Risk of Infection Following Gunshot Wound Fractures to the Foot and Ankle: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Antibiotic prophylaxis following low-velocity gunshot fractures: an updated review

PURPOSE

Low-velocity gunshot fractures (LVGFs) are a common type of gunshot-induced trauma with the potential for complications such as infection and osteomyelitis. The effectiveness of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs remains uncertain, leading to ongoing debate about the appropriate treatment. In this review, we evaluate recent updates on the current understanding of antibiotic therapy in LVGFs, how previous studies have investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs, and the current state of institutional policies and protocols for treating LVGFs with antibiotics.

METHODS

We conducted a review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that investigated the use of antibiotics in LVGFs after the last review in 2013. Due to the lack of quantitative clinical trial studies, we employed a narrative synthesis approach to analyze and present the findings from the included primary studies. We categorized the outcomes based on the anatomical location of the LVGFs.

RESULTS

After evaluating 67 publications with the necessary qualifications out of 578 abstracts, 17 articles were included. The sample size of the studies ranged from 22 to 252 patients. The antibiotics used in the studies varied, and the follow-up period ranged from three months to ten years. The included studies investigated the use of antibiotics in treating LVGFs at various anatomic locations, including the humerus, forearm, hand and wrist, hip, femur, tibia, and foot and ankle.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides updated evidence for the use of antibiotics in LVGFs and highlights the need for further research to establish evidence-based guidelines. We also highlight the lack of institutional policies for treating LVGFs and the heterogeneity in treatments among institutions with established protocols. A single-dose antibiotic approach could be cost-effective for patients with non-operatively treated LVGFs. We suggest that a national or international registry for gunshot injuries, antibiotics, and infections could serve as a valuable resource for collecting and analyzing data related to these important healthcare issues.

Factors affecting return to work time and functional outcome after low-velocity gunshot injuries related to foot in civilian population

BACKGROUND

Purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting return to work time and functional outcomes after low-velocity gunshot injuries related to foot. Related complications are also analyzed.

METHOD

This study conducted as retrospective cohort study in tertiary care university hospital. Data on 26 patients obtained through retrospective database search. Type of causing weapon, anatomic location of wound, wound type according to Gustilo Anderson classification, extend of damage regarding injured structures, extend of soft tissue damage, duration of hospital stay, need of reconstructive surgery, return-to-work time, follow-up period and functional scores at final follow-up were recorded. Factors affecting functional outcome and return-to-work time were analyzed.

RESULTS

Total of 12 patients (46.2 %) experienced complications, with eight being deep soft tissue infections. The mean MFS score for the study group was 77.27 (±11.82). The mean MFS for the pistol group was 83.46 (±6.90), extent of soft tissue damage was an independent risk factor (OR 10.67, 95 % CI 1.70-66.72, p = 0.011) for poor outcomes. On average, patients took 10.12 months (±7.59) to return to work, the type of gun used was an independent variable associated with delayed return to work (OR 144, 95 % CI 8.04-2578.09, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Gunshot injuries related to foot can lead to a high rate of complications, loss of workdays, and permanent functional losses. Therefore, it is crucial to develop appropriate treatment plans and manage inevitable complications in these injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series.