Maintaining residual kidney function in dialysis patients-is there a role for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers?

A swan song for Kt/Vurea

Dialyzer clearance of urea multiplied by dialysis time and normalized for urea distribution volume (Kt/V_urea or simply Kt/V) has been used as an index of dialysis adequacy since more than 30 years. This article reviews the flaws of Kt/V, starting with a lack of proof of concept in three randomized controlled hard outcome trials (RCTs), and continuing with a long list of conditions where the concept of Kt/V was shown to be flawed. This information leaves little room for any conclusion other than that Kt/V, as an indicator of dialysis adequacy, is obsolete. The dialysis patient might benefit more if, instead, the nephrology community concentrates in the future on pursuing the optimal dialysis dose that conforms with adequate quality of life and on factors that are likely to affect outcomes more than Kt/V. These include residual renal function, volume status, dialysis length, ultrafiltration rate, the number of intra-dialytic hypotensive episodes, interdialytic blood pressure, serum potassium and phosphate, serum albumin, and C reactive protein.

Is Hemodialysis Patient Survival Dependent upon Small Solute Clearance (Kt/V)?: If So How Can Kt/V be Adjusted to Prevent Under Dialysis in Vulnerable Groups?

Small solute clearance achieved during a single hemodialysis session has been traditionally evaluated by urea clearance, normalized for total body water (Kt/Vurea) for more than 30 years. By consensus, the target sessional KtVurea for thrice weekly treatments has been increased from 0.9 to 1.2 over the years. Although this is supported by observational studies, there is a fundamental lack of prospective studies to support this threshold target. In clinical practice achieving sessional Kt/Vurea targets are most closely followed in the US. Yet there appears to be a paradox in that by following Kt/Vurea targets in the US hemodialysis patient survival is better for men and the obese, the opposite of what is seen in the general population. Delivery of a lower dose of hemodialysis to women and smaller men can be explained by underestimation of total body water. The advent of bioimpedance techniques which can measure both body water and body composition will potentially allow a rescaling and re-evaluation of the importance of small solute clearances (Kt/Vurea) in the hemodialysis patient population.

Will incremental hemodialysis preserve residual function and improve patient survival?

The progressive loss of residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients is associated with increased mortality. It has been suggested that incremental dialysis may help preserve residual renal function and improve patient survival. Residual renal function depends upon both patient related and dialysis associated factors. Maintaining patients in an over-hydrated state may be associated with better preservation of residual renal function but any benefit comes with a significant risk of cardiovascular consequences. Notably, it is only observational studies that have reported an association between dialysis patient survival and residual renal function; causality has not been established for dialysis patient survival. The tenuous connections between residual renal function and outcomes and between incremental hemodialysis and residual renal function should temper our enthusiasm for interventions in this area.