Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) of the lower extremity: a case report

High-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces long-lasting analgesic effects by restoring lysosomal function and autophagic flux in the spinal dorsal horn

High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) has been established as an effective therapy for neuropathic pain. However, the analgesic mechanisms involved in HF-SCS remain to be clarified. In our study, adult rat neuropathic pain was induced by spinal nerve ligation. Two days after modeling, the rats were subjected to 4 hours of HF-SCS (motor threshold 50%, frequency 10,000 Hz, and pulse width 0.024 ms) in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. The results revealed that the tactile allodynia of spinal nerve-injured rats was markedly alleviated by HF-SCS, and the effects were sustained for 3 hours after the stimulation had ceased. HF-SCS restored lysosomal function, increased the levels of lysosome-associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2) and the mature form of cathepsin D (matu-CTSD), and alleviated the abnormally elevated levels of microtubule-associated protein 1A/B-light chain 3 (LC3)-II and sequestosome 1 (P62) in spinal nerve-injured rats. HF-SCS also mostly restored the immunoreactivity of LAMP2, which was localized in neurons in the superficial layers of the spinal dorsal horn in spinal nerve-injured rats. In addition, intraperitoneal administration of 15 mg/kg chloroquine for 60 minutes reversed the expression of the aforementioned proteins and shortened the timing of the analgesic effects of HF-SCS. These findings suggest that HF-SCS may exhibit long-lasting analgesic effects on neuropathic pain in rats through improving lysosomal dysfunction and alleviating autophagic flux. This study was approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (approval No. 2017PS196K) on March 1, 2017.

Bimalleolar Fracture: A Unique Case of Complication of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome of Lower Extremity After Prolonged Undue Immobilisation

Introduction:

The complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is an agonizing and disabling condition that can affect one or more extremities. Contrary to expectation, sporadic case reports about lower limb CRPS are present in literature. The usual sequence of events with respect to CRPS has always been prior trauma or inciting event, leading to manifestations. We hereby present a case of prolonged and undue immobilization without physical therapy, leading to CRPS in a susceptible phenotype. However, the unique feature of this case was severity of osteoporosis leading to bimalleolar fracture. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no case report of CRPS, leading to fracture.

Case Report:

A 30-year-old female presented 2 months after trauma to the right ankle due to a fall from a bike. A radiograph of the ankle demonstrated no evidence of any bony injury. As per records, there was no evidence of ligament injury based on magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. As the patient had severe pain and swelling, she underwent conservative treatment in the form of lower limb immobilization in a non-weight-bearing below knee splintage for a period of 8 weeks. After removal of the splintage, the patient continued to have severe pain and swelling and was unable to bear weight. At this point of time, the patient presented to our clinic where follow-up radiographs demonstrated a bimalleolar fracture of the right ankle and diffuse osteoporosis involving talus-calcaneusand metatarsals. After thorough exclusion of other metabolic bone diseases based on various laboratory parameters, the diagnosis of CRPS was made as per Budapest criteria.

The case here was diligently managed with multidisciplinary approach. It emphasized on the well-designed rehabilitation of the affected extremity to interrupt the vicious cycle of disuse along with well-controlled analgesia, cognitive psychotherapy, and supervised regular physical therapy. Meticulous medical management included bisphosphonates, careful balance of analgesics including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and beta-blockers.

Conclusion:

This case report highlights the importance of multimodal stepped care approach in CRPS 1 involving ankle joint. Our report also reiterates the relevance of early mobilization and avoiding undue immobilization.

A Comprehensive Outcome-Specific Review of the Use of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a painful, debilitating affliction that is often difficult to treat. It has become common international practice to use spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of CRPS as other therapies fail to provide adequate relief, quality of life, or improvement in function. This comprehensive outcome-specific systematic review of the use of SCS for CRPS was performed to elucidate the available evidence with focus on clinically relevant patient-specific outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to evaluate the effects of SCS on patients with CRPS for the following outcomes and provide summary levels of evidence in regard to each outcome: perceived pain relief, pain score, resolution of CRPS signs, functional status, quality of life, psychological impact, sleep hygiene, analgesic medication utilization, and patient satisfaction with SCS therapy. Search terms included "complex regional pain syndrome," "spinal cord stimulation," and "reflex sympathetic dystrophy," without restriction of language, date, or type of publication, albeit only original data were included in analyses. Of 30 studies selected, seven systematic reviews were excluded, as were four studies reporting combination therapy that included SCS and other therapies (ie, concurrent peripheral nerve stimulation, intrathecal therapy) without clear delineation to the effect of SCS alone on outcomes. A total of 19 manuscripts were evaluated.

RESULTS

Perceived pain relief, pain score improvement, quality of life, and satisfaction with SCS were all rated 1B+, reflecting positive high-level (randomized controlled trial) evidence favoring SCS use for the treatment of CRPS. Evidence for functional status improvements and psychological effects of SCS was inconclusive, albeit emanating from a randomized controlled trial (evidence level 2B±), and outcomes evidence for both sleep hygiene and resolution of CRPS signs was either nonexistent or of too low quality from which to draw conclusions (evidence level 0). An analgesic sparing effect was observed in nonrandomized reports, reflecting an evidence level of 2C+.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal cord stimulation remains a favorable and effective modality for treating CRPS with high-level evidence (1B+) supporting its role in improving CRPS patients' perceived pain relief, pain score, and quality of life. A paucity of evidence for functional improvements, resolution of CRPS signs, sleep hygiene, psychological impact, and analgesic sparing effects mandate further investigation before conclusions can be drawn for these specific outcomes.

Increased efficacy of early spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain

Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, pain relief is still not successful in a large group of patients. We suggest that the success of SCS may be related to the timing of SCS during the development of chronic neuropathic pain. We therefore compared the effect of SCS applied after 24h of neuropathic pain (early SCS) and after 16days of neuropathic pain (late SCS). For early SCS, male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=13) were implanted with an SCS device, followed by a partial ligation of the sciatic nerve. Using von Frey monofilaments, tactile allodynia was assessed 24h after ligation. Animals with tactile allodynia received 30min of SCS. Withdrawal thresholds were assessed just before SCS, during SCS and until the return to pre-stimulation withdrawal threshold. Results were compared with the data from late SCS (n=29). Out of the 13 allodynic animals that received early SCS, 10 (77%) responded to SCS with significantly increased withdrawal thresholds, compared to 38% in the late SCS group. The increase of the withdrawal threshold in the early SCS group could still be noticed 90min after termination of SCS. In more than half of these animals, pre-stimulation withdrawal thresholds were reached only the next day. Early SCS resulted in an increased number of responders to SCS and furthermore an increased duration of the effect of SCS as compared to late SCS. Early SCS treatment of neuropathic rats is more effective as compared to the late SCS treatment.