1
|
Lopes R, Bauer T. Lateral endoscopy of the sinus tarsi: Anatomy, technique and current indications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108:103383. [PMID: 35926723 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Numerous pathologies are reported in the lateral mid- and hind-foot. Access to the sinus tarsi is difficult, making lateral endoscopy the preferred approach. The present technical note describes the anatomy, technique and current indications for lateral endoscopy of the sinus tarsi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronny Lopes
- Clinique Brétéché, 3, Rue de la Béraudière, 44000 Nantes, France; Polyclinique de l'Atlantique, avenue Claude-Bernard, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - Thomas Bauer
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Île-de-France Ouest, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hollander JJ, Dusoswa QF, Dahmen J, Sullivan N, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Stufkens SAS. 8 out of 10 patients do well after surgery for tarsal coalitions: A systematic review on 1284 coalitions. Foot Ankle Surg 2022; 28:1110-1119. [PMID: 35397990 DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2022] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary aim was to determine the clinical success rate after treatment for talocalcaneal (TCC) and calcaneonavicular coalitions (CNC). The secondary aim was to evaluate the complication, recurrence and revision rate. METHODS A search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) criteria. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and was pooled per type of coalition and treatment modality. 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of the success rates were calculated. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, coalition recurrence rates, revision rates and pain improvement using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A sub-analysis on interposition material was performed. RESULTS 43 articles comprising of 1284 coalitions were included, with a pooled mean follow-up of 51 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall pooled success rate for TCCs was 79% (95% CI, 75%-83%). Conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection of TCCs resulted in success rates of 58% (95% CI, 42%-73%), 80% (95% CI, 76%-84%) and 86% (95% CI, 71%-94%), respectively. CNCs have an overall success rate of 81% (95% CI, 75%-85%), with 100% (95% CI, 34%-100%), 80% (95% CI, 74%-85%) and 100% (95% CI, 65%-100%) for conservative treatment, open resection and arthroscopic resection, respectively. Pooled complication rates of 4% (95% CI, 3%-7%) for TCCs and 6% (95% CI, 4%-11%) for CNCs were found. The success rates of resection with and without interposition material for TCCs were 83% (95% CI, 78%-87%) and 79% (95% CI, 65%-88%), and for CNCs 81% (95% CI, 76%-86%) and 69% (95% CI, 44%-85%), respectively. CONCLUSION Treatment of tarsal coalitions can be considered good to excellent as well as safe, with an overall clinical success rate of 79% for TCCs and 81% for CNCs. Arthroscopic resection of the coalition appears to be non-inferior to open resection of TCCs and CNCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Systematic Review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian J Hollander
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Quinten F Dusoswa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jari Dahmen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicholas Sullivan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd A S Stufkens
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), International Olympic Committee (IOC) Research Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Angelis S, Myrgiotis D, Apostolopoulos AP, Mandragos E, Statyris NC, Filippou DK, Michelarakis JΝ. Surgical Removal of Bone Bridge and Interposition of the Extensor Digitorum Brevis in the Treatment of the Calcaneonavicular Coalition in Pediatric Patients. A Case Series, Sh. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2022; 32:27-37. [DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.2022042255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
4
|
Addar A, Marwan Y, Algarni N, Algarni N, Berry GK, Benaroch T. Tarsal coalition: Systematic review of arthroscopic management. Foot (Edinb) 2021; 49:101864. [PMID: 34597922 DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2021.101864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The standard of care in the treatment of symptomatic tarsal coalitions is open surgery. However, certain limitations exist with open surgery, which include limited visualization leading to an incomplete resection and possible recurrence of the tarsal coalition. Arthroscopic tarsal coalition resection (TCR) is an alternative that is gaining traction, primarily as the safety profile of posterior ankle and subtalar arthroscopy is more well understood. This study provides a systematic review of the outcomes of arthroscopic TCR. METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched independently by 2 reviewers for relevant articles based on predetermined criteria. The subject heading "tarsal coalition" and its related key terms were used. RESULTS A total of 416 studies were revealed by the initial search, out of which only 6 met our predetermined inclusion criteria. A total of 42 patients (average age: 17.6 years) were treated with arthroscopic TCR. Thirty-three (78.6%) and 9 (21.4%) patients had talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions, respectively. The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 60 months (mean: 26 months), and no recurrence of the tarsal coalition was detected (0.0%). Complications occurred in two (4.8%) patients only, with one developing complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), and another patient developing hyperesthesia on the medial aspect of the calcaneus. CONCLUSION Arthroscopic TCR is a feasible and effective surgery for both CNC and TCC with minimal complications and no disease recurrence at an average of 26 months follow-up. Future high-level of evidence studies are needed to compare the outcomes of open versus arthroscopic TCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdullah Addar
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Yousef Marwan
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Nizar Algarni
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nabil Algarni
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Gregory K Berry
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Thierry Benaroch
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Surgical Treatment of Calcaneonavicular and Talocalcaneal Coalitions. Foot Ankle Clin 2021; 26:873-901. [PMID: 34752242 DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Tarsal coalition is determined by an absence of segmentation between one or more foot bones. The main symptom is activity-related foot pain, usually dorsolateral for calcaneonavicular coalitions and medial for talocalcaneal ones. At presentation, a symptomatic tarsal coalition must be treated conservatively for at least 6 months. If the conservative treatment fails and the foot is still painful, resection is the treatment of choice. Advantage of surgery is to restore mobility and reduce the risk of subsequent degenerative arthritis. Common pitfalls of surgery include failure to recognize associated coalitions, inadequate or extensive resection, and injury of adjoining bones.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Endoscopic resection of tarsal coalitions is technically feasible for both talocalcaneal and calcaneonavicular coalitions. Careful consideration of each individual patient is necessary before proceeding with endoscopic resection. Endoscopic resection of these coalitions may offer benefits in terms of faster recovery and less wound problems, but this has not been proven. Several case reports and case series appear in the literature and are reviewed here along with the different techniques reported. Better-quality evidence is required to assess the clinically relevant benefits and the recurrence rate for endoscopic resection in comparison with open resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew King
- Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Treliske, Truro TR1 3LQ, UK.
| | - Stephen Parsons
- Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Treliske, Truro TR1 3LQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Faubel Navarrete E, Sánchez-González M, Vicent V, Puchol E. Endoscopic resection of the calcaneonavicular coalition. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed) 2020; 64:375-379. [PMID: 32792286 DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Tarsal coalition has an incidence between 2-5% of the general population, and calcaneonavicular is the most frequent (53%). When conservative treatment fails, surgical resection must be indicated. Endoscopic resection is a less invasive technique and can be considered an alternative with better functional recovery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study of the patients with calcaneonavicular coalition operated in our hospital between 2015 and 2018. We performed an endoscopic resection. We used AOFAS scale score for the results. RESULTS We reviewed seven cases for a minimum of 12 months. AOFAS score improved from 42 before surgery to 92. There were no major complications from surgery. We had a patient with dysesthesias in the forefoot that improved at 3 months and a case of local swelling that solved with ice and rest. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic resection has advantages over open surgery. Offers a great vision and good control of the coalition resection, provides an early rehabilitation, decrease hospital stay, improves cosmetic results and the probability of neuroma is minimum with an adequate control of the technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - V Vicent
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - E Puchol
- Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
A tarsal coalition is an abnormal connection between two or more tarsal bones caused by failure of mesenchymal segmentation. The two most common tarsal coalitions are calcaneonavicular coalition (CNC) and talocalcaneal coalition (TCC). Both CNC and TCC can be associated with significant foot and ankle pain and impaired quality of life; there may also be concomitant foot and ankle deformity. Initial, non-operative management for symptomatic tarsal coalition commonly fails, leaving surgical intervention as the only recourse. The focus of this article is to critically describe the variety of methods used to surgically manage CNC and TCC. In review of the pertinent literature we highlight the ongoing treatment controversies in this field and discuss new innovations. The evidence-based algorithmic approach used by the authors in the management of tarsal coalitions is illustrated alongside some clinical pearls that should help surgeons treating this common, and at times complex, condition.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:80-89. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.180106
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alpesh Kothari
- Department of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Javier Masquijo
- Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Sanatorio Allende, Córdoba, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|