Molecular-based Helicobacter pylori Susceptibility Testing Is Almost Ready for Prime Time

Expression and purification of epitope vaccine against four virulence proteins from Helicobacter pylori and construction of label-free electrochemical immunosensor

The epitope vaccine against four virulence proteins (FVpE) from Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) was expressed and purified. Western blot and Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA) were used to identify and investigate the immunoreactivity of FVpE protein. The immune-sensing platform based on titanium carbide/colloidal gold nanoparticles@carbon nanofiber/ionic liquid composites electrode was constructed for immobilizing FVpE. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the electrochemical properties of the modified electrodes. The relevant influenced factors were optimized including pH value, antigen concentration, and incubating time. The prepared H. pylori label-free electrochemical immunosensor was used for antibody detection using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Under the optimal experimental conditions, the linear ranges of H. pylori antibodies, including anti-H. pylori, cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA), vacuolating cytotoxin-associated gene A (VacA), and urease A (UreA), were all 0.1-5 ng mL-1, except urease B (UreB, 0.1-4.5 ng mL-1). The selectivity study showed that other antibodies had little influence on the detection of H. pylori antibodies. The immunosensor could be used to detect serum samples, and the recoveries were in the range of 68.5%-100.5%.

Efficacy of genotypic susceptibility-guided tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and single arm meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The prevalence of antibiotic resistance for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been increasing over the year, making it more difficult for traditional empirical therapy to successfully eradicate H. pylori. Thus, tailored therapy (TT) guided by molecular-based antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) has been frequently recommended. We conducted a single-arm meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of tailored therapy guided by molecular-based AST.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed on multiple databases, and studies on molecular-based TT were included. The eradication rates of TT by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were pooled respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies from 31 literature (4626 patients) were included in the single-arm meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled eradication rate of TT was 86.9% (95% CI:84.7%-89.1%) by the ITT analysis, and 91.5% (95% CI:89.8%-93.2%) by PP analysis. The pooled eradication rates of first-line TT and rescue TT were 86.6% and 85.1% by ITT analysis and 92.0% and 87.9% by PP analysis, respectively. When tailored rescue therapy was based on the genotypic resistance to at least four antibiotics, the pooled eradication rates reached 89.4% by ITT analysis and 92.1% by PP analysis. For genotype-susceptive strains, the pooled eradication rate of TT with targeted antibiotics was 93.1% (95% CI:91.3%-94.9%), among which the pooled eradication rate of tailored bismuth quadruple therapy was the highest (94.3%). Besides, the eradication rate of 7-day TT or tailored triple therapy without bismuth for genotype-susceptive strains could both reach more than 93.0%.

CONCLUSION

Tailored therapy guided by molecular-based AST can achieve somewhat ideal therapeutic outcomes. TT with a 7-day duration or without bismuth for genotype-susceptible strains can achieve good eradication efficacy. The effectiveness of TT can be improved to some extent by expanding the coverage of AST or by adding bismuth.

Forty years of Helicobacter pylori infection and changes in findings at esophagogastroduodenoscopy

BACKGROUND

It is 40 years since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori infection. Over that time major changes have occurred in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) findings. The aim of this review is to describe these changes, and the important role H. pylori infection has played in their evolution.

METHODS

References were identified through searches of PubMed using the search terms-endoscopy time trends, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, upper gastrointestinal cancer, gastric polyps, H. pylori, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, and celiac disease, from 1970 through December 2021.

RESULTS

The prevalence of H. pylori infection has fallen and consequently, H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer disease has become rare. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is now the commonest disorder diagnosed at EGD, and Barrett's esophagus has increased in parallel. Cancer of the distal stomach has fallen while esophageal adenocarcinoma and reflux-related cardia cancer have risen. Gastric polyps have changed from hyperplastic and adenomas to sporadic fundic gland polyps. Antimicrobial resistance has made H. pylori infection more difficult to eradicate. Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, particularly eosinophilic esophagitis, have emerged as important new allergic disorders. Celiac disease has changed and increased.

CONCLUSIONS

EGD findings appear to have changed from features suggesting a H. pylori-positive "phenotype" 40 years ago to a H. pylori-negative "phenotype" today. These changes have major implications for the management of gastrointestinal disorders.

Controversies regarding management of Helicobacter pylori infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The recognition that Helicobacter pylori should be considered and treated as an infectious disease has yet to fundamentally change diagnostic and treatment practices and has resulted in many controversies.

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss the following controversies: whether the current 'per-patient' approach to H. pylori testing based on symptoms should be expanded to include achieving population-level H. pylori eradication, whether H. pylori should be approached as an infectious gastrointestinal disease similar to that of other infectious diseases of similar severity and outcome, whether treatment of H. pylori should be primarily empiric or based on antibiotic susceptibility and locally proven successful therapies as are other infectious diseases, whether it is necessary to obtain confirmation of treatment success in every patient treated for H. pylori , and whether potassium-competitive acid blockers should replace proton pump inhibitors in H. pylori therapy.

SUMMARY

Available guidelines and meta-analyses do not yet address H. pylori as an infectious disease. The diagnosis and management and treatment success of H. pylori infections trails behind that of other important infectious diseases. We provide new insights and propose changes in the traditional understanding required to modernize the management of H. pylori infections.

Empirical versus tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance detection for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori infection with empirical therapy has decreased due to increased drug resistance. The latest guidelines recommend genotypic resistance-guided therapy, but its clinical efficacy remains unclear.

Objectives

The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance is superior to empirical therapy for H. pylori infection.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tailored therapy based on genotypic resistance with empirical therapy was performed.

Sources and methods

We retrieved relevant studies from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication rate and the adverse events (AEs) was the secondary outcome. A random-effect model was applied to compare pooled risk ratios (RRs) with related 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 12 qualified RCTs containing 3940 patients were identified in our systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled eradication rates of tailored therapy based on the detection of genotypic resistance were consistently higher than those in the empirical treatment group, with no statistical significance. In triple therapy, the eradication rate was significantly higher in the tailored group than in the empirical group by intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and per-protocol analysis (PP) analysis (p < 0.0001, RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.12-1.29; p < 0.0001, RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.15-1.25). In quadruple therapy, the eradication rate was higher in the empirical group (p = 0.001, RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.97; p = 0.009, RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92-0.99). And this result was true for both bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) and non-BQT. Regarding total AEs, the pooled rate was 34% in the tailored group and 37% in the empirical group, and no difference between the two groups was found (p = 0.17, RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.74-1.06).

Conclusion

In conclusion, tailored therapy based on molecular methods may offer better efficacy than empirical triple therapy, but it may not be superior to empirical quadruple therapy in eradicating H. pylori infection. Larger and more individualized RCTs are needed to aid clinical decision-making.

Registration PROSPERO

CRD42023408688.

Implications of the paradigm shift in management of Helicobacter pylori infections

The recent availability of susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori infections in the United Sates has resulted in paradigm shifts in the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of H. pylori infections. Here, we reviewed the English literature concerning changes in H. pylori diagnosis and therapy with an emphasis on the last 3 years. We focus on the new methods that offer rapid and convenient susceptibility testing using either invasive (endoscopic) or noninvasive (stool) methods of obtaining test material. We also discuss the implications of this availability on therapy and follow-up after therapy. The approach to therapy was categorized into four groups: (1) therapies that can be used empirically, (2) therapies that should be restricted to those that are susceptibility-based, (3) potentially effective therapies that have yet to be optimized for local use, and (4), therapies that contain unneeded antibiotics that should not be prescribed. The most convenient and efficient method of susceptibility testing is by using reflexive stool testing in which if the sample is positive, it is automatically also used for determination of susceptibility. Reflexive testing can also be done via reflexive ordering (e.g., for all positive urea breath tests). The post therapy test-of-cure has emerged as a critical component of therapy as it not only provides feedback regarding treatment success but when combined with susceptibility testing also provide evidence regarding the cause of failure (e.g., poor adherence versus emergence of resistance during therapy. Susceptibility testing has made even the most current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis and therapy generally obsolete. Clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin triple therapies should only be administered as susceptibility-based therapy. Regimens containing unneeded antibiotics should not be given. We provide recommendations regarding the details and indications for all current therapies.

Prevalence and trends of multiple antimicrobial resistance of Helicobacter pylori in one tertiary hospital for 20 years in Korea

BACKGROUND

Failure of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is principally caused by antimicrobial resistance. Nowadays, multidrug resistance could be a major determinant of eradication failure. To assess minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), antimicrobial resistance rates and trends in H. pylori isolated from patients with upper gastrointestinal disease with long-term period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who had H. pylori colonies isolated from culture were consecutively enrolled during the period of 2003-2022. From each patient, one to ten isolates were collected from culture of mucosal biopsy. MIC test was performed for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin using agar dilution method. Trends in MIC distribution, prevalence of resistances with single and multiple were investigated which were suspected to be related to the failure of empirical H. pylori eradication treatment.

RESULTS

From 2003 to 2022, a total of 873 patients were enrolled and 2735 H. pylori isolates were successfully collected. Increase in the primary resistance rate was found in clarithromycin (16.1%-31.0%, p = .022), metronidazole (30.6%-38.1%, p < 0.001), and both of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin (7.3%-35.7%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of multidrug resistance to both clarithromycin and metronidazole (9.2%-37.9%, p < 0.001), clarithromycin and fluoroquinolone (2.8%-41.7%, p < 0.001), and clarithromycin, metronidazole, and fluoroquinolone (1.4%-28.2%, p < 0.001) was found to significantly increase.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of multiple resistance against H. pylori in Korea is ongoing. Its trend should be considered when establishing an empirical treatment strategy (ClinicalTrials. gov: NCT05247112).

Evaluation of a Molecular Mosprie Assay for Detection of Helicobacter pylori and Resistance to Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens should be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the molecular-based Mosprie assay for detecting H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin using gastric biopsies.

METHODS

A total of 185 culture-positive frozen gastric biopsies were included for Mosprie assay and also for 23S rRNA and gyrA gene sequencing. The susceptibility results by the Mosprie assay were compared with the E-test results retrospectively retrieved. The discordant results were analyzed by sequencing of the 23S rRNA and gyrA genes.

RESULTS

Susceptibility concordance between the Mosprie assay and E-test for clarithromycin and levofloxacin was 97.30% (180/185) and 88.11% (163/185), respectively. The full agreement between clarithromycin genotypes by Mosprie assay and the 23S rRNA sequencing results was observed in the 5 samples with discordant Mosprie assay and E-test results. However, for levofloxacin, of the 16 discordant samples with resistant phenotype but a susceptible genotype by Mosprie assay, 6 were found to have levofloxacin resistance-related gyrA gene mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The rapid and reliable Mosprie assay can be recommended for H. pylori susceptibility testing of clarithromycin and levofloxacin on gastric biopsies. Future technical improvements are needed in detecting levofloxacin resistance-associated gene mutations.

Tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Due to an increase in drug resistance, the eradication rate of H. pylori with empirical therapy has declined. Tailored therapy has been proposed as an alternative to standard empirical treatments. The necessity of personalized eradication therapy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether tailored therapy is superior to empirical therapy for H. pylori infection. Methods: We searched for eligible randomized controlled trials in the PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Wanfang, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to 10 December 2021. A random effects model comparing pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was applied in the meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the first-line treatment, tailored therapy was more effective than empirical therapy (RR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.08-1.21], I2 = 72.2%). In the second-line therapy setting, the results did not reveal significant differences between the two treatments (RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.30], I2 = 80.6%). A similar result was observed in mixed second- and third-line treatments (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96-1.11], I2 = 0.0%). Regarding adverse events, no significant differences were found between the two treatments (RR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.80-1.01], I2 = 35.7%). Most of the results were highly heterogeneous. Conclusion: A tailored approach might provide a better eradication rate than empirical methods in first-line treatment. There might be no obvious advantage in second-line or mixed second- and third-line treatments third-line treatment. Due to the high heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further clinical studies are needed and justified.

Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report

Helicobacter pyloriInfection is formally recognised as an infectious disease, an entity that is now included in the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision. This in principle leads to the recommendation that all infected patients should receive treatment. In the context of the wide clinical spectrum associated with Helicobacter pylori gastritis, specific issues persist and require regular updates for optimised management.The identification of distinct clinical scenarios, proper testing and adoption of effective strategies for prevention of gastric cancer and other complications are addressed. H. pylori treatment is challenged by the continuously rising antibiotic resistance and demands for susceptibility testing with consideration of novel molecular technologies and careful selection of first line and rescue therapies. The role of H. pylori and antibiotic therapies and their impact on the gut microbiota are also considered.Progress made in the management of H. pylori infection is covered in the present sixth edition of the Maastricht/Florence 2021 Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori infection were re-evaluated and updated. Forty-one experts from 29 countries representing a global community, examined the new data related to H. pylori infection in five working groups: (1) indications/associations, (2) diagnosis, (3) treatment, (4) prevention/gastric cancer and (5) H. pylori and the gut microbiota. The results of the individual working groups were presented for a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in various clinical fields.

Empiric treatment vs susceptibility-guided treatment for eradicating H. pylori: Is it possible to change that paradigm using modern molecular methods?

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is the most widespread infectious-contagious disease worldwide, reaching a prevalence of 50-80% in developing countries. Chronic infection is considered the main cause of chronic gastritis and has been related to other diseases, such as peptic ulcer, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. The most common treatment is with eradication regimens that utilize three or four drugs, including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and the antibiotics, clarithromycin and amoxycillin or metronidazole. Empiric antibiotic use for eradicating the bacterium has led to a growing resistance to those drugs, reducing regimen efficacy and increasing costs for both the patient and the healthcare sector. In such a context, the development of noninvasive next-generation molecular methods holds the promise of revolutionizing the treatment of H. pylori. The genotypic and phenotypic detection of the resistance of the bacterium to antibiotics enables personalized treatment regimens to be provided, reducing costs and implementing an antibiotic stewardship program. The aims of the present narrative review were to analyze and compare the traditional and next-generation methods for diagnosing H. pylori, explain the different factors associated with eradication failure, and emphasize the impact of the increasing antibiotic resistance on the reversal and prevention of H. pylori-associated diseases.

Primer for Development of Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori Therapy Using Antimicrobial Stewardship

We provide a primer to assist in the difficult transition of Helicobacter pylori therapy guidelines to those that adhere to the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. This transition will entail abandonment of many of the principles that heretofore formed the basis of treatment guidelines and recommendations. The goals of antimicrobial stewardship include optimization of the use of antibiotics while reducing antimicrobial resistance. The critical outcome measure is absolute cure rate which largely restricts comparative trials to those which reliably produce high cure rates (eg, ∼95%). Therapies that fail to achieve at least a 90% cure rate should be abandoned as unacceptable. Because only optimized therapies should be prescribed, guidance on the principles and practices of optimization will we required. Therapies that contain antibiotics which do not contribute to outcome should be eliminated. Surveillance, one of the fundamental elements of antimicrobial stewardship, must be done to provide ongoing assurance that the recommended therapies remain effective. It is yet not widely recognized when utilizing otherwise highly successful therapies, the routine test of cure data is an indirect, surrogate method for susceptibility testing. To systematically guide therapy, test of cure data should be collected, shared and integrated into local antimicrobial stewardship programs to provide guidance regarding best practices to both prescribers and public health individuals. Treatment recommendations should be compatible with those of the American Society of Infectious Disease white paper on the conduct of superiority and organism-specific clinical trials of antibacterial agents for the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant bacterial pathogens which include criteria for ethical active-controlled superiority studies of antibacterial agents.

Need for standardization and harmonization of Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As with other infectious diseases, Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens should be guided by susceptibility testing to achieve excellent success rate, especially in the era of high antibiotic resistance. However, susceptibility testing for H. pylori is rarely performed, which can be partly ascribed to the current lack of standardization of testing methods and the lack of unified consensus on the antibiotic resistance breakpoints. The aim of this review was to call for an international consensus on standardization and harmonization of H. pylori susceptibility testing.

METHODS

We summarize and compare the advantages and disadvantages of four different phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods (agar dilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution) and the molecular susceptibility testing method for H. pylori.

RESULTS

The standard phenotypic testing methods and the molecular testing methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Compared to the standard phenotypic methods, the molecular testing method does not require successful H. pylori culture, and therefore, is much more rapid and convenient for clinical use. However, the currently available molecular testing method is only suitable for detecting clarithromycin and quinolone susceptibility profiles in H. pylori. Although the standard AST is time-consuming, it is currently the only way to test the susceptibility of H. pylori to all the commonly used antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

To make H. pylori susceptibility testing become a clinical routine, an international consensus on standardization and harmonization of H. pylori AST is needed. Future efforts are needed for optimizing broth culture of H. pylori, and developing commercial AST plates for achieving high throughput and automated susceptibility testing for H. pylori.

Comparison of Culture With Antibiogram to Next-Generation Sequencing Using Bacterial Isolates and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Gastric Biopsies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The decline in Helicobacter pylori cure rates emphasizes the need for readily available methods to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. Our aim was to compare targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and culture-based H pylori susceptibility testing using clinical isolates and paired formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) gastric biopsies.

METHODS

H pylori isolates and FFPE tissues were tested for susceptibility to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, tetracycline, and rifabutin using agar dilution and NGS targeted to 23S rRNA, gyrA, 16S rRNA, pbp1, rpoB and rdxA. Agreement was quantified using κ statistics.

RESULTS

Paired comparisons included 170 isolates and FFPE tissue for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and rifabutin and 57 isolates and FFPE tissue for levofloxacin and tetracycline. Agreement between agar dilution and NGS from culture isolates was very good for clarithromycin (κ = 0.90012), good for levofloxacin (κ = 0.78161) and fair for metronidazole (κ = 0.55880), and amoxicillin (κ = 0.21400). Only 1 isolate was resistant to tetracycline (culture) and 1 to rifabutin (NGS). Comparison of NGS from tissue blocks and agar dilution from isolates from the same stomachs demonstrated good accuracy to predict resistance for clarithromycin (94.1%), amoxicillin (95.9%), metronidazole (77%), levofloxacin (87.7%), and tetracycline (98.2%). Lack of resistance precluded comparisons for tetracycline and rifabutin.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with agar dilution, NGS reliably determined resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, rifabutin, and tetracycline from clinical isolates and formalin-fixed gastric tissue. Consistency was fair for metronidazole and amoxicillin. Culture-based testing can predict treatment outcomes with clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Studies are needed to compare the relative ability of both methods to predict treatment outcomes for other antibiotics.

Favorable outcomes of rescue second- or third-line culture-based Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in areas of high antimicrobial resistance

BACKGROUND

Failure of second or third-line eradication treatment against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is principally caused by antimicrobial resistance and reduced treatment adherence.

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of culture-based rescue eradication treatments in patients who have previously experienced failed eradication treatment.

METHODS

Patients who had persistent H. pylori infection following at least one eradication treatment were recommended to undergo culture analysis to determine the minimal inhibitory concentrations of various antimicrobials via endoscopic resection. Consenting patients were assigned one of four therapeutic treatments based on an algorithm determined by antimicrobial resistance. These treatments consisted of 7 or 14-day administration of clarithromycin-containing proton pump inhibitor (PPI) triple therapy; esomeprazole, moxifloxacin, and amoxicillin (MEA) therapy; esomeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline (quadruple) therapy; or lansoprazole, rifabutin, and amoxicillin (RLA) therapy. Eradication efficacy, adherence, and adverse events were assessed aside clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were enrolled, with 84 patients completing the study. The overall resistance rates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, and moxifloxacin were 13.1%, 83.3%, 47.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. The patients were allocated to the PPI triple (n = 11), MEA (n = 15), quadruple (n = 53), or RLA triple (n = 5) therapy group. The eradication rates in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were 90.5% (76 of 84 patients) and 93.8% (76 of 81 patients), respectively. Nausea was the most frequent adverse event (25.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

As a rescue therapy, culture-based susceptibility-guided eradication treatment was both effective and safe, even for patients exhibiting high antimicrobial resistance.