Biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: why still a problem?

Gallbladder bed pocket score as a preoperative measure for assessing the difficulty of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C) is a standard surgery for symptomatic gallbladder stones and acute or chronic cholecystitis. Resident surgeons often perform this operation early in their training, but they sometimes encounter difficulties for various technical reasons. Although encountering a gallbladder buried deep within the gallbladder bed is a common operative difficulty, literature on the subject scarcely exists.

METHODS

Forty-two patients underwent Lap-C at our hospitals and were analyzed retrospectively. We defined the gallbladder bed pocket score (GBPS) as the maximum ratio between the height and width of the gallbladder bed measured based on multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images. GBPS and clinical factors were assessed in terms of their correlation with the time required for gallbladder dissection from the gallbladder bed.

RESULTS

Of the 42 patients, 20 had histories of acute or chronic cholecystitis. The mean gallbladder dissection time was 14.9 min, and the mean GBPS was 0.43 in the coronal MDCT section and 0.56 in the sagittal section. The correlation coefficient between the GBPS and gallbladder dissection time was 0.40 (P = 0.01) in the coronal section and 0.38 (P = 0.02) in the sagittal section of the MDCT images. There was no statistically significant correlation between gallbladder dissection time and the surgeon's experience, patient's history of cholecystitis, gallstone size, or blood loss. However, GBPS > 0.4 predicted more difficult and prolonged dissection.

CONCLUSION

GBPS is a useful tool for preoperatively predicting the time needed to dissect the gallbladder from the gallbladder bed during Lap-C. Cases with GBPS < 0.4 seem more suitable for resident surgeons who are performing gallbladder dissection early in their Lap-C training.

Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not?

Progress in surgical practice has paralleled the civilizational evolution. Surgery has progressed from being the last resort in saving life to being form and function preserver. Post-renaissance Industrial age gave an impetus to this march of surgery. The currently on going digital technological revolution has further catalysed this march. Having achieved the stabilized and acceptable clinical outcomes, the surgeon has embarked on a journey of improving patient reported outcomes (PRO). Improvement in PROs with the advent of laparoscopic surgery with the attendant emphasis on minimising invasion has led to debates about invasion being just parietal or holistic in physiological sense. There is a concern that parietal invasiveness shouldn't be a trade-off for compromised clinical outcomes. Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in its current avatar with current instrumentation seems to be an enthusiastic bandwagon rolling on with the cosmetic benefits acting as veil to hide the potential clinical concerns. History of surgical innovations is riddled with tales of vindictiveness and vicissitude. Lest the same fate befalls SILS we would do better to examine the SILS bandwagon in its current form till the emerging technologies address the current concerns.

[Imaging of the postoperative biliary tract]

For a long time, imaging of the biliary tract after surgical procedures was performed with invasive procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. Due to recent advances in diagnostic imaging, non-invasive techniques are now favored. While US remains the initial imaging modality, it is frequently followed by CT and/or MRCP. Image interpretation should always be performed in keeping with clinical and laboratory findings as well as the type of surgical procedure. The most appropriate imaging modality is selected based on these data. In patients with jaundice or biliary tract stenosis, MRCP, with use of an optimal technique and 3D acquisition, is the imaging modality of choice. In non-jaundiced patients with non-distended biliary tract and suspected bile leak, MRCP should be completed by the injection of a liver-specific contrast agent with biliary excretion to achieve non-invasive biliary tract opacification. In patients with malignancy, CT is preferred due to its high spatial resolution and ability to demonstrate small anastomotic tumor recurrences. CT should also be performed in patients with suspected hepatic artery or portal vein injury in addition to biliary tract injury or to detect distant complications.