1
|
Biallelic PMS2 Mutations in a Family with Uncommon Clinical and Molecular Features. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13111953. [PMID: 36360190 PMCID: PMC9690098 DOI: 10.3390/genes13111953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe a patient with constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency (CMMR-D) in whom the syndrome started at age 10 with the development of multiple adenomas in the large bowel. In the successive 25 years, four malignancies developed in different organs (rectum, ileum, duodenum, and lymphoid tissue). The patient had biallelic constitutional pathogenic variants in the PMS2 gene. We speculate that besides the PMS2 genotype, alterations of other genes might have contributed to the development of the complex phenotype. In the nuclear family, both parents carried different PMS2 germline mutations. They appeared in good clinical condition and did not develop polyps or cancer. The index case had a brother who died at age three of lymphoblastic leukemia, and a sister who was affected by sarcoidosis. Tumor tissue showed diffuse DNA microsatellite instability. A complete absence of immunoreactivity was observed for the PMS2 protein both in the tumors and normal tissues. Next-generation sequencing and multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification analyses revealed biallelic PMS2 germline pathogenic variants in the proband (genotype c.[137G>T];[(2174+1_2175-1)_(*160_?)del]), and one of the two variants was present in both parents—c.137G>T in the father and c.(2174+1-2175-1)_(*160_?)del in the mother—as well as c.137G>T in the sister. Moreover, Class 3 variants of MSH2 (c.1787A>G), APC (c.1589T>C), and CHEK2 (c.331G>T) genes were also detected in the proband. In conclusion, the recognition of CMMR-D may sometimes be difficult; however, the possible role of constitutional alterations of other genes in the development of the full-blown phenotype should be investigated in more detail.
Collapse
|
2
|
Park JS, Park JW, Shin S, Lee ST, Shin SJ, Min BS, Park SJ, Park JJ, Cheon JH, Kim WH, Kim TI. Application of Multigene Panel Testing in Patients With High Risk for Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: A Descriptive Report Focused on Genotype-Phenotype Correlation. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:793-803. [PMID: 34897210 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The genetic test solely based on the clinical features of hereditary colorectal cancer has limitations in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze the results of comprehensive multigene panel tests based on clinical findings. DESIGN This was a cross-sectional study based on a prospectively compiled database. SETTING The study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS A total of 381 patients with high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes were enrolled between March 2014 and December 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was to describe the mutational spectrum based on genotype-phenotype concordance and discordance. RESULTS Germline mutations were identified in 89 patients for polyposis hereditary colorectal cancer genes (76 in APC; 4 in PTEN; 4 in STK11; 3 in BMPR1A; 1 in POLE; 1 in POLD1), 89 patients for nonpolyposis hereditary colorectal cancer genes (41 in MLH1; 40 in MSH2; 6 in MSH6; and 2 in PMS2), and 12 patients for other cancer predisposition genes (1 in ATM; 2 in BRCA1; 1 in BRCA2; 1 in BRIP1; 1 in MLH3; 1 in NBN; 1 in PMS1; 1 in PTCH1; 1 in TP53; and 2 in monoallelic MUTYH). If we had used direct sequencing tests of 1 or 2 major genes based on phenotype, 48 (25.3%) of 190 mutations would not have been detected due to technical differences (12.1%), less frequent genotype (4.2%), unclear phenotype (3.7%), and genotype-phenotype discordance (4.7%). The genotype-phenotype discordance is probably linked to compound heterozygote, less distinctive phenotype, and insufficient information for colorectal cancer risk. LIMITATIONS This study included a small number of patients with insufficient follow-up duration. CONCLUSIONS A comprehensive multigene panel is expected to identify more genetic mutations than phenotype-based direct sequencing, with special utility for unclear phenotype or genotype-phenotype discordance. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B844. APLICACIN DE PRUEBAS DE PANEL MULTIGNICO EN PACIENTES CON ALTO RIESGO DE CNCER COLORRECTAL HEREDITARIO INFORME DESCRIPTIVO ENFOCADO EN LA CORRELACIN GENOTIPOFENOTIPO ANTECEDENTES:La prueba genética basada únicamente en la característica clínica del cáncer colorrectal hereditario tiene limitaciones en la práctica clínica.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar el resultado de pruebas integrales de panel multigénico basadas en hallazgos clínicos.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio transversal basado en una base de datos recopilada prospectivamente.AJUSTE:El estudio se realizó en un hospital terciario.PACIENTES:Se inscribió un total de 381 pacientes con alto riesgo de síndromes de cáncer colorrectal hereditario entre marzo del 2014 y diciembre del 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue describir el espectro mutacional basado en la concordancia y discordancia genotipo-fenotipo.RESULTADOS:Se identificaron mutaciones de la línea germinal en 89 pacientes para genes de cáncer colorrectal hereditario con poliposis (76 en APC; 4 en PTEN; 4 en STK11; 3 en BMPR1A; 1 en POLE; 1 en POLD1), 89 pacientes para genes de CCR hereditario sin poliposis (41 en MLH1; 40 en MSH2; 6 en MSH6; y 2 en PMS2) y 12 pacientes por otro gen de predisposición al cáncer (1 en ATM; 2 en BRCA1; 1 en BRCA2; 1 en BRIP1; 1 en MLH3; 1 en NBN; 1 en PMS1; 1 en PTCH1; 1 en TP53; y 2 en MUTYH monoalélico). Si hubiéramos utilizado pruebas de secuenciación directa de uno o dos genes principales basados en el fenotipo, 48 (25,3%) de 190 mutaciones no se habrían detectado debido a diferencias técnicas (12,1%), genotipo menos frecuente (4,2%), fenotipo poco claro (3,7%) y discordancia genotipo-fenotipo (4,7%). La discordancia genotipo-fenotipo probablemente esté relacionada con el heterocigoto compuesto, el fenotipo menos distintivo y la información insuficiente para el riesgo de cáncer colorrectal.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio incluyó una pequeña cantidad de pacientes con una duración de seguimiento insuficiente.CONCLUSIONES:Se espera que un panel multigénico completo identifique más mutaciones genéticas que la secuenciación directa basada en el fenotipo, con especial utilidad para la discordancia de fenotipo o genotipo-fenotipo poco clara. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B844. Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Soo Park
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Won Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Saeam Shin
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Tae Lee
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Joon Shin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Soh Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo Jung Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Jun Park
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hee Cheon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Ho Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Il Kim
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Cancer Prevention Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, and Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Li
- Corresponding author. Department of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu J, Huang Y, Lin C, Li X, Fang X, Zhong C, Yuan Y, Zheng S. Identification of Kininogen 1 as a Serum Protein Marker of Colorectal Adenoma in Patients with a Family History of Colorectal Cancer. J Cancer 2018. [PMID: 29535795 PMCID: PMC5845484 DOI: 10.7150/jca.22405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The serum protein markers of colorectal adenoma in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer have been rarely reported. Serum samples from colorectal adenoma patients with or without a family history of colorectal cancer and healthy controls were profiled using Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). The model to distinguish colorectal adenoma patients with a family history of colorectal cancer from atypical hereditary colorectal families (CRA-H) and sporadic colorectal adenoma patients without a family history of colorectal cancer (CRA-S) was established with 85.0% accuracy. The model distinguishing CRA-H from healthy individuals was established with 90.0% specificity and 86.7% sensitivity. Additionally, five peaks (2202, 5821, 3260, 2480, and 2218) showing differential expression in advanced colorectal adenoma patients with a family history of colorectal cancer were selected. The protein Kininogen 1 (KNG1) was identified in colorectal adenoma patients and validated using Western Blotting. KNG1 may be a biomarker for colorectal adenoma patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiekai Yu
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanqin Huang
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chen Lin
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaofen Li
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuefeng Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chenhan Zhong
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shu Zheng
- Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education), the Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Research Center for Air Pollution and Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dominguez-Valentin M, Nakken S, Tubeuf H, Vodak D, Ekstrøm PO, Nissen AM, Morak M, Holinski-Feder E, Martins A, Møller P, Hovig E. Identification of genetic variants for clinical management of familial colorectal tumors. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2018; 19:26. [PMID: 29458332 PMCID: PMC5819082 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-018-0533-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Background The genetic mechanisms for families who meet the clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome (LS) but do not carry pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes are still undetermined. We aimed to study the potential contribution of genes other than MMR genes to the biological and clinical characteristics of Norwegian families fulfilling Amsterdam (AMS) criteria or revised Bethesda guidelines. Methods The Hereditary Cancer Biobank of the Norwegian Radium Hospital was interrogated to identify individuals with a high risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) for whom no pathogenic variants in MMR genes had been found in routine diagnostic DNA sequencing. Forty-four cancer susceptibility genes were selected and analyzed by using our in-house designed TruSeq amplicon-based assay for targeted sequencing. RNA splicing- and protein-dedicated in silico analyses were performed for all variants of unknown significance (VUS). Variants predicted as likely to affect splicing were experimentally analyzed by resorting to minigene assays. Results We identified a patient who met the revised Bethesda guidelines and carried a likely pathogenic variant in CHEK2 (c.470 T > C, p.I157T). In addition, 25 unique VUS were identified in 18 individuals, of which 2 exonic variants (MAP3K1 c.764A > G and NOTCH3 c.5854G >A) were analyzed in the minigene splicing assay and found not to have an effect on RNA splicing. Conclusions Among high-risk CRC patients that fulfill the AMS criteria or revised Bethesda guidelines, targeted gene sequencing identified likely pathogenic variant and VUS in other genes than the MMR genes (CHEK2, NOTCH3 and MAP3K1). Our study suggests that the analysis of genes currently excluded from routine molecular diagnostic screens may confer cancer susceptibility. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12881-018-0533-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Sigve Nakken
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hélène Tubeuf
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie Univ, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.,Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France
| | - Daniel Vodak
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per Olaf Ekstrøm
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anke M Nissen
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich, Germany.,MGZ-Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Morak
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich, Germany.,MGZ-Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Elke Holinski-Feder
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich, Germany.,MGZ-Medizinisch Genetisches Zentrum, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexandra Martins
- Inserm-U1245, UNIROUEN, Normandie Univ, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Human Medicine, Universität Witten, Herdecke, Germany.,Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|