The Sensitivity of Thresholds by Ground Reaction Force and Postural Stability in Subjects With and Without Navicular Drop

Assessing postural stability in flatfoot using a time-in-boundary method during single-leg standing

Flatfoot, a foot deformity characterized by the collapse of the arch, significantly impacts an individual's balance and stability. This study explored postural adjustments and sway excursions in individuals with and without flatfoot using the Time-in-Boundary method. This method assessed relative stability by exploring various center of pressure radius thresholds during three trials of single-leg stance. We observed significant interactions in threshold levels (F = 4.37, p = 0.04) and normalized relative stable times (F = 7.64, p = 0.01), particularly in the initial trials. Initially, the flatfoot group showed marked decreases in stable times at 10 mm, 15 mm, and 20 mm thresholds, which expanded to 25 mm and 30 mm in subsequent trials. Despite a significant decrease in stability at the 30 mm threshold in early trials, participants exhibited improved stability control as trials progressed. This enhancement likely reflects a combination of a learning effect and an increased understanding of the task requirements, underscoring the adaptability of postural control systems to the biomechanical challenges posed by flatfoot. The Time-in-Boundary method has proven to be an effective tool for clinicians to assess postural control, playing a vital role in developing customized rehabilitation strategies for individuals with flatfoot.

Tibialis posterior muscle stiffness assessment in flat foot subjects by ultrasound based Shear-Wave Elastography

BACKGROUND

Few methodologies are used to assess Tibialis Posterior muscle stiffness. Those present limitations leading to a lack of evidence. Muscle stiffness assessment can help in the injuries risk factors identification while coupling with Ultrasound based Shear-Wave Elastography for its management. However, a precise and reliable methodology needs to be utilized to increase stiffness accuracy among the entire Tibialis Posterior muscle. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the stiffness association between Tibialis posterior deep and superficial layer and between flat and neutral footed subjects.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 18 participants, where 9 subjects represent the flatfoot group and 9 the neutral foot group. Only the subjects who presented a Navicular Drop Test value of > 9 mm were included in the flatfooted group. All participants were submitted to the Tibialis posterior stiffness assessment with the help of Ultrasound base Shear-Wave Elastography in a lying supine position. Association between Tibialis Posterior deep and superficial layers were determined by Pearson's correlation analysis and group differences were assessed using the U-Mann Whitney test in the comparison between flat foot and neutral foot group (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

No significant correlations between Tibialis Posterior layers stiffness were found (p = 0.194), nor in the comparison between both neutral and flat foot groups (p = 0.424/p = 0.258).

CONCLUSION

Among participants, no associations between tibialis posterior layers stiffness were found. Also, we did not find any differences in the stiffness between flat and neutral foot groups. In this study, the stiffness did not differentiate flat-footed subjects from neutral subjects.

Correlation between Different Methods to Diagnose Foot Posture Condition

Background: Authors refer to different methods to assess subjects’ foot posture. All methods present several limitations depending on the examiner or the chosen test. This study aims to investigate the relationship between different tests and Footprints parameters to diagnose subjects with a flat and neutral foot. Methods: The sample consisted of 37 participants, where 16 were included in the flatfoot group and 21 in the neutral foot group. Only subjects who presented a Navicular Drop Test value of >9 mm were included in the flatfooted group. All participants were submitted to Resting Calcaneal Stance Position and plantar pressure platform assessment for Footprints analysis. Associations between all tests and Footprints parameters were determined by Pearson’s correlation analysis. Results: Regarding both groups, significant correlations between tests were moderate to nearly perfect to identified both conditions of foot posture. All correlations were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The diagnosis accuracy of foot posture condition can be compromised depending on the used test. The Navicular Drop Test and the Resting Calcaneal Stance Position were shown to mislead foot posture condition assessment, unlike Footprints parameters that can be important evaluation tools in a clinical environment.