Talocalcaneal Joint Middle Facet Coalition Resection With Interposition of a Juvenile Hyaline Cartilage Graft

8 out of 10 patients do well after surgery for tarsal coalitions: A systematic review on 1284 coalitions

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to determine the clinical success rate after treatment for talocalcaneal (TCC) and calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC). The secondary aim was to evaluate the complication, recurrence and revision rate.

METHODS

A search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and was pooled per type of coalition and treatment modality. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of the success rates were calculated. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, coalition recurrence rates, revision rates and pain improvement using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A sub-analysis on interposition material was performed.

RESULTS

43 articles comprising of 1284 coalitions were included, with a pooled mean follow-up of 51 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall pooled success rate for TCCs was 79% (95% CI, 75%-83%). Conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection of TCCs resulted in success rates of 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%), 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%) and 86% (95% CI, 71%-94%), respectively. CNCs have an overall success rate of 81% (95% CI, 75%-85%), with 100% (95% CI, 34%-100%), 80% (95% CI, 74%-85%) and 100% (95% CI, 65%-100%) for conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection, respectively. Pooled complication rates of 4% (95% CI, 3%-7%) for TCCs and 6% (95% CI, 4%-11%) for CNCs were found. The success rates of resection with and without interposition material for TCCs were 83% (95% CI, 78%-87%) and 79% (95% CI, 65%-88%), and for CNCs 81% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and 69% (95% CI, 44%-85%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of tarsal coalitions can be considered good to excellent as well as safe, with an overall clinical success rate of 79% for TCCs and 81% for CNCs. Arthroscopic resection of the coalition appears to be non-inferior to open resection of TCCs and CNCs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Systematic Review.

Medial talar resection: how much remains stable?

Purpose

Pathologies of the medial talus (e.g., fractures, tarsal coalitions) can lead to symptomatic problems such as pain and nonunion. Bony resection may be a good solution for both. It is unclear how much of the medial talus can be taken before the subtalar joint becomes unstable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect a limited resection of the medial talar facet and the anteromedial portion of the posterior talar facet has on subtalar stability.

Methods

Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower limbs were mounted in a frame for simulated weight-bearing. Computed tomography scans were obtained under 700 N single-legged stance loading, with the foot in neutral, 15° inversion, and 15° eversion positions. A sequential resection of 10, 20, and 30% of the medial facet and the anteromedial portion of the posterior talar facet to the calcaneus, based on the intact talus width, was performed. Measurements of subtalar vertical angulation, talar subluxation, coronal posterior facet angle and talocalcaneal (Kite) angle in the anteroposterior and lateral view were performed.

Results

Gross clinical instability was not observed in any of the specimens. No significant differences were detected in the measurements between the resected and intact states (P ≥ 0.10) as well as among the resected states (P ≥ 0.11).

Conclusion

In a biomechanical setting, resecting up to 30% of the medial facet and anteromedial portion of the posterior facet based on the intact talus width—does not result in any measurable instability of the subtalar joint in presence of intact ligamentous structures.

Level of evidence

V.

Surgical Treatment of Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal Coalitions

Tarsal coalition is determined by an absence of segmentation between one or more foot bones. The main symptom is activity-related foot pain, usually dorsolateral for calcaneonavicular coalitions and medial for talocalcaneal ones. At presentation, a symptomatic tarsal coalition must be treated conservatively for at least 6 months. If the conservative treatment fails and the foot is still painful, resection is the treatment of choice. Advantage of surgery is to restore mobility and reduce the risk of subsequent degenerative arthritis. Common pitfalls of surgery include failure to recognize associated coalitions, inadequate or extensive resection, and injury of adjoining bones.

Excision of a Middle Facet Tarsal Coalition

Middle facet tarsal coalition is one of the commonly seen tarsal coalitions in clinical practice that can cause pain and associated flatfoot deformity. Excision of the coalition is one of the treatment options for symptomatic cases. Although symptoms may subside in children following a period of immobilization, resection should be considered as a treatment alternative for children and adolescents because of the potential for restoration of subtalar joint movement. The indications for excision of the coalition are not consistently reported in the literature, and the procedure is not always easy to perform. In this article, we describe the steps for a successful excision of a middle facet tarsal coalition.

Description

The incision is marked from 1 cm inferior to the medial malleolus, extending distally to the navicular tuberosity and inferior to the level of the posterior tibial tendon. The coalition is first located by retracting the flexor tendons and the neurovascular bundle. The bone on the surface of the coalition is gradually removed to expose the middle facet. A 2-mm guide pin and a cannulated dilator probe inserted through the sinus tarsi into the tarsal canal that exits anterior to the posterior facet help with identifying the margins of the coalition. The middle facet is then removed either partially or totally, depending on the size, shape, and location of the coalition, until the posterior facet is visualized. Following excision, bone wax is used on the exposed surfaces or fat is inserted to prevent adhesion and recurrent bone formation. If there is an associated flatfoot deformity, additional surgeries, including a medial translational osteotomy or a lateral column lengthening of the calcaneus, a Cotton osteotomy, an arthroereisis, or a calcaneus stop procedure, may be necessary.

Alternatives

The alternative treatment for managing a middle facet coalition is immobilization of the foot in a boot or cast for 6 to 8 weeks to decrease pain. This will not improve the function of the hindfoot, which remains stiff, but may alleviate pain temporarily. Excision of the coalition in combination with other procedures for correction of the flatfoot is an alternative to an arthrodesis of the subtalar joint and works well in children and adolescents, particularly in those with reasonable subtalar joint flexibility. A triple arthrodesis is rarely performed for an isolated middle facet coalition, even in adults, unless there is peritalar arthritis and more severe abduction of the talonavicular joint with associated stiffness.

Rationale

The rationale for excision of a middle facet tarsal coalition is to maximize the mobility of the hindfoot, in particular, the subtalar joint. The success of excision of the coalition is associated with the rigidity of the hindfoot and the presence of a flatfoot deformity. The stiffer the hindfoot and the flatter the foot, the less likely is excision of the coalition to be successful. Since the alternative to resection of a middle facet coalition is arthrodesis of the subtalar joint, one must distinguish between feet in which there is mobility, and excision is more likely to be successful, and those that are rigid, for which arthrodesis is preferable. In many feet, however, the size of the coalition is not associated with the flexibility of the hindfoot, and in an extremely rigid hindfoot, we recommend an arthrodesis, even in an adolescent patient. Rigidity increases with increasing age, and it is uncommon to excise the middle facet coalition in adult patients or in a patient in whom subtalar arthritis is evident.

Surgical treatment of tarsal coalitions in children and adolescents

A tarsal coalition is an abnormal connection between two or more tarsal bones caused by failure of mesenchymal segmentation.

The two most common tarsal coalitions are calcaneonavicular coalition (CNC) and talocalcaneal coalition (TCC). Both CNC and TCC can be associated with significant foot and ankle pain and impaired quality of life; there may also be concomitant foot and ankle deformity.

Initial, non-operative management for symptomatic tarsal coalition commonly fails, leaving surgical intervention as the only recourse.

The focus of this article is to critically describe the variety of methods used to surgically manage CNC and TCC. In review of the pertinent literature we highlight the ongoing treatment controversies in this field and discuss new innovations.

The evidence-based algorithmic approach used by the authors in the management of tarsal coalitions is illustrated alongside some clinical pearls that should help surgeons treating this common, and at times complex, condition.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:80-89. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180106

[Effectiveness of a modified posterior approach for arthroscopic resection on painful talocalcaneal coalition in adults]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic talocalcaneal coalition resection in painful adults via a modified posterior approach.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2017, 9 patients with painful talocalcaneal coalition accepted arthroscopic resection via the posterior malleolus high lateral observation approach combined with the lower medial operation approach. Of them, 6 were male and 3 were female, aged from 19 to 30 years (mean, 24 years). Among them, 2 cases had no definite local trauma and 7 cases had a history of sprain of foot and ankle. The disease duration ranged from 6 to 30 months, with a median of 12 months. Rozansky classification of talocalcaneal coalition for the 9 patients: 5 cases (5 feet) were type Ⅰ, 2 cases (2 feet) type Ⅱ, and 2 cases (2 feet) type Ⅲ. The patients had no sequelae of limb dysfunction and no limb joint surgery in the past. All the patients received anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films and CT scans of the ankle joint during follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind foot score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.

RESULTS

The operation time was 60-90 minutes (mean, 76 minutes). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). All the incisions healed by first intention, without infection, skin necrosis, lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, vascular nerve and tendon injury, bone bridge recurrence, and other complications. The ankle function recovered well and the pain was relieved obviously after operation, and the patients returned to work at 3-5 months after operation, with an average of 3.9 months. At last follow-up, the VAS score was 0.7±0.5, which was significantly improved ( t=20.239, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (4.2±0.5); the AOFAS ankle-hind foot score was 94±4, which was significantly improved ( t=-27.424, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score (62±2). According to AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scoring system, the results were excellent in 7 cases and good in 2 cases at last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

It is more intuitive, more space, and more flexibility for operation via the modified posterior malleolus high lateral observation approach combined with the lower medial operation approach in talocalcaneal coalition. It is feasible to remove talocalcaneal coalition programmatically according to the specific anatomic signs during the operation.

Resection of Medial Talocalcaneal Coalition With Interposition of a Pediculated Flap of Tibialis Posterior Tendon Sheath

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to present a novel operative technique in the management of medial talocalcaneal coalition (TC) and to report our clinical and radiologic results after interposition of a pediculated flap (PF) of the tibialis posterior tendon sheath.

METHODS

Twelve feet of 10 patients with a medial TC were treated with the interposition of PF of the tibialis posterior tendon sheath following resection. Pre- and postoperative clinical examinations were performed to evaluate the range of motion and the function of the tibialis posterior muscle of the affected foot. Pain was registered by visual analog scale (VAS) and the function of the foot by the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score. The mean follow-up duration was 57.2 months (SD ±37.2 range 12-128) after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out to assess the outcome.

RESULTS

All patients reported a significant reduction of pain ( P = .002) at the final follow-up. The activity level had improved since the operation, and the subtalar joint motion was increased, but no weakness of the tibialis posterior muscle could be observed. The AOFAS hindfoot score was significantly improved ( P = .002). MRI did not reveal any migration of the tibialis posterior tendon sheath, and the interposed PF was confirmed at the resection zone. Furthermore, no TC relapse or ruptures of the functional anatomical structures could be observed.

CONCLUSION

The resection combined with the interposition of a PF of the tendon sheath seems to avoid relapse of TC and improves symptoms and the function of the foot.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Conservative Management and Biological Treatment Strategies: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle

BACKGROUND

The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "Conservative Management and Biological Treatment Strategies" developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

METHODS

Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%.

RESULTS

A total of 12 statements on Conservative Management and Biological Treatment Strategies reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Ten statements reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement), and 2 achieved consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with conservative management and biological treatment strategies for osteochondral lesions of the talus.