End-to-end versus augmented repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures

Immediate mobilization after repair of Achilles tendon rupture may increase the incidence of re-rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is a significant injury that can require surgery and can have the risk of re-rupture even after successful treatment. Consequently, to minimize this risk, it is important to have a thorough understanding of the rehabilitation protocol and the impact of different rehabilitation approaches on preventing re-rupture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent team members searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on operative treatment of ATR. We included articles that covered open or minimally invasive surgery for ATR, with a detailed rehabilitation protocol and reports of re-rupture. The study protocol has been registered at PROSPERO and has been reported in the line with PRISMA Guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C85 , Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C86 and assessed using AMSTAR Tool, Supplemental Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/JS9/C87 .

RESULTS

A total of 43 RCTs were eligible for the meta-analysis, encompassing a combined cohort of 2553 patients. Overall, the postoperative incidence of ATR patients developing re-rupture was 3.15% (95% CI: 2.26-4.17; I2 =44.48%). Early immobilization group patients who had ATR had a 4.07% (95% CI: 1.76-7.27; I2 =51.20%) postoperative incidence of re-rupture; Early immobilization + active range of motion (AROM) group had an incidence of 5.95% (95% CI: 2.91-9.99; I2 =0.00%); Early immobilization + weight-bearing group had an incidence of 3.49% (95% CI: 1.96-5.43; I2 =20.06%); Early weight-bearing + AROM group had an incidence of 3.61% (95% CI: 1.00-7.73; I2 =64.60%); Accelerated rehabilitation (immobilization) group had an incidence of 2.18% (95% CI: 1.11-3.59; I2 =21.56%); Accelerated rehabilitation (non-immobilization) group had a rate of 1.36% (95% CI: 0.12-3.90; I2 =0.00%). Additionally, patients in the immediate AROM group had a postoperative re-rupture incidence of 3.92% (95% CI: 1.76-6.89; I2 =33.24%); Non-immediate AROM group had an incidence of 2.45% (95% CI: 1.25-4.03; I2 =22.09%).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests the use of accelerated rehabilitation intervention in early postoperative rehabilitation of the Achilles tendon. However, for early ankle joint mobilization, it is recommended to apply after one to two weeks of immobilization.

Return to Play and Functional Outcomes Following Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Return to play (RTP) and functional outcomes are critical to treatment success for acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR). This systematic review and meta-analysis explored treatment superiority essential in optimal treatment selection concerning individual patients and their expectations regarding RTP and functional outcomes. This study was in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. The included studies were assessed regarding the level and quality of evidence. Fixed-effects models were employed for I2 < 25% and random-effects models for I2 ≥ 25%. The RTP rate meta-analysis of surgical vs conservative treatment revealed no significant difference. This was similar to the subgroup analysis of open repair and conservative treatment. The RTP rate and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) meta-analysis of open repair + earlier rehabilitation (ER) vs + later rehabilitation (LR) also revealed no significant differences. The mean time to RTP meta-analysis of open repair + ER vs + LR showed that open repair + ER was significantly favored (-4.19 weeks; p = .002). The ATRS meta-analysis of conservative treatment with ER vs with LR revealed no significant difference. This meta-analysis has revealed that the RTP rates following treatment of AATR are high. Therefore, the decision for surgical vs conservative treatment or open repair + ER vs + LR for AATR should not be selected based on the expectation of RTP. However, open repair + ER can be advocated over + LR for reduced mean time to RTP.

Socioeconomic Status and Race Are Rarely Reported in Randomized Controlled Trials for Achilles Tendon Pathology in the Top 10 Orthopaedic Journals: A Systematic Review

Background

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial in comparative research, and a careful approach to randomization methodology helps minimize bias. However, confounding variables like socioeconomic status (SES) and race are often underreported in orthopaedic RCTs, potentially affecting the generalizability of results. This study aimed to analyze the reporting trends of SES and race in RCTs pertaining to Achilles tendon pathology, considering 4 decades of data from top-tier orthopaedic journals.

Methods

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and used PubMed to search 10 high-impact factor orthopaedic journals for RCTs related to the management of Achilles tendon pathology. The search encompassed all articles from the inception of each journal until July 11, 2023. Data extraction included year of publication, study type, reporting of SES and race, primary study location, and intervention details.

Results

Of the 88 RCTs identified, 68 met the inclusion criteria. Based on decade of publication, 6 articles (8.8%) reported on SES, whereas only 2 articles (2.9%) reported on race. No RCTs reported SES in the pre-1999 period, but the frequency of reporting increased in subsequent decades. Meanwhile, all RCTs reporting race were published in the current decade (2020-2030), with a frequency of 20%. When considering the study location, RCTs conducted outside the United States were more likely to report SES compared with those within the USA.

Conclusion

This review revealed a concerning underreporting of SES and race in Achilles tendon pathology RCTs. The reporting percentage remains low for both SES and race, indicating a need for comprehensive reporting practices in orthopaedic research. Understanding the impact of SES and race on treatment outcomes is critical for informed clinical decision making and ensuring equitable patient care. Future studies should prioritize the inclusion of these variables to enhance the generalizability and validity of RCT results.

Current Concepts in Achilles Tendon Ruptures

The Achilles tendon has a high incidence of ruptures often occurring in weekend warriors and the aging population. Based on anatomic studies of the Achilles tendon, ruptures are commonly found in the watershed area proximal to the insertion site. Traditionally, treatment options included conservative therapy with immobilization and a prolonged non-weight-bearing phase versus surgical treatment. Surgical treatment can vary between open, minimally invasive, or percutaneous approaches. In more recent years, early functional rehabilitation with or without surgery has shown to have successful results.

A systematic review of the patient reported outcome measures utilized in level 1 randomized controlled trials involving achilles tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are utilized in level 1 randomized controlled trials involving Achilles tendon ruptures. However, the characteristics of these PROMs and current practices has not yet been reported. We hypothesize that there will be heterogeneous PROM usage in this context.

METHODS

A PubMed and Embase systematic review was performed including all dates up to July 27th, 2022, assessing Achilles tendon ruptures in level 1 studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines where applicable. Inclusion criteria were all randomized controlled clinical studies involving Achilles tendon injuries. Studies that: (1) were not level 1 evidence (including editorial, commentary, review, or technique articles), (2) omitted outcome data or PROMs, (3) included injuries aside from Achilles tendon ruptures, (4) involved non-human or cadaveric subjects, (5) were not written in English, and (6) were duplicates were excluded. Demographics and outcome measures were assessed in the studies included for final review.

RESULTS

Out of 18,980 initial results, 46 studies were included for final review. The average number of patients per study was 65.5. Mean follow up was 25 months. The most common study design involved comparing two different rehabilitation interventions (48 %). Twenty different outcome measures were reported including the Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) (48 %), followed by the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle score Ankle-Hindfoot score (AOFAS-AH) (46 %), the Leppilahti score (20 %), and the RAND-36/Short Form (SF) - 36/SF-12 scores (20 %). An average of 1.4 measures were reported per study.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity exists in PROM usage among level 1 studies involving Achilles tendon ruptures, which prevents meaningful interpretation of these data across multiple studies. We advocate for usage of at least the disease-specific Achilles Tendon Rupture score and a global, quality of life (QOL) survey such as the SF-36/12/RAND-36. Future literature should provide more evidence-based guidelines for PROM usage in this context.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Systematic Review.

Comparison between primary repair and augmented repair with gastrocnemius turn-down flap for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective study with minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

To explore and compare the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary repair versus augmented repair with a gastrocnemius turn-down flap for acute Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2018, the clinical data of 113 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture who were treated with primary repair or augmented repair with a gastrocnemius turn-down flap by the same surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' preoperative and postoperative scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle⁃Hindfoot (AOFAS) score, the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment⁃Achilles (VISA-A), the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), and the Tegner Activity Scale were examined and compared. The postoperative calf circumference was measured. A Biodex isokinetic dynamometer was used to evaluate the plantarflexion strength on both sides. The time to return to life and exercise as well as the strength deficits in both groups were recorded. Finally, the correlation analyses between patient characteristics and treatment details with clinical outcomes were conducted.

RESULTS

In total, 68 patients were included and completed the follow-up. The 42 and 26 patients who were treated with primary repair and augmented repair were assigned to group A and B, respectively. No serious postoperative complications were reported. No significant between-group differences in any outcomes were observed. It was found that female sex was correlated with poorer VISA-A score (P = 0.009), complete seal of paratenon was correlated with higher AOFAS score (P = 0.031), and short leg cast was correlated with higher ATRS score (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented repair with a gastrocnemius turn-down flap provided no advantage over primary repair for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. After surgical treatment, females tended to had poorer outcomes, while complete seal of paratenon and short leg cast contributed to better results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complication Rates With Best- and Worst-Case Analyses for Rerupture Rates

BACKGROUND

An acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a common injury. The controversy that has surrounded the optimal treatment options for AATRs warrants an updated meta-analysis that is comprehensive, accounts for loss to follow-up, and utilizes the now greater number of available studies for data pooling.

PURPOSE

To meta-analyze the rates of all complications after the treatment of AATRs with a "best-case scenario" and "worst-case scenario" analysis for rerupture rates that assumes that all patients lost to follow-up did not or did experience a rerupture, respectively.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Two authors performed a systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines on February 17, 2020. The included studies were assessed in terms of the level of evidence, quality of evidence, and quality of the literature. A meta-analysis by fixed-effects models was performed if heterogeneity was low (I² < 25%) and by random-effects models if heterogeneity was moderate to high (I²≥ 25%).

RESULTS

Surgical treatment was significantly favored over nonsurgical treatment for reruptures. Nonsurgical treatment was significantly favored over surgical treatment for complications other than reruptures, notably infections. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly favored over open repair for complications other than reruptures (no difference for reruptures), in particular for minor complications.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that surgical treatment was superior to nonsurgical treatment in terms of reruptures. However, the number needed to treat analysis produced nonmeaningful values for all treatment options, except for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment and minimally invasive surgery versus open repair. No single treatment option was revealed to be profoundly favorable with respect to every complication. The results of this meta-analysis can guide clinicians and patients in their treatment decisions that should be made jointly and on a case-by-case basis.

Repair of acute Achilles tears with plantaris augmentation

PURPOSE

To determine the benefits associated with using the fanned out plantaris tendon as a membrane to cover and augment the acute Achilles tendon midportion end-to-end suture repair.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, 31 (67.4%) patients had plantaris augmented reconstruction and 15 simple end-to-end suture. The clinician filled out the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale and the patient the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS). Examination included clinical examination, limb symmetry index (LSI) using the heel rise test, and ultrasound determination of cross-sectional area (CSA).

RESULTS

80.4% were males, mean age 41 (SD 6.7, range 29-57), of which 82.6% were sports accidents. 39/46 were operated in less than two weeks from injury. 82.6% were available at the two year follow-up. Duration of surgery (62.3 min vs 58, p = 0.45), AOFAS (89.6 vs 88.4, p = 0.61 and 97.2 vs 96.8, p = 0.72), ATRS (86.3 vs 83.8, p = 0.33 and 95.6 vs 93.6, p = 0.12), LSI (60.8% vs 58.75, p = 0.24 and 80.5 vs 79, p = 0.29), CSA (3.39cm² vs 3.36, p = 0.82 and 2.57 vs 2.59, p = 0.87), return to sport (80% vs 57, p = 0.15 and 84.6 vs 85.7, p = 1.00), and complications at six months and two years were comparable between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

Fanned out plantaris augmentation of acute Achilles tendon tears yields excellent and comparable clinical and ultrasonographic results to end-to-end suture at mid-term follow-up.

ACFAS Clinical Consensus Statement: Acute Achilles Tendon Pathology

Injuries to the Achilles tendon are a challenge to the foot and ankle surgeon. In recent years, research has led to a relative change in the way that many surgeons view acute Achilles tendon rupture. In an effort to fully evaluate these trends, as well as to evaluate all aspects of care for acute Achilles tendon rupture, the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons convened a panel of experts to create a clinical consensus statement to address selected aspects of care of the acute Achilles tendon injury.

Defining Components of Early Functional Rehabilitation for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Early functional rehabilitation is frequently discussed in treating Achilles tendon rupture. A consistent definition of what constitutes early functional rehabilitation has not been established across the literature, despite studies supporting its efficacy. A standardized definition would be helpful to pool data across studies, allow for between-study comparisons, and ultimately work toward developing clinical guidelines.

PURPOSE

To define early functional rehabilitation (including when it is initiated and what it entails) when used to treat Achilles tendon rupture and to identify outcome measures for evaluating the effect of treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PEDro, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies consisted of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series (≥10 participants) including weightbearing or exercise-based interventions within 8 weeks after Achilles tendon rupture.

RESULTS

A total of 174 studies published between 1979 and 2018 were included. Studies were rated a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 17 (15-20) on the Downs & Black checklist and included 9098 participants. Early functional rehabilitation incorporated weightbearing (95%), range of motion (73%), and isometric/strengthening exercises (50%). Weightbearing was initiated within the first week, whereas exercise (eg, ankle range of motion, strengthening, whole-body conditioning) was initiated in the second week. Initiation of exercises varied based on whether treatment was nonsurgical (mean, 3.0 weeks; IQR, 2.0-4.0 weeks) or simple (mean, 2.0 weeks; IQR, 0.0-2.3 weeks) or augmented surgical repair (mean, 0.5 weeks; IQR, 0.0-2.8 weeks) (P = .017). Functional outcomes including ankle range of motion (n = 84) and strength (n = 76) were reported in 130 studies. Other outcome domains included patient-reported outcomes (n = 89), survey-based functional outcomes (n = 50), and tendon properties (n = 53).

CONCLUSION

Early functional rehabilitation includes weightbearing and a variety of exercise-based interventions initiated within the first 2 weeks after acute Achilles tendon rupture/repair. Because early functional rehabilitation has lacked a standardized definition, interventions and outcome measures are highly variable, and pooling data across studies should be done with attention paid to what was included in the intervention and how treatment was assessed.

Soft Tissue Reconstruction with Artelon for Multiple Foot and Ankle Applications

Surgical repair of tendons of the foot and ankle is performed utilizing various methods, including autografts, allografts, and synthetic grafts. Artelon is a synthetic biomaterial that is fabricated from wet-spun fibers of PCL-based polyurethane urea, and has, optimal mechanical properties compared with other grafting options. Because of excellent results of Artelon in ACL reconstruction, its use was explored in 3 foot and ankle cases: repair of Achilles, posterior tibial, and peroneal tendons. Artelon has proven to be a successful alternative for tendon repairs, with all 3 cases returning to full function within 8 to 16 weeks and with no complications related to the graft.

Augmented Versus Nonaugmented Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although simple end-to-end repair of the Achilles tendon is common, many augmented repair protocols have been implemented for acute Achilles tendon rupture. However, whether augmented repair is better than nonaugmented repair of an acute Achilles tendon rupture is still unknown.

PURPOSE

To conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether augmented surgical repair of an acute Achilles tendon rupture improved subjective patient satisfaction without an increase in rerupture rates. Secondary outcomes assessed included infections, ankle range of motion, calf muscle strength, and minor complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of peer-reviewed articles was conducted to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing augmented repair and nonaugmented repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture from January 1980 to August 2016 in the electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science (SCI-E/SSCI/A&HCI), and EMBASE. The keywords (Achilles tendon rupture) AND (surg* OR operat* OR repair* OR augment* OR non-augment* OR end-to-end OR sutur*) were combined, and results were limited to human RCTs and controlled clinical trials published in the English language. Four RCTs involving 169 participants were eligible for inclusion; 83 participants were treated with augmented repair and 86 were treated with nonaugmented repair.

RESULTS

Augmented repair led to similar responses when compared with nonaugmented repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture (93% vs 90%, respectively; P = .53). The rerupture rates showed no significant difference for augmented versus nonaugmented repair (7.2% vs 9.3%, respectively; P = .69). No differences in superficial and deep infections occurred in augmented (7 infections) and nonaugmented (8 infections) repair groups during postoperative follow-up ( P = .89). The average incisional infection rate was 8.4% with augmented repair and 9.3% with nonaugmented repair. No significant differences in other complications were found between augmented (7.2%) and nonaugmented (8.1%) repair ( P = .80).

CONCLUSION

Augmented repair, when compared with nonaugmented repair, was not found to improve patient satisfaction or reduce rerupture rate or infection rate. These conclusions are based on 4 trials with small sample sizes, and larger randomized trials are required to confirm these results.

[Effectiveness of modified suture technique in treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of modified suture technique in the treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

Between December 2013 and December 2016, 29 cases with acute closed Achilles tendon rupture were treated with modified suture technique. There were 23 males and 6 females with an average age of 34 years (range, 22-45 years). All patients were sport injuries. The injury located at left side in 22 cases and right side in 7 cases. American Foot and Ankle Surgery Association (AOFAS) ankle and hind foot function score was 44.6±3.6. According to the Amer-Lindholm criteria, 29 cases were rated as poor. MRI showed the complete rupture of the Achilles tendon.

Results

The operation time was 35-62 minutes (mean, 46 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss volume was 7-15 mL (mean, 10 mL). The incisions healed by first intention, and no sural nerve injury occured. All patients were followed up 5-38 months (mean, 18.4 months). AOFAS ankle and hind foot function score was 93.1±4.3 at 3 months after operation, showing significant difference when compared with the preoperative value ( t=-49.581, P=0.000). According to the Amer-Lindholm criteria, the results were excellent in 24 cases and good in 5 cases, and the excellent and good rate was 100%; there was significant difference between pre- and post-operation ( Z=-7.294, P=0.000). MRI showed the continuous and integrity of Achilles tendon. No Achilles tendon rupture recurred during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Modified suture technique in the treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture owns the advantages of less trauma, lower recurrence rate of rupture, lower risk of the sural nerve injury, and satisfactory function recovery.

Increasing age in Achilles rupture patients over time

BACKGROUND

The changing demographics of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) patients have not fully been investigated. However, there has been a general suspicion that this injury is occurring in an increasingly older population, in terms of mean age. The aim of this study was to objectively show an increase in age in Achilles tendon rupture patients over time.

METHODS

Published literature on Achilles tendon ruptures was searched for descriptive statistics on the demographics of patients in the studies, specifically mean and median age of Achilles tendon rupture patients, gender ratio, percentage of athletics-related injuries, percentage of smokers, and BMI. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the trend of patient demographics over time. A Welch one-way ANOVA was carried out to identify any possible differences in data obtained from different types of studies.

RESULTS

The patient demographics from 142 studies were recorded, with all ATR injuries occurring between the years 1953 and 2014. There was no significant difference in the mean age data reported by varying study types, i.e. randomized controlled trial, cohort study, case series, etc. (P=0.182). There was a statistically significant rise in mean age of ATR patients over time (P<0.0005). There was also a statistically significant drop in percentage of male ATR patients (P=0.02). There is no significant trend for percentage of athletics-related injuries, smoking or BMI.

CONCLUSION

Since 1953 to present day, the mean age at which ATR occurs has been increasing by at least 0.721 years every five years. In the same time period, the percentage of female study patients with ATR injuries has also been increasing by at least 0.6% every five years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; Retrospective cohort study.

Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to identify return to play (RTP) rates following Achilles tendon rupture and evaluate what measures are used to determine RTP.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and grouped based on repeatability of their measure of RTP determination.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched to identify potentially relevant articles.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies reporting RTP/sport/sport activity in acute, closed Achilles tendon rupture were included.

RESULTS

108 studies encompassing 6506 patients were included for review. 85 studies included a measure for determining RTP. The rate of RTP in all studies was 80% (95% CI 75% to 85%). Studies with measures describing determination of RTP reported lower rates than studies without metrics described, with rates being significantly different between groups (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

80 per cent of patients returned to play following Achilles tendon rupture; however, the RTP rates are dependent on the quality of the method used to measure RTP. To further understand RTP after Achilles tendon rupture, a standardised, reliable and valid method is required.

Augmented Compared with Nonaugmented Surgical Repair After Total Achilles Rupture: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial with Thirteen or More Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized trial with a mean fourteen-year follow-up compared simple end-to-end repair with fascial flap-augmented repair for acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2001, sixty patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomized to receive simple end-to-end repair or augmented repair; both groups were treated with postoperative bracing allowing free active plantar flexion. After a follow-up of thirteen years or more, fifty-five patients (twenty-eight in the nonaugmented-repair group and twenty-seven in the augmented-repair group) were reexamined. Outcome measures included the Leppilahti Achilles tendon score, isokinetic plantar flexion strength (peak torque and the work-displacement deficit at 10° intervals over the ankle range of motion), tendon elongation, and the RAND 36-item health survey.

RESULTS

After a mean of fourteen years of follow-up, the mean Leppilahti score was 87.1 points for the nonaugmented repairs and 91.5 points for the augmented repairs, with a mean difference of 4.3 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 8.8 points). The surgical technique did not have an impact on strength parameters, with a mean peak torque of 112.6 Nm after the nonaugmented repairs and 107.3 Nm after the augmented repairs (mean difference, 5.3 Nm [95% CI, -22.2 to 11.6 Nm]) and a median work-displacement deficit of 6.7% to 20.3% after the nonaugmented repairs and 12.8% to 18.0% after the augmented repairs (p = 0.9). Strength did not significantly change between the twelve-month and fourteen-year follow-up examinations. At a mean of fourteen years, the injured side showed a 12.2% to 18.0% median work-displacement deficit compared with the unaffected side (p < 0.001). RAND-36 scores indicated no between-group difference in health domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented repair of total Achilles tendon ruptures provided no advantage over simple end-to-end repair. Achilles tendon ruptures result in a permanent calf muscle strength deficit, but its clinical relevance remains unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmented Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Using an Allograft Tendon Weaving Technique

Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury, especially in those who are physically active. Although open surgery is a widely used option for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture, the optimal treatment is still disputed. In our study, 59 patients with unilateral, closed, acute rupture of the Achilles tendon were treated by open surgery using an allograft weave to augment the repair. All the surgeries were performed within 1 to 4 days after injury. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score was recorded as 91.20 (range 88 to 95), 95.34 (range 92 to 98), and 98.27 (range 97 to 99) at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visit, respectively. At the final follow-up visit, the mean difference between the mid-calf circumference of the injured and uninjured legs was 0.19 (range -0.03 to 1.50) cm (p = .43). At the final follow-up visit, the mean difference between the vertical distances from the plantar surface of the heel to the ground for the injured and uninjured lower extremities was 0.44 (range -0.03 to 0.5) cm (p = .17). Augmented repair using the allograft tendon weaving technique provided satisfactory tendon strength and functional outcomes and a timely return to the patients' activities.

Wound complications with posterior midline and posterior medial leg incisions: a systematic review

There is no consensus on the optimal incisional approach at the posterior leg to avoid wound healing complications. The purpose of this systematic review is to report and compare complication rates associated with two common incisions used to approach the Achilles tendon in order to provide additional recommendations for optimal incision placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched using keywords for procedures using posterior leg incisions. A total of 8724 studies were analyzed and subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Once inclusion criteria were met, each article was placed in 1 of 2 groups based on incision placement: midline (group 1) or posterior medial (group 2). Study format, patient demographics, surgical indication and other details, and wound complications were recorded. The data obtained was reviewed for trends between the two groups.

RESULTS

38 articles met the inclusion criteria. Seven articles used the midline approach (group 1) whereas 31 articles used the posterior medial incision (group 2). The 38 articles included 1287 patients, of whom 25.6% were female with an average age of 43.9 years. Group 1 included 142 patients and group 2 had 1145 patients. The total wound complication rate among all reports was determined to be 8.2%, with 7.0% and 8.3% between groups 1 and 2, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Although incision placement may influence wound healing complications, it appears that additional factors such as advanced age, delay in surgical intervention, gender, comorbid conditions, prior surgery, and postoperative protocols also play a role. This report suggests that a midline approach is no less precarious in avoidance of wound complications regardless of patient demographics or other surgical details in comparison with a posterior medial incision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV.

Acute and chronic Achilles tendon ruptures in athletes

The Achilles tendon is the most injured tendon of athletes in the lower extremities and is the most common tendon to rupture spontaneously. Operative repair provides earlier return to sporting activities and lesser rate of rerupture. The general goal is to attempt anastomosis of the acute ruptured ends; however, delayed ruptures may require more extensive procedures. New surgical approaches, including percutaneous and mini-open techniques, are being introduced to potentially diminish perioperative complications. Advent of early protective range of motion and rehabilitation has shown a potential for earlier return to sporting activities for Achilles ruptures.

Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus on the best management of the acute Achilles tendon rupture. Treatment can be broadly classified into surgical (open or percutaneous) and non-surgical (cast immobilisation or functional bracing).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relative effects of surgical versus non-surgical treatment, or different surgical interventions, for acute Achilles tendon ruptures in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (July 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3), MEDLINE (1966 to 20th July 2009), EMBASE (1966 to 2009 week 29), CINAHL (1983 to July 2007) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing surgical versus non-surgical treatment or different surgical methods for acute Achilles tendon ruptures in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected potentially eligible trials; trials were then assessed for quality using a 10-item scale. Where possible, data were pooled.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials involving 844 participants were included. One trial tested two comparisons.Quality assessment revealed a poor level of methodological rigour in many studies, particularly with regard to concealment of allocation and the lack of assessor blinding.Open surgical treatment compared with non-surgical treatment (6 trials, 536 participants) was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of rerupture (risk ratio (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21 to 0.77), but a higher risk of other complications including infection (RR 4.89, 95% CI 1.09 to 21.91), adhesions and disturbed skin sensibility (numbness). Functional status including sporting activity was variably and often incompletely reported, including frequent use of non standardised outcome measures, and the results were inconclusive.Open surgical repair compared with percutaneous repair (4 trials, 174 participants) was associated with a higher risk of infection (RR 9.32, 95% CI 1.77 to 49.16). These figures should be interpreted with caution because of the small numbers involved. Similarly, no definitive conclusions could be made regarding different tendon repair techniques (3 trials, 147 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Open surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures significantly reduces the risk of rerupture compared with non-surgical treatment, but produces significantly higher risks of other complications, including wound infection. The latter may be reduced by performing surgery percutaneously.

Diagnosis and treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture

This clinical practice guideline is based on a series of systematic reviews of published studies in the available literature on the diagnosis and treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. None of the 16 recommendations made by the work group was graded as strong; most are graded inconclusive; four are graded weak; two are graded as moderate strength; and two are consensus statements. The two moderate-strength recommendations include the suggestions for early postoperative protective weight bearing and for the use of protective devices that allow for postoperative mobilization.

Achilles tendon surgical revision with synthetic augmentation

In this paper we report about a 50-year-old patient who underwent a surgical revision procedure for rupture of the right Achilles tendon with the use of Ligastic((R)) synthetic graft in 1995, and in which a strong reactive immune response took place over the graft 11 years after. As far as we know, this is the first case described in literature of long-term follow-up inflammatory reaction after the use of such augmentation grafts in Achilles tendon repair.

An uncomplicated method for minimally invasive achilles tendon repair

The Achilles tendon is the largest palpable tendon in the human body, and rupture of this tendon is not an uncommon injury encountered by foot and ankle surgeons. A number of different minimally invasive methods have been described for repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon. In this article, we describe a relatively simple, minimally invasive technique of Achilles tendon repair that does not require special instrumentation, the key requirement being that of a sponge forceps.

Achilles tendon recurrent rupture following surgical repair: report on two cases

BACKGROUND

Rerupture is a main complication in Achilles tendon rupture surgery, with an incidence of 2-8%. Although wound break-down and rerupture are well known complications, spontaneous open rerupture has not been previously reported to the authors' knowledge.

METHODS

We report on two cases of open rerupture of Achilles tendon following augmented repair, through a transverse wound perpendicular to the primary incision line. Reruptures occurred 80 and 54 days after primary repair.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

After surgical repair long term follow-up results are good in both cases. This complication could be related to subtotal closure of the paratenon due to the bulk of the augmented repair and to an inadequate and a too extended period of postoperative ankle immobilization.

Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: fibrin glue versus fibrin glue augmented with the plantaris longus tendon

In the surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures, suturing is standard, although fibrin glue also has been used for repair since the 1980s. Augmentation with the plantaris longus tendon is also a popular technique; however, no study has yet compared the outcome of augmented versus only glued repair of ruptured Achilles tendons. This study compares the long-term results of surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture with fibrin glue versus fibrin glue augmented with the plantaris longus tendon. Forty patients who had undergone Achilles tendon repair with fibrin glue took part in a follow-up examination after an average of 11.5 years. The fibrin group consisted of 16 patients and the fibrin glue augmented with plantaris longus tendon group consisted of 15 patients. The modified Thermann score (adapted from Weber) and results of an isokinetic force measurement were the same in both groups, whereas complications in the 2 groups also did not differ. We conclude that augmentation with the plantaris longus tendon is not necessary when operatively treating acute ruptured Achilles tendons with fibrin glue.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

2.

Augmented compared with nonaugmented surgical repair of a fresh total Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Augmented and nonaugmented techniques have been used for the operative repair of a fresh complete Achilles tendon rupture. Augmented techniques have been favored for their stronger pullout strengths but have been avoided because of the risk of wound complications. If proven to be equally good, the nonaugmented technique would be the method of choice. In the present study, we hypothesized that augmentation with a down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap would not provide better results than would end-to-end suture repair with use of the Krackow locking loop surgical technique.

METHODS

Sixty patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomized preoperatively to receive end-to-end suture repair with use of the Krackow locking loop technique either without augmentation (simple repair group) or with a down-turned gastrocnemius fascia flap as described by Silfverskiöld (augmented repair group). A brace allowed free active plantar flexion of the ankle postoperatively, whereas dorsiflexion was restricted to neutral for the first three weeks. Weight-bearing was limited for six weeks. The follow-up period was one year, and the patients were evaluated in terms of clinical measurements, an outcome score, isokinetic calf muscle performance tests, and tendon elongation measurements.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was twenty-five minutes longer and the incision was 7 cm longer in the augmented repair group as compared with the simple repair group (p < 0.001 for both). In the simple repair group, the overall ankle score was excellent for nineteen patients (63%) and good for eight patients (27%) and three patients (10%) had an early failure (all because of rerupture). In the augmented repair group, the ankle score was excellent for fourteen patients (56%) and good for six patients (24%) and five patients (20%) had a failure because of rerupture (three) or deep infection (two). The difference between the groups with regard to the overall result was not significant (p = 0.68). In the simple repair group the isokinetic calf muscle strength score was excellent for eleven patients (37%), good for fourteen patients (47%), and fair for two patients (7%), with three patients (10%) having a failure, whereas in the augmented repair group the score was excellent for nine patients (36%), good for seven patients (28%), fair for three patients (12%), and poor for one patient (4%), with five patients (20%) having an early failure. Achilles tendon elongation occurred in both groups, and elongation correlated significantly with isokinetic peak torque deficits (rho = 0.64, p = 0.001) and isometric strength deficits (rho = 0.48, p = 0.026) in the simple repair group. No significant differences were seen between the two groups at the three-month and twelve-month checkups with regard to pain, stiffness, subjective calf muscle weakness, footwear restrictions, range of ankle motion, overall outcome, isokinetic calf muscle strength, mean peak work-displacement relationships, or tendon elongation.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmented repair of a fresh total Achilles tendon rupture does not have any advantage over simple end-to-end repair.

Open versus minimal invasive repair with Achillon device

BACKGROUND

We prospectively analyzed and compared the functional and clinical results of patients with standard open and minimally invasive repair with the Achillon suture system at mid-term followup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2004 to May 2007, 40 consecutive patients were operated for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture with two different methods. None of the cases required adjunctive procedures like plantaris, flexor hallucis longus or gastrocnemius augmentation (Lindholm, Bosworth) to allow for acceptable end to end apposition. The patients were divided equally into two groups. In Group 1, only Krakow end-to-end suturing technique and in Group 2, Minimal invasive repair with Achillon suture system (Integra Life Sciences Corporation, Plainsboro, NJ) was used respectively. The average age of the patients was 40 years. Patients in study groups were followed up at mean of 22.4 (range, 10 to 48) months after surgery. At the end of the followup time, functional outcome scores and complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The AOFAS hindfoot clinical outcome scores were 98.7 in Group 1, 96.8 in Group 2. Although there was a numerical increase in AOFAS Scores in Group 1, there was no significant difference. The surgical outcome concerning local tenderness, skin adhesions, scar and tendon thickness was better in Group 2 than in Group 1 with statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Although functional outcomes of both treatment groups were the same, minimally invasive repair with the Achillon suture system provided safe, reliable and practical treatment with low risk of complications in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

Long-term results after operatively treated Achilles tendon rupture: fibrin glue versus suture

The use of fibrin glue for repairing Achilles tendon ruptures was introduced in the 1980s. Although fibrin glue has been in regular use since that time, suturing remains the standard for surgical repair. Studies have indicated that, in the short term, fibrin glue is as effective as suturing. To date, there have been no long-term studies comparing the outcomes of these 2 techniques. This study compares the long-term results of surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture with sutures versus fibrin glue. Forty-two patients who had undergone Achilles tendon repair with either suture or fibrin glue took part in a follow-up examination after an average of 12.1 years. The fibrin group consisted of 31 patients and the suture group consisted of 11 patients. Patients treated with fibrin glue reached a higher modified Thermann score (adapted from Weber), achieved equal results in an isokinetic force measurement, and showed fewer complications. The authors concluded that the use of fibrin glue for the repair of ruptured Achilles tendon is a suitable alternative to traditional sutures.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

2.