Autoimmunity in Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease: A Review of Mechanisms and Prospects for Immunotherapy

Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease: Recent Updates

Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease is a small-vessel vasculitis involving the kidneys (∼90%) and the lungs (∼60%). Antibodies against the glomerular basement membrane are directly pathogenic in anti-glomerular basement membrane disease; however, recent research has highlighted the critical role of T cells. Novel autoantigens within the glomerular basement membrane are also now recognized. Atypical forms of the disease are reported along with preceding triggers, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and vaccines. Kidney outcomes in anti-glomerular basement membrane disease remain poor despite significant improvement in patient survival in the last 2 to 3 decades. Treatment typically relies on combined plasmapheresis with intensive immunosuppression. Dialysis dependency at presentation is a dominant predictor of kidney outcome. Histologically, a low (<10%) percentage of normal glomeruli, 100% crescents, together with dialysis dependency at presentation, is associated with poor kidney outcomes. In such cases, an individualized approach weighing the risks and benefits of treatment is recommended. There is a need for better ways to stop the toxic inflammatory activity associated with this disease. In this narrative review, we discuss recent updates on the pathogenesis and management of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease relevant to patients of all ages.

Epidemiology, clinical features, risk factors, and outcomes in anti-glomerular basement membrane disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease is a small-vessel vasculitis that represents the most aggressive form of autoimmune glomerulonephritis. The study aimed to investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of anti-GBM disease through a systematic review and meta-analysis involving 47 studies with 2830 patients. The overall incidence of anti-GBM disease ranged from 0.60 to 1.79 per million population per annum. In rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and crescentic glomerulonephritis, the pooled incidence rates were 8.0% and 12.8%, respectively. The pooled prevalence rates of anti-GBM antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), and lung hemorrhage were 88.8%, 27.4%, and 32.6%, respectively. Patients with combined ANCA positivity demonstrated a prognosis comparable to those patients with only anti-GBM antibodies, though with differing clinical features. The pooled one-year patient and kidney survival rates were 76.2% and 30.2%, respectively. Kidney function on diagnosis and normal glomeruli percentage were identified as strong prognostic factors. This study represents the first comprehensive meta-analysis on anti-GBM disease, providing insights into its management. However, caution is warranted in interpreting some results due to the observational nature of the included studies and high heterogeneity.

The protease inhibitor E64d might attenuate the development of experimental anti-glomerular basement membrane disease through regulating the activation of Th1 cells

BACKGROUND

Cathepsins have been recently identified as a regulator in the activation of Th1 and Th17 cells, which play an important role in the pathogenesis of anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease. Whether cathepsins contribute to the development of anti-GBM disease through regulating the activation of CD4+ T cell is still unclear.

METHODS

Rats with experimental anti-GBM disease was established by immunization with the nephritogenic T cell epitope α3127-148. E64d, a cysteine cathepsin inhibitor, was administered in vitro and vivo to evaluate the effect of cathepsins on regulating the activation of antigen specific T cells and the development of anti-GBM disease.

RESULTS

In rats with experimental anti-GBM diseases, E64d treatment not only reduced the levels of proteinuria, serum creatinine and anti-GBM antibody, but also ameliorated the kidney injury with less glomerular IgG deposition, a lower percentage of crescents and less infiltration of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and macrophages, as well as a lower percentage of splenic Th1 cells. In vitro, E64d treatment could significantly reduce the production of IFN-γ in the supernatant which might be produced by the activation of Th1 cells after being recalled with the autoantigen α3127-148. We also found the CD4+ T cells of rats with anti-GBM disease had an increased expression of cathepsin L (Cts-L), and the percentage of CD4+ T cells with extracellular expression of Cts-L was obviously higher, indicating it as a potential key regulator.

CONCLUSIONS

E64d might attenuate the development of anti-GBM disease by participating in the activation of Th1 cells, indicating it as a potential drug for anti-GBM disease in the future.

Unleashing the power of complement activation: unraveling renal damage in human anti-glomerular basement membrane disease

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease is a rare but life-threatening autoimmune disorder characterized by rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis with or without pulmonary hemorrhage. Renal biopsies of anti-GBM patients predominantly show linear deposition of IgG and complement component 3 (C3), indicating a close association between antigen-antibody reactions and subsequent complement activation in the pathogenesis of the disease. All three major pathways of complement activation, including the classical, lectin, and alternative pathways, are involved in human anti-GBM disease. Several complement factors, such as C3, C5b-9, and factor B, show a positive correlation with the severity of the renal injury and act as risk factors for renal outcomes. Furthermore, compared to patients with single positivity for anti-GBM antibodies, individuals who are double-seropositive for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and anti-GBM antibodies exhibit a unique clinical phenotype that lies between ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) and anti-GBM disease. Complement activation may serve as a potential "bridge" for triggering both AAV and anti-GBM conditions. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the latest clinical evidence regarding the role of complement activation in anti-GBM disease. Furthermore, potential therapeutic strategies targeting complement components and associated precautions are discussed, to establish a theoretical basis for complement-targeted therapies.

Atypical Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Nephritis After the First Dose of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 mRNA Vaccine

Atypical anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) nephritis is a slowly progressive characterized by linear deposition of immunoglobulin (Ig) G in the GBM without circulating anti-GBM antibodies or lung involvement. There is no established therapy for this disease, and efficacy of the immunosuppressive treatment is questionable. A few cases of atypical anti-GBM nephritis have been reported after administration of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccine. Classic anti-GBM disease has also been reported after the administration of the second dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Herein, we present the case of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced atypical anti-GBM nephritis that developed after the first dose and was unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapy. A 57-year-old Japanese woman developed edema 11 days after the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. She developed nephrotic-range proteinuria and microscopic hematuria. Renal biopsy revealed endocapillary proliferative glomerulonephritis with linear IgG deposition. However, electron-dense deposits were not detected on electron microscopy. The patient tested negative for circulating anti-GBM antibodies and was diagnosed with atypical anti-GBM nephritis. Although steroids and mizoribine were administered, the patient's renal function deteriorated. In conclusion, atypical anti-GBM nephritis may have earlier onset than the classic anti-GBM disease. Given its uncertainty of effectiveness, immunosuppressive agents should be carefully used for SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine-induced atypical anti-GBM nephritis.