Long-Term Follow-Up of the Cheilectomy for Degenerative Joint Disease of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Minimally Invasive Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus

Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint cheilectomy is a joint-sparing technique that involves resection of the dorsal metatarsal head osteophytes; this may be achieved through minimally invasive and arthroscopic techniques. General indications for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) cheilectomy are mild-to-moderate hallux rigidus (Grades I-II) with symptomatic dorsal osteophytes causing dorsal impingement and/or shoe wear irritation in those who have failed extensive nonoperative management. The literature confirms equivalent outcomes to open cheilectomy; however, it is somewhat inconsistent regarding superiority. The theoretic benefits of MIS cheilectomy include better cosmesis, reduced wound complications, less soft tissue disruption, and faster recovery.

High Preoperative Pain Score is a Predictor of Cheilectomy Failure in Hallux Rigidus

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a prevalent arthritic condition in the foot. Cheilectomy is a common joint-preserving procedure for HR, involving the removal of prominent osteophytes to relieve impingement of the 1st MTPJ. This study aims to identify factors associated with the failure of cheilectomy in the treatment of HR. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database from 2007 to 2021 identified all cheilectomy cases. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Preoperative demographic data, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and foot radiographs were collected. PROMs were reassessed in postoperative reviews, and cases were categorized as successes or failures. Failure was defined by meeting at least one of the following criteria at the latest review: 1) Visual analog pain score (VAS) more than or equal to 4, 2) undergoing subsequent revision procedures, or 3) reporting poor or terrible satisfaction with the surgery. The analysis involved 66 patients, with 19 failure and 47 success cases. Both groups showed similar age, BMI, and gender profiles. Preoperative radiographic parameters were comparable between groups. However, preoperative VAS was significantly higher in the failure group: 7.16 vs 5.23 (p = .0029). Logistic regression confirmed preoperative VAS as a predictor of nonresponse (p = .023). Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis established an optimal cut-off VAS score of 7.0. Patients with a preoperative VAS score of more than 7 had an odds ratio of 5.11 (p = .0055) for failure. A higher preoperative VAS score is significantly associated with cheilectomy failure in HR treatment, suggesting a cutoff score of 7.0.

Treatment of hallux rigidus with percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a case series with a minimum follow-up of 2 years

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis is an option for the treatment of hallux rigidus in more advanced cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results at least 2 years after percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus.

METHODS

This is a case series of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus grades III and IV with a minimum of 24 months of clinical and radiographic follow-up. The primary outcome was clinical assessment using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS). Secondary outcomes included American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, patient satisfaction, complications, and bone healing (radiographic analysis).

RESULTS

Between August 2017 and February 2020, 29 feet (24 patients) underwent percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. The mean follow-up was 38.4 (range 24-54) months. There was an improvement in the pain (VAS) from 7.8 to 0.6 (p < 0.001) and in the AOFAS score from 49.9 to 83.6 (p < 0.001). There was a rate of bone union of 82.8% and screw removal of 13.8%. All patients considered the result to be excellent or good.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of grade III and IV hallux rigidus with percutaneous metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis demonstrated high patient satisfaction and significantly improves in clinical outcomes but the nonunion rate was higher than reported outcomes for open 1st metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, case series.

Clinical Outcomes After Joint-Preserving and Joint-Sacrificing Surgery for Hallux Rigidus

Introduction Hallux rigidus (HR) is a degenerative condition affecting the first metatarsal phalangeal joint, causing stiffness and pain. Surgery is indicated for those who have failed a trial of conservative management. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the functional outcomes at short and medium term after surgery for HR. Methods All patients who underwent surgical treatment for HR between 2017 and 2022 at the time of this study were identified and invited to return for a follow-up evaluation. Outcomes were assessed by comparison of pre-operative and post-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. Results A total of 26 patients were included in our study with a mean follow-up of 31 months. There was a mean improvement in VAS score by 5.6 (p-value < 0.0001) and 5.7 (p-value = 0.0012) in patients who underwent joint-preserving (JP) and joint-sacrificing (JS) surgery, respectively. Patients who underwent JP surgery had a mean increase of 28.1 points (p-value < 0.0001) in the AOFAS Hallux score, while patients who underwent JS surgery had a mean increase of 27.29 points (p-value = 0.0066). Conclusion Functional outcomes after surgical management for HR are good at short- and medium-term follow-up. Good outcomes are seen with both JP and JS procedures. JP procedures should be considered as a first-line surgical option for HR as it allows revision procedures if required.

Cheilectomy Alone in Patients With Elevatus Yields Poor 5-Year Survival Rate

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the cheilectomy procedure for different degrees of elevatus. The study was Institutional Review Board approved and patients were evaluated retrospectively at Ascension St. John Hospital, St. John Surgery Center and St. John Macomb Township Surgery Center between 9/8/2012 and 1/8/2016. These were all performed by the same surgeon. The pre- and postoperative radiographs were analyzed and Seiberg's index was calculated. Charts were also reviewed, and demographic information was obtained. A telephone survey was performed, and Visual Analog Pain score and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure was obtained. Body mass index, age, calcaneal inclination angle, Seiberg's index, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, and visual analog score were analyzed using chi-square test, bivariate regression analysis and independent t test. Seiberg's index had a statistically significant influence on 5-year survival rate for the cheilectomy procedure (p ≤ .05). For patients with Seiberg's index less than 0.20 cm demonstrated FAAM, and VAS p values .18 and .37 with 87.0% 5-year survival. Seiberg's index between 0.20 and 0.40 cm had FAAM and VAS scores with p values <.01 and .02 with 62.0% 5-year survival. Seiberg's index ≤0.40 cm p values <.01 and .55 with 5-year survival rate of 0.0%. Therefore, if Seiberg's index is greater than 0.20 cm based on this research a cheilectomy alone as a sole treatment is at greater risk of failure.

Interposition arthroplasty with bovine collagenous membrane for hallux rigidus: A long-term results retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a degenerative arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) with progressive loss of range of movement (ROM). Interposition arthroplasty (IA) is a technique widely used for the treatment of HR;however, few studies reported long-term clinical results. This study aims to report the clinical results of IA using a bovine pericardium collagen matrix for HR with a minimum 10-years follow-up.

METHODS

Thirty patients (31 feet) who underwent IA using a bovine pericardium collagen matrix from 2001 to 2009 were retrospectively evaluated with a mean follow up of 154.1 ± 28.6 (range 124-218) months. All HR ranged from grade II to grade III, according to Regnauld classification. All patients were clinically assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Hallux Metatarsophalangeal- Interphalangeal Scale, a pain Visual Analog Scale, and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index. Scores before and after treatment, respectively achieved from clinical records and clinical evaluation at final follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

At final follow-up, an improvement of all the considered scores (p < 0.01) was recorded. The overall rate of unsatisfying results was 16.1 %. Two (6.4 %) patients complained discomfort due to first ray shortening and 3 (9.7 %) cases of persistent metatarsal pain. There was one (3.2 %) case of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CPRS). No revision surgeries, infection, or other adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Interposition arthroplasty using bovine collagenous membrane is a reliable solution for high-grade HR with durable results over 10 years in more than 80 % of patients.

Effect of Prior Cheilectomy on Outcomes of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

Background

Patients with hallux rigidus who do not experience significant pain relief after cheilectomy often require a conversion to metatarsophalangeal (MTP) fusion. However, it is unclear whether the previous cheilectomy affects outcomes of the subsequent fusion. The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes and complications in patients undergoing MTP fusion for hallux rigidus between patients with a history of cheilectomy and those undergoing a fusion as a primary procedure.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent MTP fusion who had preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. Patients were divided into a "primary MTP fusion" cohort and a "prior cheilectomy" cohort based on their history of a previous cheilectomy. Preoperative, postoperative, and improvement in PROMIS scores, along with rates of complications including nonunion, infection, interphalangeal (IP) joint pain, and removal of hardware were compared between groups.

Results

The prior cheilectomy group had significantly lower preoperative physical function scores than the primary MTP fusion group (P < .05). Postoperatively, the prior cheilectomy group had worse physical function (P < .017) and global physical health (P < .017) scores. However, there were no significant differences in pre- to postoperative change in PROMIS scores. There were no significant differences in rates of nonunion (P = .99), infection (P = .99), or hardware removal (P = .99). More patients in the prior cheilectomy group had IP joint pain (P = .034).

Conclusion

This study found that a prior cheilectomy may not affect serious complication rates of a subsequent fusion, but it may be associated with worse baseline function. Overall, our results suggest that a prior failed cheilectomy does not influence the amount of improvement in function and pain from MTP fusion.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Distal oblique osteotomy versus cheilectomy for moderate-advanced hallux rigidus: A 2-year propensity-score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of moderate-advanced hallux rigidus is controversial. Cheilectomy is widely used but has recurrence rates of up to 30%. Dorsal oblique metatarsal osteotomy (DOO) has also shown good results, however, there is no study comparing outcomes of the DOO against cheilectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective propensity score matched study based on registry data from a single tertiary institution. Between 2007 and 2017, all patients who had undergone dorsal cheilectomy or DOO for hallux rigidus were included. Patients with previous foot surgery, revision surgeries, and concomitant surgical procedures were excluded. Clinical outcomes, complication rates, revision rates and patient satisfaction were assessed at 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were 44 patients (34 cheilectomy, 10 DOO). After propensity score matching, 17 cheilectomy and all 10 DOO cases were selected for comparison. Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and AOFAS 1st toe scores 2-years post-operatively (P<0.001) with high levels of post-operative satisfaction (85.1%). Overall there were no statistically significant differences in post-operative scores, improvement in scores, complication rates, revision rates, and levels of patient satisfaction between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the DOO and cheilectomy give similarly good outcomes for moderate-advanced hallux rigidus. Further studies are needed to elucidate differences in indications for each procedure.

Valenti resection arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Valente Valenti proposed in 1976 a "V" resection of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MPT1) on the sagittal plane for advanced stages of hallux limitus/rigidus, preserving length of the first ray, flexor hallux brevis and sesamoid function. The available literature concerning correct indications, management and clinical outcomes of the Valenti procedure (VP) and its modifications in patients affected by hallux limitus/rigidus was systematically analyzed.

METHODS

Titles and abstracts of all selected articles were independently screened by two authors to assess their suitability to the research focus.

RESULTS

Selection produced 8 articles as full-text, for a total of 347 patients, with a mean follow-up of 6±7.1 (range 0.2-17.5) years. Most common complication was transient sesamoiditis in 21 (7.4%) patients. No substantial differences in clinical outcomes were found between the original and modified techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

VP appears to allow an early recovery with few complications, if compared to fusion, interposition arthroplasties or osteotomies. The wide joint resection does not prevent, if necessary, further procedures such as fusion or implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, systematic review.

Long-term Effects of Cheilectomy, Keller's Arthroplasty, and Arthrodesis for Symptomatic Hallux Rigidus on Patient-Reported and Radiologic Outcome

BACKGROUND

Several operative interventions are available to alleviate pain in hallux rigidus, and the optimal operative technique is still a topic of debate among surgeons. Three of these are arthrodesis, cheilectomy, and Keller's arthroplasty. Currently, it is unclear which intervention yields the best long-term result. The aim of this study was to assess which of these interventions performed best in terms of patient-reported outcome, pain scores, and disease recurrence at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

These data are the follow-up to the initial study published in 2006. In the original study, 73 patients (n = 89 toes) with symptomatic hallux rigidus were recruited and underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis (n = 33 toes), cheilectomy (n = 28 toes), or Keller's arthroplasty (n = 28 toes). Outcome measures were AOFAS hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (HMI) score, and pain was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) at a mean follow-up period of 7 years. Patients of the original study were identified and invited to participate in the current study. Data were collected in the form of AOFAS-HMI score, VAS pain score, Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). In addition, a clinical examination was performed and radiographs were obtained. Data were available for 37 patients (45 toes), with a mean follow-up period over 22 years.

RESULTS

AOFAS-HMI and VAS pain score improved during follow-up only in arthrodesis patients. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences in clinical and patient-reported outcome were detected between groups based on AOFAS-HMI, VAS pain, MOXFQ, or FJS-12. However, clinically important differences in patient-reported outcomes and pain scores were detected, favoring arthrodesis. Radiographic disease progression was more evident after cheilectomy compared with Keller's arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Arthrodesis, cheilectomy, and Keller's arthroplasty are 3 sucessful operative interventions to treat symptomatic hallux rigidus. Because clinically important differences were detected and symptoms still diminish many years after surgery, a slight preference was evident for arthrodesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.

Intermediate-term results of isolated minimally invasive arthroscopic cheilectomy in the treatment of hallux rigidus

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the intermediate-term results of minimally invasive cheilectomy of the first MTPJ using a high-torque low-speed burr and arthroscopic debridement.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who underwent isolated unilateral minimally invasive cheilectomy of the first MTPJ were contacted by telephone. A questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction and complications. Patients with less than 2 years of follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients completed the study. Mean patient age at time of surgery was 50.0 years (range 24.5-67.0). Mean follow-up was 4.69 years (range 2.0-7.3). Thirty patients (83%) reported they would recommend the procedure. Mean postoperative improvement in pain was 69% (range 0-100). Twenty-seven (84%) of patients reported either no pain (28%) or mild pain (56%). For patients who reported any pain, the mean pain experienced was rated as 3.4 out of 10 (range 1-9). Twenty-nine (81%) patients reported they could wear a 'fashionable' shoe postoperatively. One patient experienced a delayed rupture of the extensor hallucis longus at 6 months postsurgery. One patient underwent further arthroscopic cheilectomy. No patient required conversion to fusion of the first MTPJ.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive cheilectomy of the first MTPJ using high-torque low-speed burr and arthroscopic debridement results in high patient satisfaction with a low rate of complications at intermediate follow-up.

Orthoplastic Approach for Surgical Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers remain a challenge to practitioners and costly to health care systems. They range from simple to complex and many treatment options are available. By following standard wound care protocols to ensure adequate blood supply, infection control, debridement, wound management, and offloading many diabetic foot ulcers heal in a timely fashion. For those that do not, an underlying foot and ankle musculoskeletal abnormality must be suspected and treated concomitantly with soft tissue treatment. This article presents a systematic orthoplastics approach for surgical treatment of diabetic foot ulcers using the soft tissue reconstructive ladder and the musculoskeletal reconstructive matrix.

Comparison of Complication and Reoperation Rates for Minimally Invasive Versus Open Cheilectomy of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

BACKGROUND

Dorsal cheilectomy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is an accepted treatment to alleviate dorsal impingement, pain, and reduced dorsiflexion in hallux rigidus. Traditionally performed via an open incision, this procedure has more recently been performed using minimally invasive techniques despite limited supportive published evidence.

METHODS

From December 2012 through December 2017, a retrospective analysis of all cheilectomies performed in our institution was done. The surgical technique was recorded along with any subsequent procedures performed for either persistent or recurrent pain, and complications were also noted. A comparison between open and minimally invasive outcomes was performed. In total, 171 cheilectomies were performed during this period. There were 38 open and 133 minimally invasive procedures.

RESULTS

At a mean 3-year follow-up, the reoperation rates of the 2 groups were different with only 1 (2.6%) of the open group requiring a fusion, while 17 (12.8%) of the minimally invasive surgical (MIS) group required further surgery (relative risk, 4.86; P = .059). In the open group, there was 1 (2.6%) complication, compared with 15 (11.3%) in the minimally invasive group (relative risk, 4.29; P = .076).

CONCLUSION

While patients may opt for MIS cheilectomy with a proposed faster recovery time and better cosmesis, they should be counseled about the risks and benefits of both methods, and that the technique of MIS cheilectomy utilized in this study appears to have an increased relative risk of requiring a further procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Modified Valenti Arthroplasty in Running and Jumping Athletes With Hallux Limitus/Rigidus: Analysis of One Hundred Procedures

Despite hallux limitus/rigidus being a common condition, results of surgical procedures specifically pertaining to athletes are scarce. The results of 100 modified Valenti procedures, prospectively studied from January 2000 to June 2016 with an average 49.17 months of follow-up, are presented evaluating demographics, sport, time and ability to return to activity (RTA), decreased desired activity level, and need for additional surgery. Inclusion criteria included athletes who have exhausted conservative care without relief of daily pain, dorsiflexion <20°, and grade ≥2. Seventeen had grade 2, 79 had grade 3, and 4 had grade 4 disease. RTA for the 89 procedures where exact time could be determined was 9.25 weeks; however, 100% were confirmed to RTA to some degree. The RTA of dancers and runners (the largest portion of the cohort at 76) was around 8 weeks, whereas soccer players were the slowest at >16 weeks, which was significant. There was no other significant difference in RTA between sport, sex, or grade of hallux limitus/rigidus except for between runners and soccer players. Six patients (6%) stated a decreased desire to activity, although this was not a significant finding. The modified Valenti procedure is a safe and highly effective treatment for running and jumping athletes limited by hallux limitus/rigidus because 94% of patients were able to return to their desired level of activity.

Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus

BACKGROUND:

Following failure of conservative treatment, a dorsal cheilectomy can be performed for patients in early stages of hallux rigidus by a traditional open approach or by a minimally invasive technique. We report our clinical outcomes following minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC).

METHODS:

Eighty-nine patients (98 feet) with symptomatic hallux rigidus treated between 2011 and 2016 were included in this study. The average age was 54 years. Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were collected. The mean follow-up was 50 months.

RESULTS:

The average VAS score improved from 8.0 preoperatively to 3 postoperatively. The mean MOxFQ summary index score decreased from 58.6 preoperatively to 30.5 postoperatively. All 3 MOxFQ domains also improved. Swelling took an average of 5.3 weeks to settle. There were 2 wound infections and 2 delayed wound healings. Two patients had transient nerve paraesthesia, while 2 patients had permanent numbness in the dorsomedial cutaneous nerve distribution. Twelve patients (12%) underwent reoperation, of which 7 had a first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis for ongoing pain, 4 had repeat cheilectomy for residual impingement, and 1 had an open removal of loose bone.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that MIDC resulted in improvement in patient-reported outcome measures and was a safe technique with minimal complications. The complications were similar to open cheilectomy. There was an associated learning curve as 5 of our reoperations were due to incomplete cheilectomy. Coughlin grade 1 did well with MIDC as with open cheilectomy as none went onto an arthrodesis. However, 10% (7/65) of our grade 2 and 3 cases went on to an arthrodesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, retrospective case series.

A comprehensive and narrative review of historical aspects and management of low-grade hallux rigidus: conservative and surgical possibilities

Hallux rigidus, Latin for Stiff Toe, is characterized by an osteoarthritic degeneration of the articular surfaces of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The aim of this literature narrative overview is to summarize and expose the great amount of management concepts and information, including the well-codified operative procedures and the more up to date knowledge about non-operative and surgical treatment of hallux rigidus. This may provide current information for physicians, medschool attendants and researchers. A comprehensive literature search using PubMed database has been performed, up to April 1, 2017. Several different types of treatment are described in the literature for low-grade hallux rigidus. The management for hallux rigidus can involve a variety of therapeutic interventions, conservative or operative. Hallux rigidus is a complex disease characterized by several clinical and pathological findings, and to achieve optimal results, surgical treatment for low-grade forms should be chosen between several surgical techniques depending on the degree of arthritis and other different clinical conditions.

Hallux rigidus: How do I approach it?

Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsalphalangeal (MTP) joint and affects 2.5% of people over age 50. Dorsal osteophytes and narrowed joint space leads to debilitating pain and limited range of motion. Altered gait mechanics often ensued as 119% of the body force transmit through the 1^st MTP joint during gait cycle. Precise etiology remains under debate with trauma being often cited in the literature. Hallux valgus interphalangeus, female gender, inflammatory and metabolic conditions have all been identified as associative factors. Clinical symptoms, physical exam and radiographic evidence are important in assessing and grading the disease. Non-operative managements including nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, intra-articular injections, shoe modification, activity modification and physical therapy, should always be attempted for all hallux rigidus patients. The goal of surgery is to relieve pain, maintain stability of the first MTP joint, and improve function and quality of life. Operative treatments can be divided into joint-sparing vs joint-sacrificing. Cheilectomy and moberg osteotomy are examples of joint-sparing techniques that have demonstrated great success in early stages of hallux rigidus. Arthrodesis is a joint-sacrificing procedure that has been the gold standard for advanced hallux rigidus. Other newer procedures such as implant arthroplasty, interpositional arthroplasty and arthroscopy, have demonstrated promising early patient outcomes. However, future studies are still needed to validate its long-term efficacy and safety. The choice of procedure should be based on the condition of the joint, patient’s goal and expectations, and surgeon’s experience with the technique.