Comparison between Simple Radiographic and Computed Tomographic Three-Dimensional Reconstruction for Evaluation of the Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle

Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle in Hallux Valgus Deformity. Fact or Fiction? A 3-Dimensional Weightbearing CT Assessment

BACKGROUND

The Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle (DMAA) was previously described as an increase in valgus deformity of the distal articular surface of the first metatarsal (M1) in hallux valgus (HV). Several studies have reported poor reliability of this measurement. Some authors have even called into question its existence and consider it to be the consequence of M1 pronation resulting in projection of the round-shaped lateral edge of M1 head.Our study aimed to compare the DMAA in HV and control populations, before and after computer correction of M1 pronation and plantarflexion with a dedicated weightbearing CT (WBCT) software. We hypothesized that after computerized correction, DMAA will not be increased in HV compared to controls.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case-control study including 36 HV and 20 control feet. In both groups, DMAA was measured as initially described on conventional radiographs (XR-DMAA) and WBCT by measuring the angle between the distal articular surface and the longitudinal axis of M1. Then, the DMAA was measured after computerized correction of M1 plantarflexion and coronal plane rotation using the α angle (3d-DMAA).

RESULTS

The XR-DMAA and the 3d-DMAA showed higher significant mean values in HV group compared to controls (respectively 25.9 ± 7.3 vs 7.6 ± 4.2 degrees, P < .001, and 11.9 ± 4.9 vs 3.3 ± 2.9 degrees, P < .001).Comparing a small subset of precorrected juvenile HV (n=8) and nonjuvenile HV (n=28) demonstrated no significant difference in the measure DMAA values. On the other hand, the α angle was significantly higher in the juvenile HV group (21.6 ± 9.9 and 11.4 ± 3.7 degrees; P = .0046).

CONCLUSION

Although the valgus deformity of M1 distal articular surface in HV is overestimated on conventional radiographs, comparing to controls showed that an 8.6 degrees increase remained after confounding factors' correction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

After pronation computerized correction, an increase in valgus of M1 distal articular surface was still present in HV compared to controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Outcome of proximal triple derotational metatarsal osteotomy for three-dimensional correction of hallux valgus deformity

PURPOSE

To correct hallux valgus deformities in patients with a greater pronation of the first metatarsal, we designed a novel proximal triple derotational metatarsal osteotomy (PTDMO), which could be used to achieve three-dimensional correction of hallux valgus deformities at the proximal metatarsal level.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the radiographic and clinical outcomes of 13 consecutive cases underwent PTDMO between November 2018 and May 2020. The minimum follow-up for inclusion was 12 months. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), first-to-second intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), relative length of the second metatarsal, and medial sesamoid position on the weight bearing foot anteroposterior radiographs, and the degree of the first metatarsal pronation on forefoot axial radiographs were measured pre-operatively, at six weeks post-operatively, and at the final follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and Foot Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS) were measured.

RESULTS

In the comparison of pre-operative and final follow-up parameters, HVA, IMA, and DMAA were significantly improved post-operatively (all, P < 0.001). The relative length of the second metatarsal did not differ significantly post-operatively (P = 0.724). The medial sesamoid was significantly reduced (P = 0.01), and the first metatarsal pronation decreased by 10.16° (P = 0.034). Regarding clinical parameters, the AOFAS score and FAOS in all categories significantly improved post-operatively (all, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PTDMO resulted in satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes with respect to deformity correction and pain relief, with significant post-operative reduced pronation of the first metatarsal.

A Comparison Between X-ray Imaging and an Innovative Computer-aided Design Method Based on Weightbearing CT Scan Images for Assessing Hallux Valgus

With the development of recent technology, radiographs can be saved digitally, and angular measurements can be processed using various software packages. We developed an innovative computer-aided design method with Materialize Interactive Medical Image Control System software to measure hallux valgus angle (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) and assessed its concordance with traditional X-ray imaging methods. All measurements were carried out on 42 feet from 26 adult patients diagnosed with hallux valgus who were prospectively selected from July 2016 to April 2018. Standing X-ray radiograph and weightbearing computed tomography scans were conducted on all patients, and HVA, IMA, and DMAA were generated using both a traditional X-ray method and our innovative method. Two different observers assessed measurements for each patient. Finally, statistical analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the measurements. Both X-ray imaging and our innovative method had strong interobserver and test-retest reliability. The ICC of X-ray imaging was 0.945, p < .001, and the ICC of the innovative method was 0.915, p < .001. There was no statistical difference between the 2 methods for HVA and IMA measurements (p > .05); however, a difference was detected for DMAA (p < .05). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated a high degree of agreement between the 2 methods for HVA and IMA, but a significant difference for DMAA. From the results, we concluded that our innovative computer-aided design method is a feasible, reliable way to quantitatively assess HVA, IMA, and DMAA, and it is likely more accurate for measuring DMAA.

First Metatarsal Rotation in Hallux Valgus Deformity

Rotation of the first metatarsal (M1) as a potential etiological factor of hallux valgus (HV) deformity was described relatively early in the description of HV pathoanatomy. However, because biplanar radiographs have been the standard method for imaging HV, clinicians primarily developed measurement methods and corrective operations confined to 2 dimensions, medial-lateral and inferior-superior. Recently, as our understanding of HV pathoanatomy has further developed, aided in part by advanced imaging technology, M1 rotation about its axis ("axial rotation") and its implications for HV deformity and treatment has reemerged. The goal of this review is to summarize M1 rotation in HV from a historical perspective, to present the current understanding of its potential role in the etiology/pathogenesis of HV, and to summarize relevant imaging and operative considerations with respect to M1 rotation.Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

Fixation Principles in Minimal Incision Hallux Valgus Surgery

Minimal incision surgical principals rely on the soft tissue envelope to maintain stability that is supplemented by a variety of clinically recommended fixation methods. The extended distal first metatarsal osteotomy has renewed interest because of the ability to laterally translate, angulate, and rotate the metatarsal head in proper alignment with the sesamoids to a neutral alignment. The soft tissue envelope of capsule, ligaments, and tendons will re-align once the bone deformity is corrected. The periosteum is maintained to provide a biologic scaffold for new bone formation and must be minimally disrupted during the intervention."

Three-Dimensional Analysis of the First Metatarsal Bone in Minimally Invasive Distal Linear Metatarsal Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus

BACKGROUND

Modified Bösch osteotomy (distal linear metatarsal osteotomy [DLMO]) is one of the minimally invasive correctional surgeries for hallux valgus. The 3-dimensional correctional angles and distances of the first metatarsal bone in DLMO have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to analyze the 3-dimensional postoperative morphological changes of the first metatarsal bone in DLMO.

METHODS

Twenty patients (30 feet) who underwent DLMO were enrolled. Preoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of the feet were examined. Postoperative radiographs and CT scans were also obtained after bone union. The surface data of the pre- and postoperative first metatarsals were reconstructed from the CT data. The positions of the distal ends of the first metatarsals described with respect to the proximal ends were calculated using CT surface-matching technique.

RESULTS

The distal end of the first metatarsal after DLMO was significantly supinated (10.2 ± 6.0 degrees, P < .001), adducted (6.0 ± 11.8 degrees, P = .004), dorsiflexed (11.1 ± 10.9, P < .001), shortened (7.4 ± 2.5 mm, P < .001), elevated (2.3 ± 3.1 mm, P = .001), and laterally shifted (8.2 ± 3.0 mm, P < .001) compared to the preoperative metatarsal distal end. Supination correction demonstrated a significant correlation with adduction correction (r = 0.659, P < .001) on correlation analyses between these parameters.

CONCLUSION

The 3-dimensional corrections of the first metatarsal bone after DLMO were evaluated. Pronation and abduction were successfully corrected. Furthermore, adduction correction might be an important factor affecting correction of pronation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Does Hallux Valgus Exhibit a Deformity Inherent to the First Metatarsal Bone?

Hallux valgus is a common condition, and it still poses some challenges. The identification of factors associated with the development of the deformity is of paramount importance in obtaining a full correction of the disorder. Hallux pronation is one of the frequently found components, especially in larger deformities, but the cause and exact location of this condition are not fully understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether there is a rotational deformity inherent to the first metatarsal bone. A case-control study was conducted on patients with and without hallux valgus who were subjected to computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction. Statistical analysis was performed by means of a mixed model adjusted for foot and gender to compare metatarsal rotation between cases and controls. Correlations between numerical quantitative measurements were investigated by means of Pearson's correlation coefficient obtained in a linear mixed model. A total of 82 feet (tests) were analyzed in the hallux valgus group and 64 feet (tests) in the control group (N = 146). The hallux valgus group was significantly different from the control group (p< .001). Mean metatarsal bone rotation was 15.36° (range 1.65° to 32.52°) in the hallux valgus group and 3.45° (range -7.40° to 15.56°) in the control group. The difference between the means was 11.9° (confidence interval 9.2° to 14.6°). In conclusion, patients with hallux valgus exhibited increased exclusive bone rotation of the first metatarsal toward pronation compared with the population without this condition.