Immediate Weightbearing of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion Comparing Buried Crossed Kirschner Wires Versus Crossing Screws: Does Incorporating the Sesamoids Into the Fusion Contribute to Higher Incidence of Bony Union?

First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis for the Failed Hallux

Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis was first described in 1894 by Clutton, who recommended ankylosing the MTPJ to treat painful hallux valgus (HV). He used ivory pegs to stabilize the MTP joint. Surgeons over the last century have modified the procedure and added indications, including hallux rigidus, rheumatoid arthritis, and revision of failed surgeries. This article addresses many common yet challenging clinical scenarios, and a few hot topics, related to hallux MTPJ arthrodesis, including matarsus primus elevatus, severe hallux valgus, avascular necrosis, and infections. The article provides a condensed evidence-based discussion on how to manage these challenges using MTPJ arthrodesis.

Biomechanical Study Concerning the Types of Resection in Arthrodesis of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

This work concerns a biomechanical study aiming to ascertain the optimal type of joint resection when performing a joint arthrodesis. A 3-dimensional digital model of the first metatarsophalangeal joint including the entire first metatarsal bone and proximal phalanx using CT scans of the forefoot was created. Using this computer model, 4 types of resections; ball-and-socket, flat-on-flat, wedge 90°, and wedge 100° were simulated. Parameters measured using this model were the force necessary to separate the 2 fused surfaces, the surface area of the resected surfaces and the shortening of the first ray. By measuring the reactive force necessary to separate the phalanx from the first metatarsal, the 90° wedge resection was found to be the most stable, with comparable results in the case of the 100° wedge resection. Wedge resections are also more favorable when comparing the shortening of the first ray. Wedge resections, though being more technically difficult to perform prove to be the most stable for metatarsophalangeal joint-1 arthrodesis using this model.

Intrinsic Fixation of the Tibial Sesamoid in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Cadaveric Study

Nonunion rate of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) joint arthrodesis is reportedly less than 6%, regardless of fixation type. Robust modern plating constructs aim to decrease incidence of nonunion while also allowing early postoperative weight-bearing. Quicker transition to weight-bearing postoperatively increases patient adherence, decreases adjacent joint stiffness, and reduces risk of deep vein thrombosis in the postoperative period. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect tibial sesamoid fixation has on first MTP joint arthrodesis.

Comparison of 4 different techniques in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes and fusion rates of 4 different methods of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of first MTPJ fusion using Bold® and Acutrak® compression screws, universal 1/3 tubular plate and Hallu®-S non-locking plate in 6 hospitals in Dublin over 4 years. A cohort of 300 patients (351 feet) was operated on by 3 feet and ankle fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons (PK, MMS, JVMcK) over 4 years. Mean age was 62.4 years. There were 261 females and 39 males. One hundred three patients had a fusion of first MTPJ using two Acutrak® screws and 90 with two Bold® screws. Sixty-five were fused with the Hallu-S® plate and 42 with the universal 1/3 tubular plate. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6 weeks, 3 months and 12 months.

RESULTS

Functional outcome scores performed using Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). Failure rate in those fused with the Hallu®-S plate was 0%, Acutrak® screws 2.4%, Bold® screws 9.5% and universal 1/3 tubular plate 12.5% (p > 0.12). All treatment groups demonstrated significantly reduced MOXFQ scores (p value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study for first MTPJ fusion, a low profile, pre-contoured plate in combination with a screw mode had the best results with no failure rates and improved MOXFQ scores.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Immediate Weightbearing After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis With Screw and Locking Plate Fixation: A Short-Term Review

Historically, the postoperative protocol for patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis has included 6 weeks of non-weightbearing, followed by protected weightbearing in a below-the-knee cast boot or postoperative shoe. This prolonged period of non-weightbearing predisposes the patient to disuse atrophy, osteopenia, deep vein thrombosis risk, and, overall, a prolonged time to recovery. The present study reports a retrospective review of a patient cohort that underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion with immediate full weightbearing postoperatively. Thirty consecutive first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodeses were performed during the study period. Five patients were excluded secondary to insufficient postoperative follow-up data or a lack of adequate radiographic evaluation at regular postoperative intervals. Conical reamers were used for joint preparation. Internal fixation, consisting of a single cannulated interfragmentary compression screw and a dorsal locking plate, was used in all patients. The results showed that patients achieved clinical healing at an average of 5.92 weeks and showed radiographic fusion at an average of 6.83 weeks. The patients in the present study had an overall union rate of 96%. Complications included 1 nonunion, 1 superficial wound infection, 1 wound dehiscence, 1 case of symptomatic hardware, and 2 patients with symptomatic hallux interphalangeal joint arthralgia. The mean visual analog pain score preoperatively was 6.64 (range 4 to 8) and postoperatively was 0.6 (range 0 to 4). In conclusion, we found that immediate full weightbearing after first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion in the context of interfragmentary compression and locked plating techniques is a safe, predictable postoperative protocol that allows for a successful fusion interval and an early return to regular activity.

Early Weight-Bearing After Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsal-Phalangeal Joint: A Systematic Review of the Incidence of Non-Union

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint is a reliable procedure for correction of both hallux limitus/rigidus and severe hallux abducto valgus deformities. However, 1 potential contraindication to the procedure is the extended period of non-weight-bearing immobilization that is typically associated with the postoperative course. The objective of this investigation was to perform a systematic review of the incidence of non-union after early weight bearing in patients who underwent arthrodesis of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint. We performed a review of electronic databases with the inclusion criteria of retrospective case series, retrospective clinical cohort analyses, and prospective clinical trials with n ≥ 15 feet, a mean follow-up of ≥12 months, a defined postoperative early weight-bearing protocol (defined as ≤2 weeks), a clear description of the fixation construct, a reported incidence rate of non-union, and patients who underwent primary surgery for hallux abducto valgus or hallux limitus/rigidus deformities. Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria, with a total of 898 feet analyzed. Of these, 57 (6.35%) were described as developing a non-union. This would likely be considered an acceptable crude, heterogeneous incidence of non-union when considering this procedure. It might also indicate that arthrodesis of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint does not always require an extended period of non-weight-bearing postoperative immobilization.

American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons® Clinical Consensus Statement: Perioperative Management

A wide range of factors contribute to the complexity of the management plan for an individual patient, and it is the surgeon's responsibility to consider the clinical variables and to guide the patient through the perioperative period. In an effort to address a number of important variables, the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons convened a panel of experts to derive a clinical consensus statement to address selected issues associated with the perioperative management of foot and ankle surgical patients.