Rehabilitation After Surgical Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Functional Outcome With a Minimum Follow-Up of 6 Months

Paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis with best- and worst-case analyses for rerupture rates

INTRODUCTION

Paratenon preserving techniques to facilitate acute Achilles tendon rupture repair (AATR) functions by maintaining vascularity and biology for optimal healing response. Therefore, the purpose is to evaluate the outcomes following paratenon preserving repair of the midsubstance AATR. The hypothesis was that paratenon-preserving techniques demonstrate high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed by two authors using specific search terms and eligibility criteria. The assessment of the evidence was two-fold: level and quality of evidence. A meta-analysis of proportions for the various complication rates was performed using the restricted maximum likelihood method following the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. Fixed effects models were employed if I2 < 25% (low heterogeneity), and random effects models were employed if I2 ≥ 25% (moderate to high heterogeneity).

RESULTS

The pooled return to play rate was 90.3%. The pooled rerupture rate as reported was 0.9% (best-case scenario 0.8% and worst-case scenario 6.8%). No meaningful subgroup analysis for rerupture rates could be performed based on the meta-regression. The pooled complication rate other than reruptures was 4.8%. The pooled infection rates were 0.3%, DVT rates were 1.6%, and sural nerve injury rates were 0.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Paratenon preserving techniques that are minimally invasive in nature demonstrated safe and favorable outcomes with high return to play rates and low complication rates for the repair of the midsubstance AATR.

Comparison of the Effects of Open Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery on the Achilles Tendon Rupture Healing Based on Angiogenesis

Objective

To compare the effect of three different surgical methods on rabbit Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

The Achilles tendon transection model was constructed by cutting off the inner half of the Achilles tendon. Rabbits were divided into 4 groups: model group, open surgery (OS) group, minimally invasive surgery (MS) group, and conservative treatment (CT) group. Biomechanical evaluation, H&E, and Picrosirius Red staining were applied to evaluate the histological changes and healing. RT-qPCR, Western blot, ELISA, and IHC staining were used to detect the expression of COLIII, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, CD31, VEGF, bFGF, and TGF-β1.

Results

Different surgery treatments significantly alleviated the histological changes in rabbits. The tension and elasticity of the Achilles tendon were significantly increased after surgery. In addition, surgery treatments notably alleviated the inflammatory responses in vivo via downregulation of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 and promoted the tube formation in tissues through upregulating VEGF, bFGF, TGF-β1, and CD31. Furthermore, MS exhibited best therapeutic efficiency on Achilles tendon rupture healing, compared with OS or CT.

Conclusions

Our research revealed the superiority of MS in Achilles tendon rupture treatment at the molecular level compared with OS or CT.

[Application of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet technique in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture]

Objective

To explore the value of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

In a prospective randomized controlled trial, 48 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture who met the criteria between March 2020 and October 2020 were randomly divided into two groups according to 1∶1 distribution, with 24 cases in each group. The study group used WALANT technique and the control group used epidural anesthesia with tourniquet for channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, injured side, cause of injury, distance from broken end of Achilles tendon to calcaneal tubercle, and time from injury to hospitalization ( P>0.05). The operating room use time (from patients entering the operating room to leaving the operating room), intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and the highest pain score [using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)] during operation and at 1 day after operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. The tourniquet adverse reactions in the control group were recorded. The functional recovery was evaluated by the scoring method of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) at 12 months after operation.

Results

The operation was successfully completed in both groups. The operating room use time and hospital stay in the study group were significantly less than those in the control group ( P<0.05), but the difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups was not significant ( t=0.429, P=0.670). There was no significant difference in the highest NRS score during operation between the two groups ( t=1.671, P=0.101); the highest NRS score in the study group at 1 day after operation was significantly lower than that in the control group ( t=-6.384, P<0.001). In the control group, 13 patients had different degrees of tourniquet adverse reactions, including tourniquet regional pain, local swelling, blisters, thigh numbness, and discomfort. The patients in both groups were followed up 12-18 months, with an average of 13.9 months. The motor function of all patients returned to normal at 12 months after operation. The difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups was not significant ( t=0.345, P=0.731). There was no complication such as sural nerve injury, local infection, and secondary rupture in both groups.

Conclusion

The application of WALANT combined with CAMIR technique in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture has good anesthetic and effectiveness, avoids the adverse reactions of tourniquet, and reasonably saves social medical resources.