Factors Associated With Survival of Patients With Severe Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure Before and After Liver Transplantation: Unanswered Questions

Liver Transplantation: Protocol for Recipient Selection, Evaluation, and Assessment

Liver transplantation (LT) is the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, acute-on-chronic liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metabolic liver diseases. The acceptance of LT in Asia has been gradually increasing and so is the expertise to perform LT. Preparing a patient with cirrhosis for LT is the most important aspect of a successful LT. The preparation for LT begins with the first index decompensation for a patient with cirrhosis. Patients planned for LT should undergo a thorough screening for infections, and a complete cardiac, pulmonology, and psychosocial evaluation pre-LT. In this review, we discuss the indications and contraindications of LT and the evaluation and assessment of patients with liver disease planned for LT.

Prognostic Models in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by severe hepatic dysfunction leading to multiorgan failure in patients with end-stage liver disease. ACLF is a challenging clinical syndrome with a rapid clinical course and high short-term mortality. There is no single uniform definition of ACLF or consensus in predicting ACLF-related outcomes, which makes comparing studies difficult and standardizing management protocols challenging. This review aims to provide insights into the common prognostic models that define and grade ACLF.

Liver Transplantation in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

In recent years there has been a significant increase in the incidence of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). This syndrome is characterized by infections, organ failures, and high short-term mortality. Although progress in the management of these sick patients has been evident, liver transplantation (LT) remains the best treatment modality to date. Several studies have reported LT as a feasible option, despite organ failures. The outcomes following LT are inversely related to the grade of ACLF. This review discusses the current literature on the feasibility, futility, timing, and outcomes of LT in patients with ACLF.

A novel, simplified, and reproducible porcine model of acute ischemic liver failure with portal vein preservation

The current ischemic models of liver failure are difficult and usually time-consuming to produce. The aim of this study was to develop a simplified and reproducible porcine model of acute liver failure for use in preclinical research. Eighteen Bama miniature pigs were randomly divided into Groups A, B, and C. The hepatic artery and common bile duct were ligated in all groups. While the portal vein was completely preserved in Group A, it was narrowed by 1/3 and 1/2 in Groups B and C, respectively. Results of biochemical analyses, encephalopathy scores, and survival times were compared among the groups. Results of hematoxylin-eosin staining, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling, Masson staining, and Ki-67 analyses were recorded. Survival times in Groups B and C were 11.67 ± 1.86 and 2.16 ± 0.75 days, respectively, shorter than that in Group A (>15 days). Following surgery, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and direct bilirubin levels significantly increased relative to baseline values in all groups (P<0.05). Groups B and C exhibited a significant decrease in encephalopathy scores and a significant increase in ammonia levels, which were negatively correlated with one another. Pathological analysis revealed obvious necrosis of liver cells, which correlated closely with the degree of portal vein constriction. Our simple, highly reproducible model effectively mimics the clinical characteristics of acute liver failure in humans and provides a foundation for further research on artificial liver support system development.

Predictors and outcome of emergent Liver transplantation for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Controversy exists over whether emergent liver transplantation (LT) should be performed for patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), especially for patients with multiple organ failure.

METHODS

A total of 110 ACLF patients, defined by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) criteria were analyzed. The primary outcome was overall survival after ACLF diagnosis.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 76 patients received LT (59 received deceased-donor LT and 17 patients received living-donor LT). The overall survival was better for patients who received LT than patients who did not (82.9% vs. 17.6%, P < 0.001). Among the 76 patients who received LT, the overall survival was not different according to ACLF grade at diagnosis (70.0%, 85.3%, and 84.4% at one-year for ACLF grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively, P = 0.45). The baseline model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and progression of the ACLF grade during the pre-transplant period were independent factors for survival after LT. The one-year survival rate was 92.3% for patients with baseline MELD scores of ≤ 32 without ACLF grade progression, whereas it was 33.3% for those with baseline MELD scores of > 32 and ACLF grade progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergent LT provided a significant survival benefit to ACLF patients, regardless of the baseline ACLF grade. Post-LT outcomes were associated with baseline MELD scores and ACLF progression during the pre-transplant period, which might be used in the emergent LT plan for patients presenting with ACLF.

Early Transplantation in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure: Who and When

Purpose of Review

Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a unique syndrome that afflicts patients with chronic liver disease and results in high short-term mortality, > 50% at 28 days in patients with severe ACLF (grade 3, ACLF-3). Given this prognosis, there is an urgent need to understand risk factors for this condition, as well as selection criteria for patients who may benefit from liver transplantation (LT).

Recent Findings

Several studies have identified risk factors for developing ACLF, including higher model for end-stage liver disease score, anemia, and morbid obesity, as well ACLF mortality, such as infection, increasing organ failures, and higher white blood cell count. Prognostic tools are now available as online calculators. Regarding LT in ACLF, data suggest that even patients with ACLF-3 may do well after LT, with 1-year survival > 80% in several studies. Improvement in organ failures prior to LT, higher donor quality, and lack of mechanical ventilation further improve outcomes. Importantly, ACLF-3 patients may have higher short-term wait list mortality than patients listed status-1a, suggesting that increased LT prioritization may be warranted.

Summary

ACLF is a high-mortality condition that frequently responds well to LT. Ongoing efforts to understand the natural history of ACLF and predictors of improved post-LT survival will facilitate LT criteria for this condition, which may ultimately include increased LT prioritization for selected patients.