Evaluating Short-Term Outcomes Post-Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fracture Fixation via a Sinus Tarsi Approach in a Non-Exclusively Selected Cohort

Stable Clinical and Radiological Outcomes at Medium and over 5 Year Follow Up of Calcaneus Fracture Open Reduction Internal Fixation Using a Sinus Tarsi Approach

The sinus tarsi approach is increasingly growing in popularity for open reduction internal fixation of calcaneus fractures. Multiple studies have demonstrated favorable short-term results compared to the traditional extensile L incision, however long-term data over 5 years is currently limited to a single retrospective case series. Following local ethical approval, all patients who had completed a minimum 5 years from time of operation were contacted with a Standardized Telephone Questionnaire completed. This followed a previous retrospective chart review, with follow up telephone or clinic consultation performed by Davey et al. of this cohort at mean 35 months. Thirty-four fractures (31 patients) completed minimum 5 year follow up from the eligible group of 54 fractures (49 patients). Regarding functional outcomes, a significant improvement in mean Maryland Foot Score was observed between short- (mean 35.8 months) and medium-term (mean 81.9 months) of 77.6 (SD 15.0) to 86 (SD 7.9) (p = .0082). There was no significant difference in postoperative and long term radiographic Bohler's angle (p = .9683). Eleven feet (32%) proceeded to require reoperation, with removal of metal performed in 10 (29%), fusion in 2 (6%), and skin grafting following wound breakdown for 1 (3%). Four feet (12.9%) experienced post operative wound complications, including 3 (9.68%) cases of infection and 2 (6.45%) of delayed wound healing. This study demonstrated stable clinical and radiographic outcomes over 5 years following Calcaneus Fracture Open Reduction Internal Fixation using a sinus tarsi approach, supporting its continued usage when treating intraarticular calcaneus fractures for which operative intervention is indicated.

Short-Term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Ankle Fracture Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been successfully adopted for the improvement of medical quality and efficacy in many diseases, but the effect thereof for ankle fracture patients can vary. The aim of the present study was to explore the short-term postoperative outcomes of ERAS among ankle fracture patients.

METHODS

The present study was a retrospective cohort study conducted between January 2019 and May 2019. One hundred and sixty ankle fracture participations (58 males and 102 females, aged 41.71 ± 14.51 years) were included. The participants treated with open reduction and internal fixation were divided into two groups (non-ERAS vs. ERAS) depending on whether ERAS was applied. Postoperative outcomes included American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, length of stay (LOS), hospital cost, complications, and consumption of opioids. To assess the association between the groups and outcomes, generalized estimating equation (GEE) modeling and multivariable linear regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up periods of the participations were 24 months postoperatively. No significant differences were detected between the non-ERAS group and ERAS group with respect to the demographic of patients in terms of gender, age, Danis-Weber classification of fracture, dislocation of ankle joint, and comorbidity (P > 0.05). Significant differences in terms of a higher AOFAS score were found in the ERAS group compared with the non-ERAS group (6.73, 95% CI, 5.10-8.37, p < 0.001) at 3 months postoperatively (PO3M) and (4.73, 95% CI, 3.02-6.45, p < 0.001) at 6 months postoperatively (PO6M). However, similar AOFAS scores were found at 12 months postoperatively (PO12M) (0.28, 95% CI, -0.32 to 0.89, P > 0.05) and at 24 months postoperatively (PO24M) (0.56, 95% CI, -0.07 to 1.19, P > 0.05). Additionally, the GEE analysis and group-by-time interaction of AOFAS score revealed that the ERAS protocol could facilitate faster recovery for ankle fracture patients, with higher PO3M and PO6M (both P < 0.05). At the same time, significant differences in terms of a shorter length of stay (-3.19, 95% CI, -4.33 to -2.04, P < 0.01) and less hospital cost (-6501.81, 95% CI, -10955.21 to -2048.42, P < 0.01) were found in the ERAS group compared with the non-ERAS group.

CONCLUSION

By reducing LOS and hospital cost, the ERAS protocol might improve the medical quality and efficacy. The present study can provide a realistic evaluation and comparison of the ERAS protocol among ankle fracture patients, and ultimately guide clinical decision making.

Global research trends and hotspots in calcaneal fracture: A bibliometric analysis (2000-2021)

Background

Calcaneal fracture is common and carries high morbidity and disability. Its treatment is therefore of vital concern. Many topics concerning calcaneal fracture remain controversial, and the subject has not yet been well-researched. We aim to analyze and illustrate the trends in development, overall knowledge structure, "hotspots," and research frontiers on the topic of calcaneal fracture.

Methods

Literature relating to calcaneal fracture published between 2000 and 2021 was retrieved from Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database of the Web of Science. Three bibliometric tools (Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer software) were used for analysis and the generation of knowledge maps. Annual trends in publication counts and the relative contributions of different countries, regions, institutions, authors, and journals, as well as keyword clusters, "hot topics," and research frontiers, were analyzed.

Results

A total of 1,687 publications were included in the analysis. The number of calcaneal fracture articles published worldwide each year was highest in 2019, with a total of 128 articles. The United States has made the greatest contribution to the field, with the largest number of publications and the highest H-index. Foot & Ankle International was the most productive journal, publishing a total of 167 articles on calcaneal fracture during the study period. Hebei Medical University of China and the University of California, San Francisco were the most prolific institutions. Professors T. Schepers, S. Rammelt, H. Zwipp, and Y. Z. Zhang have made remarkable contributions to the field. However, the degree of collaboration between researchers and among institutions was relatively low, and took place mainly in Europe and the Americas. All relevant keywords could be categorized into three clusters: studies of internal fixation, studies of fractures, and studies of osteoporosis. A trend of balanced and diversified development could be seen within these clusters. Keywords with ongoing "citation bursts," such as sinus tarsi approach, wound complications, minimally invasive technique, extensile lateral approach, surgical treatment, and plate, may continue to be research "hotspots" in the near future.

Conclusion

Based on current global trends, the number of publications on calcaneal fracture will continue to increase. Topics such as minimally invasive techniques and complications have become important hotspots of research. We recommend enhancing international communication and collaboration for future research in this field.

Tourniquet Use During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The intra-operative use of tourniquet in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures remains a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ankle ORIF with tourniquet use versus a control group where no tourniquet was used. A systematic review was performed with reference to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines of the Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they were an RCT comparing tourniquet and no-tourniquet in ankle ORIF. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan, and p-value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. On completion of the literature search, a total of 4 RCTs including 350 ankles (52.6% males), with a mean age of 47.1 ± 5.7 years were included. There were 173 patients in the tourniquet group (T), versus 177 patients in the no tourniquet control group (NT), with nonsignificant differences between the groups for age, gender and body mass index demographics (all p > .05). There were significantly shorter duration of surgery, with significantly higher patient-reported rates of pain levels at day 2 postoperatively (both p < .001) in the T group. Additionally, there were significantly greater ranges of ankle motion at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = .03), with nonsignificant differences reported incidence of wound infections and deep vein thrombosis (p = .056 and p = .130 respectively) between the groups. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that although intraoperative tourniquet usage in cases of ankle ORIF results in significant reductions in duration of surgery, this may be at the expense of higher patient-reported pain scores and reduced range of motion postoperatively.