Proton-pump inhibitor use is not associated with osteoporosis or accelerated bone mineral density loss

Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitors on phosphocalcium metabolism and bone mineral density

Aim: Although Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are well-tolerated, their long-term use may be associated with decreased bone mass. Methods: This is a case-control study including patients treated with PPIs (>1 year) and control subjects who have not received PPIs treatment. Results: A total of 90 patients and 90 matched controls were included. PPIs use was associated with hypocalcemia and hypomagnesemia. Vitamin D3 deficiency and hyperparathyroidism were associated with PPIs use. Long-term PPIs use was significantly associated with decreased bone density. Risk factors of decreased bone mineral density (BMD) included age >50 years, menopause, lack of sun exposure, double PPIs dose, daily intake, post-meal intake and association with a mucoprotective agent. Conclusion: Our results highlight the risk of decreased BMD in patients on long-term PPIs treatment.

Proton pump inhibitors, bone and phosphocalcic metabolism

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders; however, concerns have arisen about their prolonged and inappropriate use. Although generally considered safe, recent evidence has linked PPI use with an increased risk of kidney disease, stomach cancer, pneumonia, dementia, cardiovascular events and potential bone health problems. This systematic review examines the effects of PPIs on bone health, including osteoporosis and changes in phosphocalcic and magnesium metabolism, through a comprehensive analysis of the recent literature. The relationship between PPIs, bone mineral density and fracture risk, especially in populations with comorbidities, is complex and we propose a focus based on recent data. Studies of the effect of PPI use on bone mineral density have shown mixed results and require further investigation. Observational studies have indicated an increased risk of fractures, particularly vertebral fractures, associated with PPI use. Recent meta-analyses have confirmed an association between PPI use and hip fractures with a dose-dependent effect. More recently, PPIs have been associated with serious disturbances in phosphocalcic and magnesium metabolism that require careful management and discontinuation. Proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia (PPIH) is a well-established phenomenon. In addition, hypocalcemia secondary to severe hypomagnesemia has been described. Despite growing evidence of PPI-related risks, further research is essential to better understand the complex mechanisms, as most data are from observational studies and do not establish a causal relationship. This review emphasizes the need for judicious prescription practices, particularly in long-term use scenarios and rheumatological contexts.

Different effects of chronic omeprazole use on osteoporotic fractures rate in the elderly

AIMS

To investigate the potential association of chronic use of omeprazole with the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures (OF) in community-dwelling elderly subjects.

METHODS

The cohort consisted of community-dwelling residents aged >65 years registered with a large health maintenance organization in Israel between January 2002 and December 2016. Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical files on demographics, parameters known to be associated with OF, diagnoses of osteoporotic hip, wrist, and vertebral fractures, and chronic use of omeprazole (>11 prescriptions/year). Time to OF/death/end of study was calculated from the beginning of the study (2002). The risk of fractures in the chronic users of omeprazole was analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 46 805 subjects were included (41% men), mean age 83.4±6.4 years, of whom 10 272 (21.9%) were chronic users of omeprazole. During 14 years of follow-up, OF were diagnosed in 414 (4.0%) omeprazole users and 1007 (2.8%) omeprazole nonusers (p < 0.001). In a Cox regression model adjusted for age and gender only, chronic use of omeprazole was associated with a 16% excess of OF. However, when parameters known to be associated with OF were entered into the multivariate Cox regression model, chronic use of omeprazole was not found to be an independent risk factor for OF, either overall (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.965, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.08, P = .55) or specifically, in the ≥85 years age group (adjusted hazard ration = 0.780, 95% confidence interval 0.635-0.958, P < .05) in which an inverse correlation between omeprazole use and OF, was demonstrated.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic use of omeprazole was not associated with the occurrence of OF in elders.

Relevance of early management by proton-pump inhibitor in acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorder: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) are frequently used in the emergency and general practice settings in several clinical presentations linked to acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorders as abdominal or chest pain without recommendations.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to assess pain reduction, diagnostic performance, and safety in the first 24 h-management in primary care or emergency medicine.

METHODS

Search was realized by 2 independent reviewers in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Only original articles or systematic reviews in English were included. Studies about chronic and/or bleeding conditions, therapeutic cocktails and studies without pain evaluation were excluded. Two methodologies were used for bias estimation.

RESULTS

From 4442 titles, 79 full-text articles were assessed, and 9 were included. There is no strong evidence supporting the use of PPI as a first line analgesic or diagnostic test in acute syndromes linked to acute upper gastro-intestinal tract disorder. A small effect in pain reduction was retrieved in patients with low pain scores. A poor additional value in patients with gastric reflux, and a low specificity compared to other diagnostic tests were observed. A short-term PPI administration appears to be safe with low risk of serious allergic reactions, and poor adverse effects (moderate evidence).

CONCLUSION

Although PPIs may contribute to the multimodal analgesia in acute settings, with few and/or minor side effects, no recommendation can be drawn for their use as a primary analgesic. Data regarding the relevance of the PPI test are much less clear, no data regarding care pathways are available.

Bone microstructure in proton pump inhibitor users

OBJECTIVES

We assessed skeletal microstructure and stiffness in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) users compared to non-users with high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) and microfinite element analysis (μFEA) and other modalities. Relationships between PPI dose/frequency and bone parameters were evaluated.

METHODS

We cross-sectionally assessed skeletal health in 601 older (≥age 65 years) adults (130 PPI users and 471 non-users) participating in a multi-ethnic population-based study of aging.

RESULTS

PPI users tended to have more comorbidities and take more medications than non-users. Female PPI users (n = 100) were more likely to be non-Caucasian, shorter with higher BMI, and more likely to have diabetes, lower physical activity and be using anti-depressants and thiazide diuretics compared to non-users (n = 302). Male PPI users (n = 30) were more likely to have liver disease than non-users (n = 169). In women, historical fractures (53.0 % vs. 43.4 %, p = 0.05) and falls (38 % vs. 26.8 %, p = 0.04) tended to be more frequent in PPI users compared to non-users. Number of falls was higher in women reporting daily rather than intermittent PPI use (1.8/year vs. 1.0/year, p < 0.001). In women, there were no differences in any HRpQCT or μFEA parameter. By HRpQCT, covariate-adjusted cortical volumetric bone density (Ct.vBMD) was 4.2 % lower in male PPI users vs. non-users at the tibia (p = 0.04), but this did not result in reduced stiffness. There were no other differences by HRpQCT at the tibia or radius.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use was not associated with altered skeletal microstructure or stiffness in elderly men and women. The results do not support a relationship between PPI use and microstructure.

PPI-Induced Changes in Plasma Metabolite Levels Influence Total Hip Bone Mineral Density in a UK Cohort

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most used drugs in the UK. PPI use has been associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk, although these results have been inconsistent. We hypothesized that PPI could modulate BMD by altering gut and/or host systemic metabolic environments. Using data from more than 5000 British male and female individuals, we confirmed that PPI use is associated with decreased lumbar spine and total hip BMD. This effect was not mediated through the gut microbiome. We suggest here that PPI use may influence total hip BMD, both directly and indirectly, via plasma metabolites involved in the sex hormone pathway. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Proton Pump Inhibitors in Allergy: Benefits and Risks

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed and are indicated for the treatment of several gastrointestinal disorders. Allergists may prescribe PPIs as a result of the coincidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease with asthma or rhinitis, or when gastroesophageal reflux disease presents as chronic cough. Furthermore, long-term, high-dose PPI therapy is a recommended option for managing eosinophilic esophagitis, resulting in histologic remission in approximately 40% of patients. Here, we discuss current recommendations for PPI use, its deescalation, and its side effect profile. We review evidence supporting the epidemiologic link between the use of acid-suppressant medication and the subsequent development of allergic disorders.

Clinical Use of Lansoprazole and the Risk of Osteoporosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) lansoprazole acts as a liver X receptor agonist, which plays a crucial role in the crosstalk of osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro and during bone turnover in vivo. However, epidemiological studies on the association between the use of lansoprazole and osteoporosis risk are limited. We aimed to determine the risk of developing osteoporosis in patients with lansoprazole use.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan dated from 2000 to 2013. The study includes 655 patients with lansoprazole use (the exposed cohort) and 2620 patients with other PPI use (the comparison cohort). The main outcome was the primary diagnosis of osteoporosis. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between the use of lansoprazole and risk of osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Patients receiving lansoprazole treatment had a reduced risk of osteoporosis as compared with those undergoing other PPI therapy (adjusted HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.46-0.68). Moreover, this inverse association is evident in both sexes and in various age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This population-based cohort study demonstrated that lansoprazole use was associated with a reduced risk of osteoporosis. The clinical implications of the present study need further investigations.

Changes in bone turnover markers in adolescents with gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with lansoprazole

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been suggested to lead to bone resorption, while the effects of PPIs on the bone mineral metabolism in children has received only limited attention in literature to date. The present study investigates whether lansoprazole alters bone turnover markers in adolescents with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Patients and methods

Included in the study were adolescents aged 16-18 with GERD and a healthy volunteers group. The GERD patient group was treated with lansoprazole 30 mg once daily for eight weeks. The serum calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathormone (PTH), 25 (OH) vitamin D, osteocalcin and urinary calcium, creatinine, deoxypyridinoline (DPD), collagen type-1 crosslinked C-telopeptide (CTX) and collagen type-1 crosslinked N-telopeptide (NTX) of both groups were studied before and after the end of the treatment.

Results

A comparison of the 30 patients with GERD and the 30 volunteers revealed no significant difference in the serum calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, ALP, urinary calcium/creatinine ratio, 25 (OH) vitamin D and PTH levels measured before and after the lansoprazole treatment, while the osteocalcin, DPD, CTX and NTX values were found to be higher after treatment when compared to those at pre- treatment.

Conclusions

The results of this study reveal that eight weeks of treatment with 30 mg lansoprazole daily increased the bone turnover markers of CTX, NTX, DPD and osteocalcin in adolescents aged 16-18.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Bone Health: An Update Narrative Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are an antacid drug often used in acid-related disorders. They decrease acid secretion in the stomach by blocking an enzyme called H+/K+ ATPase which controls acid production. Introduced to the market in 1989, their use has increased rapidly worldwide and they are now among the top 10 most prescribed drugs in the United States. As of 2015, the FDA has already approved six drugs of this class (omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole). Recently, the risks and benefits of long-term PPI use were questioned and many studies indicated that their use should be carefully considered, especially in young patients, whose treatment with these drugs could last many years. Even greater concerns have been raised about a potential positive association between PPIs and osteoporotic fracture risk including the hip, spine and wrist. Although based on observational studies, there is substantial evidence associating the long-term use of PPIs and fracture. This relationship is only partially admitted due to the lack of consistent effects of PPIs on bone mineral density loss. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to discuss the recent findings pertaining to the risk of osteoporotic fracture associated with PPIs, in particular prolonged use, and to call for further research to elucidate the mechanisms associated with this bone fragility.

Suppression of vacuolar-type ATPase and induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress by proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as esomeprazole, pantoprazole, dexlansoprazole, and rabeprazole, are one of the most commonly prescribed medications. Several studies have linked the long-term use of PPIs to a potentially increased risk of gastric cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the underlying mechanism of PPI-mediated gastric cancer.

METHODS

Lysosomes were isolated using immunoprecipitation. The inhibition of vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase) by PPIs was assayed using a PiColorLock Gold Phosphate Detection System. PPI-induced lysosomal stress was analyzed using transcription factor EB (TFEB) nuclear translocation. PPI-induced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress was analyzed using the expression of protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). Finally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) removal was determined using the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD).

RESULTS

PPIs caused a 70% inhibition of V-ATPase activity at 20 μM, leading to lysosomal stress through TFEB nuclear translocation; ER stress by inducing the expression of PERK, IRE1, and ATF6; and enhanced SOD activity for ROS removal.

CONCLUSION

The long-term use of PPIs inhibits lysosomal V-ATPase, leading to ER stress and ROS accumulation, which may result in an increased risk of gastric cancer. Because lysosomes and the ER are common organelles in cells, physicians prescribing PPIs for gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases should pay more attention to the general effects of these agents on the human body.

Long-term proton pump inhibitor use and risk of osteoporosis and hip fractures: A nationwide population-based and multicenter cohort study using a common data model

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Association between protonpump inhibitors (PPIs) and osteoporosis, hip fractures has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between PPIs use and the risk of osteoporosis and hip fractures in the databases converted to a common data model (CDM) and to compare the results across the databases.

METHODS

This was a population-based, propensity-matched, retrospective cohort study that included patients aged ≥ 50 years who were prescribed with PPIs for over 180 days. We compared the incidence of osteoporosis and hip fractures between new PPI user and new user of other drugs using the Cox proportional hazards model and performed meta-analysis in the electronic health record (EHR) databases.

RESULTS

In the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS)-CDM database, long-term PPI users had greater risk of osteoporosis [PPIs vs non-PPIs groups, 28.42/1000 person-years vs 19.29/1000 person-years; hazard ratio (HR), 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-2.15; P = 0.001]. The meta-analytic results of six EHR databases also showed similar result (pooled HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.28-1.92). In the analysis of hip fracture, PPI use was not significantly associated with a hip fracture in the NHIS-CDM database (PPI vs non-PPI groups, 3.09/1000 person-years vs 2.26/1000 person-years; HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 0.74-2.80; P = 0.27). However, in the meta-analysis of four EHR databases, the risk of hip fractures was higher in PPI users (pooled HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.04-3.19).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term PPI was significantly associated with osteoporosis; however, the results of hip fractures were inconsistent. Further study based on better data quality may be needed.

The influence of proton pump inhibitors on tissue attachment around teeth and dental implants: A scoping review

Objectives

Materials and Methods

Results

Conclusions

Statin Supply and Polydrug Use in Older Adults: A Focus on Drug Combinations that Reduce Bone Density

Background

We investigated the comorbidities of individuals who were prescribed statins to identify the use of bone mineral density (BMD)-reducing drugs, examine polydrug use trends involving these drugs, and explore their relationship with osteoporosis.

Methods

We analyzed claims data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (January 2014–December 2018). We sampled 20% of 8,379,419 patients aged ≥50 years who were prescribed statins. Among them, we analyzed the data of those who were administered two or more prescriptions for 14 days or longer within 6 months of the initial date of statin prescription. Data on comorbidities and drugs that can potentially reduce BMD were obtained. Osteoporosis-related diagnoses were obtained as an outcome measure. The relationship between statins and BMD-reducing drugs was analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

Among the 4,138 statin users aged 50 years or older, 552 were diagnosed with osteoporosis. The most common comorbidity in statin users was hypertension, followed by ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and stroke. The most frequently administered BMD-reducing drugs were proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The osteoporosis diagnosis rate was higher in patients who were prescribed both statins and PPIs or both statins and levothyroxine than in those using only a statin.

Conclusion

PPIs and levothyroxine should be prescribed cautiously in statin users and bone densitometry should be proactively performed considering the increased risk of osteoporosis.

Proton-Pump Inhibitors: Do Children Break a Leg by Using Them?

ABSTRACT

The risk of bone fracture in children under proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) treatment has been the subject of recent publications and naturally raises concerns among prescribing doctors, patients and their parents.Currently, there is no consistency in those risk claims according to the available evidence and an update on it is beneficial to reduce anxiety on one hand, and prompt for well-planned studies addressing the issue on the other. Furthermore, common sense and well-founded prescriptions must be the general rule for this as for any other therapeutic drug.

Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors adversely affects minerals and vitamin metabolism, bone turnover, bone mass, and bone strength

Notwithstanding, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most excellent options for different anti-secretory therapy in terms of improved symptomatic outcomes, numerous epidemiological and cohort studies provide evidence of an association between long-term proton PPIs use and increased fracture risk among users. The present attempt aimed to summarize the effect of long-term use of PPIs on musculoskeletal systems by considering the recent claims of different research groups to understand the risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis and to determine the risk factors associated with these complications. We extracted data from various systematic reviews and meta-analyses, cross-sectional studies, prospective studies, case-control studies, cohort studies, and in-vivo and in-vitro studies to observe the consequence of long-term PPIs uses over the patient's bone health. Recent findings suggested that long-term use of PPIs plays an introductory and cabalistic role in the development of osteoporosis mostly hip fractures by disturbing numerous biological pathways and thus able to set up a link between over-prescription of PPIs and bone loss. Frequent administration of PPIs is associated with a significantly worse outcome to bone mineral density (BMD) profile and produce a negative impression on bone health. Since, there are limited data to determine the association of PPIs use and change in BMD, recommending further studies to find out this dissertation.

Prolonged Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors, but Not Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists, Is Associated With Lower Bone Mineral Density in Males Aged Over 70

Aims: The association of acid suppressants use with bone mineral density (BMD) is still unclear, especially in older adult with prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs). In this study, our aim was to investigate the association between PPI or H2RA use and BMD in general US older adults. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on a sample from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Association between long-term use of PPIs or H2RAs and lumber spine BMD in elderly was evaluated using weighted multivariate linear regression models. Sensitive and subgroup analysis were also performed in this study. Results: Long-term PPI use is correlated with lower lumber spine BMD in our multivariable regression model after adjusting for known confounding factors. Further analysis showed PPI use with a duration over 1 year was negatively associated with lumber spine BMD in male, elderly aged over 70 years, and white elderly. There is no significant association between long-term H2RA use and lumber spine BMD. Conclusions: Our results indicated that the association between long-term use of PPI and lumber spine BMD differed by gender. Long term use of PPIs would reduce lumber spine BMD in older men, while H2RA use is not significantly linked with lumber spine BMD. Patients that are at high risk of bone loss should shortened the duration of PPI use (<1 year) or use H2RAs as alternative if possible.

Acid-Suppressive Drugs and Risk of Fracture in Children and Young Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Background: Recent studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) may increase the risk of fracture. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of fracture with PPIs and H2RAs use in children and young adults.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE database, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant articles published before May 2021 were searched. We included all the observational studies reporting on the risk of fracture with acid-suppressive drug (PPIs and H2RAs) use in children and young adults. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs) for fracture using random-effects models and conducted subgroup analyses.

Results: A total of six studies were included in our analysis. Pooled analysis of PPIs use showed significant risk for fracture (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12–1.34; I² = 79.3), but not significant for PPIs combined with H2RAs use (RR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.94–1.60; I² = 44.0%), as well as for H2RAs use alone (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.24; I² = 84.1%). Grouping of studies by region showed a significantly increased fracture risk with PPIs use in North America (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.16–1.32; I² =0.0%) than in Europe (RR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.00–1.52; I² = 94.6%) and Asia (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96–1.25). However, there was no significant association between the H2RAs use and the fracture risk in North America (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09; I² = 0.0%). Moreover, PPIs use showed an increased risk of fracture in women (RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07–1.19; I² = 0.0%), whereas there was no significant association between the PPIs use and the risk of fracture in men (RR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66–1.31; I² = 0.0%).

Conclusion: PPIs use alone could increase the risk of fracture in children and young adults, but not for PPIs combined with H2RAs use or H2RAs use alone. Clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing PPIs for patients.

Do patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease exhibit compromised bone quality prior to proton pump inhibitor therapy?

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are routinely treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), despite many reports of increased fracture risk associated with PPI use. Notably, the skeletal properties in patients with GERD prior to PPI therapy have not been addressed. We hypothesized that PPI-naïve GERD patients have bone impairment, and that short-term treatment with PPI has minimal skeletal effects. To test this, 17 (12 men/5 women) GERD patients age 32–73 years, not previously exposed to PPI, and 17 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled from September 2010 to December 2012. Bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and trabecular bone score (TBS) at the lumbar spine, a marker of bone microarchitecture, were measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Markers of bone turnover and calcium homeostasis, and gastric hormones were analyzed. The same parameters were measured after three months of treatment with the PPI pantoprazole. The GERD patients displayed a significantly lower TBS at baseline than controls (1.31 ± 0.11 vs. 1.43 ± 0.07, p = 0.0006). Total hip and femoral neck BMD were lower in patients compared to controls, however, not significantly (p = 0.09 and 0.12, respectively). CTX was non-significantly higher in GERD patients at baseline (p = 0.11). After three months, changes in BMD, TBS and CTX did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, this is the first report demonstrating compromised bone quality and inferior BMD in PPI-naïve GERD patients. Treatment with pantoprazole did not influence bone parameters, indicating that short-term use with this PPI is safe for the skeleton.

•

Previous studies have reported an increased fracture risk in PPI users.

•

Patients with GERD had compromised bone quality before starting PPI.

•

Three months treatment with pantoprazole did not influence bone parameters.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Fractures in Adults: A Critical Appraisal and Review of the Literature

Despite the large number of patients worldwide being on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders, uncertainty remains over their long-term safety. Particularly, the potential side effects of these drugs on bone health have been evaluated in the last years. The purpose of our narrative review is to gather and discuss results of clinical studies focusing on the interactions between PPIs and fracture risk. Data generated mainly from nested case-control studies and meta-analysis suggest that long-term/high-dose PPIs users are characterized by an increased risk of fragility fractures, mainly hip fractures. However, in these studies, the PPIs-induced bone impairment is often not adjusted for different confounding variables that could potentially affect bone health, and exposure to PPIs was reported using medical prescriptions without adherence evaluation. The mechanisms of the PPI-related bone damage are still unclear, but impaired micronutrients absorption, hypergastrinemia, and increased secretion of histamine may play a role. Clinicians should pay attention when prescribing PPIs to subjects with a preexistent high risk of fractures and consider antiosteoporotic drugs to manage this additive effect on the bone. However, further studies are needed to clarify PPIs action on the bone.

Effect of proton pump inhibitors on dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

The present systematic review aims to determine the evidence on the impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on dental implants.

Settings and Design

This secondary qualitative and quantitative research was done using a pre-specified question and inclusion criteria.

Materials and Methods

A systematic search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane. All the studies that assessed the effect of PPIs on dental implants were included, irrespective of the design. Literature review, letter to editors, short commentaries, and opinion articles were excluded.

Results and Statistical Analysis Used

A total of three publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All these included articles were retrospective cohort studies; the methodological quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A total of 452 implants were placed in 149 PPI users, whereas 6798 were positioned in 2241 nonusers. Of these, 43 and 212 implants failed in users and nonusers, respectively (odds ratio: 2.91, 95% confidence interval: 2.06-4.11). The meta-analysis was performed using the statistical software Review Manager, and a fixed-effect model was used to obtain the odds ratio. The success rate of implants based on age, gender, smoking, and bone augmentation could be combined only from two studies, which revealed a considerable effect of these factors.

Conclusion

As far as the available evidence is considered, it seems as if the usage of PPI has a detrimental effect on the success of dental implants. This influence needs justification as none of the included studies segregated the data based on confounding factors. Hence, there is a need to conduct well-designed, prospective, randomized clinical trials with balanced confounding factors to derive a proper conclusion.

Proton pump inhibitor use is associated with hip fracture development: a nationwide population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use on the risk of hip fracture is controversial. This study aimed to clarify the association between PPI use and hip fracture risk using a large cohort.

METHODS

This study recruited participants from the nationwide cohort (n = 1,025,340). After exclusion of participants who had hip fractures or were aged less than 40 years during the baseline period (2002 to 2004), 371,806 participants were followed to 2013. Participants prescribed PPIs for more than 90 days during baseline period were defined as users. Fracture cases were defined when participants were hospitalized with claims of a hip fracture.

RESULTS

During 4,159,343 person-years of follow-up, fractures developed more often in PPI users than in nonusers (relative risk [RR], 1.787; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.260 to 2.534; p = 0.002). The results persisted after adjusting for age, sex, and many drugs relevant to osteoporosis or influential in bone health. Furthermore, fracture risk associated with PPI use increased with duration of use (p trend < 0.001). The fully adjusted RRs of hip fracture development were 1.350 (95% CI, 1.203 to 1.515) for 1- to 90-day users, 1.487 (95% CI, 0.957 to 2.311) for 91- to 180-day users, and 1.771 (95% CI, 0.931 to 3.368) for > 180-day users. The positive association between PPI use and fracture was also confirmed in a subgroup with health screening data where further adjustment for body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity was available (adjusted RR, 2.025; 95% CI, 1.151 to 3.564, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

PPI use is associated with hip fracture development.

Potential proton pump inhibitor-related adverse effects

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most common medications taken by patients worldwide. PPIs are used to treat acid-related disorders, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug/stress ulceration. For some of these diseases, long-term treatment is necessary. With such prolonged use, concern and investigation into potential adverse effects has increased. In addition, data are available regarding potential anticancer effects of PPIs, especially regarding solid tumors. The aim of this review is to assess the literature on PPIs with regard to common concerns, such as drug-drug interactions, the intestinal microbiome, dementia and central nervous system disease, and osteoporosis, as well as to highlight potential negative and positive impacts of the drug in cancer.

Association between proton pump inhibitor use and risk of fracture: A population-based case-control study

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to reconfirm the association between the risk of fracture and proton pump inhibitor use and to establish evidence for defining a high-risk group of patients among proton pump inhibitor users.

Methods

A nested case-control study was performed using data from the National Health Insurance Sharing Service database from the period January 2007 to December 2017. The study population included elderly women aged ≥65 years with claims for peptic ulcer or gastro-esophageal reflux disease. The cases were all incidental osteoporotic fractures, and up to two controls were matched to each case by age, osteoporosis, and Charlson comorbidity index. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 21,754 cases were identified, and 43,508 controls were matched to the cases. The adjusted odds ratio of osteoporotic fractures related to the use of proton pump inhibitors was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.11–1.20). There was a statistically significant interaction between proton pump inhibitor and bisphosphonate use (p<0.01). The risk of fracture in patients using proton pump inhibitors was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.08–1.92) in bisphosphonate users and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03–1.20) in bisphosphonate non-users.

Conclusion

Concomitant use of bisphosphonates and proton pump inhibitors will likely increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures in women aged 65 and over, and caution should be exercised in this high-risk group of patients.

Supplement With Calcium or Alendronate Suppresses Osteopenia Due to Long Term Rabeprazole Treatment in Female Mice: Influence on Bone TRAP and Osteopontin Levels

Background and Purpose

Rabeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPIs) is much endorsed to patients with increased gastric acidity. PPIs were accused to have osteoporotic effects on patients who chronically use them. The point of the current investigation was to decide the impact of rabeprazole on osteoporosis and to explore the modulatory effects of dietary calcium or alendronate on this side effect.

Methods

80 female mice were alienated into four groups maintained for 18 weeks: [1] Vehicle group: given distilled water in 12 ml/kg, P.O. [2] Rabeprazole control group: given rabeprazole in a dose equals 10 mg/kg every 48 h, P.O. [3] Rabeprazole + calcium: given rabeprazole (10 mg/kg every 48 h) along with calcium supplement. [4] Rabeprazole + alendronate: given rabeprazole (10 mg/kg every 48 h) and alendronate (1 mg/kg per week, i.p.). Serum calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone were measured. Both femurs were kept in paraformaldehyde, and then the right one was used for X-ray examination with analysis by Digora software and the left one for histopathological examination (H&E) and immunohistochemical stains for osteopontin and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP).

Results

Calcium supplementation or administration of alendronate along with rabeprazole significantly restored the mean bone density as shown by X-ray analysis. Femurs from mice received rabeprazole showed widely separated, thin-walled bone trabeculae and increased number of osteoclasts. Calcium or alendronate with rabeprazole showed thick bone trabeculae without full recovery from rabeprazole induced damage. Adding calcium supplementation to rabeprazole did not affect the histological abnormalities related to osteoclasts meanwhile alendronate produced inactivation of osteoclasts. Both calcium and alendronate decreased the rabeprazole-induced increment in the femur osteopontin level.

Conclusion

Calcium or alendronate can be recommended for female patients on PPI therapy who are at risk of osteopenia.

Comparative analysis of the risk of osteoporotic fractures with proton pump inhibitor use and histamine-2 receptor antagonist therapy in elderly women: A nationwide population-based nested case-control study

The influence of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on the risk of osteoporotic fractures remains to be elucidated, especially in the Asian population. This study evaluated the risk of osteoporotic fractures in elderly female Korean PPI users compared to histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) users, as well as the relationship between fractures and the duration, dose, and pattern of use of PPI. We screened a nationwide cohort of elderly Korean women who underwent bone mineral density measurements during their 66-year-old life-transition medical examination between 2009 and 2014. Study subjects included 8903 cases diagnosed with new osteoporotic fractures and 44,515 matched controls (1:5 ratio based on cohort entry date, follow-up duration, and baseline osteoporosis status) without fractures. They were followed up until 2015. Information on the exposure to PPI or H2RA, occurrence of fracture, and covariates were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service data. Covariate-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using conditional logistic regression analysis. PPI use was associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.18) compared with H2RA-only use. Increasing duration of PPI use was positively associated with the risk of osteoporotic fracture [aOR (95% CI) of long-term PPI use (≥1 year): 1.3 (1.09, 1.56)]. Recent PPI use within the last year was associated with an increased risk of fracture (aOR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.38), whereas remote PPI use was not (aOR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.92, 1.04). The risk of fracture did not increase with the increasing cumulative PPI dose. Compared with the use of H2RA alone, PPI use was associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in elderly Korean women, particularly among those who had used PPI within the last year or for more than one year.

The Clinical Characteristics of Fractures in Pediatric Patients Exposed to Proton Pump Inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

There are increasing concerns regarding proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the risk of fractures in adults. Few studies have evaluated this risk among pediatric patients. This study examined fractures and fracture location among pediatric patients exposed to PPI compared with those without documented exposure.

STUDY DESIGN

Encounters for patients 6 months to 15.5 years were identified between July 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015 in the Pediatric Hospital Information System database. Exclusion criteria was applied for chronic illnesses, conditions or medications predisposing to fracture. Encounters were classified as PPI encounters if a charge for PPI was documented. PPI encounters were propensity matched to non-PPI encounters. Following initial encounter, patients were evaluated over a 2-year period for hospitalizations resulting from fracture.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant higher rate of fractures among the PPI-exposed group (1.4% vs 1.2%, P = 0.019). Adjusting for remaining differences in sex, race, encounter type, payer, and resource intensity after matching, the difference remained statistically significant (P = 0.017) with an adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of 1.2 (1.0--1.4). Upper extremity was the most common location for fracture; however, the PPI cohort was more likely to suffer from lower extremity, rib, and spinal fractures (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests an increased risk of fracture among pediatric patients taking PPI. Among patients hospitalized with a fracture, those with PPI exposure had a higher rate of lower extremity, rib, and spine fractures compared with controls. This appeared to be a class effect not related to individual PPI agent.

Esophageal injury associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Determinants of risk and protective strategies

Catheter ablation has become an important element in the management of atrial fibrillation. Several technical advances allowed for better safety profiles and lower recurrence rates, leading to an increasing number of ablations worldwide. Despite that, major complications are still reported, and esophageal thermal injury remains a significant concern as atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is often fatal. Recognition of the mechanisms involved in the process of esophageal lesion formation and the identification of the main determinants of risk have set the grounds for the development and improvement of different esophageal protective strategies. More sensitive esophageal temperature monitoring, safer ablation parameters and catheters, and different energy sources appear to collectively reduce the risk of esophageal thermal injury. Adjunctive measures such as the prophylactic use of proton-pump inhibitors, as well as esophageal cooling or deviation devices, have emerged as complementary methods with variable but promising results. Nevertheless, as a multifactorial problem, no single esophageal protective measure has proven to be sufficiently effective to eliminate the risk, and further investigation is still warranted. Early screening in the patients at risk and prompt intervention in the cases of AEF are important risk modifiers and yield better outcomes.

Proton Pump Inhibitors: The Good, Bad, and Ugly

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) continue to be the medication of choice for treatment of acid-related disease, with few if any overt side effects seen with daily use. They are often prescribed empirically, often in high doses and with many patients being treated with multiple PPIs without an objective diagnosis. Therefore, they are believed to be overprescribed and used without indication. In this article we discuss the appropriate clinical indications for PPIs, review in detail the major associated adverse events, and put in perspective key issues in balancing benefits and risk of this exceptional (and safe) class of drug.

Proton pump inhibitors and fracture risk. The HUNT study, Norway

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been linked to increased risk of fracture; the data have, however, been diverging. We did not find any increased risk of fractures among users of PPIs in a Norwegian population of 15,017 women and 13,241 men aged 50-85 years with detailed information about lifestyle and comorbidity.

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed and have been linked to increased risk of fracture.

METHODS

We used data from the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3), The Fracture registry in Nord-Trøndelag, and the Norwegian Prescription Database, including 15,017 women and 13,241 men aged 50-85 years. The study population was followed from the date of participating in HUNT3 (2006-2008) until the date of first fracture (forearm or hip), death, or end of study (31 December 2012). The Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent exposure to PPIs was applied, and each individual was considered as unexposed until the first prescriptions was filled. To be included, the prescription of PPIs should minimum be equivalent to 90 defined daily doses (DDD) in the period. Individuals were defined as exposed until 6 months after end of drug supply.

RESULTS

The proportion of women and men using PPIs was 17.9% and 15.5%, respectively. During a median of 5.2 years follow-up, 266 women and 134 men had a first hip fracture and 662 women and 127 men, a first forearm fracture. The combined rate/1000 patient-years for forearm and hip fractures in women was 49.2 for users of PPIs compared with 64.1 among non-users; for men 18.6 and 19.8, respectively. The hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval for the first forearm or hip fracture among users of PPIs in the age-adjusted analysis were 0.82 (0.67-1.01) for women and 1.05 (0.72-1.52) for men. Adjusting for age, use of anti-osteoporotic drugs, and FRAX, the HR declined to 0.80 (0.65-0.98) in women and 1.00 (0.69-1.45) in men.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PPIs was not associated with an increased risk of fractures.

Adverse Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors-Evidence and Plausibility

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been increasingly used over the last decades and there are concerns about overuse and the numerous reported side-effects. It is uncertain whether associations between PPI use and potential side effects are causal. However, important evidence from experimental and mechanistic studies that could support a causal relationship may have been underestimated by epidemiologists and meta-analysists. In the current manuscript we review the combined epidemiological and mechanistic evidence of the adverse effects of PPI use.

Insights into Effects/Risks of Chronic Hypergastrinemia and Lifelong PPI Treatment in Man Based on Studies of Patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) over the last 30 years has rapidly increased both in the United States and worldwide. PPIs are not only very widely used both for approved indications (peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens, stress ulcer prevention), but are also one of the most frequently off-label used drugs (25–70% of total). An increasing number of patients with moderate to advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease are remaining on PPI indefinitely. Whereas numerous studies show PPIs remain effective and safe, most of these studies are <5 years of duration and little data exist for >10 years of treatment. Recently, based primarily on observational/epidemiological studies, there have been an increasing number of reports raising issues about safety and side-effects with very long-term chronic treatment. Some of these safety issues are related to the possible long-term effects of chronic hypergastrinemia, which occurs in all patients taking chronic PPIs, others are related to the hypo-/achlorhydria that frequently occurs with chronic PPI treatment, and in others the mechanisms are unclear. These issues have raised considerable controversy in large part because of lack of long-term PPI treatment data (>10–20 years). Zollinger–Ellison syndrome (ZES) is caused by ectopic secretion of gastrin from a neuroendocrine tumor resulting in severe acid hypersecretion requiring life-long antisecretory treatment with PPIs, which are the drugs of choice. Because in <30% of patients with ZES, a long-term cure is not possible, these patients have life-long hypergastrinemia and require life-long treatment with PPIs. Therefore, ZES patients have been proposed as a good model of the long-term effects of hypergastrinemia in man as well as the effects/side-effects of very long-term PPI treatment. In this article, the insights from studies on ZES into these controversial issues with pertinence to chronic PPI use in non-ZES patients is reviewed, primarily concentrating on data from the prospective long-term studies of ZES patients at NIH.

The Safety of Long-term Daily Usage of a Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Literature Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are amongst the most prescribed medications in the whole world due to their effectiveness and safety profile. However, doubts have arisen about its safety in long term use and have been associated with an increased risk of developing gastric cancer. We aim to study if there is an association between chronic PPI use and the risk of gastric cancer. If this is true, we would like to know the duration of use at which the risk of cancer is high. We performed a literature review of relevant full articles present in the PubMed database that were published in the last five years. Articles that were in the English language and discussed the risk of gastric cancer with chronic PPI use in adult age groups (18 years and above) were evaluated. Only observational or interventional studies with more than 20,000 participants were considered. Two nationwide based studies were included in this review, the Cheung study, and the Brusselaers study. The Cheung study included a total of 63,397 individuals, where 153 cases developed gastric cancer. PPI users had a hazard ratio of 2.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-4.20), and the risk of cancer increased with the duration of PPI use. The Brusselaers study included a total of 797,067 individuals, where 2,219 cases developed gastric cancer. The standardized incidence ratio of gastric cancer among PPI users was 3.38 (95% CI 3.23-3.53), and the risk of cancer increased with the duration of PPI use. Therefore, chronic PPI use is associated with an increase in the risk of gastric cancer. It might also be an independent risk factor for gastric cancer.

In search of the grail: A race for acid suppression

Proton pump inhibitors are the reference standards for the treatment of acid-related diseases. Acid suppression in gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with a high rate of mucosal cicatrization, but symptom response differs among endoscopic phenotypes. Extraesophageal manifestations have a good clinical response in patients that present with abnormal acid exposure (diagnostic test) in the esophagus. Proton pump inhibitors have shown their effectiveness for reducing symptom intensity in nighttime reflux and sleep disorders, improving quality of life and work productivity. That can sometimes be achieved through dose modifications by splitting or increasing the dose, or through galenic formulation. Proton pump inhibitors are not exempt from controversial aspects related to associated adverse events. Technological development is directed at improving proton pump inhibitor performance through increasing the half-life, maximum concentration, and area under the curve of the plasma concentrations through galenic formulation, as well as creating safer and more tolerable drugs. The present review is focused on the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and technological advances for increasing the pharmacologic performance of a proton pump inhibitor.

Early Acid Suppression Therapy Exposure and Fracture in Young Children

BACKGROUND

Acid suppression therapy (AST), including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H₂-receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), is frequently prescribed to treat symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux in otherwise healthy infants. PPI use has been associated with increased fracture risk in older adults; 2 preliminary studies in children have conflicting results.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of children born 2001 to 2013 who were followed for ≥2 years was formed. Those with osteogenesis imperfecta, cholestasis, or child maltreatment were excluded. Prescription data were used to identify AST prescription before age 1 year. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes identified fractures after age 1 year. A Cox proportional hazard analysis assessed fracture hazard and was adjusted for sex, prematurity, low birth weight, previous fracture, anti-epileptics, and overweight or obesity.

RESULTS

Of 851 631 included children, 97 286 (11%) were prescribed AST in the first year of life; 7998 (0.9%) children were prescribed PPI, 71 578 (8%) were prescribed H₂RA, and 17 710 (2%) were prescribed both a PPI and H₂RA. Infants prescribed AST had an earlier median first fracture age (3.9 vs 4.5 years). After adjustment, increased fracture hazard was associated with PPI use (21%) and PPI and H₂RA use (30%), but not H₂RA use alone. Longer duration of AST treatment and earlier age of first AST use was associated with increased fracture hazard.

CONCLUSIONS

Infant PPI use alone and together with H₂RAs is associated with an increased childhood fracture hazard, which appears amplified by days of use and earlier initiation of ASTs. Use of AST in infants should be weighed carefully against possible fracture.

The impact of proton pump inhibitors on bone regeneration and implant osseointegration

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become known for the treatment of gastric-acid related disorders. Similar to any other drugs, PPIs have possible adverse reactions, being associated with bone fractures, infections, kidney disease, mineral deficiency, dementia, and pneumonia. Multiple analyses have stated that PPIs therapy may affect bone regeneration and osseointegration process, causing an increased risk of bone fracture, deterioration of bone metabolism and impaired bone healing. In this review, we emphasized the current literature regarding the influence of proton pump inhibitors in the bone regeneration process. Results from the studies suggest a link between PPIs intake and bone regeneration, but several concerns are raised regarding inadequate recipient bone, surgical trauma, limitations on the titanium surface, comorbidities or interference with other pharmacological agents. Further studies are needed to determine whether the impaired bone regeneration process is due to PPI or coexisting factors.

Association of Vitamin D and Parathyroid Hormone With Barrett's Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Esophageal adenocarcinoma has been inversely associated with exposure to ultraviolet radiation. This could be because of vitamin D deficiency or hyperparathyroidism promoting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus.

AIM

The aim of this study is to determine the association between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and vitamin D deficiency with GERD symptoms, erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

We assayed banked serum for PTH and total 25-hydroxy vitamin D from a cross-sectional cohort. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the associations of vitamin D deficiency and hyperparathyroidism with GERD symptoms, erosive esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus.

RESULTS

Sera from 605 men were assayed, including 150 with GERD, 216 with erosive esophagitis, 145 with Barrett's esophagus, and 174 normal subjects. Contrary to our hypothesis, we found a strong inverse association between Barrett's esophagus and hyperparathyroidism (odds ratio=0.516; 95% confidence interval=0.265, 1.01), and a trend toward an inverse association with vitamin D deficiency. We found no association between vitamin D deficiency or hyperparathyroidism with GERD symptoms or erosive esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, we found an inverse association between serum PTH and Barrett's esophagus. Validation of the finding and the mechanism of that association deserves further study.

Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of bone diseases: An update meta-analysis

AIMS

Large observational studies have yielded conflicting results regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) increases the risk of bone diseases. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to examine the link between PPI and risk of bone fractures, osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically performed a search for published reports on PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. We considered articles published in English, and restricted the search to studies on human participants. Studies that reported adjusted Hazard ratio (HR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations of interest were included. Data from the articles which can be used to estimate standardized mean difference (SMD) were also obtained and utilized to assess the risk of BMD loss.

KEY FINDINGS

Compared with patients not taking PPI, those taking PPI, had the increased risk of developing any-site fractures (HR: 1.30; 95%CI: 1.16 to 1.45), hip fracture (HR:1.22; 95%CI:1.15 to 1.31), spine fracture (HR:1.49; 95%CI:1.31 to 1.68), and osteoporosis (HR:1.23; 95%CI:1.06 to 1.42) based on a random model, but there was no correlation with developing BMD loss in the femoral (SMD: -0.27; 95%CI: -0.62 to 0.09), or in the spine (SMD: -0.06; 95%CI: -0.54 to 0.41).

SIGNIFICANCE

Results of this meta-analysis suggest that PPI may moderately increase the risk of any-site, hip, spine fracture. Due to the widespread use of PPI and the impact of fractures on human health, clinicians should carefully evaluate the patient condition before prescribing PPI therapy.

Adverse outcomes of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The association between the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risks of various diseases remains controversial. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to quantify the associations as presented in the literature and to also provide this information to healthcare professionals and patients about their potentially adverse effects. In July 2016, we searched through Medline (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception using common keywords. We included observational studies that provided risk estimates on the long-term use of PPIs and their adverse effects. Overall, 43 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 28 studies were also included in the random effect meta-analysis. Odds of community-acquired pneumonia, hip fracture, and colorectal cancer were 67% [odds ratio (OR)=1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-2.67], 42% (OR=1.42; 95% CI: 1.33-1.53), and 55% (OR=1.55; 95% CI: 0.88-2.73) higher in patients with long-term PPIs use compared with patients who did not use PPIs. Although the use of PPIs provides short-term health benefits, their prolonged use is associated with minor and also potentially major adverse health outcomes. Hence, we strongly recommend that the prescription of PPIs should be done with caution to improve the medication's efficacy and patients' safety.

Do recent reports about the adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors change providers' prescription practice?

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are utilized for a variety of indications, including treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, and prevention of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Several studies have documented an increasing prevalence of inappropriate PPI use. Furthermore, recent media reports have highlighted new research data suggesting a possible association between chronic PPI use and several adverse medical outcomes, leading to frequent patient inquiries about these associations. Thus, providers face the challenge of counseling patients about the balance of risks and benefits related to PPI use. We aimed to explore providers' knowledge and attitudes toward reported adverse effects of PPI use and compare providers' prescription practices. A comprehensive, non-incentivized electronic survey was sent to all providers (residents, fellows, advanced practice providers, and consultants across 8 internal medicine specialties) at our tertiary academic medical center. The survey contained 21 questions covering provider demographics and responses to challenging clinical scenarios dealing with PPI use. Chi-square was used to compare responses from providers. The survey was distributed to 254 providers, of which 94 (24 GI and 70 non-GI) completed the survey (37% response rate). Among those 94 providers, 48 were consultants, 17 were advanced practice providers, and 29 were trainees. Non-GI providers included cardiology, pulmonary, endocrinology, family medicine, general internal medicine, hematology/oncology, and nephrology. Over half of the providers (51 [54%]) described their practice as outpatient setting, 29 (31%) providers defined their practice as a mixed setting (inpatient and outpatient), while 14 (15%) designated it as inpatient only. Nineteen (80%) GI providers and 48 (69%) non-GI providers discussed the risks and benefits with patients (P = 0.64). Fifteen (63%) GI providers and 33 (47%) non-GI providers indicated that recent reports changed their practice (P = 0.49). More GI providers (5 [21%]) lowered the dose of PPI compared with non-GI (1[1%]) (P = 0.004); 18 (26%) of non-GI and 3 (13%) of GI providers discontinued PPI and substituted it with a histamine 2 (H2) blocker (P = 0.29). A larger but nonsignificant percentage of trainees (8 [28%]) switched PPI to H2 blockers compared with consultants (8 [17%]; P = 0.39). Six (25%) of GI providers and 14 (20%) of non-GI providers were concerned about Clostridium difficile infection (P = 0.58). Twenty-four (34%) of the non-GI were worried about kidney diseases compared with 3 (13%) of the GI providers (P = 0.1). Ten (21%) consultants were concerned about risk of osteoporosis compared with 3 (10%) trainees (P = 0.38), while 8 (28%) trainees were worried about the risk of C. difficile infection compared with 10 (21%) consultants (P = 0.69). Most providers (85 [90%]) agreed that educational activities would be helpful to address these challenges. More GI providers lowered the dose of PPI compared with non-GI; non-GI providers were more likely to discontinue PPI and substitute it with an H2 blocker. Educating patients and providers about potential adverse effects of PPI is imperative.

Proton pump inhibitors: Review of reported risks and controversies

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most prescribed classes of drugs in this day and age. These may be beneficial to treat many gastrointestinal conditions, such as gastroesophageal reflux or Barrett's esophagus as well as laryngopharyngeal reflux. However, many reports have emerged in the literature exposing the potential association of PPIs with various risks and complications such as bone fracture, infection, myocardial infarction, renal disease, and dementia. This review highlights many of these potential adverse side effects by exploring relevant publications and addressing the controversies associated with those findings. The diligent otolaryngologist should be aware of the current state of the literature and the risks associated with prescribing PPIs to insure proper counseling of their patients.

Level of Evidence

5

Proton Pump Inhibitors, Histamine-2 Receptor Antagonists, and Hip Fracture Risk among Patients on Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

An association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and hip fracture risk has been described in the general population, where the primary causative hypothesis focuses on impaired gastrointestinal calcium absorption. The impact of acid suppressor use on hip fracture risk in a high-risk subset, patients with ESKD requiring hemodialysis, is unknown and could help further distinguish the reason for higher susceptibility among PPI users.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using the US Renal Data System, we identified all hip fracture events recorded between 2009 and 2014 among patients dependent on hemodialysis. Eligible cases were matched on index date with ten controls. We identified PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist use from Medicare Part D claims covering 3 years before the index date and stratified according to proportion of days covered by filled prescriptions. Using logistic regression with multiple imputation for missing data, we estimated unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

We studied 4551 cases and 45,510 controls. Patients were older, more likely to be female and white, and had shorter dialysis vintage; fewer were obese. A larger proportion of patients had any prior PPI (70% versus 63%) or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (25% versus 23%) use. Use of PPI was associated with higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.28). This association remained within subgroups of low, moderate, and high PPI use, yielding adjusted ORs of 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.27), 1.21 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.31), and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.31), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ESKD on hemodialysis, PPIs and not histamine-2 receptor antagonists were associated with hip fracture events.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use, H2-Receptor Antagonist Use, and Risk of Incident Clinical Vertebral Fracture in Women

The few prospective studies examining the relation between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and risk of vertebral fracture (VF) suggest a higher risk, but the magnitude of the association has been inconsistent. Moreover, no prospective studies have examined the association between substantially longer duration of PPI use and VF risk. Our objective was to determine the association between PPI use, H₂RA use, and incident clinical VF in women. We conducted a prospective study in 55,545 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study. PPI and H₂RA use was assessed by questionnaire every 4 years. Self-reports of VF were confirmed by medical record. Our analysis included 547 incident VF cases (2002-2014). The multivariate adjusted relative risk (MVRR) of VF for women taking PPIs was 1.29 (95% CI 1.04-1.59) compared with non-users. Longer duration of PPI use was associated with higher VF risk (MVRR 1.16 [0.90-1.49] for < 4 years; 1.27 [0.93-1.73] for 4-7.9 years; 1.64 [1.02-2.64] for ≥ 8 years; p_trend = 0.01). The MVRR of VF for women taking H₂RAs was 1.22 (0.90-1.67) compared with non-users. Longer duration of H₂RA use was not associated with VF risk (MVRR 1.16 [0.88-1.53] for < 4 years; 0.98 [0.60-1.59] for ≥ 4 years; p_trend = 0.72). PPI use is independently associated with a modestly higher risk of VF and the risk increases with longer duration of use. There was no statistically significant association between H₂RA use and VF risk. Our findings add to the growing evidence suggesting caution with PPI use, particularly with longer duration of use.

Quantifying Candidacy for Deprescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors among Long-Term Care Residents

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a commonly prescribed drug class used to inhibit gastric acid secretion. They are prescribed for both treatment and prophylaxis of several gastrointestinal conditions. Although PPIs can be used safely in the short term, several serious adverse effects have been reported following long-term use, including increased risk of falls and fragility fractures. Long-term care home (LTCH) residents represent a population in which the long-term adverse effects of PPIs can be significant and PPI deprescribing should be considered when appropriate.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the proportion of LTCH residents with PPI prescriptions who were eligible for PPI deprescribing, and to examine vitamin B₁₂ deficiencies and fall risk in the study population.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, multisite chart review involved LTCH residents who had an active PPI prescription during October 2016. A convenience sample of 150 charts was randomly selected, and the appropriateness of PPI deprescribing was determined using Canadian guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used to examine demographic characteristics, PPI dosing and indication, vitamin B₁₂ supplementation, fall history, and fall risk.

RESULTS

Three of the selected charts were excluded because of missing information. Of the 147 residents included in the chart review, 93 (63%) were candidates for deprescribing. PPI use for gastroesophageal reflux disease for more than 8 weeks without a deprescribing attempt in the past year was the most frequently observed opportunity for deprescribing (49/93 [53%]). Twenty-nine residents (20%) had no documented indication for PPI use. Thirteen residents (9%) had had a fall within the past 30 days, and 53 (36%) had a prescription for vitamin B₁₂ supplements and/or had low serum vitamin B₁₂ levels.

CONCLUSIONS

A majority of the residents whose charts were reviewed were candidates for PPI deprescribing. This finding suggests an opportunity for clinicians who care for LTCH residents to increase their deprescribing efforts.

Proton-pump Inhibitor Use and Fracture Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

This study's objective was to evaluate the association between proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use and bone fracture incidence and bone mineral density (BMD) by meta-analyzing the estimates reported by epidemiological and cohort studies.

Methods

Data were acquired from studies identified after a literature search in electronic databases. Odds ratios (ORs), hazard ratios (HRs), and risk ratios (RRs) between PPI use and bone fracture incidence were pooled under the random effects model, and meta-analysis of standardized mean differences between PPI users and controls in cross-sectional values and BMD changes was conducted.

Results

Thirty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. These studies provided data from 2,714,502 individuals with a mean age of 66.91 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.37–70.46); 33.21% (95% CI, 30.44–35.99) were males and 64.61% (95% CI, 60.73–68.49) were females. Overall, fracture incidence was 22.04% (95% CI, 16.10–27.97) in PPI users and 15.57% (95% CI, 12.28–18.86) in controls. The overall effect size of the point estimate was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.22–1.35) between PPI use and bone fracture incidence. There was a trend towards increased fracture incidence from short duration use: OR 1.29 (95% CI, 1.19–1.40), medium duration use: OR 1.33 (95% CI, 1.12–1.55) and long duration use: OR 1.62 (95% CI, 1.33–1.90). There was no significant difference in the standardized mean differences between PPI users and controls, either in cross-sectional BMD values or in the BMD change observed in longitudinal studies.

Conclusions

Pooling of ORs, HRs, and RRs suggested that PPI use might increase fracture risk. However, there was no effect of PPI use on BMD.

Proton pump inhibitors' use and risk of hip fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In the last decade, epidemiological studies presented inconsistent findings concerning the proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use and the risk of hip fracture. So, this systematic review and meta-analysis were performed with the aim to quantify the risk of hip fracture associated with PPI use. PubMed^® and Cochrane Central databases were searched from inception to January 2018. The quality of included studies in meta-analysis was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Primary outcome of this study was to assess the risk of hip fracture among PPI user. Secondary outcomes include subgroup analysis based on study design, study quality, duration of PPI use, calcium intake, and geographical region. Sensitivity analysis was also performed. Review Manager (RevMan) was used to perform statistical analysis. This meta-analysis was based on seventeen studies. Pooled risk ratio showed a statistically significant association between PPI use and hip fracture risk (RR 1.26 [95% CI 1.17-1.35], p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis, based on the study design, showed a highly significant association between PPI use and risk of hip fracture (p < 0.0001). The risk of hip fracture persisted even when stratified by calcium adjustment and the duration of PPI use (p < 0.0001). This meta-analysis suggests that PPI user have a 26% increased risk of hip fracture as compared to non-PPI user. Physicians should take caution in prescribing PPI to patients who are at increased risk of hip fracture.

Side Effects of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: A Review

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used, and concerns about overuse have been raised. Therefore, side effects are important to be aware of and several suggested side effects of long-term use have been studied. In this MiniReview, we sum up the evidence of side effects related to long-term PPI treatment. Suspected side effects are mainly related to increased susceptibility to infections, secondary hypergastrinaemia, impeded absorption of micronutrients or idiosyncratic reactions. Most of the potential side effects have only been evaluated in observational studies demonstrating conflicting and weak associations with a substantial risk of confounding. However, a high probability of causality seems to be established for the side effects increased risk of gastrointestinal infections and rebound acid hypersecretion following discontinuation of treatment due to secondary hypergastrinaemia. The risk of side effects should not be a reason to withhold PPIs from patients with a true indication, and worry about poorly proven side effects should not lead to unnecessary discontinuation. The most important safety issue regarding PPI therapy is to critically evaluate the indication when initiating treatment and reconsidering the indication in long-term-treated patients.