Cody EA, Karnovsky SC, DeSandis B, Tychanski Papson A, Deland JT, Drakos MC. Hamstring Autograft for Foot and Ankle Applications.
Foot Ankle Int 2018;
39:189-195. [PMID:
29171284 DOI:
10.1177/1071100717738220]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Hamstring tendon autografts may be used for foot and ankle surgeries, although reports on their effectiveness and morbidity in the foot and ankle literature are limited. We studied a cohort of patients who underwent hamstring harvest for foot and ankle applications, hypothesizing that morbidity to the knee would be limited.
METHODS
We studied a cohort of patients who underwent hamstring autograft for foot or ankle applications by a fellowship-trained sports and foot and ankle surgeon since 2011. Thirty-seven patients underwent isokinetic strength testing using a dynamometer an average of 38 months postoperatively. The average patient age was 45 ± 16 (range, 18-78) years, and 54% were women. Peak flexion and extension torque as well as flexion and extension torque at 30, 70, and 90 degrees of flexion were collected at 2 different testing speeds, 180 and 300 degrees/s. t tests were used for all comparisons.
RESULTS
At follow-up, 32 patients (86%) reported no pain at the harvest site; the remaining 5 patients reported mild to moderate symptoms. No patients were dissatisfied, and all would recommend the surgery to someone else. Flexion strength at higher degrees of flexion was significantly lower compared with extension strength as well as compared with flexion strength at lower degrees of flexion, when testing was performed at lower speed ( P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
When used for foot and ankle surgery, hamstring autografts resulted in high patient satisfaction with minimal donor site morbidity. While knee flexion strength was decreased at higher degrees of flexion, this finding did not appear to be clinically significant.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV, case series.
Collapse