchers to embrace and research PROs, with the aim to create a holistic, patient-centered model of care for patients at all stages of CKD, including those on chronic dialysis and after transplantation, keeping the whole person-and their families-in mind.

Conditionally funded field evaluations--a solution to the economic barriers limiting evidence generation in dialysis?

Evaluation of new therapies after licensing is usually a binary decision by payers; to fund or not to fund. In the real world, many therapies fall into a gray zone of incomplete evaluation. Many clinical and economic issues in nephrology have combined to create a long list of such promising but incompletely evaluated therapies. This article focuses on the economic challenges that limit evidence generation in nephrology. Conditionally funded field evaluations such as coverage with evidence development can allow both earlier access to new treatments and rigorous evaluation. The authors propose that field evaluations will stimulate an environment that promotes pivotal renal care advances. Certainly, the evidence challenge faced by nephrology requires urgent discussions on creating conditions that catalyze and accelerate innovation, and improve patient outcomes.